Back to California

AB-1359 • 2026

Jury service exemptions.

Jury service exemptions.

Healthcare Housing Land
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Ahrens
Last action
2026-01-27
Official status
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The candidate explanation included details about housing developments which are not directly supported by the provided official source material. These were removed or noted in 'removed_claims'.

Jury Service Exemptions

This law allows people aged 80 years or older to be permanently excused from jury duty without needing a doctor's note.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows individuals who are 80 years old or older to request permanent exemption from jury service without providing medical documentation.
  • Requires courts to grant this permanent exemption if requested by someone aged 80 or over.
  • Gives the Judicial Council permission to create rules and forms needed to follow these new guidelines.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People aged 80 or older who are eligible for jury service.
  • Courts that handle jury duty requests.

Terms To Know

housing element
A part of a city or county's general plan that outlines how it will meet the regional need for different types of housing.
density bonus law
A state law that gives developers incentives to build affordable housing units in exchange for certain benefits, like allowing more building density.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify when the new jury service exemption rules will take effect.
  • It is unclear how many local governments will be designated as 'housing-forward jurisdictions'.
  • The impact of these housing development conditions on developers and local communities remains to be seen.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-27 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  2. 2026-01-26 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 3837.)

  3. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  4. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (January 22).

  5. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

  6. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3806.)

  7. 2026-01-13 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. 2026-01-13 California Legislative Information

    Coauthors revised.

  9. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  10. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  11. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

  12. 2025-04-01 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  13. 2025-03-28 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

  14. 2025-03-28 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.

  15. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  16. 2025-02-22 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  17. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 1359, as amended, Ahrens.
Planning and zoning: development conditions: housing-forward jurisdictions.
Jury service exemptions.
Existing law allows for an eligible person to be excused from jury service only for undue hardship upon themselves or the public, as defined by the Judicial Council. Existing rules of court allow a person with a disability or their representative to seek a permanent medical excuse from jury service and require the individual to submit a written request accompanied by a supporting letter, memo, or note from a treating health care provider, as specified.
This bill would authorize a person 80 years of age or older to seek a permanent excuse from jury service without providing a supporting letter, memorandum, or note from a treating health care provider. The bill would require the court to permanently excuse a person who seeks the above-described permanent excuse from
jury service. The bill would authorize the Judicial Council to adopt or amend a rule of court and publish related judicial forms as necessary to implement these provisions.
Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for land use development within its boundaries that includes, among other things, a housing element. The housing element is required to be updated at specified intervals, and when updating the housing element, the local government is required to take into account regional housing needs for various income levels, as specified. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to determine whether the housing element is in substantial compliance with specified provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law, and requires HCD to designate jurisdictions as prohousing, as prescribed.
The Planning and Zoning Law also provides for the creation of an
accessory dwelling unit by local ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in accordance with specified standards. The law prohibits a local agency from imposing certain standards, except as specified, when evaluating a proposed accessory dwelling unit.
Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to provide a developer that proposes a housing development, as defined, within the city or county with a density bonus, waivers or reductions of development standards and parking ratios, and other incentives or concessions, as specified, if the developer agrees to construct, among other options, specified percentages of units for lower income households or very low income households, and meets other requirements.
This bill would authorize a housing-forward jurisdiction, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county that is designated as a
prohousing jurisdiction by HCD and has met or exceeded its share of the regional housing need allocation, as provided, to impose certain conditions on a development project, including prohibiting a developer from using a density bonus benefit, as defined, to reduce the number of bicycle parking or storage spaces, and requiring an impact fee for specified accessory dwelling units.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF