Back to California

AB-1595 • 2026

Criminal procedure: writs of habeas corpus and motions to vacate.

Criminal procedure: writs of habeas corpus and motions to vacate.

Children Crime
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Schultz
Last action
2026-06-03
Official status
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and digest do not provide detailed implementation steps, leaving some uncertainty on how these changes will be put into practice.

Criminal Procedure Changes for Habeas Corpus and Vacating Judgments

This law modifies the criteria for challenging convictions through writs of habeas corpus and motions to vacate judgments, making it easier in some aspects but also setting stricter requirements.

What This Bill Does

  • Changes the standard for false evidence used in a case so that any reasonable likelihood of affecting the outcome is enough, not just material evidence.
  • Updates the new evidence requirement to need a reasonable probability of producing a different result sufficient to undermine confidence in the original verdict.
  • Makes stipulations by prosecutors or the Attorney General binding unless proven otherwise with strong evidence.
  • Prohibits parties from withdrawing concessions made during court proceedings or in legal documents.
  • Expands assistance for exonerated individuals, including those who were wrongfully convicted as juveniles.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who are imprisoned and want to challenge their convictions through writs of habeas corpus.
  • Individuals seeking to vacate judgments based on new evidence or misconduct by government officials.
  • The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, which must provide assistance to exonerated individuals.

Terms To Know

Habeas Corpus
A legal action where a person can challenge their imprisonment or detention.
Exoneration
Being officially declared innocent of a crime, often after new evidence is found.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how the changes will be implemented in practice.
  • It's unclear if and when the governor will sign this bill into law.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-03 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  2. 2026-05-27 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  3. 2026-05-26 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 14.)

  4. 2026-05-19 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. 2026-05-18 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  6. 2026-05-14 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 14).

  7. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  8. 2026-03-04 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. 2026-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. 2026-02-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  11. 2026-02-02 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  12. 2026-01-17 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 16.

  13. 2026-01-16 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 1595, as amended, Schultz.
Criminal procedure: writs of habeas corpus and motions to vacate.
Existing law allows a person who is unlawfully imprisoned or restrained of their liberty to prosecute a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of their imprisonment or restraint. Existing law allows a writ of habeas corpus to be prosecuted on several bases, including on the basis of false evidence that is material on the issue of guilt or punishment, as specified, or the discovery of new evidence that exists that is presented without substantial delay, is admissible, and that has not been previously presented and heard at trial and has been discovered after trial. Existing law creates a presumption in favor of granting relief through habeas when the district attorney in the county of the conviction or the Attorney General concedes or stipulates to a legal or factual basis for habeas relief.
This bill would revise the above-described
standards to no longer require false evidence to be material and would instead require that the evidence create any reasonable likelihood it could have affected the outcome of the case. The bill would also change the new evidence standard to instead require that there be a reasonable probability it would have produced a different result sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case. The bill would revise the presumption in favor of granting relief to instead make a stipulation binding on the parties unless the moving party proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the other party violated the terms or the state withheld evidence, as specified. The bill would also revise the process for a concession and instead prohibit a party from withdrawing a concession made in open court, or in a pleading, as specified. The bill would additionally authorize the petitioner, in order to overcome a procedural bar to relief based on untimeliness or successiveness, to identify changes in law or new
evidence that create a reasonable probability of a different result sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case.
Existing law allows a person who is no longer unlawfully imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence of fraud by a government official that completely undermines the prosecution’s case, is conclusive, and points unerringly to their innocence, newly discovered evidence that a government official testified falsely at trial that resulted in the conviction and that the testimony was substantially probative on the issue of guilt or punishment, or newly discovered evidence of misconduct by a government official committed in the underlying case that resulted in fabrication of evidence that was substantially material and probative on the issue of guilt or punishment.
The bill would revise the above-described standards to instead require a
demonstration that there is a reasonable probability the evidence would have produced a different result sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case, as specified.
Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to assist a person who is exonerated as to a conviction for which the person is serving a state prison sentence in accessing specified public services, including enrollment in certain programs. Existing law defines “exonerated” to include a writ of habeas corpus was granted on the basis that the evidence unerringly points to innocence, or the person’s conviction was reversed on appeal on the basis of insufficient evidence.
The bill would revise that definition to no longer include that the writ was granted on the basis that the evidence unerringly points to
innocence. The bill would additionally require the department to provide that assistance to a person exonerated of a juvenile delinquency adjudication for which the person is serving a sentence as a result of that adjudication at the time of exoneration.
The bill would make other conforming changes.
The bill would make related findings and declarations.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF