Nonquantitative treatment limitations.

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and digest do not provide specific details on which entities are required to submit yearly analyses, leaving this as an uncertainty.

Nonquantitative Treatment Limitations

AB-2011 prohibits health care service plans and insurers from using unfair factors to set limits on mental health or substance use disorder benefits compared to medical/surgical benefits, requires them to collect data and submit yearly analyses to the relevant departments.

What This Bill Does

• Prohibits health care service plans and insurers from relying upon discriminatory factors or evidentiary standards when designing nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
• Requires these entities to collect data and evaluate it to ensure that NQTLs applied to mental health/substance use disorder benefits are not more restrictive than those applied to medical/surgical benefits.
• Specifies that certain plans and insurers must perform comparative analyses of their rules affecting mental health/substance use disorder benefits and submit these analyses annually starting January 1, 2027.
• Authorizes the Department of Managed Health Care or the Department of Insurance to direct a plan or insurer not to enforce an NQTL if it is found to violate parity requirements.

Who It Names or Affects

• Health care service plans and insurance companies in California.
• People who have health coverage through these plans or insurers.

Terms To Know

Nonquantitative treatment limitation (NQTL)

A rule that limits mental health or substance use disorder benefits without setting a specific dollar amount, such as how many visits are allowed.

Limits and Unknowns

• The bill does not specify what happens if the departments do not make a final determination of noncompliance.
• It is unclear exactly which plans and insurers will be required to submit yearly analyses.
• The effective date for this bill has not been set.

Official Summary Text

AB 2011, as introduced, Hart.
Nonquantitative treatment limitations.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance.
Existing federal law, the federal Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA), requires group health plans and health insurance issuers that provide both medical and surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits to ensure that financial requirements and treatment limitations applicable to mental health or substance use disorder benefits are no more restrictive than the predominant requirements or limitations applied to substantially all medical and
surgical benefits. Existing state law requires every health care service plan and disability insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2021, that provides hospital, medical, or surgical coverage to provide coverage for medically necessary treatment of mental health and substance use disorders under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions, as specified.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan or insurer from relying upon discriminatory factors or evidentiary standards to design a nonquantitative treatment limitation (NQTL) to be imposed on mental health or substance use disorder benefits, as specified. To ensure that an NQTL applicable to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in a classification is no more restrictive than the predominant NQTL applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in the classification, the bill would require a health care service plan or insurer to collect
and evaluate relevant data to assess the impact of the NQTL on outcomes related to access to mental health and substance use disorder benefits and medical/surgical benefits. The bill would require specified health care service plans or insurers to perform and document comparative analyses of the design and application of each NQTL applicable to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in accordance with prescribed requirements and submit the analyses to the respective departments by January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter. If the departments make a final determination of noncompliance, the bill would require the health care service plan or insurer to, among other things, notify all enrollees or insureds of its noncompliance with the requirements of parity. If a health care service plan or insurer receives a final determination of noncompliance with these provisions with respect to an NQTL or with the requirements of the MHPAEA, the bill would deem the NQTL to be a violation of parity and authorize
the respective department to direct the plan or insurer not to impose the NQTL, as provided. The bill would define terms for purposes of these provisions and make related findings and declarations. Because a violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Download Bill PDF