Back to California

AB-225 • 2026

Health care: facility fees.

Health care: facility fees.

Crime Education Healthcare
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Bonta
Last action
2026-06-03
Official status
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide details on the expansion of patient fund usage in state hospitals, which was mentioned in the candidate explanation.

Health Care: Facility Fees

This law stops hospitals from charging extra fees for outpatient care and telehealth services but allows them to charge professional fees. It also requires hospitals to refund any extra fees already paid by patients.

What This Bill Does

  • Stops health care providers, hospitals, or health systems from charging facility fees for outpatient services in certain situations, including telehealth.
  • Requires the Department of Health Care Access and Information Director to penalize those who break this rule.
  • Forbids health plans and insurers from paying these extra fees.
  • Allows patients to get back any money they paid for prohibited facility fees.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Health care providers, hospitals, and health systems
  • Patients receiving outpatient services or telehealth
  • Health plans and insurers

Terms To Know

Facility fee
An extra charge for using a hospital's facilities beyond the professional fees charged by doctors.
Outpatient services
Medical care provided to patients who do not stay overnight in a hospital.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not specify how much the penalties will be for breaking the rules.
  • It is unclear if there are specific consequences for health plans and insurers who do not follow these new rules.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-03 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  2. 2025-05-07 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  3. 2025-04-24 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  4. 2025-04-24 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1278.)

  5. 2025-04-10 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  6. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 9).

  7. 2025-03-26 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. 2025-02-03 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  9. 2025-01-10 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  10. 2025-01-09 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 225, as amended, Bonta.
State hospitals for persons with mental health disorders: patient funds.
Health care: facility fees.
Existing law establishes the Department of Health Care Access and Information to oversee various aspects of the health care market, including oversight of hospital facilities and community benefit plans. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act’s requirements a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of general acute care hospitals and clinics by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit a health care provider, hospital, or health system from charging, billing, or collecting a facility fee for any outpatient services in specified circumstances, including for health care services furnished via telehealth. The bill would not prohibit the billing of a professional fee. The bill would require the Director of the Department of Health Care Access and Information to impose an administrative penalty pursuant to a specified process for each violation against a health care provider, hospital, or health system that fails to comply with these provisions. The bill would specify that multiple violations identified during the same investigation constitute a single violation for purposes of assessing an administrative penalty. The bill would require a health care provider, hospital, or health system to reimburse the patient or patients any amount actually paid for a prohibited facility fee.
The bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from reimbursing, paying, or otherwise providing coverage for any prohibited facility fee. The bill would prohibit a plan from including in any contract or provider agreement any term permitting payment of a prohibited facility fee, and would prohibit a plan or insurer from passing through or otherwise shifting the fee to an enrollee or insured. Because a willful violation of these provisions relative to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law sets forth various functions and duties for the State Department of State Hospitals with respect to the administration of state institutions for the care and treatment of persons with mental health disorders. Existing law authorizes the Director of State Hospitals to deposit funds of patients in trust, as specified. Existing law also authorizes the hospital administrator, with the consent of the patient, to deposit the interest or increment on the funds of the patient in the state hospital in a special fund for each state hospital, designated the “Benefit Fund,” and requires the hospital administrator to be the trustee of the fund.
Existing law authorizes the hospital administrator, with the approval of the Director of State Hospitals, to expend moneys in the fund for the education or entertainment of the patients of the institution.
Existing law requires that the hospital administrator take into consideration the recommendations of representatives of patient government and recommendations submitted by patient groups before expending any moneys in the fund.
This bill would additionally authorize the funds to be expended for the welfare of the patients of the institution. The bill would require the hospital administrator of a state hospital to notify patients, patient governments, and patient groups, in writing, about any newly authorized expenditure options for the benefit fund, when applicable.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF