Back to California

AB-2262 • 2026

Courts: disqualification of judges.

Courts: disqualification of judges.

Crime
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Michelle Rodriguez
Last action
2026-05-13
Official status
Referred to Com. on JUD.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Courts: disqualification of judges.

AB 2262, as amended, Michelle Rodriguez.

What This Bill Does

  • AB 2262, as amended, Michelle Rodriguez.
  • Criminal procedure: discrimination.
  • Courts: disqualification of judges.
  • Existing law establishes procedures for a judge to disqualify themselves from a case.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-13 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

  2. 2026-05-05 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  3. 2026-05-04 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 2262.)

  4. 2026-04-29 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  5. 2026-04-28 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 28).

  6. 2026-04-28 California Legislative Information

    Coauthors revised.

  7. 2026-04-06 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  8. 2026-03-25 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  9. 2026-03-24 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  10. 2026-03-09 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  11. 2026-02-20 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  12. 2026-02-19 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 2262, as amended, Michelle Rodriguez.
Criminal procedure: discrimination.
Courts: disqualification of judges.
Existing law establishes procedures for a judge to disqualify themselves from a case. Under existing law, if a judge who should disqualify themselves refuses or fails to do so, a party may file with the clerk a written verified statement objecting to the hearing or trial before the judge and setting forth the facts constituting grounds for disqualification of the judge. Existing law requires copies of the statement to be served on each party and personally served on the judge alleged to be disqualified or on their clerk, provided that the judge is present in the courthouse or in chambers.
This bill would require the statement to be served during regular business hours on the judge alleged to be disqualified at the courthouse in which the judge is sitting. The bill would, in addition to the clerk, permit service of the statement on the court
executive officer, provided that the judge is present in the courthouse or in chambers.
Existing law prohibits the state from seeking, obtaining, or imposing a criminal conviction or sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin. Under existing law, a defendant may pursue relief for a violation of this prohibition by filing a motion pursuant to the provisions that prohibit this conduct, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, or a motion to vacate a conviction or sentence.
The bill would authorize a judge to admit or deny the allegations in a defendant’s motion showing that the judge exhibited bias or animus towards the defendant because of the defendant’s race, ethnicity, or national origin in a written answer that sets forth any additional material or relevant facts. The bill would authorize a trial judge, if a motion is made during a trial and is based in whole or in part on the conduct of or statements
made by the trial judge, to stay or proceed with the trial until a hearing is held, as specified. The bill would require the motions that are made after a verdict is entered and prior to sentencing to be made before the judge issues a tentative sentence.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF