Back to California

AB-2494 • 2026

State forests: forest management.

State forests: forest management.

Budget Crime Education Taxes Water
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Rogers
Last action
2026-04-15
Official status
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The candidate explanation includes details about staffing needs and recreational user fees that are not directly supported by the provided official source material.

Forest Management Changes

This bill changes how California manages its state forests by focusing on conservation, wildfire resilience, and research.

What This Bill Does

  • Changes the definition of 'management' for state forests to prioritize biodiversity conservation, wildfire resilience, carbon storage, wildlife habitat, recreation, and research.
  • Requires that any sale or cutting of forest products from state lands must align with these new management goals.
  • Updates regulations on grazing in state forests to match the new definition of 'management'.
  • Removes permission for mining activities in state forests.

Who It Names or Affects

  • The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
  • California Native American tribes involved in forest management

Terms To Know

Biodiversity conservation
Protecting the variety of living organisms within an ecosystem.
Wildfire resilience
Making forests less likely to burn severely by managing vegetation and reducing fuel buildup.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how much funding will be provided for these changes.
  • It is unclear if the new management goals will affect existing timber production operations in state forests.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-15 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  2. 2026-03-26 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  3. 2026-03-25 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  4. 2026-03-24 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (March 23).

  5. 2026-03-09 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  6. 2026-02-21 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  7. 2026-02-20 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 2494, as amended, Rogers.
State forests: forest management.
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to engage in management of state forests and defines “management” for purposes of the state forests as a means of handling forest crop and forest soil to achieve maximum sustained production of high-quality forest products while giving consideration to values relating to, among other values, recreation, watershed, and wildlife, as provided.
This bill would redefine “management” for purposes of state forests as the handling of forest vegetation and soils within state forests for biodiversity conservation and
fire
wildfire
resilience, while
maximizing the promotion of
supporting
durable onsite carbon storage and sequestration, climate
mitigation and
resiliency goals, equitable forest access, wildlife and
fish habitat,
recreation opportunities, and compatible research efforts.
The bill would specify that timber harvesting consistent with this definition is permissible.
(2) Existing law declares it is in the interest of the welfare of the people of the state and their industries and other activities involving the use of wood, lumber, poles, piling, wood pulp, and other forest products that desirable cutover forest lands be made fully productive and that the
holding and reforestation of such lands is a necessary measure predicated on waning supplies of original old growth timber, as provided. Existing law further declares it is in the interest of the welfare of the people of the state that the state retain the existing land base of state forests in timber production for research and demonstration.
This bill would instead
declare
declare, among other things,
that
desirable
state
forest
lands
lands, as provided,
should be restored to fulfill ecological
conditions
functions
and processes, and managed consistent with the definition of management, and would further declare
it to be the
policy of the state
to be
to respect California Native American tribal sovereignty and to seek opportunities for comanagement and integration of indigenous traditional ecological knowledge in forest management. The bill would instead declare
it to be the policy of the state, among other things, to accept or acquire lands, the
reforestation or restoration of which is not assured under private ownership, to restore those lands with locally appropriate species and manage those lands for public benefit, and
that the state should retain the existing land base of state forests primarily for research and demonstration purposes and allow the sale of timber and other forest
products only when harvest occurs for ecological restoration or research purposes.
products.
(3) Existing law requires the management of state forests and the cutting and sale of timber and other forest products from state forests to conform with regulations prepared by the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection and approved by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. Existing law
requires the regulations to conform with forest management practices designed to achieve maximum sustained production of high-quality forest products while giving consideration to values relating to, among other values, recreation, watershed, and wildlife, as specified. Existing law authorizes state forest lands to be used for grazing and mining purposes pursuant to regulations established by the board. Under existing law, a person who violates the rules and regulations pertaining to the state forests established by the board is guilty of a misdemeanor.
The bill would
prohibit
require
the sale of timber and other forest products from state forests
unless harvest occurs for ecological restoration or research purposes
to occur
in a manner consistent with the definition of management, as provided. The bill would repeal the authorization for state forest lands to be used for mining purposes.
The bill would require the regulations concerning the management of state forests and the cutting and sale of timber and other forest products to prioritize management practices, as specified.
The bill would require the regulations permitting grazing on state forest lands to be updated to reflect the redefinition of management. Because a violation of these regulations would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(4) Existing law requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, in consultation with the Secretary for Environmental Protection, to submit a report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee on the activities of all state departments, agencies, and boards relating to forest and timberland regulation, as specified.
This bill would, among other changes to the report, require the report include additional information including, among other things, any identified staffing needs, by department, and costs per position, to support a more efficient review of timber harvest plans.
(5) Existing law authorizes the department to collect recreational user fees for overnight camping and reserved group activities in a demonstration state forest.
Existing law prohibits the department from charging a fee that exceeds the amount necessary to reimburse the department’s costs for maintenance and improvement of campground facilities, associated recreational facilities, natural environment, and access thereto.
Existing law requires all user fees collected by the department to be deposited into the Forest Resources Improvement Fund and requires the fees to be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to reimburse the department’s cost of maintaining and improving the campground facilities, associated recreational facilities, natural environment, and access thereto. Under existing law, the Forest Resources Improvement Fund is the depository for all revenue
derived from the receipts from the sale of forest products, as defined, from state forests to support specified operations. Existing law authorizes money in the Forest Resource Improvement Fund to only be expended, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the cost of operations associated with management of lands held in trust by the state and operated as demonstration state forests, as specified.
Existing law creates the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund in the State Treasury and requires that specified revenues received from a lumber or engineered wood products assessment, less amounts deducted for refunds and reimbursements, be deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be used for specified purposes, including for forest resources improvement grants and projects administered by the department.
This bill would instead require that all
recreational user fees received by the department be deposited into the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund, as provided. The bill would instead also require that all revenue derived from the receipts from the sales of forest products, and any other funds generated by a demonstration state forest, be deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund, except as provided. The bill would require moneys deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be expended to support demonstration state forests, as provided.
The bill would repeal the prohibition on the department regarding charging a fee that exceeds the amount necessary to reimburse the department’s costs for maintenance and improvement, as provided.
(6) The California
Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF