Back to California

AB-2575 • 2026

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

Crime Education Healthcare Labor Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Ortega
Last action
2026-04-23
Official status
Read second time and amended.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide specific details about the penalties for violations or enforcement mechanisms, leaving these aspects unclear.

Health Care Services: Artificial Intelligence

AB-2575 requires health facilities and clinics to disclose information about the use of artificial intelligence tools to healthcare professionals, allows workers to override AI outputs when necessary based on professional judgment or legal compliance, prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who rely on approved technology for patient care, and limits certain legal defenses related to AI.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires health facilities and clinics that use clinical decision support systems (AI tools) for patient care to provide written notice about the AI's capabilities and limitations to healthcare professionals.
  • Allows healthcare workers providing direct patient care to override AI-generated outputs if it is necessary based on their professional judgment or to comply with applicable laws, including civil rights law.
  • Prohibits employers from using technology to replace a worker’s use of professional judgment in patient care and prevents them from retaliating against workers who rely on approved technology for patient care.
  • Limits the legal defenses available to defendants who developed or used clinical decision support systems if those systems are alleged to have caused harm.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Health facilities and clinics that use artificial intelligence for patient care.
  • Licensed healthcare professionals and workers providing direct patient care.
  • Employers of healthcare workers.

Terms To Know

Clinical decision support system
A type of software used in health facilities to help doctors make decisions about patient care by analyzing data and suggesting treatment options.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify the exact penalties for violations of its requirements.
  • It is unclear how this legislation will be enforced and what specific actions health facilities must take to comply with it.
  • There are no details on how the state will ensure that employers do not retaliate against healthcare workers.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-23 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  2. 2026-04-22 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 21).

  3. 2026-04-13 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  4. 2026-04-09 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

  5. 2026-04-09 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  6. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  7. 2026-03-26 California Legislative Information

    (Pending re-refer to Com. on L. & E.)

  8. 2026-03-26 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 56 suspended.

  9. 2026-03-19 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  10. 2026-03-18 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  11. 2026-03-16 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on HEALTH, L. & E. and P. & C.P.

  12. 2026-02-21 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  13. 2026-02-20 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 2575, as amended, Ortega.
Health care services: artificial intelligence.
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities and clinics by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law generally makes a violation of these provisions a crime. Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, establishes the Medical Board of California for the licensing, regulation, and discipline of physicians and surgeons. Existing law requires a health facility, clinic, physician’s office, or office of a group practice that uses generative artificial intelligence to generate written or verbal patient communications pertaining to patient clinical information, as defined, to ensure that those communications include both a disclaimer that indicates to the patient that a communication was generated by generative artificial intelligence, as specified, and clear instructions describing how a patient may contact a human health care
provider, employee, or other appropriate person.
This bill would require a health facility, clinic, physician’s office, or office of a group practice that uses or deploys a
covered tool,
clinical decision support system,
as defined, for patient care to provide written notice of required information to any licensed health care professional or other person using a
covered tool
clinical decision support system
or viewing outputs from a
covered tool.
clinical decision support system.
The bill would require, among other things, the disclosure to include a notice that a worker providing direct patient care is
permitted
authorized
to override the output of a
covered tool
clinical decision support system
if, in the judgment of the worker acting
in
within
their scope of practice, an override is
appropriate for the patient, or as necessary to comply with applicable law, including civil rights law.
necessary to meet the applicable standard of care or comply with applicable law.
The bill would specify the required time and manner the disclosure is to be provided pursuant to these provisions. By placing new requirements on health facilities and clinics, this bill would expand the scope of a crime and would impose a state-mandated local program.
(2) Existing law charges the Labor Commissioner with enforcement of various labor laws, including investigation of employee complaints.
This bill would declare it is the policy of the state that a worker providing direct patient care be free to use their professional judgment to make assessments and decisions within their scope of practice as appropriate for their
patients and that it is public policy of the state that a worker should not be penalized for relying in good faith on technology that the licensed health care professional’s employer has selected or approved for their use in patient care.
patients.
The bill would prohibit an employer from
using or deploying technology to replace or eliminate a worker’s use of professional judgment in patient care and would prohibit an employer from
retaliating or discriminating against a worker providing patient care, as specified. The bill would authorize a worker who is subject to retaliation or discrimination in violation of these provisions to file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner against an employer.
(3) Existing law provides that everyone is responsible not only for the result of their willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by their want of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property or person. Existing law prohibits a defendant who developed, modified, or used artificial intelligence, as defined, from asserting a defense that the
artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm to the plaintiff.
This bill would prohibit a defendant who developed, modified,
or used artificial intelligence or
selected, or deployed
a clinical decision support
system, as those terms are defined,
system
that is alleged to have harmed the plaintiff from asserting a defense that the failure of a licensed health care professional or other health care worker to override an output of the
artificial intelligence or
clinical decision support system is a
superseding cause severing the defendant’s liability for the alleged harm.
(4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF