Back to California

AB-350 • 2026

Health care coverage: fluoride treatments.

Health care coverage: fluoride treatments.

Budget Children Crime Education Healthcare Parental Rights
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Bonta
Last action
2025-09-10
Official status
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Rubio.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not specify exact details on how reimbursement will be handled beyond stating that a policy must be established. The official source material indicates the department will define appropriate fluoride treatment but does not provide specifics about billing and reimbursement rules.

Health Care Coverage: Fluoride Treatments

AB-350 requires health insurance plans and Medi-Cal to cover fluoride varnish treatments without cost sharing for children under 21 years old, starting in 2026.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies issued after January 1, 2026, to provide free coverage for fluoride varnish applications as a pediatric oral care benefit.
  • Makes the application of fluoride varnish a covered benefit under Medi-Cal for children under 21 years old without cost sharing.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Health insurance companies
  • Children under 21 years old
  • Parents or guardians of children covered by Medi-Cal

Terms To Know

Medi-Cal
A government health care program for low-income people in California.
Fluoride varnish
A dental treatment that helps prevent cavities and is applied to the teeth as a protective coating.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not require coverage if it would create costs for the state unless there is an appropriation.
  • It will only take effect after January 1, 2026.
  • No reimbursement is required by this act for local agencies or school districts.

Bill History

  1. 2025-09-10 California Legislative Information

    Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Rubio.

  2. 2025-09-08 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  3. 2025-09-05 California Legislative Information

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  4. 2025-08-29 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. 2025-08-29 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 29).

  6. 2025-08-18 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Referred to suspense file.

  7. 2025-07-07 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. 2025-07-03 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2).

  9. 2025-06-11 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  10. 2025-06-03 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. 2025-06-02 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 1927.)

  12. 2025-05-27 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  14. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 23).

  15. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 1644.)

  16. 2025-05-07 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  17. 2025-04-28 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. 2025-04-24 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  19. 2025-04-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 22).

  20. 2025-02-18 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. 2025-01-30 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.

  22. 2025-01-29 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 350, as amended, Bonta.
Health care coverage: fluoride treatments.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act’s requirements a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law sets forth specified coverage requirements for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies.
Existing law requires an individual or small group health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2017, to include, at a minimum, coverage for essential health benefits pursuant to the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Existing
law requires an essential health benefit to be provided only to the extent that federal law does not require the state to defray the costs of the benefit.
This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, that provides coverage for the application of fluoride varnish as a pediatric oral care benefit to provide coverage without cost sharing for the application of fluoride varnish as medically necessary regardless of whether the service is billed as a dental benefit or as a medical benefit. If this coverage requirement creates an obligation for the state to defray costs for an individual, the bill would not require coverage unless there is an appropriation for this purpose, as specified. Because a willful violation of this provision by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which health care services are provided to low-income individuals. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program and provides for various services, including certain dental services, that are rendered by Medi-Cal enrolled providers. Under existing law, silver diamine fluoride treatments are a covered benefit for eligible children 0 to 6 years of age, inclusive, as specified, and application of fluoride or other appropriate fluoride treatment is covered for children 17 years of age and under.
This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, to provide coverage without cost sharing for the application of fluoride varnish in the primary care setting for children under 21 years of age. Because a willful violation of this provision by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would make the application of fluoride or other appropriate fluoride treatment,
including fluoride varnish,
as defined by the department,
a covered benefit under the Medi-Cal program for children under 21 years of age. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to establish and promulgate a policy
governing billing and reimbursement for
on or before January 1, 2027, that specifies this covered benefit includes
the application of fluoride varnish, as
specified.
specified, and that allows reimbursement in certain circumstances.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF