Back to California

AB-379 • 2026

Crimes: prostitution.

Crimes: prostitution.

Budget Children Crime Education Labor
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Schultz (A) , Nguyen
Last action
2025-07-30
Official status
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 82, Statutes of 2025.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on how fines collected will be used or the exact services provided by the Survivor Support Fund.

Crimes: Prostitution

AB-379 increases penalties for soliciting minors in prostitution cases, makes it illegal to loiter with intent to purchase commercial sex, and establishes the Survivor Support Fund.

What This Bill Does

  • Increases punishment if someone over 18 tries to get a minor under 16 into prostitution, especially if the minor is more than three years younger than the adult.
  • Makes it illegal for anyone to loiter in public places with the intent of buying commercial sex and imposes an additional fine of $1000 on violators.
  • Establishes the Survivor Support Fund where fines from new laws will be deposited to help victims of human trafficking and exploitation.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who try to buy or sell sexual services in public places
  • Businesses like hotels and transportation hubs that need to put up warning signs about human trafficking

Terms To Know

Survivor Support Fund
A fund created by the bill where fines from new prostitution laws will be deposited to help victims of sex trafficking.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify an effective date for all its provisions.
  • It is unclear how much money will be available in the Survivor Support Fund and what services it can fund.

Bill History

  1. 2025-07-30 California Legislative Information

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 82, Statutes of 2025.

  2. 2025-07-30 California Legislative Information

    Approved by the Governor.

  3. 2025-07-18 California Legislative Information

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.

  4. 2025-07-14 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. 2025-07-14 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 2. Page 2053.).

  6. 2025-07-08 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. 2025-07-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 7).

  8. 2025-06-18 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  9. 2025-06-10 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. 2025-05-28 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  11. 2025-05-15 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. 2025-05-15 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1546.)

  13. 2025-05-12 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. 2025-05-08 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  15. 2025-05-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 7).

  16. 2025-05-05 California Legislative Information

    Joint Rule 62(a) suspended. (Ayes 62. Noes 0. Page 1424.)

  17. 2025-05-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. 2025-05-01 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  19. 2025-05-01 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  20. 2025-04-30 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29).

  21. 2025-04-28 California Legislative Information

    Joint Rule 62(a) suspended. (Page 1307.)

  22. 2025-04-24 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  23. 2025-03-28 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  24. 2025-03-27 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  25. 2025-02-25 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  26. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  27. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  28. 2025-02-04 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.

  29. 2025-02-03 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 379, Schultz.
Crimes: prostitution.
Under existing law, a person who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, any act of prostitution is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. Under existing law, if the person solicited was under 16 years of age, or if the person solicited was under 18 years of age at the time of the offense and the person solicited was a victim of human trafficking, the offense is punishable as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year and a fine not to exceed $10,000 or as a felony by imprisonment in the county jail for 16 months or 2 or 3 years.
This bill would
additionally make that increased punishment applicable if the solicited minor was more than 3 years younger than the defendant at the time of the offense. The bill would require a defendant subject to that increased punishment, if granted probation, to successfully complete an education program on human trafficking and the exploitation of children, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to loiter in any public place with the intent to purchase commercial sex, as specified. The bill would make any person who violates that crime or who commits prostitution in exchange for providing compensation, money, or anything of value to the other person subject to an additional fine of $1,000, and would establish the Survivor Support Fund and require that additional fine be deposited in the fund. The bill would require the California Victim Compensation Board to establish a grant program to provide grants to community-based organizations that provide direct
services and outreach to victims of sex trafficking and exploitation, and would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, authorize moneys in the Survivor Support Fund to be used for the purposes of that grant program. By creating a new crime and increasing the punishment of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires specified businesses and other establishments, including, among others, airports, intercity passenger rail or light rail stations, bus stations, facilities that provide pediatric care, and truck stops, to post a notice, as developed by the Department of Justice, that contains information relating to slavery and human trafficking, including information regarding specified nonprofit organizations that a person can call for services or support in the elimination of slavery and human trafficking. Existing law makes a business or
establishment that fails to comply with the requirements of these provisions liable for a civil penalty of $500 for a first offense, and $1,000 for each subsequent offense.
This bill would increase that civil penalty to $1,000 for a first offense, and $2,000 for each subsequent offense. The bill would require these fines to be deposited in the Survivors Support Fund.
Existing law allows civil penalties to be imposed against a hotel, as defined, if a supervisory employee, as defined, of the hotel knew of or acted with reckless disregard of the activity constituting sex trafficking activity, as defined, that occurred within the hotel and failed to inform law enforcement, the National Human Trafficking Hotline, or another appropriate victim service organization, as specified, or if any employee of that hotel was acting within the scope of employment and knowingly benefited from participating in a venture that the employee
knew, or acted in reckless disregard of the activity constituting sex trafficking activity within the hotel. Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county attorney to seek equitable relief against a hotel, and to seek a civil penalty of $1,000 for the first violation, $3,000 for a 2nd violation within the same calendar year, and $5,000 for a 3rd and any subsequent violation of sex trafficking within the same calendar year. Existing law authorizes a court to consider specified factors and exercise its discretion to increase the amount of the civil penalty, not to exceed $10,000, for any 4th or subsequent violation.
This bill would additionally authorize the attorney general to enforce these provisions. The bill would increase the penalty for a violation of these provisions to $3,000 for a first violation, $10,000 for a 2nd violation within a 24-month period of time, and $15,000 for the third and any subsequent violation within a 24-month period of time.
The bill would authorize the court to increase the amount of the civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for a 4th or subsequent violation. The bill would require fines collected pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Survivors Support Fund.
Existing law establishes the Office of Emergency Services, which is required to, among other things, allocate and award funds to communities developing and providing ongoing citizen involvement and crime resistance programs.
This bill would require the office, to the extent funds are available for this purpose, to allocate and award funds to up to 11 district attorney offices that employ a vertical prosecution methodology for the prosecution of human trafficking crimes and that meet other specified criteria, including minimum staffing levels for the program.
The bill would require the office, on or before January 1, 2028, to submit to the Legislature and the office of the Governor a report that describes the counties that received funding pursuant to this program, the number of prosecutions for human trafficking cases filed by the counties receiving funding, the number of human trafficking convictions obtained by those counties, and the sentences imposed for human trafficking crimes in those counties.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF