Criminal procedure: child pornography.

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on the timing or process for making child pornography material available for inspection.

Child Pornography Evidence Rules

This law changes how child pornography evidence is handled in criminal cases by limiting who can see and copy it.

What This Bill Does

• Removes the ability of a defendant, their family, or anyone else to get copies of child pornography evidence unless specifically allowed by a court after a hearing.
• Requires that all material considered child pornography stays with law enforcement, prosecutors, or courts instead of being given out.
• Prohibits defendants and others from copying, photographing, or duplicating any child pornography materials if the prosecution makes them available for inspection.
• Ensures victims or their lawyers can see the evidence needed to prepare expert testimony.

Who It Names or Affects

• Defendants in criminal cases involving child pornography
• Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors handling such cases
• Victims of child pornography crimes

Terms To Know

Child Pornography

Illegal images or videos showing children involved in sexual activities.

Limits and Unknowns

• The bill does not specify when or how the material must be made available for inspection.
• It is unclear what happens if a defendant needs copies of evidence for their defense and cannot get them without violating this law.

Official Summary Text

AB 528, as amended, Alanis.
Criminal procedure: child pornography.
Existing law requires a prosecuting attorney to disclose to the defendant or their attorney all relevant real evidence seized or obtained as a part of the investigation of the offenses charged that is in the possession of the prosecuting attorney or known to be in the possession of the investigating agencies.
Existing law prohibits an attorney from disclosing or permitting to be disclosed to a defendant, members of the defendant’s family, or anyone else copies of child pornography evidence, unless specifically permitted to do so by the court after a hearing and a showing of good cause. Existing law authorizes an attorney to disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of child pornography evidence to persons employed by the attorney or to persons appointed by the court to assist in the preparation of a defendant’s case if that disclosure is
required for that preparation.
This bill would repeal the provisions allowing disclosure of copies to a defendant, the defendant’s family, person’s employed by an attorney or appointed by the court, or anyone else. The bill would instead require any
property of
material that constitutes child pornography, as defined, to remain in the care, custody, or control of either a law enforcement agency, the prosecution, or the court. The bill would prohibit a defendant, their attorney, or anybody else from copying, photographing, duplicating, or reproducing any material that constitutes child pornography so long as the prosecution makes the material, and any hardware, media, or other property containing, storing, or housing the material, reasonably available
for inspection and exemination,
to the defendant,
as specified. The bill would also require this material to be made available, as specified, to a victim or the victim’s attorney or to any individual the victim may seek to qualify to furnish expert testimony.
By requiring new duties on prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, and the courts, this bill would create a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Current Bill Text

Download Bill PDF