Back to California

AB-883 • 2026

Data brokers: deletion of personal information of elected officials and judges.

Data brokers: deletion of personal information of elected officials and judges.

Education Privacy
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Lowenthal
Last action
2026-06-03
Official status
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source does not specify which exact personal information is required to be provided.

Deleting Personal Information of Elected Officials and Judges

This law creates a process for data brokers to remove personal information about elected officials and judges upon request.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires the Secretary of State, certain local government officials, and the Judicial Council to provide lists of personal information for state and local elected officials and California judges to the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA).
  • Allows these officials and judges to ask that their names be removed from the lists.
  • Requires the CPPA to upload these lists to a system where data brokers can delete personal information within 10 days of receiving a request.
  • Authorizes elected officials, judges, or legal representatives to sue if data brokers do not follow this rule.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Data brokers who collect and sell personal information.
  • Elected state and local government officials in California.
  • California judges.

Terms To Know

Data broker
A company that collects, stores, and sells personal information about individuals to other companies.
CPPA
The California Privacy Protection Agency, which enforces privacy laws in California.

Limits and Unknowns

  • It is not clear how many data brokers will comply with the new requirements.
  • Local government officials may face additional duties and costs due to this law.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-03 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.

  2. 2026-06-01 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. 2026-05-06 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on P., D.T., & C.P. and JUD.

  4. 2026-01-27 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. 2026-01-26 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3833.)

  6. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 22).

  8. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

  9. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3806.)

  10. 2026-01-13 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. 2026-01-13 California Legislative Information

    Coauthors revised.

  12. 2026-01-08 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  13. 2026-01-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

  14. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  15. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  17. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  18. 2025-03-25 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  19. 2025-03-24 California Legislative Information

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  20. 2025-03-24 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

  21. 2025-02-20 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  22. 2025-02-19 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 883, as amended, Lowenthal.
Elected
Data brokers: deletion of personal information of elected
officials and judges.
Existing law establishes the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) to enforce various laws protecting the privacy of individuals. If a business knowingly collects and sells to third parties the personal information of a consumer with whom the business does not have a direct relationship, existing law requires the business to register with the CPPA as a data broker, except as specified. Existing law requires the CPPA to establish an accessible deletion mechanism that allows a consumer to request that every data broker delete any personal information related to that consumer held by the data broker or associated service provider or contractor, as prescribed.
This bill would
create an additional process for the deletion of personal information of state and local
government officials and California judges held by data brokers. In this regard, the bill would
require the Secretary of
State
State, certain local government officials, and the Judicial Council
to provide to the
agency a list
CPPA lists of certain personal information
of all state
or
elected officials, all
local elected
officials that, if available, includes each official’s personal information, as specified, would require the Judicial Council to provide the agency with a list of all California judges,
officials, or all California judges, respectively,
and would require
the agency to allow
elected officials
or a
and
judges
to be provided an opportunity
to remove their information from those lists, as prescribed. The bill would require the lists to be kept confidential, as specified.
By imposing additional duties on local government officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would
also
require the
agency
CPPA
to upload the lists to the accessible deletion mechanism described above and would require
an entity receiving a notification that a deletion is required to do so within 5 days.
data brokers to delete that personal information within 10 days.
This bill would authorize an elected official or judge who is on a list described above, the Attorney General, a county counsel, or a city attorney to bring a civil action for a violation of the bill, as prescribed.
This bill would make its provisions operative on July 1, 2027.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a
statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF