Back to California

SB-1119 • 2026

Companion chatbots: children’s safety.

Companion chatbots: children’s safety.

Children Parental Rights Taxes Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Padilla
Last action
2026-06-04
Official status
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and digest do not provide specific details on how the yearly audits will be structured or what constitutes a covered harm.

Rules for Safe Chatbots for Kids

The bill requires companies running chatbot apps to perform yearly safety checks and audits, and allows parents or guardians of children harmed by a violation to sue the company.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires companies running chatbot apps to do a yearly check on how safe their app is for children.
  • Needs these companies to get an independent review of their safety measures every year.
  • Starting in 2028, the Attorney General will make public reports each year on how well chatbot apps are following these rules.
  • Allows parents or guardians of children who get hurt by a violation to sue the company for damages.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Companies that run chatbot apps
  • Children using chatbots
  • Parents and guardians of children affected by chatbots

Terms To Know

Companion Chatbot
An artificial intelligence program designed to interact with users, often in a conversational manner.
Operator
The company or organization that runs and manages the chatbot app.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not specify what happens if a company does not follow these rules.
  • It is unclear how much it will cost companies to comply with yearly audits.
  • Details on how the Attorney General's public reports will be structured are not provided.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-04 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  2. 2026-05-26 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.

  3. 2026-05-20 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  4. 2026-05-19 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  5. 2026-05-14 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. 2026-05-14 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 14).

  7. 2026-05-12 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 14.

  8. 2026-05-11 California Legislative Information

    May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  9. 2026-05-04 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 11.

  10. 2026-04-28 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. 2026-04-27 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3978.) (April 21).

  12. 2026-04-20 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3958.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. 2026-04-14 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 21 in JUD. pending receipt.

  14. 2026-04-09 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 20.

  15. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Coms. on P., D.T., & C.P. and JUD.

  16. 2026-03-25 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. 2026-02-26 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. 2026-02-18 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  19. 2026-02-17 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 1119, as amended, Padilla.
Companion chatbots: children’s safety.
Existing law generally regulates artificial intelligence, including companion chatbots, as defined. Existing law requires an operator, as defined, to prevent a companion chatbot on its companion chatbot platform from engaging with users unless the operator maintains a protocol for preventing the production of suicidal ideation, suicide, or self-harm content to the user. Existing law requires an operator, for a user the operator knows is a minor, to, among other things, notify the user that the user is interacting with artificial intelligence and to disclose that companion chatbots may not be suitable for some minors, as specified.
The Digital Age Assurance Act requires a person who owns, maintains, or controls a software application, as defined, to request age bracket data sent by a real-time secure application programming interface or
operating system with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.
This bill would require an operator of a companion chatbot to, on or before July 1, 2027, do various things with respect to child safety and companion chatbots, including annually perform and document a comprehensive risk assessment to identify any child safety
risk
risk, as defined,
posed by the design, configuration, and operation of the companion chatbot that assesses, among other things, the likelihood of a covered harm, as defined, occurring to
child
users. The bill would require an operator to submit to
an independent audit of its compliance with those provisions, as specified, and would require, within 90 days of completing an independent audit, the auditor to submit an AI child safety audit report to the Attorney General for any audited companion chatbot. The bill would, except as specified, require those audit reports to be kept confidential.
This bill would, beginning January 1, 2028, require the Attorney General to issue an annual public report on the audits submitted pursuant to the above-described provision, as specified. The bill would authorize a public prosecutor to bring a certain civil action to enforce the bill’s provisions and would authorize a child who suffers actual harm as a result of a violation of this chapter, or a parent or guardian acting on behalf of that child, to bring a civil action against the operator to
recover,
obtain,
among other relief,
exemplary
punitive
damages.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF