Back to California

SB-1166 • 2026

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District: employee relations.

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District: employee relations.

Education Elections Labor
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Arreguín
Last action
2026-04-20
Official status
April 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source does not provide details on how PERB's new duties will be funded or what specific changes must be notified.

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Employee Relations

This legislation gives PERB authority over employee disputes and collective bargaining for represented employees of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District.

What This Bill Does

  • Gives PERB jurisdiction to handle unfair practice charges from represented district employees, subject to a selection by an exclusive representative.
  • Requires PERB's regulations to apply to the transit district, allowing PERB to make emergency rules as needed.
  • Requires the transit district to notify employee representatives before making changes that affect their work conditions.
  • Allows charging parties, respondents, or intervenors to challenge PERB decisions in court if they disagree with them.
  • Enables PERB to enforce its final decisions through state courts.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Employees of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
  • The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB)
  • The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

Terms To Know

Public Employment Relations Board (PERB)
A state agency that handles disputes and enforces rules for public employers and employees.
Unfair practices
Actions by an employer or union that violate labor laws, such as discrimination or unfair treatment of workers.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how the new duties will be funded.
  • It is unclear what specific changes to work conditions the transit district must notify employee representatives about.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-20 California Legislative Information

    April 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  2. 2026-04-10 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 20.

  3. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. 2026-03-27 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 7.

  5. 2026-03-25 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  6. 2026-03-16 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing March 25.

  7. 2026-02-26 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.

  8. 2026-02-19 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

  9. 2026-02-18 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 1166, as introduced, Arreguín.
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District: employee relations.
Existing law, the Transit District Law, establishes the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District with various powers and duties relative to transportation projects and services and the operation of public transit in the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa.
Existing law establishes the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in state government as a means of resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory duties and rights of specified public employers and employees under various acts regulating collective bargaining, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. Existing law includes within PERB’s jurisdiction the resolution of disputes alleging violation of rules and regulations adopted by a public agency, as defined, concerning unit determinations, representations, recognition, and elections, as specified. Existing law authorizes PERB to adopt rules and
regulations to carry out its purposes, as provided.
This bill would vest PERB with jurisdiction to enforce certain provisions related to the district’s employees over charges of unfair practices for represented district employees, subject to a selection by an exclusive representative. The bill, in the case of such a selection, would give PERB jurisdiction over the initial determination as to whether those charges are justified and, if so, the appropriate remedy, subject to certain restrictions. The bill would require that PERB’s regulations apply, as appropriate, to the district, and authorize PERB to make additional emergency regulations applicable to the district. The bill would require the district to give reasonable written notice to an exclusive representative of its employees of its intent to make any change to matters within the scope of representation of the employees represented by the exclusive representative, as specified. This bill would authorize any
charging party, respondent, or intervenor aggrieved by a final decision or order of PERB in an unfair practice case, except a decision of PERB not to issue a complaint in such a case, to petition for a writ of extraordinary relief from that decision or order, as specified. The bill, if the time to petition for extraordinary relief from a PERB decision or order has expired, would authorize PERB to seek enforcement of any final decision or order in a district court of appeal or superior court having jurisdiction over the county where the events giving rise to the decision or order occurred, as specified. By imposing new duties on the district, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the district.
The California
Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF