Back to California

SB-1364 • 2026

Child custody.

Child custody.

Children Crime
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Menjivar
Last action
2026-05-26
Official status
Referred to Com. on JUD.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide specific details on how the bill will handle shared responsibilities post-assault or its impact in cases with insufficient proof of sexual assault.

Child Custody Rules

This law changes how courts decide child custody when a parent is convicted of sexually assaulting the other parent and the child was conceived or born shortly after the assault.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires courts to consider sexual abuse that led to a child's conception when deciding what's best for the child.
  • Prohibits someone from getting custody or visitation rights if they were convicted of sexually assaulting the mother and the child was conceived as a result or born within 300 days after the assault.
  • Creates a strong belief that giving custody to such a parent is harmful unless proven otherwise with clear evidence.
  • Allows anyone to ask the court to say there's no legal relationship between the father and child if the child was conceived due to sexual assault.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Courts that decide custody cases
  • Parents involved in custody disputes
  • Children born from relationships involving sexual assault

Terms To Know

sexual assault
A serious crime where someone forces another person to do a sexual act without their consent.
rebuttable presumption
An assumption made by the court that can be proven wrong with strong evidence.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if the mother and father share responsibilities after a sexual assault.
  • It is unclear how this law will affect cases where there isn't enough proof of sexual assault.
  • This legislation has passed both chambers but its final status, including whether it becomes law, remains to be seen.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-26 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

  2. 2026-05-19 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  3. 2026-05-18 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  4. 2026-04-30 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  5. 2026-04-29 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 28).

  6. 2026-04-20 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  7. 2026-04-10 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 28.

  8. 2026-03-04 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

  9. 2026-02-23 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  10. 2026-02-23 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  11. 2026-02-20 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 1364, as amended, Menjivar.
Child custody.
Existing law governs the determination of child custody and visitation in contested proceedings and requires the court, for purposes of deciding custody, to determine the best interests of the child based on certain factors, including, among other things, the health, safety, and welfare of the child and a history of abuse by a parent or another person seeking custody against specified individuals, including the other parent. As a prerequisite to considering an allegation of abuse, existing law authorizes the court to consider written reports from specified entities, including law enforcement and child protective services. Existing law prohibits the court from considering a person’s sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation when determining the best interests of the child.
The bill would also require the court to consider
abuse that resulted in the conception of the child when determining the best interests of the child.
Existing law prohibits a person from being granted physical or legal custody of, or visitation with, a child if the person has been convicted of rape and the child was conceived as a result of that violation.
This bill, instead, would prohibit a person from being granted custody of, or visitation with, a child if the person has been convicted of an act of sexual assault, as defined, and the child was conceived as a result of, or born within 300 days after, that act against the mother. Upon a finding by the court, by clear and convincing evidence, that a party seeking custody of a child perpetrated an act of sexual assault that resulted in the conception of the child, the bill would create a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint physical or legal custody of the child is detrimental to the best interests of the
child, which may only be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
Existing law, the Uniform Parentage Act, prescribes various circumstances under which an action may be brought for the purpose of determining the existence or nonexistence of a parent and child relationship and specifies when and by whom the action may be brought.
This bill would authorize an action to be brought to declare the nonexistence of the parent and child relationship to be brought at any time if the child was conceived as a result of a sexual assault and the father was convicted of that violation.
The Uniform Parentage Act defines the “parent and child relationship” as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child’s parents, including determining who is a presumed parent. Under existing law, a person is presumed to be the natural parent of a child if they satisfy certain
criteria, including, among other things, that the presumed parent and the child’s natural mother are, or have been, married to each other and the child is born during the marriage or within 300 days after the marriage is terminated. Existing law specifies exceptions to those presumptions, including if the child was conceived as a result of rape or unlawful intercourse, as specified.
This bill would instead make that presumption inapplicable if the father was convicted of, or is found by clear and convincing evidence to have committed, a sexual assault against the child’s mother and the child was conceived as a result of, or born within 300 days after, the sexual assault unless, after the date of the sexual assault, the child’s natural mother and the father voluntarily share the rights and responsibilities of rearing the child.
Existing law permits a proceeding to be brought for the purpose of having a child under 18 years
of age declared free from the custody and control of either or both parents if the child’s parent or parents have been convicted of a felony of a nature that proves the unfitness of the parent or parents to have future custody and control of the child. Existing law authorizes the court to consider the parent’s criminal record prior to the felony conviction for these purposes. Existing law authorizes the mother of a child to bring a proceeding for these purposes against the father of the child if the child was conceived as a result of rape and the father was convicted of that violation.
This bill would instead authorize the mother of a child to bring a proceeding for these purposes against the father of the child if the child was conceived as a result
of, or born within 300 days after, an act of sexual assault, or a violation of a similar statute in another jurisdiction where the act occurred, against the mother of the child and the father was convicted of, or is found by clear and convincing evidence to have committed, that
act.
of an act of rape or sexual assault, as specified. The bill would create a presumption that the father of the child is unfit to have custody or control of the child if the father is convicted of rape. The bill would also create that presumption if the father is found, by clear and convincing evidence, to have committed an act of sexual assault, except as specified.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF