Back to California

SB-337 • 2026

Prisons.

Prisons.

Crime Healthcare Labor
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Menjivar
Last action
2025-08-29
Official status
August 29 hearing postponed by committee.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material did not provide specific penalties for hiring violations or details on how the advocate request policy will be enforced if an advocate is unavailable.

Prison Rules and Policies

This legislation updates prison policies to ensure body-worn cameras are used properly, establishes zero-tolerance for sexual violence in prisons, allows incarcerated individuals to have an advocate during certain searches, requires investigators to disclose conflicts of interest, and sets stricter hiring standards for staff who work with inmates.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (department) to create policies about when body-worn cameras can be turned off. It says cameras must stay on unless there is a private conversation or other specific reasons.
  • Establishes zero-tolerance policy for sexual violence, staff misconduct, and harassment in prisons and correctional facilities.
  • Allows people in prison to ask for an advocate during searches like cavity checks or strip searches. The department has to write down if the person asked for help and why.
  • Requires investigators to tell when they have a conflict of interest that might affect their work on cases involving staff members with whom they are personally connected.
  • Makes it harder to hire people who have been involved in sexual abuse, serious crimes like murder or rape, or other misconduct related to prison jobs.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People working for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
  • Inmates in state prisons

Terms To Know

body-worn camera
A small video camera worn by correctional staff to record interactions with inmates.
conflict of interest
When someone's personal interests might affect their ability to make fair decisions at work.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if an advocate is not available when requested.
  • It is unclear how the new hiring rules will be enforced or what penalties there are for breaking them.
  • There may be additional details about these policies that are not covered in this summary.

Bill History

  1. 2025-08-29 California Legislative Information

    August 29 hearing postponed by committee.

  2. 2025-07-09 California Legislative Information

    July 9 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  3. 2025-06-17 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. 2025-06-17 California Legislative Information

    Coauthors revised.

  5. 2025-06-05 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  6. 2025-05-28 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  7. 2025-05-28 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1305.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  8. 2025-05-27 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1196.) (May 23).

  11. 2025-05-16 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 23.

  12. 2025-05-12 California Legislative Information

    May 12 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. 2025-05-02 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 12.

  14. 2025-04-30 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 945.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. 2025-04-11 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 29.

  16. 2025-04-10 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. 2025-04-02 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  18. 2025-03-26 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  19. 2025-02-19 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

  20. 2025-02-13 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.

  21. 2025-02-12 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 337, as amended, Menjivar.
Prisons.
(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (department) and sets forth its powers and duties regarding the administration of correctional facilities and the care and custody of inmates. Existing law requires law enforcement agencies to consider specified best practices when establishing policies and procedures for downloading and storing data from body-worn cameras, including, among other things, prohibiting the unauthorized use, duplication, or distribution of the data, and establishing storage periods for evidentiary and nonevidentiary data, as defined.
This bill would require the department to establish policies and procedures that include circumstances under which a body-worn camera may be deactivated and would require the department to ensure that those policies and procedures prohibit
a body-worn camera from being deactivated only because there is no incarcerated person present or if the correctional staff member is not interacting with an incarcerated person. The bill would require the department’s policies and procedures to authorize deactivation of a body-worn camera during specified confidential interactions and would require staff to inform the subject the reason for the deactivation and to document the time of the deactivation, the reason for the deactivation, and the time of reactivation.
This bill would require the department to adopt, and update regularly, a Prison Rape Elimination policy that would outline specified principles, including, among others, that the department maintains zero tolerance for sexual violence, staff sexual misconduct, and sexual harassment in its institutions, community correctional facilities, and conservation
camps, and for all offenders under its jurisdiction.
(2) Under existing law, a person sentenced to imprisonment in a state prison for a felony offense, as specified, may, during that period of confinement, be deprived only of those rights as is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. Existing law enumerates certain civil rights of these prisoners.
This bill would entitle a person incarcerated in a state prison to request the presence of an advocate during a physical or visual body cavity search, strip search, or body scan. The bill would require the department to document specified information, including whether the presence of an advocate was requested by the incarcerated individual, when an individual incarcerated in state prison is subject to any physical or visual body cavity search, strip search, or body scan of their person using a contraband or metal
detection device or an electronic drug detection device. The bill would also require the department to document specified information if, during a medical appointment, an individual incarcerated in state prison requests the presence of an advocate who is not an employee of the department.
(3) Existing law requires members of the department’s Office of Internal Affairs to possess certification from the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training for investigators, except as specified. Existing law requires the department to conduct a complete and thorough background check prior to training a peace officer who is selected to conduct internal affairs investigations and requires each person to satisfactorily pass the background check. Existing law states that any person who has been the subject of a sustained, serious disciplinary action, as specified, shall not pass the background check.
This bill would require an investigator to disclose an actual or potential conflict of interest they may have in an investigation in which they are participating. The bill would require the department to take appropriate action to remedy that conflict. The bill would require an investigator to recuse themselves from participating in an investigation or a decision related to an investigation if they have a conflict of interest involving a staff member with whom they have a personal relationship, as defined.
(4) Existing law authorizes the secretary of the department to prescribe and amend rules and regulations for the administration of prisons. Under existing law, the State Civil Service Act, certain acts, including convictions of certain crimes, are cause for discipline of a state employee or of a person whose name appears on an employment list.
This bill would prohibit the department from appointing or promoting a person to a position that may involve any contact with incarcerated persons, or engaging a contractor for services that may involve contact with incarcerated persons, if that person or contractor has engaged in sexual abuse in a prison or other correctional facility or institution, as specified. The bill would prohibit the department from appointing or promoting any person to a position that may involve contact with incarcerated persons, or engaging a contractor for services that may involve contact with incarcerated persons, if that person or contractor has been convicted of certain offenses, including murder and rape, among others, or has been civilly or administratively adjudicated to have engaged in that conduct. The bill would require the department to consider any substantiated incident of sexual harassment in determining whether to appoint or promote an applicant and would require the
department before appointing a new employee to make best efforts to contact all prior institutional employers for information on substantiated allegations of sexual abuse, among other things. The bill would require the department to conduct criminal background checks every 5 years of existing employees or implement a system to otherwise capture that information.
(5) Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an employee or officer of a public entity health facility, or an employee, officer, or agent of a private person or entity that provides a health facility or staff for a health facility under contract with a public entity, to engage in sexual activity with a consenting adult who is confined in a health facility. Existing law additionally makes it a misdemeanor for specified individuals, including an employee or officer of a public entity detention facility or an employee with a department, board, or authority under the
department, to engage in sexual activity with a consenting adult who is confined in a detention facility or who is an inmate, ward, or parolee, as specified. Existing law makes it a felony for any subsequent violations for a person who was previously convicted of these violations. Existing law requires a person convicted of a felony violation of the above-described provisions who is employed by a department, board, or authority within the department to be terminated, as specified, and prohibits that person from being eligible to be hired or reinstated by the department. Existing law requires administrators to report criminal sexual abuse by staff to law enforcement authorities.
This bill would instead require that a person convicted of any violation of these provisions be terminated and prohibited from being reinstated by the department. The bill would also require that a person convicted of any violation of these provisions who is employed by a public entity health
facility be terminated and made ineligible to be hired or reinstated by a public entity health facility. This bill would require administrators to report any known or suspected sexual abuse by staff to a local law enforcement agency.
(6) Existing law establishes the Office of the Inspector General that is responsible for, among other things, contemporaneous public oversight of internal affairs investigations and staff grievance inquiries conducted by the department’s Office of Internal Affairs. Existing law requires the Office of the Inspector General to have investigatory authority over all staff misconduct cases that involve sexual misconduct with an incarcerated person, as specified.
This bill would authorize an incarcerated person to file an anonymous grievance relating to an allegation of sexual violence directly to the Office of the Inspector General, and would authorize the
Inspector General to review any grievance filed from an incarcerated person, whether or not that grievance had been previously filed with the institution or hiring authority where the grievance occurred.
(7) Existing regulations establish a grievance procedure for individuals in the custody of, or under the supervision of, the department. Under those regulations, a claimant is required to submit a grievance no later than 60 calendar days after discovering an adverse policy, decision, action, condition, or omission by the department.
This bill would extend that time period to 120 calendar days.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF