Back to California

SB-574 • 2026

Generative artificial intelligence: attorneys and arbitrators.

Generative artificial intelligence: attorneys and arbitrators.

Education Housing Land Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Umberg
Last action
2026-01-29
Official status
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill text does not specify penalties or enforcement mechanisms.

Rules for Lawyers and Arbitrators Using AI

The bill sets rules for lawyers and arbitrators using generative artificial intelligence, requiring them to protect confidential information, verify accuracy of AI-generated content, and disclose reliance on AI in decision-making.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires attorneys who use AI to ensure that no confidential or personal identifying information is entered into public AI systems.
  • Requires attorneys to take reasonable steps to check the accuracy of AI-generated material and correct any errors before using it.
  • Prohibits briefs, pleadings, motions, or other court papers from including citations not personally read and verified by the attorney.
  • Forbids arbitrators from delegating decision-making tasks to AI tools.
  • Requires arbitrators to disclose reliance on AI-generated information outside of official records before using it in decisions.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Lawyers and attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence in legal work.
  • Arbitrators involved in dispute resolution processes.

Terms To Know

Generative Artificial Intelligence
AI that creates new content like text, images, or code based on input it receives.
Arbitrator
A neutral person chosen to make decisions in disputes between parties who have agreed to arbitration instead of going to court.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify penalties for lawyers or arbitrators who do not follow these rules.
  • It is unclear how the use of AI will be monitored and enforced by legal authorities.
  • There are no details on what constitutes 'reasonable steps' to verify AI-generated content.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-29 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  2. 2026-01-29 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3323.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  3. 2026-01-26 California Legislative Information

    Ordered to special consent calendar.

  4. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3269.) (January 22).

  6. 2026-01-21 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 22.

  7. 2026-01-20 California Legislative Information

    January 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  8. 2026-01-15 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 20.

  9. 2026-01-14 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3214.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. 2026-01-06 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 13.

  11. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.

  12. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  13. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Withdrawn from committee.

  14. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  15. 2025-04-02 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Coms. on HOUSING and L. GOV.

  16. 2025-03-24 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. 2025-03-05 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  19. 2025-02-20 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 574, as amended, Umberg.
Streamlined housing approvals.
Generative artificial intelligence: attorneys and arbitrators.
Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. The act requires an attorney to strictly maintain client confidences and to preserve client secrets at their own peril.
This bill would obligate an attorney who uses generative artificial intelligence to practice law to ensure that confidential personal identifying, or other nonpublic information, is not entered into a public generative artificial intelligence system. The bill would also require an attorney to ensure that reasonable steps are taken to verify the accuracy of generative artificial intelligence material and to correct any erroneous or hallucinated output in any material used by the attorney.
Existing law requires every pleading, petition, written notice of motion, or other similar paper to be signed by the attorney of record, or if a party is unrepresented, by the party, thereby certifying to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief that it is not being presented primarily for an improper purpose and that the claims, defenses, and legal and factual contentions are warranted, as specified.
This bill would prohibit a brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court from containing any citations that the attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally read and verified, including any citation provided by generative artificial intelligence.
Existing law, the California Arbitration Act, provides a statutory framework for the enforcement of contractual arbitration under California law. The act establishes that a written
agreement to submit a present or future controversy to arbitration is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable, except as specified. The act defines a neutral arbitrator as one who is selected jointly by the parties or by the parties’ arbitrators, or is appointed by the court if the parties or their arbitrators cannot jointly select an arbitrator. The act requires a person selected to serve as a neutral arbitrator to disclose all matters that could cause a person aware of the facts to reasonably entertain a doubt as to the proposed neutral arbitrator’s impartiality.
This bill would prohibit an arbitrator from delegating any part of their decision-making process to any generative artificial intelligence tool. The bill would prohibit an arbitrator from relying on information generated by generative artificial intelligence outside the record without making appropriate disclosures to the parties beforehand. The bill would require an arbitrator to assume responsibility for
all aspects of an award, regardless of any use of generative artificial intelligence tools to assist with the decision-making process.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.
Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for a multifamily housing development that is subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process, as provided, and not subject to a conditional use permit, if the development satisfies specified objective planning standards.
This bill would authorize a
development proponent to submit an application for a housing development that is subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process if the development is for single-family housing in which each unit is 1,600 square feet or less and the development is consistent with objective planning and design standards. By establishing a streamlined, ministerial approval process for certain housing developments, this bill would expand the exemption for the ministerial approval of projects under CEQA. By expanding the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF