Electricity: deenergization events: report: compensation.

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and digest text do not explicitly mention that the Public Utilities Commission can impose fines or penalties on electrical corporations for violating deenergization protocols, although it is implied in the context of assessing fines or penalties after reviewing events.

Electricity: Deenergization Events Report and Compensation

The bill requires electrical companies to automatically give customers a $30 credit for each full day their power is turned off due to safety concerns, report details about these events to the Public Utilities Commission, and include plans to compensate affected customers in wildfire mitigation strategies.

What This Bill Does

• Requires electrical corporations to provide an automatic $30 credit to customers for every full day their electricity is cut off during a deenergization event.
• Prohibits using customer rate payments to fund the $30 credits given after a deenergization event.
• Necessitates that each electrical corporation submits a detailed report about any deenergization events to the Public Utilities Commission, including information like how long it lasted and which customers were affected.
• Requires local publicly owned electric utilities to include plans for compensating customers who might be impacted by power line deenergizations in their wildfire mitigation strategies.

Who It Names or Affects

• Customers of electrical companies when their electricity is turned off for safety reasons.
• Electrical corporations that must provide credits and submit reports after turning off power.
• Local publicly owned electric utilities that need to plan how to compensate customers during deenergization events.

Terms To Know

Deenergization event

A situation where electricity is intentionally turned off by a utility company to prevent safety risks, such as wildfires.

Public Utilities Commission

The government agency that oversees and regulates public utilities like electrical companies in California.

Limits and Unknowns

• Does not specify how the $30 credits will be applied to customer bills.
• Local publicly owned electric utilities must create plans for compensating customers, but it does not detail exactly what these plans should include.
• The bill requires electrical corporations to report on deenergization events, but it does not provide specific details about how this information will be used.

Official Summary Text

SB 618, as amended, Reyes.
Electricity: deenergization
events: reimbursement credit.
events: report: compensation.
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law requires each electrical corporation to annually prepare a wildfire mitigation plan and to submit its plan to the commission for review and approval, as specified. Existing law requires that the wildfire mitigation plan include, among other things, protocols for deenergizing portions of the electrical distribution system that consider the associated impacts on public safety.
This bill would require
each electrical
corporation to automatically provide a reimbursement credit to all customers affected by a deenergization event in an amount equal to $30 for every 24 hours that a customer experiences a deenergization event. The bill would prohibit the reimbursement credit from being funded with ratepayer moneys.
each electrical corporation to file a postdeenergization event report with the commission following a deenergization event that includes the duration of the deenergization event, the circuits affected, the number of customers impacted, and any other information required by the commission. The bill would also require each electrical corporation to include the cost to a customer of the interruption of electrical service, per affected customer, and the aggregated cost for all affected customers in the report, and would require the commission, in a new or existing proceeding, to develop a standardized methodology for calculating
that cost, as specified. The bill would authorize the commission to assess a fine or penalty on an electrical corporation following its review of a deenergization event if the commission determines the electrical corporation violated deenergization protocols, commission rules, laws, or other requirements. If the commission assesses a fine or penalty on an electrical corporation, the bill would require the commission to consider the impact of the deenergization event on the electrical corporation’s customers and to direct any revenues from the fine or penalty to automatic credits to those customers affected by the deenergization event, as specified.
Existing law requires each local publicly owned electric utility to prepare a wildfire mitigation plan and to verify that the wildfire mitigation plan complies with all applicable rules, regulations, and standards, as appropriate. Existing law requires that the wildfire mitigation plan includes,
among other things, protocols for deenergizing portions of the electrical distribution system that consider the associated impacts on public safety.
This bill would require the wildfire mitigation plan to additionally include appropriate and feasible procedures for compensating a customer who may be impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines.
Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.
Because a violation of a commission action implementing this bill’s requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Additionally, by imposing new duties on local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution
requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Current Bill Text

Download Bill PDF