Back to California

SB-677 • 2026

Housing development: transit-oriented development.

Housing development: transit-oriented development.

Crime Education Housing Land
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Wiener
Last action
2026-01-26
Official status
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on enforcement mechanisms or funding sources for the changes outlined in the legislation.

Housing Near Transit

This law updates the definitions of 'high-frequency commuter rail' and 'transit-oriented development stop' to include ferry services, excludes new transit routes not planned by January 1, 2026, and prohibits housing developments on certain mobile home or recreational vehicle sites.

What This Bill Does

  • Revises the definition of 'high-frequency commuter rail' to mean a public commuter or intercity rail station with at least 48 passenger trains per weekday in all directions.
  • Updates the definition of 'transit-oriented development stop' to include stops served by high-frequency ferry services and excludes new transit routes not identified in regional transportation plans by January 1, 2026.
  • Prohibits housing developments from being built on land governed by laws for mobile homes or recreational vehicles.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who live near public transportation and might see changes to housing development rules.
  • Local officials responsible for approving housing projects near transit stops.

Terms To Know

Transit-oriented development (TOD)
A type of urban planning that focuses on building homes, businesses, and other places close to public transportation.
High-frequency commuter rail
Train services running at least 48 trains per day in both directions.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify who will fund the changes or how they will be enforced.
  • It is unclear what happens if a new transit route starts after January 1, 2026.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-26 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  2. 2026-01-26 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 10. Page 3285.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  3. 2026-01-21 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  4. 2026-01-20 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  5. 2026-01-15 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 20.

  6. 2026-01-14 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3224.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. 2026-01-08 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  8. 2026-01-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 3184.) (January 6).

  9. 2026-01-07 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 14 in L. GOV. pending receipt.

  10. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  11. 2026-01-05 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing January 6.

  12. 2025-04-23 California Legislative Information

    April 22 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 832.) Reconsideration granted.

  13. 2025-04-22 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 30 in L. GOV. pending receipt.

  14. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  15. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 22.

  16. 2025-04-01 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  17. 2025-03-05 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and L. GOV.

  18. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  19. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  20. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 677, as amended, Wiener.
Housing development: transit-oriented development.
Existing law requires that a housing development project, as defined, within a specified distance of a transit-oriented development (TOD) stop, as defined, be an allowed use as a transit-oriented housing development on any site zoned for residential, mixed, or commercial development, if the development complies with certain applicable requirements, as provided. Among these requirements, existing law establishes requirements concerning height limits, density, and residential floor area ratio in accordance with a development’s proximity to specified tiers of TOD stops, as provided, and requires a development to meet specified labor standards that require that a specified affidavit be signed under penalty of perjury, under specified circumstances. Existing law specifies that a development proposed pursuant to
these provisions is eligible for streamlined, ministerial approval, as provided. Existing law defines, among other terms, the term “high-frequency commuter rail” for purposes of these provisions to mean a commuter rail service operating a total of at least 48 trains per day across both directions, not including temporary service changes of less than one month or unplanned disruptions, and not meeting the standard for very high frequency commuter rail, at any point in the past three years. Existing law also defines the term “Tier 2 transit-oriented development stop” for these purposes to mean a TOD stop within an urban transit county, as defined, excluding a Tier 1 transit-oriented development stop, as defined, served by light rail transit, by high-frequency commuter rail, or by bus service meeting specified standards.
This bill would revise the definition of
“high-frequency commuter rail” to instead mean a public commuter or intercity rail station with a total of at least 48 passenger trains on average per weekday across all directions, not including temporary service changes of less than one month or unplanned disruptions, and not meeting the standard for very high frequency commuter rail, at any point in the past three years. By increasing the duties of local officials, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified
reasons.
Existing law requires that a housing development project, as defined, within a specified distance of a transit-oriented development (TOD) stop, as defined, be an allowed use as a transit-oriented housing development on any site zoned for residential, mixed, or commercial development, if the development complies with certain applicable requirements, as provided. Among these requirements, existing law establishes requirements concerning height limits, density, and residential floor area ratio in accordance with a development’s proximity to specified tiers of TOD stops, as provided; prohibits a proposed development under these provisions from being located on sites where the development would require demolition of housing, or that was previously used for housing, that is subject to rent or price controls, as
provided; and requires a development to meet specified labor standards that require that a specified affidavit be signed under penalty of perjury, under specified circumstances. Existing law specifies that a development proposed pursuant to these provisions is eligible for streamlined, ministerial approval, as provided. Existing law defines, among other terms, the term “transit-oriented development stop” for purposes of these provisions to mean a major transit stop, as defined by specified law, and to additionally include stops on a route for which a preferred alternative has been selected or are identified in a regional transportation improvement program, that is served by specified types of transit services, exclusive of certain new transit routes or extensions not identified in the applicable regional transportation plan on or before January 1, 2026, as specified. Existing law also defines the term “Tier 2 transit-oriented development stop” for these purposes to mean a TOD stop within an urban transit
county, as defined, excluding a Tier 1 transit-oriented development stop, as defined, served by light rail transit, by high-frequency commuter rail, or by bus service meeting specified standards.
This bill would revise the definition of “transit-oriented development stop” to instead mean a major transit stop, as defined, that is served by the above-described types of transit services, exclusive of any newly planned transit route or extension that was not identified in the applicable regional transportation plan on or before January 1, 2026, as specified. The bill would also revise the definitions of “transit-oriented development stop” and “Tier 2 transit-oriented development stop” to include stops served by high-frequency ferry service, as defined. The bill would delete the definition of “rail transit” and, instead, define the term “rail transit station” for
purposes of these provisions, as specified. The bill would additionally prohibit a transit-oriented housing development under these provisions from being located on an existing parcel of land or site governed under the Mobilehome Residency Law, the Recreational Vehicle Park Occupancy Law, the Mobilehome Parks Act, or the Special Occupancy Parks Act. By increasing the duties of local officials, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law authorizes a transit agency’s board of directors to adopt agency TOD zoning standards for district-owned real property located in a TOD zone, as defined, which establishes minimum zoning requirements for an agency TOD project for, among other things, residential floor area ratio, as provided.
This bill would remove the
specification that the TOD zoning standards for floor area ratio be for residential floor area ratio only, thereby requiring that the ordinance establish floor area ratio standards generally for district-owned real property within the TOD zone.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF