Back to California

SB-689 • 2026

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

Education Elections
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Becker
Last action
2026-02-02
Official status
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on how much extra work this will create for local officials and what costs might be involved.

Local Jurisdictions: District-Based Elections

This law changes how cities with fewer than 50,000 people can hold elections and extends the time local governments have to respond to notices about changing their election system.

What This Bill Does

  • Creates an exception in the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) for small cities to use a mix of at-large and district-based voting methods if no more than 20% of members are elected at large.
  • Extends the time period that local governments have to respond to notices about changing their election system from 45 days to 90 days.
  • Requires written complaints about CVRA violations in smaller cities to be signed by at least 100 voters.
  • Makes population and demographic data available online for city districts before elections.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Cities with populations of 50,000 or less
  • Local government officials responsible for election rules

Terms To Know

At-large method of election
A system where all members of a governing body are elected by the entire city, not just their district.
District-based elections
Elections where representatives are chosen from specific areas or districts within a larger area.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify an effective date for the new rules.
  • It is unclear how much extra work this will create for local officials and what costs might be involved.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-02 California Legislative Information

    Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. 2025-04-23 California Legislative Information

    April 29 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. 2025-04-23 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 30 in L. GOV. pending receipt.

  4. 2025-04-21 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

  5. 2025-04-04 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 29.

  6. 2025-04-02 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and L. GOV.

  7. 2025-03-25 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  8. 2025-03-05 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  10. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  11. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 689, as amended, Becker.
California Voting Rights Act of 2001.
Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.
The California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA) prohibits a political subdivision from imposing or applying an at-large method of election for members of the political subdivision’s governing body in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as specified. Existing law requires courts to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, for violations of the CVRA. Existing law defines “at-large method of election” for these purposes to include a method of election that combines at-large elections with district-based elections.
This bill would create an exception for cities with a population of 50,000 people or less, whereby a method of electing members to the governing body of the city in which no more than
20% of the members are elected at large and the remaining members are elected by district would constitute a district-based election for purposes of the
CVRA.
CVRA, unless that method of election would prevent the city from drawing district boundaries in a manner that allows a protected class to elect candidates of its choice.
Existing law requires a prospective plaintiff, before commencing an action to enforce the CVRA, to first mail a written notice to the clerk of the political subdivision. Existing law prohibits the prospective plaintiff from commencing an action to enforce the CVRA within 45 days of the political subdivision’s receipt of the notice and authorizes the political subdivision, within those 45 days, to pass a resolution outlining its intention to transition
from at-large elections to district-based elections.
This bill would extend that period to within 90 days of the political subdivision’s receipt of the notice.
For allegations that elections for the governing body of a city with a
population of 50,000 people or less violate the CVRA, the bill would require the written notice to be signed by at least 100 voters.
Existing law requires a local jurisdiction that is governed by a legislative body elected using district-based elections to adopt boundaries for the election districts no later than 204 days before the local jurisdiction’s next regular election occurring after January 1 in each year ending in the number 2. Existing law requires the local jurisdiction to hold workshops and public hearings before adopting new election district boundaries, as specified.
This bill would require the local jurisdiction to make the population and demographic data that will be used to adopt its election district boundaries publicly available on its internet website no later than 9 months before the local jurisdiction’s first
regular election occurring after January 1 in each year ending in the number 2. To the extent the bill would create additional duties for local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF