Back to California

SB-716 • 2026

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

Crime Education Taxes
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Durazo
Last action
2025-09-11
Official status
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on how much more people might have to pay if these changes are implemented.

Lifeline Program: Broadband Internet Access

This law allows internet service providers to offer low-cost broadband plans to people who qualify for the Lifeline program, which helps low-income households.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows internet companies to join a program that gives discounts on high-speed internet to low-income families.
  • Requires these companies to offer at least one plan with speeds of 100 megabits per second download and 20 megabits per second upload for $30 or less monthly.
  • Prohibits the government from requiring people who get help through Lifeline to buy both phone and internet services together.
  • Prevents companies from upselling extra services on customers who use the discounted broadband plan.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Low-income households that qualify for the Lifeline program
  • Internet service providers

Terms To Know

Lifeline Program
A government program that helps low-income families get affordable phone and internet services.
Broadband Internet Access Service
High-speed internet service that allows users to quickly access the internet for activities like streaming videos or downloading large files.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the California Legislature to pass.
  • It sets rules and requirements but does not specify how much more people might have to pay if these changes are implemented.

Bill History

  1. 2025-09-11 California Legislative Information

    Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.

  2. 2025-09-02 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  3. 2025-08-29 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 29).

  4. 2025-08-20 California Legislative Information

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  5. 2025-07-17 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. 2025-07-17 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 16).

  7. 2025-07-17 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 15. Page 2578.)

  8. 2025-06-16 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on C. & C.

  9. 2025-06-05 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  10. 2025-06-04 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 1516.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  11. 2025-05-27 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  13. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1210.) (May 23).

  14. 2025-05-20 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 23.

  15. 2025-05-19 California Legislative Information

    May 19 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  16. 2025-05-09 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 19.

  17. 2025-05-06 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. 2025-05-05 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 3. Page 935.) (April 29).

  19. 2025-04-21 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.

  20. 2025-04-11 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 29.

  21. 2025-04-02 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.

  22. 2025-03-26 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  23. 2025-03-12 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

  24. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  25. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  26. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 716, as amended, Durazo.
Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.
Existing law, the Moore Universal Telephone Service Act, establishes the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service program to provide low-income households with access to affordable basic residential telephone service. Existing law requires all revenues collected by telephone corporations in rates authorized by the Public Utilities Commission to fund the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service program to be submitted to the commission pursuant to a schedule established by the commission. Existing law requires all moneys appropriated from the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service Trust Administrative Committee Fund to the commission to be used exclusively by the commission for the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service program.
This bill would require the commission, as part of a new or existing proceeding, to establish a mechanism to
permit internet service providers to voluntarily
include
standalone
stand-alone
broadband internet access service as a class of lifeline service. The bill would provide that an internet service provider would be eligible for a lifeline subsidy if it offers at least one internet service plan that provides broadband internet access service at a speed of at least 100 megabits per second downstream and 20 megabits per second upstream and costs $30 or less per month. The bill would authorize the commission to adjust the speed and monthly plan cost for certain areas of the state, as provided. The bill would prohibit the commission from requiring a lifeline subscriber to bundle their voice and internet service plans in order to receive a lifeline subsidy pursuant to these provisions, as
specified. The bill would prohibit the commission from providing a lifeline subscriber with more than one lifeline subsidy per household under the act, as provided. The bill would prohibit an internet service provider from being required to obtain an eligible telecommunications carrier designation in order to obtain a lifeline subsidy, except as provided. The bill would require the commission to prohibit internet service providers that offer lifeline service pursuant to these provisions from
the inappropriate
upselling
of
their internet service plans, as specified. The bill would require the commission, on or before December 31, 2026, to submit to the Legislature an estimate of any increase to the Universal Service Public Purpose Programs surcharge rate required for the implementation of these
provisions.
The bill would prohibit the commission from increasing the surcharge for the lifeline program above the highest rate collected within the previous 4 years, as of January 1, 2026.
The bill would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2027, to adopt rules to implement these provisions. The bill would repeal these provisions
as of
on
January 1, 2032.
The bill would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2028, to report to the Legislature, as part of a specified report, on the performance and fiscal impact of the lifeline program, as specified.
Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.
Because the above-described provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill’s requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
This bill would include a change in state statute that
would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of
2
/
3
of the membership of each house of the Legislature.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF