Back to California

SB-903 • 2026

Mental health professionals: artificial intelligence.

Mental health professionals: artificial intelligence.

Crime Education Healthcare Labor Privacy Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Padilla
Last action
2026-04-24
Official status
Set for hearing May 4.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance.

Mental Health Professionals and Artificial Intelligence

The bill sets rules about how mental health professionals can use artificial intelligence (AI) in therapy sessions, including requiring patient consent for AI involvement.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires mental health professionals to inform patients if they will be using AI during therapy sessions and get the patient's permission before doing so.
  • Does not allow anyone or any company to offer therapy services through internet-based AI unless a licensed professional is involved in providing those services.
  • Prohibits mental health professionals from letting AI make independent therapeutic decisions.
  • Requires that if AI is used, it must follow the same privacy rules as other patient information under California law.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Licensed mental health professionals in California
  • Patients receiving therapy or counseling services

Terms To Know

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Computer systems that can do tasks that usually need human intelligence, like understanding language and making decisions.
Licensed Professional
A mental health professional who has a special license to provide therapy or counseling services in California.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if someone breaks these rules.
  • It is unclear how the new requirements will be enforced and monitored by licensing boards.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-24 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing May 4.

  2. 2026-04-21 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  3. 2026-04-13 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.

  4. 2026-04-10 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 20 in P., D.T., & C.P. pending receipt.

  5. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 13.

  6. 2026-04-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.

  7. 2026-02-18 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on B. P. & E.D. and P., D.T., & C.P.

  8. 2026-01-22 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 21.

  9. 2026-01-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 903, as amended, Padilla.
Mental health professionals: artificial intelligence.
Existing law establishes
the Board of Behavioral Sciences in the Department of Consumer Affairs to regulate licensees under
various healing arts boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees. Existing laws, including
the Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Act, the Educational Psychologist Practice Act, the Clinical Social Worker Practice Act, and the Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor
Act.
Act, make a violation of those acts a crime.
Existing law regulates the use of artificial intelligence, as defined. Existing law requires a health facility, clinic, physician’s office, or office of a group practice that uses generative artificial intelligence to generate written or verbal patient communications pertaining to patient clinical information to ensure those communications include a disclaimer that indicates to the patient that a communication was generated by artificial intelligence and instructions describing how a patient may contact a human health care provider, employee, or other appropriate person.
This bill would
prohibit a licensed professional, as defined, from engaging in the use of artificial intelligence to assist in providing supplementary support in therapy or psychotherapy where the client’s therapeutic session is recorded or transcribed unless the patient or their authorized representative is informed that artificial intelligence will be used and provides consent, as specified. The bill would also prohibit an individual, corporation, or entity from providing, advertising, or otherwise offering therapy or psychotherapy, including through the use of internet-based artificial intelligence, to the public in this state unless the therapy or psychotherapy services are conducted by an individual who is a licensed professional. The bill would additionally prohibit a licensed professional from allowing artificial intelligence to make independent therapeutic decisions or take other specified actions
related to communications with clients, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to investigate actual, alleged, or suspected violations of these provisions and impose civil penalties, as prescribed.
regulate the use of artificial intelligence by licensed professionals providing psychotherapy services, as defined. The bill, among other things, would prohibit an individual, corporation, or entity from using artificial intelligence to record or transcribe psychotherapeutic communications or sessions or to triage or screen a person for the need for psychotherapy services unless the patient or their authorized representative is informed that artificial intelligence will be used and provides consent, as specified. The bill would prohibit a licensed professional from allowing artificial intelligence to perform certain acts, including making independent therapeutic decisions or detecting emotions or mental states.
The bill would make a violation of the bill’s provisions subject to the jurisdiction of the appropriate health care professional licensing board or enforcement agency, as specified, and would authorize those boards and enforcement entities to pursue any remedies authorized by law.
Existing law, the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, generally restricts the persons and entities to whom, and the purposes for which, a health care provider, health care service plan, or contractor may release a patient’s medical information. The Confidentiality of Medical Information Act additionally imposes certain disclosure requirements for the release of medical information that specifically relates to the patient’s participation in outpatient treatment with a psychotherapist. In this regard, the act prohibits a health care provider, health care service plan, or
contractor from releasing that information to persons or entities who have requested that information and who are otherwise authorized by specified laws to receive that information, unless the requester makes certain written disclosures to the patient and to the provider of health care, health care service plan, or contractor, as specified. Those disclosures include, among other things, the specific intended uses of the information, and the length of time during which the information will be kept before being destroyed or disposed of, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions that result in economic loss or personal injury to a patient punishable as a misdemeanor.
This bill would require the use of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy records to comply with the confidentiality requirements of the above-described provision of the
Confidentiality of Medical Information Act.
By expanding the scope of existing crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF