Back to California

SB-988 • 2026

California Motor Vehicle Glass Act.

California Motor Vehicle Glass Act.

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Grayson
Last action
2026-04-21
Official status
Set for hearing April 27.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on enforcement mechanisms or penalties beyond civil fines.

California Motor Vehicle Glass Act

This act sets rules for motor vehicle glass repair shops in California regarding notifications and estimates before repairs, prohibitions on certain practices like offering rebates or false information, and penalties for violations.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibits an insured person from assigning their rights under a car insurance policy to another person after January 1, 2027.
  • Requires repair shops to inform customers if their vehicle has advanced driver assistance systems that need calibration after windshield repairs.
  • Requires repair shops to provide written notice and itemized invoices for completed glass repairs.
  • Forbids repair shops from contracting with people until certain conditions are met, such as receiving a claim number.
  • Prohibits offering incentives or false information about insurance coverage for glass repairs.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Motor vehicle glass repair shops in California
  • People insured under motor vehicle insurance policies

Terms To Know

Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS)
A system that helps drivers with tasks like maintaining a safe distance from other vehicles or parking.
First-party claim
A claim made by an insured person to their own insurance company for damages covered under the policy.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how it will be enforced.
  • It is unclear what happens if a repair shop violates these rules before January 1, 2027.
  • Details about penalties and enforcement are limited to civil fines only.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-21 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 27.

  2. 2026-04-16 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  3. 2026-04-15 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 14).

  4. 2026-04-09 California Legislative Information

    Set for hearing April 14.

  5. 2026-04-08 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  6. 2026-03-24 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. 2026-03-24 California Legislative Information

    Withdrawn from committee.

  8. 2026-03-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  9. 2026-02-18 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on INS.

  10. 2026-02-09 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  11. 2026-02-05 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Official Summary Text

SB 988, as amended, Grayson.
California Motor Vehicle Glass Act.
Existing law enacts the California Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Act, commencing October 1, 2026 , that makes it a violation of the act for a dealer to, among other things, make any misrepresentation regarding material information about specified matters relating to the vehicle sale, including the costs or terms of purchasing, financing, or leasing a vehicle, the availability of vehicles at a total price communicated by the dealer, and the remedy available if a dealer fails to sell or lease a vehicle at the total price.
Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including automobile insurance. Existing law requires an insurer that issues a policy providing automobile collision coverage, or automobile physical damage coverage, to pay to the repairer or to the named insured and the repairer, jointly, for repairs in a specified
manner if a covered automobile is damaged by collision or otherwise and the insurer knows that the automobile will be repaired. Existing law prohibits an insurer from withholding the payment of reasonable repair cost benefits that are otherwise payable under the policy if the insured decides not to have the vehicle repaired. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from restricting payment in cases of suspected fraud or from including a named loss payee or lienholder as an additional payee on the claims payment check or draft, as described. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from requiring that a damaged vehicle be repaired as a condition for payment if the damage to the vehicle is sufficiently serious that safety features that are part of the vehicle’s operating systems are compromised.
This bill, the California Motor Vehicle Glass Act, would prohibit an insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy
that covers windshield and calibration repair or replacement from, either before or after a claimed or covered loss, assigning, delegating or otherwise transferring, in whole or in part, to any other person the insured’s duties under the policy or rights or benefits under the policy, and would make a contract entered
into
into, on and after January 1, 2027,
under these circumstances void and unenforceable. The bill would require a motor vehicle glass repair shop (repair shop), before providing service to
an insured
a person
for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass, to notify the
insured,
person,
among other things, whether the motor vehicle has an advanced driver assistance system, and if it does, whether calibration or recalibration of the motor vehicle’s advanced driver assistance system is needed after a windshield repair or replacement as recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. The bill would require the repair shop to provide written notice to the
insured
person
whether the calibration or recalibration was successful or not successful, as specified, and would require the repair shop to provide an itemized invoice and
receipt upon completion of a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass.
This bill would prohibit a repair shop from contracting with a person for repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass that would be paid by a first-party insurance policy until specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the person has made a first-party claim for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass under a motor vehicle insurance policy and that the repair shop has received a claim or referral number for the claim. The bill would require a repair shop to, among other things, provide the
insured
person
a good faith estimate of the fees and costs that are anticipated to be charged to the
insured
person
by the repair shop for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass.
This bill would prohibit a repair shop, or any other person who is compensated for the solicitation of insurance claims, from offering a rebate, gift, gift card, cash, coupon, fee, prize, bonus, payment, incentive, inducement, or any other thing of value to any insured, insurance producer, or other person in exchange for directing or making a claim under a motor vehicle insurance policy for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. The bill would also prohibit a repair shop from, among other things, submitting false, misleading, or incomplete documentation or information to an insured or an insured’s insurer, including any agent of the insured or insurer, for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass or state that a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass will be paid for entirely by an insurer and at no
cost to the insured unless the coverage has been verified by the insurer or the insurer’s agent.
This bill would state that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer, insurance producer, insurance adjuster, or any person acting on behalf of an insurer, insurance producer, or insurance adjuster from recommending a repair shop or providing an explanation to an insured of the coverage available, and any applicable liability limit, under any insurance policy. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $500 for the first violation and not to exceed $2,000 for each subsequent violation.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF