Back to Colorado

HB26-1001 • 2026

Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties

The bill requires a subject jurisdiction, on or after December 31, 2027, to allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel, subject t

Education Elections Energy Housing Land Taxes
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Rep. A. Boesenecker, Rep. J. Mabrey, Sen. T. Exum, Sen. J. Gonzales, Rep. J. Bacon, Rep. S. Camacho, Rep. M. Carter, Rep. R. English, Rep. M. Froelich, Rep. L. García, Rep. L. Goldstein, Rep. J. Jackson, Rep. J. Joseph, Rep. M. Lindsay, Rep. K. McCormick, Rep. K. Nguyen, Rep. A. Paschal, Rep. J. Phillips, Rep. M. Rutinel, Rep. G. Rydin, Rep. E. Sirota, Rep. L. Smith, Rep. R. Stewart, Rep. T. Story, Rep. S. Woodrow, Rep. Y. Zokaie, Sen. J. Amabile, Sen. M. Ball, Sen. A. Benavidez, Sen. J. Coleman, Sen. L. Cutter, Sen. J. Danielson, Sen. N. Hinrichsen, Sen. I. Jodeh, Sen. C. Kipp, Sen. W. Lindstedt, Sen. J. Marchman, Sen. M. Snyder, Sen. M. Weissman
Last action
2026-03-25
Official status
Governor Signed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not specify what happens if a property owner fails to notify the county assessor.

Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties

This law requires local governments to allow residential developments on certain properties owned by specific organizations after December 31, 2027.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires a subject jurisdiction to approve the construction of residential developments on qualifying properties that do not contain exempt parcels starting from December 31, 2027.
  • Limits local governments' ability to restrict these developments based on height or number of units unless they follow specific zoning rules.
  • Allows additional uses like childcare and community services in these residential developments if permitted by local laws.
  • Requires property owners to notify county assessors when a development is approved.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Nonprofit organizations with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing
  • School districts, state colleges, universities, and housing authorities
  • Local governments responsible for approving developments

Terms To Know

Qualifying property
A piece of land owned by certain organizations that can be used to build affordable housing.
Subject jurisdiction
The local government responsible for approving residential developments on qualifying properties.

Limits and Unknowns

  • It is unclear how this will affect existing zoning laws and regulations in different areas of Colorado.
  • The bill only applies to developments starting from December 31, 2027.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

S.001

Committee of the Whole

Lost

Plain English: The amendment changes a part of the bill to remove certain requirements for residential developments on qualifying properties and adds that no public hearing or decision by an elected body is needed.

  • Removes specific language about exempt parcels from the bill text.
  • Adds new language stating that no public hearing, recommendation, or decision by a public body is required for these developments.
  • The exact impact of removing the reference to exempt parcels is unclear without more context.
  • It's not clear what 'qualifying properties' means in this context.
S.002

Committee of the Whole

Lost

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to apply only to counties with more than fifty thousand people instead of all local governments.

  • Changes 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT THAT' to 'COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FIFTY THOUSAND PEOPLE.'
  • Removes lines 7 and 8 from the bill.
  • The exact content of lines 7 and 8 that were removed is not provided, so their specific details are unknown.
L.001

HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new definition for 'Nonprofit Organization' in the bill.

  • Adds a new subsection (5) to define 'Nonprofit Organization' as an organization exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(a) and listed as an exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
  • The amendment only adds a definition and does not specify how this new term will be used in the rest of the bill.
L.002

HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new definition for 'Board of Cooperative Services' in the bill.

  • Adds a new section (c) to define 'Board of Cooperative Services' as specified in another part of the law.
  • The exact role and responsibilities of the Board of Cooperative Services are not detailed in this amendment, making it unclear how this definition will be used or affect the bill's requirements.
L.003

HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill's first section from 'Definitions' to a 'Legislative declaration,' which outlines reasons for supporting affordable housing development in Colorado.

  • Replaces the initial section titled 'Definitions' with a new section called 'Legislative declaration.'
  • This new section includes statements about the need for more affordable housing due to rising costs and population growth, highlighting challenges such as zoning regulations that hinder residential developments.
  • The amendment text does not specify concrete changes to how housing developments will be constructed or regulated; it focuses on a declaration of intent.
  • Further details about the practical implementation of affordable housing development are not provided in this amendment.
L.004

HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds provisions to ensure that school districts and institutions of higher education can continue their existing practices without being restricted by the new housing development rules.

  • Adds a clause allowing school districts to construct, purchase, or remodel teacherages as per specific sections in other laws.
  • Removes certain lines on page 10 related to restrictions that are no longer applicable after this amendment.
  • Modifies text on page 11 to ensure institutions of higher education can still make decisions about their property and building codes without being limited by the new housing development rules.
  • The exact impact of removing lines from page 10 is not fully explained in the amendment text.
  • Some technical legal references may be unclear to readers who are not familiar with Colorado state laws.
L.005

HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a definition for 'administrative approval process' to the bill, which describes how local government administrative staff will approve or deny development proposals based on objective standards set by local laws.

  • Adds a new section defining 'administrative approval process'.
  • Specifies that this process involves local government staff approving, approving with conditions, or denying development applications based solely on compliance with local laws' objective standards.
  • The amendment does not specify what the objective standards are or how they will be applied in practice.
L.019

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes specific words in the bill to clarify how residential developments can be constructed on qualifying properties.

  • Changes 'SURROUNDING' to 'NEARBY' on page 3, line 13.
  • Replaces 'THE LAST FIVE YEARS,' with 'THE FIVE YEARS PRECEDING THE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION'S SUBMISSION OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION,' on page 9, line 26.
  • Modifies 'PROJECTS WHICH HAVE RECEIVED' to 'A PROJECT WHICH HAS RECEIVED A' on page 9, line 27.
  • Replaces 'CREDITS OR' with 'CREDIT OR A' and 'CREDITS;' with 'CREDIT;' on page 10.
  • The amendment text does not provide a full explanation of the bill's purpose or how these changes affect its overall meaning, making it hard to understand the broader impact without additional context.
L.020

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section to the bill that outlines the goals of reducing housing construction costs while maintaining public health and safety standards, allowing local jurisdictions flexibility in site design for residential developments, and building upon recent laws promoting affordable housing.

  • Adds a new section stating the General Assembly's intent to streamline residential development processes to reduce housing construction costs while ensuring compliance with public health and safety codes.
  • Allows local jurisdictions to determine appropriate site design standards based on similar types of housing developments, providing flexibility in zoning regulations.
  • Builds upon recent laws that encourage school districts and local governments to promote affordable housing.
  • The amendment text does not specify how the new section will be enforced or what specific changes it will bring about beyond stating the intent of the General Assembly.
L.021

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds two new types of parcels that cannot be used for residential development under certain conditions.

  • Adds a new paragraph (d) to the bill, which states that a parcel zoned or primarily used for industrial purposes is exempt from being developed into a residential property.
  • Adds another new paragraph (e), stating that a parcel subject to an intergovernmental agreement or annexation agreement limiting residential development cannot be used for such development.
  • The exact impact and specific conditions under which these exemptions apply are not fully detailed in the amendment text provided.
L.022

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds new types of parcels that cannot be used for residential development, including agricultural land, forestry and natural resource preservation areas, and flood-prone zones.

  • Adds a new clause (f) to exclude parcels zoned for agricultural use from being developed as residential properties.
  • Includes a new clause (g) to prevent the construction of residential developments on parcels designated for forestry, natural resource preservation, or open space.
  • Introduces a new clause (h) that prohibits residential development in floodways and one-hundred-year floodplains.
  • The amendment text does not specify how these exclusions will affect existing zoning laws or development plans.
L.024

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes the language in the bill to include a broader range of setback standards for residential developments beyond just oil and gas facilities.

  • Replaces the phrase 'SETBACKS FROM OIL AND GAS FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS' with 'OTHER OBJECTIVE SETBACK STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS, INCLUDING SETBACKS FROM OIL AND GAS FACILITIES, OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS, STREAM CORRIDORS, RIPARIAN AREAS, WETLANDS, AND SENSITIVE WILDLIFE HABITATS.'
  • The amendment text does not provide specific details on how these new setback standards will be implemented or enforced.
L.025

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a requirement for local laws to include public notification and feedback collection from residents when dealing with development applications.

  • Adds new language requiring local jurisdictions to notify the public about development applications and collect feedback from residents.
  • The exact details of how this notification and feedback process will be implemented are not specified in the amendment text.
L.026

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds new requirements for local governments to encourage the development of a variety of housing types and offers funding incentives for developers who create more affordable housing units.

  • Local governments must apply laws and policies that support diverse housing developments based on accepted needs assessments and action plans.
  • Local governments can provide financial incentives, like grants or tax breaks, to developers if these incentives lead to the creation of more affordable homes.
  • The exact details about how local governments will implement these requirements are not fully explained in the amendment text.
L.027

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes the deadline for jurisdictions to update their zoning or development codes to comply with new requirements from December 31, 2027, to June 31, 2028.

  • Extends the deadline for subject jurisdictions to complete updates to their zoning or development codes to June 31, 2028, if they are actively working on these updates by December 31, 2027.
  • Changes the height limit for residential structures from forty-five feet tall to thirty-eight feet tall, with exceptions for fire protection limitations and historic district restrictions.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how jurisdictions will be determined as 'actively working' on updates by December 31, 2027.
  • It is unclear what specific standards or requirements are referred to in the amendments related to site design and fire protection.
L.028

SEN Local Government & Housing

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes the definition of a qualifying property to specify that it must not be adjacent to another small qualifying property within certain population and geographic limits.

  • Changes the definition of 'qualifying private property' to include properties that are part of a subdivision process within the last five years, located in specific areas with populations over 5,000 people, or near municipalities.
  • Adds a new definition for 'qualifying public property' similar to the revised definition for private property.
  • The amendment text is complex and includes technical details about census data and municipal boundaries that may be hard to understand without additional context.
L.006

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new clause to the bill that allows local governments to implement a program where development rights can be transferred, if this program includes policies for long-term affordable housing.

  • Adds a definition of 'Transferable Development Rights Program' which is a local land use program allowing the transfer or sale of real property development rights as part of a planning strategy.
  • Modifies existing text to exclude certain properties from being required to allow residential developments if they have an approved Transferable Development Rights Program.
  • The amendment does not specify what qualifies as 'affordable housing' or how long-term restrictions are enforced, which could be unclear for local jurisdictions implementing such programs.
L.007

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to apply only to counties with a population of more than fifty thousand people instead of all local governments.

  • Changes the requirement from applying to any local government to applying specifically to counties with populations over fifty thousand people.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if a qualifying property is in a county that has exactly fifty thousand residents, leaving this detail unclear.
L.009

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes a specific condition related to exempt parcels from the bill's requirements for residential developments on qualifying properties.

  • Removes the phrase 'OR' and the reference to another section of law ('29-4-503; OR') from the bill text.
  • Deletes two lines that were previously part of the bill.
  • The exact impact of removing these references is not fully explained in the amendment text, so it's unclear what practical changes this will have on residential developments.
L.010

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires a local government to conduct an infrastructure impact assessment before allowing construction of residential developments on certain properties.

  • Adds a new requirement for local governments to evaluate the capacity of roads, utilities, and emergency services before approving residential development projects.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if an infrastructure impact assessment shows that the existing facilities cannot handle additional development.
  • It is unclear how this new requirement will be enforced or what penalties might apply for non-compliance.
L.011

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a requirement for water or wastewater service providers to approve residential developments based on their capacity and willingness to serve the property, with conditions under which they can deny service.

  • Adds new language requiring water or wastewater service providers' approval as a condition for allowing residential development construction.
  • Specifies that providers may deny service if it would exceed their treatment or infrastructure capacity, require unfunded infrastructure improvements from existing customers, or create unreasonable burdens on current customers.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens when a provider denies service due to the conditions listed.
  • It is unclear how this requirement will be enforced and what consequences there are for non-compliance by providers.
L.012

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes specific language from the bill regarding residential developments on qualifying properties.

  • Removes lines 11 through 23 from page 9 of the printed bill.
  • The exact content and implications of the removed text are not provided, making it difficult to explain the full impact of this change.
L.013

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section to the bill that requires the Department of Local Affairs to create and manage a program to help schools and colleges build residential developments.

  • Adds a requirement for the Department of Local Affairs to establish a Housing Development Assistance Program.
  • This program will provide technical support, financial resources, and legal guidance to school districts and state colleges and universities.
  • The amendment does not specify how the program will be funded or what specific types of assistance it will offer.
L.015

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new requirement for solar access to the list of considerations for residential developments on qualifying properties.

  • Adds 'Solar Access' as a consideration after line 13 on page 10 of the bill.
  • The exact impact and details of how 'Solar Access' will be implemented are not specified in this amendment text.
L.016

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds the term 'Wildfire Resiliency' after the word 'FIRE' in a specific section of the bill.

  • Adds 'Wildfire Resiliency' to the existing text.
  • The exact impact and context of this addition are not clear from the provided amendment text alone.
L.017

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a bonus for affordable housing units in residential developments on qualifying properties.

  • Adds a new section that allows each unit of affordable housing built on a qualifying property to count as 1.1 newly constructed affordable housing units.
  • The exact impact and implementation details are not fully explained in the amendment text.
L.018

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes when a new housing development law takes effect based on whether or not a referendum petition is filed against it.

  • Changes the effective date of the bill to be contingent upon whether a referendum petition is filed within ninety days after final adjournment of the general assembly.
  • If a referendum petition is filed, the new housing development law will only take effect if approved by voters in November 2026.
  • The exact date when the bill takes effect depends on whether or not a referendum petition is filed and its outcome, which are unknown at this time.
L.030

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes specific language and sections from the bill related to housing developments on qualifying properties.

  • Removes the phrase 'DESCRIBED IN SECTION 29-35-504 (1),' and replaces it with 'APPLIED TO SIMILAR HOUSING,' in the bill text.
  • Strikes out lines 9 through 27 on page 15 of the bill.
  • Strikes out lines 1 through 15 on page 16 of the bill.
  • The amendment does not provide details about what 'APPLIED TO SIMILAR HOUSING' means, making it unclear how this change will affect the bill's requirements.
  • Without the struck-out sections, it is difficult to understand the full impact of the changes on housing developments.
L.031

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to apply only to counties with a population of more than fifty thousand people instead of all local governments.

  • Changes the requirement from applying to all local governments to only counties with a population over fifty thousand people.
  • The exact impact and details of how this change will be implemented are not fully explained in the amendment text.
L.032

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires a local government to conduct an infrastructure impact assessment before allowing construction of residential developments on certain properties.

  • Adds a requirement for local governments to ensure that an infrastructure impact assessment is conducted before approving the construction of residential developments on qualifying properties.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens if the infrastructure impact assessment shows negative impacts or how these assessments should be carried out.
L.033

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes when a new housing development law takes effect based on whether or not a referendum petition is filed against it.

  • Changes the effective date of the bill to be contingent upon whether a referendum petition is filed within ninety days after final adjournment of the general assembly.
  • If a referendum petition is filed, the new housing development law will only take effect if approved by voters in November 2026.
  • The exact date when the bill takes effect depends on whether or not a referendum petition is filed and its outcome, which are unknown variables.
  • Details about how the referendum process works and what happens if it fails to pass are not provided in this amendment text.
L.034

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the requirement for residential developments on qualifying properties by adding conditions that the property must not be within an urban renewal area or a special district.

  • Adds new requirements that a qualifying property cannot be located in an urban renewal area or a special district.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if a property meets the original criteria but is later found to be within an urban renewal area or a special district.
L.035

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires a public hearing before a residential development can be approved on a qualifying property after December 31, 2027.

  • Adds a requirement for at least one public hearing to be held by the subject jurisdiction before approving a residential development on a qualifying property.
  • The amendment text does not specify details about how or when this public hearing should take place, leaving some aspects undefined.
L.036

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a requirement that rental units in new residential developments on certain properties must be rented at prices no higher than 80% of the median rent price in the area.

  • Adds an affordability requirement for rental units within new residential developments on qualifying properties.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens if a developer fails to meet this affordability requirement.
L.037

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the definition of a 'qualifying entity' to include more types of organizations that can develop affordable housing on small properties.

  • Adds new definitions for what qualifies as an entity eligible to develop residential property, including school districts, state colleges and universities, transit authorities, and certain nonprofits with a history of providing affordable housing.
  • The amendment text does not specify all the details about how these entities will be allowed to develop properties or what specific requirements they must meet beyond being listed as qualifying entities.
L.038

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds new requirements for local governments to accept certain land dedications and apply subdivision regulations when a residential development is built on a qualifying property.

  • Adds a requirement for local government legislative bodies to accept common law or statutory dedications of interest in land related to residential developments on qualifying properties.
  • Includes the application and enforcement of subdivision regulations by local governments.
  • The amendment text does not specify what qualifies as 'qualifying property' or provide details about the types of common law or statutory dedications that must be accepted.
L.039

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires the Department of Local Affairs to publish guidance by December 31, 2027, to help local governments verify the status of nonprofit organizations that provide affordable housing.

  • Adds a requirement for the Department of Local Affairs to create and publish guidelines before December 31, 2027.
  • The amendment does not specify what kind of guidance will be provided or how it will assist local governments.
  • It is unclear if there are existing processes for verifying nonprofit status that this new requirement would replace or supplement.
L.040

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the phrase 'FOR RESIDENTIAL USE' to 'TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT' in a report related to housing developments.

  • Changes the wording from 'FOR RESIDENTIAL USE' to 'TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT'.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how this change affects the actual implementation of residential development projects.
L.042

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes a part of the bill to remove certain requirements for public hearings and decisions by government bodies when considering residential developments on qualifying properties.

  • Removes specific language that required public hearings, recommendations, or decisions from elected or appointed public bodies for residential developments on qualifying properties.
  • Adds new text stating that a public hearing is not necessary and cannot be elevated to require one.
  • The exact impact of removing these requirements is unclear without further context about current practices in local jurisdictions.
L.043

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds requirements for residential developments built on school district land to comply with local safety and infrastructure standards.

  • Residential developments on qualifying properties located on school district land must now follow all locally adopted life safety codes, including building, fire, wildfire resilience, utility, and stormwater codes.
  • School districts must adhere to all infrastructure standards in local law during the administrative approval process for these developments.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if a development does not comply with these requirements.
L.044

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new requirement that a parcel within a platted subdivision cannot be exempt from the bill's provisions.

  • Adds a new clause (c) to the existing section, stating that a parcel within a platted subdivision is not exempt.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how this change affects other parts of the bill or what specific implications it has for residential developments.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-25 Governor

    Governor Signed

  2. 2026-03-24 Governor

    Sent to the Governor

  3. 2026-03-24 Senate

    Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. 2026-03-24 House

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. 2026-03-13 House

    House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. 2026-03-12 Senate

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. 2026-03-11 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  8. 2026-03-10 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/11/2026 - No Amendments

  9. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/10/2026 - No Amendments

  10. 2026-03-04 Senate

    Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  11. 2026-02-11 Senate

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing

  12. 2026-02-06 House

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  13. 2026-02-05 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  14. 2026-02-03 House

    House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  15. 2026-01-14 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Official Summary Text

The bill requires a subject jurisdiction, on or after December 31, 2027, to allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel, subject to an administrative approval process. A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by:
A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing;
A nonprofit organization that provides public transit;
A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property;
A school district;
A state college or university;
A housing authority; or
A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties.

If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that it meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation.
Each housing unit in a residential development constructed on a qualifying property that meets certain affordable housing criteria is equivalent to 1.1 newly constructed affordable housing units for the purposes of the statewide affordable housing fund.

A subject jurisdiction shall not:
Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development is no more than 3 stories or 45 feet tall;
Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development complies with the height-related standards for the zoning district in which the residential development will be built or any zoning district that is contiguous to the qualifying property on which the residential development will be built;
Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property based on the number of dwelling units that the residential development will contain, except in accordance with standards listed in the bill; or
Apply standards to a residential development on a qualifying property that are more restrictive than the standards the subject jurisdiction applies to similar housing constructed within the subject jurisdiction, including standards related to structure setbacks from property lines; lot coverage or open space; on-site parking requirements; numbers of bedrooms in a multifamily residential development; on-site landscaping, screening, and buffering requirements; or minimum dwelling units per acre.

Provided that the uses are allowed conditionally or by right within the zoning district in which a qualifying property is located, a subject jurisdiction shall allow the following uses in a residential development on a qualifying property:
Child care; and
The provision of recreational, social, or educational services provided by community organizations for use by the residents of the residential development and the surrounding community.

The bill requires the owner of a qualifying property to notify the county assessor that a subject jurisdiction has allowed the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property within the county.
(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)
(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HOUSE BILL 26-1001
BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Boesenecker and Mabrey, Bacon, Camacho,
English, Froelich, Garcia, Goldstein, Jackson, Lindsay, Nguyen, Phillips,
Rutinel, Sirota, Stewart R., Story, Woodrow, Zokaie, Carter, Joseph,
McCormick, Paschal, Rydin, Smith;
also SENATOR(S) Exum and Gonzales J., Amabile, Ball, Benavidez,
Cutter, Danielson, Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Lindstedt, Marchman, Snyder,
Weissman, Coleman.
CONCERNING THE PROMOTION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON
QUALIFYING PROPERTIES.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. Short title. The short title of this act is the "Housing
Opportunities Made Easier (HOME) Act".
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 29-35-103, amend
(2)(a)(I); and add (2.5) as follows:
29-35-103. Definitions.
(2) (a) "Administrative approval process" means a process in which:
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
the act.
(I) A development proposal APPLICATION for a specified project is
approved, approved with conditions, or denied by local government
administrative staff based solely on its compliance with objective standards
set forth in local laws; and -
(2.5) "AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA" MEANS AN AREA NEARBY AN
AIRPORT THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT HAS DESIGNATED AS UNSUITABLE FOR
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE:
(a) DEVELOPMENT COULD IMPACT AIRPORT OPERATIONS; OR
(b) AIRPORT NOISE OR SAFETY HAZARDS COULD AFFECT THE AREA.
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 5 to article 35
of title 29 as follows:
PARTS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
QUALIFYING PROPERTIES
29-35-501. Legislative declaration.
( 1) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT:
(a) COLORADANSAREOVERWHELMINGLYBURDENEDWITHTHECOST
OF HOUSING. THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT SPEND MORE THAN THIRTY
PERCENT OF THEIR TOTAL INCOME ON RENT OR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS IN
COLORADO INCREASED FROM SIX HUNDRED SIXTY-EIGHT THOUSAND ONE
HUNDRED IN 2014 TO EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED IN
2024, REPRESENTING THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS.
(b) A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE INCREASE IN COST-BURDENED
HOUSEHOLDS IS THAT POPULATION GROWTH HAS OUTPACED NEW HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT, RESULTING IN SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND ESCALATING
COSTS. BETWEEN 2000 AND 2023, RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES AND
RENTAL RA TES INCREASED AT RA TES EXCEEDING INCOME GROWTH, THEREBY
EXERTING CONSIDERABLE FINANCIAL STRAIN ON MANY RESIDENTS. A 2025
RESEARCH BRIEF PUBLISHED BY THE COLORADO STATE DEMOGRAPHY OFFICE
TITLED "COLORADO'S HOUSING SHORTFALL: AN ESTIMATE AND REVIEW OF
EXISTING STUDIES" ESTIMATED THAT, AS OF 2023, AN ADDITIONAL ONE
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
HUNDRED SIX THOUSAND HOUSING UNITS WERE NEEDED TO OVERCOME THE
HOUSING SHORTFALL, AND THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND ONE-HUNDRED UNITS
NEEDED TO BE BUILT ANNUALLY TO MAINTAIN THE HOUSING SHORTAGE AT
ITS 2023 LEVEL.
( c) AS COLORADO GROWS, SO DOES THE CHALLENGE OF PROVIDING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO RESIDENTS. WHILE LAND THAT IS AVAILABLE FOR
NEW HOUSING IN ESTABLISHED COMMUNITIES IS IN SHORT SUPPLY, MANY
QUALIFYING ORGANIZATIONS OWN UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTIES WHERE
HOUSING COULD BE BUILT.
( d) COLORADO URGENTLY NEEDS MORE HOUSING TO MEET THE
NEEDS OF A GROWING STATEWIDE POPULATION AND ADDRESS ISSUES
DIRECTLY RELATED TO HOUSING, SUCH AS TRANSIT, COMMUTING, THE
WORKFORCE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT. PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES TO
CONSTRUCT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON UNDERUTILIZED LAND IS A
MATTER OF MIXED STATEWIDE AND LOCAL CONCERN.
( e) LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS OFTEN PREVENT HOUSING FROM
BEING DEVELOPED ON VACANT PROPERTIES BY PROHIBITING RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT ON QUALIFYING PROPERTIES OR BY REQUIRING EXTENSIVE
REZONING PROCESSES THAT ADD COST AND UNCERTAINTY TO AFFORDABLE
HOUSING PROJECTS.
( t) THIS HOUSE BILL 26-1001, ENACTED IN 2026, STREAMLINES THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY PROVIDING A PROCESS THAT
ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON QUALIFYING
PROPERTIES AS LONG AS CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED.
(g) ACCORDING TO A 2022 ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF
THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION TITLED "DOES DISCRETION DELAY
DEVELOPMENT?", RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS THAT WENT THROUGH
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESSES WERE APPROVED TWENTY-EIGHT
PERCENT FASTER THAN RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS THAT WENT THROUGH
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL PROCESSES, AND FASTER APPROVAL TIMES
REDUCE DEVELOPER COSTS AND THEREFORE HOUSING COSTS. STUDIES HA VE
SHOWN THAT HOMEBUILDERS, INCLUDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
DEVELOPERS, WILL AVOID PARCELS THAT NEED TO GO THROUGH A
DISCRETIONARY PROCESS.
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
(h) A 2022 RESEARCH PAPER PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK OF BOSTON TITLED "How TO INCREASE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY:
UNDERSTANDING LOCAL DETERRENTS TO BUILDING MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING" FOUND THAT RELAXING DENSITY RESTRICTIONS, EITHER ALONE
OR IN COMBINATION WITH RELAXING MAXIMUM HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS, IS
THE MOST EFFECTIVE POLICY REFORM FOR INCREASING THE HOUSING SUPPLY
AND REDUCING MULTIFAMILY RENTS AND SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PRICES. THIS
PAPER ALSO FOUND THAT EVEN IF MULTIFAMILY ZONING IS ALLOWED,
MUNICIPALITIES OFTEN LIMIT THE SIZE OR SHAPE OF BUILDINGS WITH HEIGHT
RESTRICTIONS.
(i) RESEARCH EXAMINING THREE DECADES OF REZONING DECISIONS
IN HENRICO COUNTY, VIRGINIA DEMONSTRATED THAT PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION IN RESIDENTIAL REZONING PROCESSES IS OVERWHELMINGLY
OPPOSITIONAL, WITH MORE THAN EIGHTY-FIVE PERCENT OF COMMENTERS
RAISING CONCERNS ABOUT PERCEIVED NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF NEW
DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO DENSITY, SITE DESIGN, AND PARKING. As A
RESULT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FREQUENTLY IMPOSE CONDITIONS THAT GO
BEYOND BASELINE ZONING ST AND ARDS TO REDUCE DENSITY. PROHIBITING
THE APPLICATION OF THESE MORE RESTRICTIVE ST AND ARDS TO RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS ENSURES DEVELOPMENT ST AND ARDS ARE APPLIED
CONSISTENTLY AND OBJECTIVELY, RATHER THAN BEING APPLIED AD HOC IN
DISCRETIONARY PROCESSES DRIVEN BY OPPOSITION.
(j) HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF COLORADANS HA VE ONE OR MORE
DISABILITIES AND THIS NUMBER CONTINUES TO INCREASE AS THE
POPULATION AGES. ENSURING FAIR AND ACCESSIBLE HOUSING BENEFITS
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES AND PROVIDES SAFER WORKING CONDITIONS
FOR HOME HEALTH-CARE WORKERS. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS
THAT PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY PROTECTIONS SUCH AS THE FEDERAL "FAIR
HOUSING ACT", 42 U.S.C. SEC. 3601 ET SEQ., THE FEDERAL "AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990", 42 U.S.C. SEC. 12101 ET SEQ., AND THE
"COLORADO ANTI-DISCRIMINATION ACT", PARTS 3 THROUGH 8 OF ARTICLE
34 OF TITLE 24, ARE IMPERATIVE TO INCREASING ACCESSIBLE HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES.
(2) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FURTHER FINDS AND DECLARES THAT:
(a) COMMUNITY OPPOSITION AND RESTRICTIVE LOCAL LAND USE
POLICIES LIMIT THE HOUSING SUPPLY, IMPACT HOUSING OPTIONS FOR
PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
COLORADANS OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOMES, AND RESTRICT THE
AVAILABILITY OF WORKFORCE HOUSING, THEREBY AFFECTING EMPLOYMENT
GROWTH.
(b) WHEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS RESTRICT HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTIONS, THEY IMPACT NEIGHBORING LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS. AN INCREASE IN JOB GROWTH IN ONE COMMUNITY WITHOUT
A CORRESPONDING GROWTH IN HOUSING LEADS TO A HOUSING SHORTFALL
IN THE COMMUNITY. RESEARCH HAS SHOWN THAT REGIONAL IMBALANCES
BETWEEN JOBS AND HOUSING HA VE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELED AND COMMUTE TIMES ACROSS JURISDICTIONS, ACCORDING TO
STUDIES SUCH AS "WHICH REDUCES VEHICLE TRAVEL MORE:
JOBS-HOUSINGBALANCEORRETAIL-HOUSINGMIXING?",PUBLISHEDINTHE
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION. WHEN PEOPLE ARE
UNABLE TO LIVE NEAR WHERE THEY WORK, WORKERS' ONLY OPTION IS TO
SPEND MORE HOURS ON THE ROAD COMMUTING. LONGER COMMUTES
INCREASE VEHICLE TRAFFIC, PUT ADDITIONAL STRAIN ON COLORADO'S
ROADS, AND INCREASE POLLUTION.
( C) THE AVAILABILITY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS A MA TIER OF
MIXED STATEWIDE AND LOCAL CONCERN.
(d) COLORADO HAS A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST IN MANAGING
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT GROWTH AND ENSURING A STABLE QUALITY
AND QUANTITY OF HOUSING FOR COLORADANS, AS THIS IS AMONG THE MOST
PRESSING PROBLEMS CURRENTLY FACING COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT
COLORADO.
(3) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FURTHER FINDS AND DECLARES THAT
THIS HOUSE BILL 26-1001, ENACTED IN 2026, IS INTENDED TO:
(a) STREAMLINE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES TO REDUCE
HOUSING CONSTRUCTION COSTS WHILE ENSURING SUBJECT JURISDICTIONS
ARE ABLE TO APPLY ALL RELEVANT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY CODES
THAT TYPICALLY APPLY TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;
(b) ALLOW FLEXIBILITY FOR SUBJECT JURISDICTIONS TO DETERMINE
APPROPRIATE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS BY
USING ST AND ARDS THAT APPLY TO SIMILAR HOUSING PURSUANT TO SECTION
29-35-504 (l)(d). FOR EXAMPLE, IF A SUBJECT JURISDICTION RECEIVES A
PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TO BUILD SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, THE
SUBJECT JURISDICTION MAY APPLY SITE DESIGN STANDARDS THAT ARE
CONSISTENT WITH A ZONE DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLINGS BY-RIGHT. IF A SUBJECT JURISDICTION RECEIVES A
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MULTI-UNIT DWELLINGS, THE SUBJECT
JURISDICTION MAY APPLY SITE DESIGN ST AND ARDS THAT ARE CONSISTENT
WITH A ZONE DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS MULTI-UNIT DWELLINGS BY-RIGHT;
AND
(c) BUILD UPON RECENT LAWS THAT AUTHORIZE AND ENCOURAGE
SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO PROMOTE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING, SUCH AS:
(I) HOUSE BILL 21-1117, CONCERNING THE ABILITY OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNITS PURSUANT TO THEIR EXISTING AUTHORITY TO REGULATE
LAND USE WITHIN THEIR TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES;
(11) SENATE BILL 24-174, CONCERNING STATE SUPPORT FOR
SUSTAINABLE AFFORDABLE HOUSING; AND
(Ill) HOUSE BILL 25-1006, CONCERNING ALLOWING A SCHOOL
DISTRICT TO LEASE DISTRICT PROPERTY FOR ANY TERM OF YEARS, WHICH
ALLOWS A BOARD OF EDUCATION OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT TO LEASE LAND FOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ANY TERM OF YEARS IF THE BOARD OF
EDUCATION DEVELOPS A POLICY THAT DEFINES AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR
THE PROJECT.
( 4) THEREFORE, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND
DECLARES THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICIES THAT LIMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A DIVERSE RANGE OF HOUSING IN AREAS SERVED BY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND THAT EFFECTIVELY CREATE HOUSING SUPPLY
SHORTFALLS AND UNSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS, REQUIRE A
ST A TEWIDE SOLUTION.
29-35-502. Definitions.
AS USED IN THIS PART 5, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(1) "DWELLING UNIT" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION
PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
29-35-402 (8).
(2) "EXEMPT PARCEL" MEANS:
(a) A PARCEL THAT IS:
(I) NOT SERVED BY A DOMESTIC WATER AND SEWAGE TREATMENT
SYSTEM, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-65.1-104 (5);
(II) SERVED BY A WELL THAT IS NOT CONNECTED TO A WATER
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25-9-102 (6); OR
(III) SERVED BY A SEPTIC TANK, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25-10-103
(18);
(b) A PARCEL WHERE RESIDENTIAL USE IS PREVENTED OR LIMITED BY
STATE REGULATION, FEDERAL REGULATION, OR DEED RESTRICTION
PURSUANT TO:
(I) FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION RESTRICTIONS PURSUANT
TO 14 CFR 77 OR49 U.S.C. CHAPTER471;
(II) AN ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
25-15-318 TO 25-15-323; OR
(III) FLAMMABLE GAS OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT RESTRICTIONS;
(c) A PARCEL THAT IS SUBJECT TO A CONSERVATION EASEMENT;
(d) A PARCEL THAT IS ZONED OR USED PRIMARILY FOR INDUSTRIAL
USE, WHICH, FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION MEANS A BUSINESS USE OR
ACTIVITY AT A SCALE GREATER THAN HOME INDUSTRY INVOLVING
MANUFACTURING, FABRICATION, MINERAL OR GRAVEL EXTRACTION,
ASSEMBLY, WAREHOUSING, OR STORAGE;
(e) A PARCEL THAT IS SUBJECT TO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT OR ANNEXATION AGREEMENT THAT LIMITS RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT;
(f) A PARCEL THAT IS ZONED FOR AGRICULTURAL USE;
PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
(g) A PARCEL THAT IS ZONED FOR FORESTRY, NATURAL RESOURCE
PRESERVATION, OR OPEN SPACE;
(h) A PARCEL THAT IS IN A FLOOD WAY OR IN A ONE- HUNDRED-YEAR
FLOODPLAIN, AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY;
(i) A PARCEL THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AIRPORT INFLUENCE
AREA; OR
G) A HISTORIC PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF A HISTORIC
DISTRICT.
(3) "HISTORIC DISTRICT" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION
29-35-402 (10).
( 4) "HISTORIC PROPERTY" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION
29-35-402 (11).
(5) "NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION" MEANS AN ORGANIZATION
AUTHORIZEDTODOBUSINESSINTHESTATETHATISEXEMPTFROMTAXATION
PURSUANTTOSECTION 501 (a) OF THE FEDERAL "INTERNALREVENUECODE
OF 1986", 26 U.S.C. SEC. 501, AS AMENDED, AND LISTED AS AN EXEMPT
ORGANIZATION IN SECTION 501 ( c )(3) OF THE FEDERAL "INTERNAL REVENUE
CODE OF 1986", 26 U.S.C. SEC. 501, AS AMENDED.
(6) "NONPROFITORGANIZATIONWITHADEMONSTRATEDHISTORYOF
PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING" MEANS A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION
THAT, WITHIN THE FIVE YEARS PRECEDING THE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION'S
SUBMISSION OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, HAS:
(a) DEVELOPED A PROJECT WHICH HAS RECEIVED A FEDERAL
LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT OR A STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
CREDIT;
(b) BEEN A WARDED FUNDING THROUGH THE FEDERAL "HOME
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM", 24 CFR 92.1, ET SEQ.;
(c) BEEN AWARDED FUNDING TO SUPPORT THE CREATION,
PRESERVATION, OR REHABILITATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FROM THE
PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS; THE COLORADO HOUSING AND
FINANCE AUTHORITY; THE COLORADO OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE; OR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT;
(d) OWNED PROPERTY THAT IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TAXATION
• PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-3-113.5;
( e) BEEN CERTIFIED AS A COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
ORGANIZATION PURSUANT TO 24 CFR 92.2 AND, TOGETHER WITH THE
COLORADO DIVISION OF HOUSING OR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT, IS A PARTY TO
A COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION OPERA TING
AGREEMENT;
( f) BEEN APPROVED BY THE COLORADO DIVISION OF HOUSING AS AN
"APPROVED NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION" PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-22-548
AND ENGAGED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OR OPERATIONAL SERVICE OF
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-22-548 (2)(h); OR
(g) OWNED PROPERTY FOR WHICH THE ORGANIZATION RECEIVED A
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR LONG-TERM AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND
CAN PRODUCE THAT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, A RESTRICTED USE
COVENANT, OR A SIMILAR RECORDED AGREEMENT THAT ENSURES
AFFORDABILITY.
(7) "QUALIFYING ENTITY" MEANS A:
(a) SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-30-103;
(b) STATE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION
23-2-102;
(c) BOARD OF COOPERATIVE SERVICES, AS DEFINED IN SECTION
22-5-103;
( d) HOUSING AUTHORITY CREATED PURSUANT TO SECTION
29-1-204.5, 29-4-204, 29-4-402, OR 29-4-503;
( e) LOCAL OR REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT OR A REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SERVING ONE OR MORE COUNTIES;
PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
(f) NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WITH A DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF
PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING; OR
(g) NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT HAS ENTERED INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH ANOTHER NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WITH A
DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, PROVIDED
THAT THE AGREEMENT REQUIRES THE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WITH A
DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, OR ITS
SUCCESSOR ORGANIZATION, TO DEVELOP A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
THE PROPERTY.
(8) "QUALIFYING PROPERTY" MEANS REAL PROPERTY THAT
CONTAINS NO MORE THAN FIVE ACRES OF LAND AND IS:
(a) OWNED BY A QUALIFYING ENTITY;
(b) NOT ADJACENT TO ANOTHER QUALIFYING PROPERTY CONTAINING
FIVE OR LESS ACRES THAT WAS PART OF A SUBDIVISION PROCESS THAT
OCCURRED WITHIN THE PAST FIVE YEARS; AND
(c) WITHIN:
(I) A MUNICIPALITY; OR
(II) A PORTION OF A COUNTY THAT IS WITHIN A CENSUS DESIGNATED
PLACE WITH A POPULATION OF FIVE THOUSAND OR MORE, AS REPORTED IN
THE MOST RECENT DECENNIAL CENSUS, THAT IS ALSO WITHIN A THREE-MILE
AREA EXTENDING IN ANY DIRECTION FROM ANY POINT IN A MUNICIPALITY,
AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 31-12-105 ( 1 )( e )(I).
(9) "RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT" MEANS A DEVELOPMENT:
(a) WITH ONE OR MORE STRUCTURES THAT CONTAIN PERMANENT
DWELLING UNITS;
(b) THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY TEMPORARY HOUSING OR SHELTER
SPACE; AND
(c) THAT HAS A PRIMARY PURPOSE OF RESIDENTIAL USE.
PAGE IO-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
(10) "SIMILAR HOUSING" MEANS HOUSING THAT IS SIMILAR IN FORM
AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS.
(11) "SUBJECT JURISDICTION" MEANS A LOCAL GOVERNMENT THAT
HAD A POPULATION GREATER THAN TWO THOUSAND PEOPLE AS OF THE LAST
UNITED STATES CENSUS.
(12) "TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM" MEANS AN
ENACTED LOCAL LAND USE PROGRAM THAT AUTHORIZES THE TRANSFER OR
SALE OF REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AS PART OF A LAND USE
PLANNING STRATEGY THAT AIMS TO ACHIEVE CONSERVATION, GROWTH
MANAGEMENT, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, OR OTHER POLICY OBJECTIVES.
29-35-503. Residential developments on qualifying properties.
(1) Residential developments on qualifying properties. EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (5) OF THIS SECTION, ON OR AFTER DECEMBER
31, 2027, SUBJECT TO AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PART 5, A SUBJECT JURISDICTION SHALL ALLOW A
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON A QUALIFYING
PROPERTY IF THE QUALIFYING PROPERTY DOES NOT CONTAIN AN EXEMPT
PARCEL; EXCEPT THAT, IFON DECEMBER 31, 2027, A SUBJECT JURISDICTION
IS ACTIVELY IN THE PROCESS OF UPDATING THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION'S
ZONING OR DEVELOPMENT CODE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THISPART5,THESUBJECTJURISDICTIONSHALLCOMPLETETHEUPDATESAND
SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PART 5 BY JUNE 31, 2028.
(2) Verification of nonprofit status. A SUBJECT JURISDICTION MAY
REQUEST, AS PART OF AN INITIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, THAT A
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WITH A DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF PROVIDING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT IT MEETS ANY ONE
OF THE CRITERIA LISTED IN SECTION 29-35-502 (6). THE NONPROFIT
ORGANIZATION SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTATION BUT IS
NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF MORE THAN ONE OF THE
CRITERIA LISTED IN SECTION 29-3 5-502 ( 6) TO BE VERIFIED BY THE SUBJECT
JURISDICTION.
(3) Subject jurisdiction administrative practices. NOTHING IN
THIS SECTION PREVENTS A SUBJECT JURISDICTION FROM:
PAGE 11-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
(a) APPLYING AND ENFORCING INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS IN
LOCAL LAW DURING THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS, INCLUDING
STANDARDS RELATED TO UTILITIES, TRANSPORTATION, OR PUBLIC WORKS
CODES;
(b) APPL YING AND ENFORCING A LOCALLY ADOPTED LIFE SAFETY
CODE, INCLUDING A BUILDING, FIRE, WILDFIRE RESILIENCY, UTILITY, OR
STORMWATER CODE;
( C) APPL YING AND ENFORCING REGULATIONS RELATED TO HUMAN
AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY, INCLUDING OIL AND GAS
SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS, AND AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREAS;
( d) ADOPTING GENERALLY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEES OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT CHARGES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 29-20-104.5, OR THE MITIGATION OF IMPACTS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 2 OF ARTICLE 20 OF THIS TITLE 29;
(e) REQUIRINGASTATEMENTBY A WATEROR WASTEWATERSERVICE
PROVIDER REGARDING THE PROVIDER'S CAPACITY TO SERVICE THE PROPERTY
AS A CONDITION OF ALLOWING A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;
(t) APPLYING AND ENFORCING INCLUSIONARY ZONING ORDINANCES,
DEED RESTRICTIONS, COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENTS, DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENTS, OR OTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICIES OR STANDARDS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 29-20-104;
(g) APPLYING SITE DESIGN STANDARDS TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON A QUALIFYING PROPERTY WHEN
SUCH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COULD BE DISALLOWED BASED ON THE
STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 29-3 5-504 ( 1 ), OR OTHERWISE OFFERING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES TO DEVELOPERS;
(h) ENACTING OR APPL YING A LOCAL LAW CONCERNING A
SHORT-TERM RENTAL, AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN SECTION 29-35-402 (19),
OF A DWELLING UNIT ON A QUALIFYING PROPERTY;
(i) ENACTINGORAPPLYINGALOCALLAWTHATREQUIRESNOTIFYING
THE PUBLIC REGARDING A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR SOLICITING AND
COLLECTING FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS OF THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION;
PAGE 12-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
G) APPL YING LAWS AND POLICIES TO A QUALIFYING PROPERTY
PURSUANT TO ACCEPTED HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS AND ACCEPTED
HOUSING ACTION PLANS THAT ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RANGE
OF HOUSING TYPES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 37 OF ARTICLE 32 OF TITLE
24;
(k) OFFERING FUNDING, FINANCING INCENTIVES, OR DEVELOPMENT
INCENTIVES THAT MAY REQUIRE APPROVAL IN A PUBLIC HEARING TO A
DEVELOPER OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, IF THE FUNDING OR
INCENTIVES WOULD LEAD TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GR EATER AMOUNT OF
AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS THAN THE AMOUNT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
UNITS THAT WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN THE ABSENCE OF THE FUNDING OR
INCENTIVES AND THE DEVELOPER OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS NOT
REQUIRED TO ACCEPT THE FUNDING OR INCENTIVES;
(1) REQUIRING COMMON LAW OR STATUTORY DEDICATIONS OF
INTEREST IN LAND ASSOCIATED WITH A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A
QUALIFYING PROPERTY TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF A
LOCAL GOVERNMENT;
(m) APPLYING AND ENFORCING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS;
(n) EXERCISING THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION'S RIGHT OF FIRST
REFUSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 29-4-1202; OR
(o) APPLYING THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF A
HISTORIC DISTRICT TO A QUALIFYING PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED IN A
HISTORIC DISTRICT, INCLUDING A STANDARD OR PROCEDURE RELATED TO
DEMOLITION.
( 4) School district administrative practices. NOTHING IN THIS
SECTION PREVENTS A SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM CONSTRUCTING, PURCHASING,
OR REMODELING A TEACHERAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-32-110 (l)(d),
OR FROM USING ANY OF THE PROCESSES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 22-32-124
REGARDING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES.
(5) Transferable development rights program. A SUBJECT
JURISDICTION IS NOT REQUIRED TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
A QUALIFYING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS
SECTION IF THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION IMPLEMENTS A TRANSFERABLE
PAGE 13-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM ON THE QUALIFYING PROPERTY, AND THE
TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM INCLUDES A POLICY FOR
AFFORDABLE RESIDENT HOUSING THAT IS RESTRICTED IN OWNERSHIP AND
OCCUPANCY IN PERPETUITY BY A DEED RESTRICTION, COVENANT, OR A
MECHANISM PROVIDED IN SECTION 29-35-103 (16)(b).
29-35-504. Qualifying property requirements for a subject
jurisdiction -allowable uses.
(1) A SUBJECT JURISDICTION SHALL NOT:
(a) DISALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
A QUALIFYING PROPERTY ON THE BASIS OF HEIGHT IF THE TALLEST
STRUCTURE IN THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS NO MORE THAN THREE
STORIES OR THIRTY-EIGHT FEET TALL, UNLESS:
(I) THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION IS SERVED BY A FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, OR FIRE AUTHORITY WHOSE AERIAL
APPARATUS IS UNABLE TO SERVE A STRUCTURE THAT IS THREE STORIES TALL;
OR
(II) THE QUALIFYING PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT
THAT DOES NOT ALLOW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES THAT ARE THREE STORIES
TALL;
(b) DISALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
A QUALIFYING PROPERTY ON THE BASIS OF HEIGHT IF THE TALLEST
STRUCTURE IN THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH THE HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS:
(I) OF THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH THE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BUILT; OR
(II) THAT APPLY TO ANY PARCEL ZONED TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT THAT IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE QUALIFYING PROPERTY ON
WHICH THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BUILT;
( C) DISALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
A QUALIFYING PROPERTY BASED ON THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS THE
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTAIN, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PAGE 14-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
ONE OF THE STANDARDS LISTED IN SUBSECTION ( 1 )( d) OF THIS SECTION; OR
(d) APPLY SITE DESIGN STANDARDS TO A RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT ON A QUALIFYING PROPERTY THAT ARE MORE RESTRICTIVE
THAN THE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS THA TTHE SUBJECT JURISDICTION APPLIES
TO SIMILAR HOUSING CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE SUBJECT JURISDICTION,
INCLUDING SITE DESIGN STANDARDS RELATED TO:
(I) STRUCTURE SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINES;
(II) LOT COVERAGE OR OPEN SPACE;
(III) ON-SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS;
(IV) NUMBERS OF BEDROOMS IN A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT;
(V) ON-SITE LANDSCAPING, SCREENING, AND BUFFERING
REQUIREMENTS;
(VI) SOLAR ACCESS;
(VII) MINIMUM DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE; OR
(VIII) OTHER OBJECTIVE SETBACK ST AND ARDS THAT APPLY TO
RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS, INCLUDING SETBACKS FROM OIL AND GAS
FACILITIES, OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS, STREAM CORRIDORS, RIPARIAN AREAS,
WETLANDS, AND SENSITIVE WILDLIFE HABITATS.
(2) PROVIDED THAT THE USES ARE ALLOWED CONDITIONALLY OR BY
RIGHT WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH A QUALIFYING PROPERTY IS
LOCATED, A SUBJECT JURISDICTION SHALL ALLOW THE FOLLOWING USES IN
A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A QUALIFYING PROPERTY:
(a) CHILD CARE; AND
(b) THE PROVISION OF RECREATIONAL, SOCIAL, OR EDUCATIONAL
SERVICES PROVIDED BY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR USE BY THE
RESIDENTS OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE SURROUNDING
COMMUNITY.
PAGE 15-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
29-35-505. Authority of institutions of higher education
preserved.
NOTHING IN THIS PART 5 IS INTENDED TO ABROGATE OR LIMIT THE
AUTHORITY OF AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO MAKE DECISIONS
REGARDING THE USE OF OR DISPOSITION OF THE INSTITUTION'S PROPERTY, OR
TO CREATE ADDITIONAL BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATIONS FOR AN
INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION BEYOND THOSE ALREADY REQUIRED BY
SECTION 24-30-1303.
29-35-506. Published guidance in verification of nonprofit
status.
ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2027, THE DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL
AFFAIRS SHALL PUBLISH GUIDANCE TO ASSIST SUBJECT JURISDICTIONS IN
VERIFYING THE STATUS OF A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WITH A
DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 29-35-503 (2).
SECTION 4. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,
determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
PAGE 16-HOUSE BILL 26-1001
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for
the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state
institutions.
Juli~
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vanessa Reilly
CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
;;z::~a~ Sr.
PRESIDENT OF
THE SENATE
iuC&tli~
Esther van Mourik
SECRETARY OF
THE SENATE
APPROVED Dir\ W-ed~--i m~n/212.Si"" ?1flb ~ l :~rm
(Date anti Time)
OF COLORADO
PAGE 17-HOUSE BILL 26-1001