Back to Colorado

HB26-1080 • 2026

County Mail Ballot Signature Verification Requirements

Currently, in every mail ballot election coordinated with or conducted by a county clerk and recorder, a single election judge personally conducts the review of each mail ballot for purposes of signat

Elections
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Rep. A. Paschal, Rep. C. Richardson, Sen. M. Baisley
Last action
2026-04-29
Official status
House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/14/2026 - No Amendments
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official text confirms the effective date logic regarding petitions, but does not specify if a petition has been filed yet.

County Mail Ballot Signature Verification Requirements

This bill requires county clerks to use a team of election judges from different political parties instead of one judge to check signatures on mail ballots.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires a team of bipartisan election judges to review mail ballot signatures instead of a single judge.
  • Directs the Secretary of State to create rules for how these teams must work together.
  • Changes the process so that if one judge finds a mismatch, another judge from any party reviews it with them.
  • States that if team members disagree on whether a signature matches, the ballot is treated as valid and counted.
  • Keeps existing rules about not rejecting ballots just because voters use initials or nicknames.

Who It Names or Affects

  • County clerks and recorders who manage mail ballot elections
  • Election judges assigned to verify voter signatures

Terms To Know

Bipartisan election judges
A group of officials from different political parties working together on a task.
Signature verification device
A machine that compares the signature on a ballot envelope to the one stored in voter records.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not take effect until August 12, 2026, unless voters approve it at an election if a petition is filed.
  • Specific details on how teams will be formed depend on rules the Secretary of State has not yet written.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L.001

HOU State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes the wording to require a bipartisan team of election judges, rather than just one judge or any other single person, to review mail ballot signatures.

  • It replaces phrases like 'team of bipartisan' with the clearer phrase 'bipartisan team of'.
  • It requires that if two other election judges agree on a signature issue, it must be decided by a full bipartisan team instead of just one judge.
  • It updates several sections to ensure all references describe a group of judges working together rather than an individual.
  • The amendment text only shows the specific words being changed and does not explain how these teams are formed or what happens if they cannot agree.
  • Some parts of the original bill were cut off in the provided metadata, so the full context before this change is incomplete.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-29 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/14/2026 - No Amendments

  2. 2026-02-26 House

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  3. 2026-02-23 House

    House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  4. 2026-02-02 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

Official Summary Text

Currently, in every mail ballot election coordinated with or conducted by a county clerk and recorder, a single election judge personally conducts the review of each mail ballot for purposes of signature verification, unless the county clerk and recorder allows the election judge to use a signature verification device. The bill requires the county clerk and recorder to use a team of bipartisan election judges, rather than a single election judge, to review mail ballots for purposes of signature verification. The bill requires the secretary of state to adopt rules concerning the procedure for using a team of bipartisan election judges for such signature verification.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Second Regular Session
Seventy-fifth General Assembly
STATE OF COLORADO
INTRODUCED

LLS NO. 26-0323.01 Sam Anderson x4218 HOUSE BILL 26-1080
House Committees Senate Committees
State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
A BILL FOR AN ACT
CONCERNING A REQUIREMENT THAT A COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER101
USE A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES TO VERIFY102
SIGNATURES IN A MAIL BALLOT ELECTION.103
Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
http://leg.colorado.gov.)
Currently, in every mail ballot election coordinated with or
conducted by a county clerk and recorder, a single election judge
personally conducts the review of each mail ballot for purposes of
signature verification, unless the county clerk and recorder allows the
election judge to use a signature verification device. The bill requires the
HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
Richardson and Paschal,
SENATE SPONSORSHIP
(None),
Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.
Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
county clerk and recorder to use a team of bipartis an election judges,
rather than a single election judge, to review mail ballots for purposes of
signature verification. The bill requires the secretary of state to adopt
rules concerning the procedure for using a team of bipartisan election
judges for such signature verification.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 1-7.5-107.3, amend2
(1)(a), (2)(a), (2)(c), (3), (4)(a), (5), and (6) as follows: 3
1-7.5-107.3. Verification of signatures - rules.4
(1) (a) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, in5
every mail ballot election that is coordinated with or conducted by the6
county clerk and recorder, an election judge A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN7
ELECTION JUDGES shall compare the signature on the self-affirmation on8
each return envelope with the signature of the eligible elector stored in9
the statewide voter registration system in accordance with subsections (2),10
(3), and (4) of this section AND ANY RULES ADOPTED BY THE SECRETARY11
OF STATE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6) OF THIS SECTION.12
(2) (a) (I) If, upon comparing the signature of an eligible elector13
on the self-affirmation on the return envelope with the signature of the14
eligible elector stored in the statewide voter registration system, the TEAM15
OF BIPARTISAN election judge JUDGES determines that the signatures do16
not match, or if a signature verification device used pursuant to17
subsection (5) of this section is unable to determine that the signatures18
match, two other election judges of different political party affiliations19
ONE OTHER ELECTION JUDGE OF ANY POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION shall20
simultaneously compare the signatures;21
(II) If, both AFTER COMPLETING THE REVIEW OF SIGNATURES22
PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(a)(I) OF THIS SECTION, THE other election23
HB26-1080-2-
judges agree JUDGE AGREES that the signatures do not match, the county1
clerk and recorder shall, within three days after the signature deficiency2
has been confirmed, but in no event later than two days after election day,3
send to the eligible elector at the address indicated in the registration4
records and to the eligible elector's electronic mail address if available a5
letter explaining the discrepancy in signatures and a form for the eligible6
elector to confirm that the elector returned a ballot to the county clerk and7
recorder. If the county clerk and recorder receives the form within eight8
days after election day confirming that the elector returned a ballot to the9
county clerk and recorder and enclosing a copy of the elector's10
identification as defined in section 1-1-104 (19.5), and if the ballot is11
otherwise valid, the ballot shall be counted. If the eligible elector returns12
the form indicating that the elector did not return a ballot to the county13
clerk and recorder, or if the eligible elector does not return the form14
within eight days after election day, the self-affirmation on the return15
envelope shall be categorized as incorrect, the ballot shall not be counted,16
and the county clerk and recorder shall send copies of the eligible17
elector's signature on the return envelope and the signature stored in the18
statewide voter registration system to the district attorney for19
investigation.20
(c) In the case of a disagreement among the election judges as to21
whether the signature of an eligible elector on the self-affirmation on the22
return envelope matches the signature of the eligible elector stored in the23
statewide voter registration system pursuant to the procedures specified24
in paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) SUBSECTION (2)(a) OF THIS25
SECTION, the signatures are deemed to match, and the election judge26
TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES shall follow the procedures27
HB26-1080-3-
specified in section 1-7.5-107 (6) concerning the qualification and1
counting of mail ballots.2
(3) If the election judge TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES3
determines that the signature of an eligible elector on the self-affirmation4
matches the elector's signature stored in the statewide voter registration5
system, the election judge TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES shall6
follow the procedures specified in section 1-7.5-107 (6) concerning the7
qualification and counting of mail ballots.8
(4) (a) An election judge A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES9
shall not determine that the signature of an eligible elector on the10
self-affirmation does not match the signature of that eligible elector11
stored in the statewide voter registration system solely on the basis of12
substitution of initials or use of a common nickname.13
(5) (a) A county clerk and recorder may allow an election judge14
A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES to use a signature verification15
device to compare the signature on the self-affirmation on a return16
envelope of an eligible elector's ballot with the signature of the elector17
stored in the statewide voter registration system in accordance with this18
subsection (5) and any rules promulgated by the secretary of state19
pursuant to subsection (6) of this section.20
(b) If a signature verification device determines that the signature21
on the self-affirmation on a return envelope of an eligible elector's ballot22
matches the signature of the elector stored in the statewide voter23
registration system, the signature on the self-affirmation is deemed24
verified, and the election judge TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES25
shall follow the procedures specified in section 1-7.5-107 (6) concerning26
the qualification and counting of mail ballots. If a signature verification27
HB26-1080-4-
device is unable to determine that the signature on the self-affirmation on1
a return envelope of an eligible elector's mail ballot matches the signature2
of the elector stored in the statewide voter registration system, an election3
judge A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION JUDGES shall compare the4
signatures in accordance with subsections (2), (3), and (4) of this section.5
(6) The secretary of state shall adopt rules in accordance with6
article 4 of title 24 C.R.S., establishing procedures for using signature7
verification devices AND FOR USING A TEAM OF BIPARTISAN ELECTION8
JUDGES to process ballots used in mail ballot elections pursuant to this9
article ARTICLE 7.5.10
SECTION 2. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act11
takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the12
ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August13
12, 2026, if adjour nment sine die is on May 13, 2026); except that, if a14
referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the15
state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act16
within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect17
unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in18
November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the19
official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.20
HB26-1080-5-