Back to Colorado

HB26-1250 • 2026

Procedures Related to Civil Asset Forfeiture

The act clarifies an existing requirement for the criminal conviction of a property owner by requiring that one or more criminal charges be brought as a prerequisite to any nuisance abatement or forfe

Budget Crime Taxes
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Rep. J. Bacon, Rep. K. DeGraaf, Sen. S. Bright, Sen. K. Wallace, Sen. M. Baisley, Rep. B. Bradley, Rep. M. Brooks, Rep. K. Brown, Rep. R. English, Rep. L. García, Rep. R. Gonzalez, Rep. R. Keltie, Rep. S. Lieder, Rep. M. Lindsay, Rep. S. Luck, Rep. J. Mabrey, Rep. B. Marshall, Rep. K. Nguyen, Rep. N. Ricks, Rep. E. Sirota, Rep. S. Slaugh, Rep. M. Soper, Rep. T. Story, Rep. B. Titone, Rep. Y. Zokaie, Sen. J. Amabile, Sen. A. Benavidez, Sen. J. Bridges, Sen. J. Carson, Sen. J. Coleman, Sen. L. Frizell, Sen. J. Gonzales, Sen. N. Hinrichsen, Sen. I. Jodeh, Sen. C. Kipp, Sen. C. Kolker, Sen. M. Snyder, Sen. M. Weissman, Sen. L. Zamora Wilson
Last action
2026-06-04
Official status
Governor Signed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official text confirms the requirement for criminal charges but notes several exceptions where forfeiture can proceed without a conviction, such as if an owner dies or waives their rights.

HB26-1250: New Rules for Civil Asset Forfeiture and Defense Counsel

This law requires criminal charges to be filed before property can be taken, creates a fund to pay for lawyers in these cases, and changes how forfeited money is shared.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires that one or more criminal charges be brought against an owner as a prerequisite to starting any nuisance abatement or forfeiture proceeding.
  • Clarifies that if the property belongs to someone who did not commit the crime but was involved, the person who actually committed the crime must still be convicted before the property can be taken.
  • Establishes a right for people with low income (indigent defendants) to get legal help in civil asset forfeiture cases and sets up a system where private lawyers are hired by contract to provide this defense.
  • Creates a Forfeiture Defense Counsel Fund capped at $500,000 that will be paid from money collected through property seizures starting in fiscal year 2027-28 instead of using general state tax money.
  • Changes how leftover money from seized property is shared by giving 25% to the new defense counsel fund and keeping 25% for local behavioral health organizations, while law enforcement agencies still receive their share.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Property owners facing civil asset forfeiture or nuisance abatement proceedings
  • People with low income who need legal representation in these cases
  • The state court administrator and private contractors hired to provide defense lawyers
  • Local government bodies, behavioral health organizations, and law enforcement agencies that receive shares of forfeited funds

Terms To Know

Civil Asset Forfeiture
A legal process where the government takes property it claims was used in or gained from a crime.
Nuisance Abatement
Legal action to stop illegal activity on a property, which can lead to taking ownership of that property.
Indigent
A person who does not have enough money to pay for legal services or other costs.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The official text states the effective date is unknown, though the bill was signed by the Governor on June 4, 2026.
  • Starting in fiscal year 2027-28, the defense fund cannot use general state tax money and must rely only on proceeds from forfeited property.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

J.002

HOU Appropriations

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment sets aside specific amounts of money from existing funds to pay for legal defense contracts and a new online system related to civil asset forfeiture.

  • $556,750 is set aside for the judicial department to hire lawyers who defend people in civil asset forfeiture cases.
  • $55,000 is given to the Department of Local Affairs to manage an online portal for handling these types of legal cases.
  • The amendment text only lists funding amounts and does not explain how the new laws or procedures will actually work.
  • It references specific sections of state law that are not included in this document, so full details about those rules cannot be explained here.
L.022

HOU Appropriations

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes how a specific fund for civil asset forfeiture is managed by adding new funding sources and setting rules that stop state money from being used starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year.

  • It directs $55,000 per year to the Department of Local Affairs to help manage grants and an online portal for civil asset forfeiture cases.
  • Starting in the 2027-28 state budget year, the fund can only be filled with gifts, donations, or money from specific legal fees instead of general tax dollars.
  • The General Assembly is no longer allowed to give regular state funds to this account after that date.
  • A private contractor hired for the program does not have to provide free lawyers if there is no money left in the fund.
  • The amendment text refers to specific line numbers and section codes from other reports, so it cannot explain exactly which laws are being changed without seeing those original documents.
  • It does not define what 'indigent' means or how much money the private contractor receives before they stop providing legal defense.
L.023

HOU Appropriations

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes a document label by adding the word 'fiscal' to describe a specific section.

  • Adds the word "FISCAL" after the word "PER" on page 1, line 9 of the bill.
  • The amendment only changes a label or heading and does not explain what specific rules about civil asset forfeiture are being changed.
  • Without seeing the full text around this change, it is unclear how adding "fiscal" affects the actual laws in the bill.
L.014

HOU Finance

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes how a specific fund for civil asset forfeiture is managed by setting a maximum balance limit and directing extra money to another state program.

  • It sets a hard cap of $500,000 on the total amount of money allowed in the new fund.
  • If the fund has more than $500,000, the administrator must send the extra money to the State Treasurer.
  • The State Treasurer will then move that extra money into a different account called the Law Enforcement Community Services Grant Program Fund.
  • This amendment text only describes changes to a committee report and does not include the full original bill, so it is unclear what other rules or definitions were removed from pages 7 and 8 of the bill.
  • The exact purpose of some specific legal references mentioned in the text cannot be explained without seeing the rest of the law.
L.015

HOU Finance

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment removes specific text from pages 2 and 3 of the bill without providing a replacement.

  • Deletes lines 2 through 10 on page 2 of the original bill.
  • The official text only shows that words are being removed but does not include any new language to replace them, so it is unclear what specific rules or requirements remain after this change.
  • Because the deleted content is missing from the provided material, we cannot explain exactly which parts of the civil asset forfeiture process were originally included.
L.016

HOU Finance

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes a committee report by correcting a punctuation error and removing several lines of text.

  • It fixes a typo on page 3, line 8 where the word 'APPOINTMENT.' was repeated with extra periods.
  • It deletes all the text found in lines 9 through 22 on page 3 of the Judiciary Committee Report.
  • The amendment only changes a committee report document, not the actual law or bill itself.
  • Because the removed lines are not included here, it is unclear what specific information was taken out of the report.
L.019

HOU Finance

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes a reference in an official report and removes specific text from page 7 of the bill.

  • It updates a citation on page 1 of the Judiciary Committee Report to point to different sections labeled (3)(a)(VII)(C) and (5).
  • It instructs that lines 3 through 11 on page 7 of the actual bill be deleted.
  • The amendment text only shows instructions for editing a report and deleting lines, but it does not include the original or new wording to explain what specific rules are being changed.
  • Because the content of the removed lines is missing from this document, we cannot describe exactly how civil asset forfeiture procedures will be affected.
L.001

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes which government fund receives a share of seized money by directing it to the Forfeiture Defense Counsel Fund instead of another program.

  • Updates a reference in the law from subsection (B) to subsection (C).
  • Removes old text about how funds are split and replaces it with new instructions.
  • Directs twenty-five percent of seized money to the Forfeiture Defense Counsel Fund, which helps pay for lawyers defending people against asset forfeiture.
  • The amendment removes a specific time limit that said certain rules only applied before July 1, 2026.
  • Because this text is very technical and refers to other laws not included here, the full details of how money was handled in the past cannot be explained.
L.002

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes the bill's language to say that people who cannot afford lawyers have an 'ability to access' legal help instead of a guaranteed 'right,' and it adds a definition for private contractors.

  • Changes phrases like 'right to counsel' or 'right to forfeiture defense counsel' to 'ability to access legal representation.'
  • Adds a new rule defining what the term 'private contractor' means in this bill.
  • Removes several lines of text that listed specific rights and details about how lawyers are provided.
  • The amendment only shows which words to delete or add, so it does not explain exactly why the change from 'right' to 'ability' matters in real court cases.
  • Some parts of the original bill text were removed without showing what they said, making it hard to know all the details that are being taken out.
L.004

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes the law to allow property forfeiture without a criminal conviction only when someone other than the owner committed the crime, while requiring a conviction if the owner is involved.

  • The bill now allows courts to take away property without first convicting an owner of a crime if that person did not commit the offense themselves.
  • Courts must prove by clear evidence that someone else used the property for a crime or gained money from it before taking it from an innocent-looking owner.
  • The official text contains confusing and contradictory phrases, such as 'without ONLY AFTER' and mixed references to both owners and nonowners in the same sentence.
  • Because of these unclear edits, it is difficult to explain exactly how courts should apply this rule without guessing at the intended meaning.
L.005

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment sets a $3,500 limit on payments to court-appointed lawyers for asset forfeiture cases and requires the government to repay legal costs if the defendant wins.

  • Limits payment to appointed defense counsel at $3,500 unless a judge finds good reason to pay more.
  • Allows appointed lawyers to withdraw from a case following professional conduct rules while letting judges appoint new help if needed for justice.
  • Requires the government (plaintiff) to reimburse the state fund when an indigent defendant wins their forfeiture case with court-appointed counsel.
  • Requires the government to pay reasonable attorney fees directly to private lawyers when they represent a winning defendant.
  • The amendment does not define what specific situations count as 'good cause' for paying more than $3,500 or exactly how much money counts as 'reasonable attorney fees' for private counsel.
  • This text only covers changes to pages 10 and 11 of the bill; it is unclear if other parts of the original bill were changed by this amendment.
L.006

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment requires the state to hire a private contractor by September 1, 2026, to provide free legal defense for people who cannot afford lawyers in civil asset forfeiture cases.

  • The administrator must sign an agreement with a private company that regularly helps poor clients or litigants to handle these legal defenses.
  • When someone facing asset forfeiture asks for help, the contractor must assign them a lawyer from their list of qualified attorneys.
  • The contractor will rotate cases among different lawyers as much as possible so no single attorney gets too many cases.
  • Any money left over at the end of the contract period must be returned to the state fund.
  • The text does not explain how 'indigent' (poor) is defined or what income level qualifies a person for this free legal help.
  • It is unclear exactly which specific government administrator has the power to sign these contracts and manage the fund.
L.007

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment changes how money is described for funding legal defense in civil asset forfeiture cases, updates the rules for hiring lawyers to defend those cases, and removes language about making a specific appropriation of funds.

  • Changes the description of available funds from 'one million dollars' to any unspent or unused money already in the account.
  • Updates the rule so the State Court Administrator can hire legal counsel specifically for defending civil asset forfeiture cases instead of using broader language.
  • Removes text that authorized a specific appropriation (setting aside) of new money, leaving only the reference to property.
  • The amendment does not explain how much unspent money is currently available or if it will be enough for all cases.
  • It does not specify which types of civil asset forfeiture cases qualify for this legal defense funding.
L.010

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment removes several specific pages and line numbers from the original bill text.

  • Deletes lines 15 through 25 on page 7 of the printed bill.
  • Removes lines 11 through 22 on page 11.
  • Strikes out lines 20 through 27 on page 14.
  • Eliminates all content from pages 15 through 18 and deletes lines 1 through 14 on page 19.
  • The amendment text only lists the locations of deleted words but does not include the actual language being removed, so it is unclear what specific rules or requirements are changing.
  • Without seeing the original bill's content at those exact lines, we cannot explain in plain English exactly how civil asset forfeiture procedures will be affected.
L.012

HOU Judiciary

Lost

Plain English: This amendment would stop property owners who know about or help with specific serious crimes from fighting to keep their assets in civil forfeiture cases.

  • It adds a new rule that blocks people involved in terrorism, human trafficking, illegal drug sales, or fraud from claiming ownership of seized property.
  • Property owners lose the legal right to defend themselves if they knew about these crimes and the asset is connected to them.
  • The amendment was not passed because its status is listed as 'Lost' in committee.
  • It does not explain exactly how officials will prove a person had knowledge of or helped with the crime before blocking their case.
L.024

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: This amendment changes the law to say that a court order stopping asset seizure cannot continue if certain conditions are met.

  • The bill now states that 'a stay shall not be maintained' instead of saying it must or has to be kept in place.
  • The amendment text only shows the specific words being changed and does not explain what a 'stay' is, who decides when one should stop, or which situations this rule applies to.
  • Without more context from the full bill, it is unclear exactly how this change affects property owners or law enforcement.
L.025

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: This amendment changes the bill's effective date to December 1 and requires private contractors to submit quarterly reports to an administrator.

  • The start date for the new rules is changed from September 1 to December 1.
  • Private contractors must now report their activities every three months (quarterly) instead of following previous reporting instructions.
  • The amendment text does not explain what specific information must be included in the quarterly reports, only that they are required.
  • It is unclear who exactly holds the title of 'Administrator' or which agency oversees these contractors based on this short excerpt.
L.029

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: This amendment would change the official short name of the bill to 'Restoring Funds to the Taxpaying Widgets of Colorado Act'.

  • It adds a new section that sets the short title for the act.
  • The new title refers to returning funds to tax-paying widgets in Colorado.
  • This amendment was lost and did not become part of the final bill.
  • The text does not explain what 'widgets' means or how funds would be returned, so those details are unknown.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-04 Governor

    Governor Signed

  2. 2026-06-03 Governor

    Sent to the Governor

  3. 2026-06-03 Senate

    Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. 2026-06-03 House

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. 2026-05-13 Senate

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. 2026-05-12 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. 2026-05-12 Senate

    Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. 2026-05-12 Senate

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Appropriations

  9. 2026-05-12 House

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. 2026-05-11 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  11. 2026-05-08 House

    House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  12. 2026-05-04 House

    House Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations

  13. 2026-04-21 House

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Finance

  14. 2026-02-18 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

Official Summary Text

The act clarifies an existing requirement for the criminal conviction of a property owner by requiring that one or more criminal charges be brought as a prerequisite to any nuisance abatement or forfeiture proceeding.
Existing law provides an exception to the conviction requirement for noninnocent owners who are not subject to criminal charges that no criminal conviction is necessary of the nonowner criminal defendant if the plaintiff proves its case by clear and convincing evidence that the property subject to the forfeiture proceeding is traceable proceeds of the charged offense or related criminal activity. The act clarifies this exception to first require a conviction of the nonowner criminal defendant before the noninnocent owner's property may be forfeited, while retaining other various exceptions that allow forfeiture actions to proceed against the interest of a claimant.
The act establishes a right for indigent civil asset forfeiture defendants to access forfeiture defense counsel and creates a procedure for the appointment of forfeiture defense counsel in nuisance abatement and forfeiture proceedings. The state court administrator shall enter into a contract for services with a private contractor who regularly provides legal services for indigent clients or litigants to provide a legal defense to a civil asset forfeiture proceeding. The private contractor is subject to certain reporting requirements.
The act creates a forfeiture defense counsel fund (fund) to pay for contracted forfeiture defense counsel who are authorized to represent persons against whom a nuisance abatement or forfeiture proceeding has been filed in connection with criminal charges. The fund is capped at $500,000, and starting in state fiscal year 2027-28, no general fund money is allowed to finance the fund. The balance of the fund over $500,000 is credited to the law enforcement community services grant program fund. The act transfers any unexpended and unencumbered money from the law enforcement community services grant program fund to the forfeiture counsel defense fund.
The act alters the disposition of property and proceeds ordered forfeited in a nuisance abatement or forfeiture action. Currently, forfeited property and proceeds are applied first toward restitution and cost recovery for a list of stakeholders, and of the remainder, 50% is granted to the local governmental body with authority over the seizing agency, 25% is granted to the local behavioral health administrative services organization, and 25% is granted to the law enforcement community services grant program fund. The act amends the disposition of the remainder so that 50% is granted to the local governmental body with authority over the seizing agency, 25% is granted to the fund, and 25% is granted to the local behavioral health administrative services organization.
The act appropriates $556,750 to the judicial department from the fund for civil asset forfeiture defense contracting and $55,000 to the department of local affairs from the fund for civil asset forfeiture portal administration.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HOUSE BILL 26-1250
BYREPRESENTATIVE(S)DeGraafandBacon,Bradley,Brooks,Brown,
English, Garcia, Gonzalez R., Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Luck, Mabrey,
Marshall, Nguyen, Ricks, Sirota, Slaugh, Soper, Story, Titone, Zokaie;
also SENATOR(S) Bright and Wallace, Baisley, Amabile, Benavidez,
Bridges, Carson, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker,
Snyder, Weissman, Zamora Wilson, Coleman.
CONCERNING PROCEDURES RELATING TO STATE ACTION RES UL TING IN THE
RELINQUISHMENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND, IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH, MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-13-307, amend
(1.5), ( 1.6), ( 1. 7) introductory portion, (1. 7)(a)(II), ( 1. 7)(b ), ( 1.7)( c ),
(1.7)(d), (1.7)(e), (l.7)(t), and (5) as follows:
16-13-307. Jurisdiction -venue - parties -process.
(1.5) No A COURT SHALL NOT ENTER judgment of forfeiture of
property in any forfeiture proceeding shall be entered unless and until an
owner of the property is convicted of an offense listed in section 16-13-301
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
the act.
or 16-13-303, or a lesser included offense of an eligible offense if the
conviction is the result of a negotiated guilty plea. Nothing in this section
shall be constmed to require REQUIRES the conviction to be obtained in the
same jurisdiction as the jurisdiction in which the forfeiture action is
brought. In the event ONE OR MORE criminal charges MUST BE FILED arising
from the same activity giving rise to the forfeiture, proceedings are filed
against any individual el aiming an inter est in the property subject to the
forfeiture proceeding, the trial and discovery phases of the for feitm e
proceeding shall be stayed by the court AND THE COURT SHALL STAY THE
FORFEITURE PROCEEDING until the disposition of the criminal charges. A
stay shall not be maintained during an appeal or post-conviction proceeding
challenging a criminal conviction. Nothing in this section shall be constrned
to prohibit or prevent PROHIBITS OR PREVENTS the parties from
contemporaneously resolving criminal charges and a forfeiture proceeding
arising from the same activity.
(1.6) Upon acquittal or dismissal of a criminal action against a
person named in a forfeiture action related to the criminal action; unless the
forfeitme action was brought pmsuant to one or more of paragraphs (a) to
(f) ofsubsection ( 1. 7) EXCEPT THAT, IF A PROVISION OF SUBSECTION ( 1. 7) of
this section APPLIES, the forfeiture claim shall be dismissed and the seized
property shall be returned as respects the subject matter property or interest
therein of that person, if the case has been adjudicated as to all other claims,
interests, and owners, unless possession of the property is illegal. If the
forfeiture action is dismissed or judgment is entered in favor of the
claimant, the claimant shall not be IS NOT subject to any monetary charges
by the state for storage of the property or expenses incurred in the
preservation of the property, unless at the time of dismissal the plaintiff
shows that those expenses would have been incurred to prevent waste of the
property even if it had not been seized.
(1.7) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1.5) of this
section:
(a) (II) If a person lacks standing pursuant to this paragraph (a)
SUBSECTION (1.7)(a), the forfeiture action may proceed AGAINST THE
PERSON'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY' and a judgment of forfeiture may be
entered without a THE PERSON'S criminal conviction, of an owner, upon
motion and notice as provided in the rules of civil procedure.
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
(b) If, following THE DISPOSITION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE AND notice
to all persons known to have an interest, or who have asserted an interest in
the property subject to forfeiture, an NO owner fails to file FILES an answer
or other appropriate pleading with the court claiming an interest in the
subject matter property, or no person establishes standing to contest the
forfeiture action pursuant to section 16-13-303 (5), a forfeiture action may
proceed and a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without a criminal
conviction of an owner.
(c) If the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that the
property was instrumental in the commission of an offense listed in section
16-13-303 (1) or that the property is traceable proceeds of the offense or
related criminal activity by a non owner and the plaintiff proves by clear and
convincing evidence that an owner is not an innocent owner pursuant to
section 16-13-303 (5.2)(a), a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without
ONL y AFTER a criminal conviction of an owner THE NONOWNER IN THE
UNDERLYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE RELATED TO THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO
THE FORFEITURE PROCEEDING.
( d) If an owner of the property who was involved in the public
nuisance act or conduct giving rise to the claim of forfeiture subsequently
dies, THE FORFEITURE ACTION MA y PROCEED AGAINST THE OWNER'S
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, and IF THE PLAINTIFF PROVES THAT THE
DECEASED OWNER was not an innocent owner pursuant to section 16-13-303
(5.2)(a), a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without a THE OWNER'S
criminal conviction. of an owner.
( e) If an owner received a deferred judgment, deferred sentence, or
participated in a diversion program, or in the case of a juvenile a deferred
adjudication or deferred sentence or participated in a diversion program for
the offense, THE FORFEITURE ACTION MA y PROCEED AGAINST THE OWNER'S
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, AND a judgment of forfeiture may be entered
without a criminal conviction.
(f) A defendant or claimant shall be IS permitted to waive the
requirement of a criminal conviction in order to settle a forfeiture action AS
TO THE DEFENDANT'S OR CLAIMANT'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY.
(5) An action to abate a public nuisance, other than a class 4 public
nuisance, and any action in which a temporary restraining order, temporary
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
writ of injunction, or preliminary injunction is requested, shall MUST be
commenced by the filing of a complaint, which shalt MUST be verified or
supported by affidavit. A summons shall MUST be issued and served as in
civil cases; except that a copy of the complaint, and copies of any orders
issued by the court at the time of filing, shall AND NOTICE OF THE ABILITY
TO ACCESS LEGAL REPRESENTATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-13-318 MUST
be served with the summons.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-13-311, amend
(3)(a) introductory portion, (3)(a)(VII)(C), and (6); and add (3)(a)(VI.5) as
follows:
16-13-311. Disposition of seized personal property.
(3) (a) If the prosecution prevails in the forfeiture action, the court
shall order the property forfeited. Stteh THE COURT'S order perfects the
state's right and interest in and title to such THE property and relates back to
the date when title to the property vested in the state pursuant to section
16-13-316. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3 )( c) of this
section, the court shall also order such THE property to be sold at a public
sale by the law enforcement agency in possession of the property in the
manner provided for sales on execution, or in another commercially
reasonable manner. Property forfeited pursuant to this section or proceeds
therefrom must be distributed or applied in the following order:
(Vl.5) THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE BALANCE, UP TO FIFTY-FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS PER FISCAL YEAR, TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL
AFFAIRS CREATED IN SECTION 24-1-125 FOR GRANT AND PORTAL
ADMINISTRATION RELATED TO CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PROCEEDS REQUIRED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-13-701;
(VII) The balance must be delivered, upon order of the court, as
follows:
(C) Twenty-fivepercenttothelaw enfmeementeommuniey serviees
gr ant program fund, er eated pm suant to section 24-32-124 (5) FORFEITURE
DEFENSE COUNSEL FUND, CREATED IN SECTION 16-13-318 (3).
( 6) The state shall issue a certificate of title for a vehicle to the
purchaser or seizing agency if said THE vehicle is acquired pursuant to this
PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
part 3.
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 16-13-318 as
follows:
16-13-318. Forfeiture defense counsel - fund - definitions.
(1) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE
REQUIRES:
(a) "ADMINISTRATOR" MEANS THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13-3-101.
(b) "FORFEITURE DEFENDANT" MEANS A PERSON WHO CLAIMS AN
INTEREST IN PROPERTY SUBJECT TO A FORFEITURE PROCEEDING.
(c) "FORFEITURE PROCEEDING" MEANS AN ACTION TO ABATE A
PUBLICNUISANCEPURSUANTTOTHISPART3,ORANACTIONFORFORFEITURE
DESCRIBED IN PART 5 OF THIS ARTICLE 13.
( d) "FUND" MEANS THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL FUND
ESTABLISHED IN SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION.
( e) "PRIVATE CONTRACTOR" MEANS THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR
SELECTEDBYTHEADMINISTRATORPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (3)(c) OFTHIS
SECTION.
(2) (a) AN INDIGENT FORFEITURE DEFENDANT HAS THE ABILITY TO
ACCESS TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION UTILIZING THE FUND.
(b) UPON A FORFEITURE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST, THE COURT SHALL
CONTINUE THE FORFEITURE PROCEEDING FOR TWENTY-ONE DAYS OR MORE
AFTER THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL BEGINS REPRESENTATION UNLESS
THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL WAIVES THE CONTINUANCE. AT ANY
TIME BEFORE THE CONTINUANCE ENDS, THE FORFEITURE DEFENDANT IS
ALLOWED TO FILE AN INITIAL OR AMENDED ANSWER OR OTHER APPROPRIATE
PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT OR PETITION.
( c) A FORFEITURE DEFENDANT MAY CHOOSE TO APPOINT PRIVATE
COUNSEL FOR A FORFEITURE PROCEEDING, OR MAY CHOOSE TO REPRESENT
PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
THEMSELF.
(d) THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL, PURSUANT TO THE SERVICE
AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)(c) OF THIS
SECTION, PAY THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR REPRESENTING THE
FORFEITURE DEFENDANT IN A FORFEITURE PROCEEDING UNLESS THE COURT
FINDS GOOD CAUSE FOR A HIGHER PAYMENT. IF THE COURT FINDS GOOD
CAUSE FOR A HIGHER PAYMENT, THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY THE
FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL THE AMOUNT ORDERED.
( e) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION PREVENTS FORFEITURE DEFENSE
COUNSEL FROM WITHDRAWING REPRESENTATION OF AN INDIGENT
FORFEITURE DEFENDANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLORADO RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. IF A FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHDRAWS
REPRESENTATION OF AN INDIGENT FORFEITURE DEFENDANT, THE COURT MAY
REQUIRE THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR TO APPOINT ANOTHER FORFEITURE
DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT IF THE COURT FINDS THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE REQUIRES ANOTHER APPOINTMENT.
(3) (a) THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL FUND IS CREA TED IN THE
STATE TREASURY.
(b) (I) THE FUND CONSISTS OF MONEY TRANSFERRED TO THE FUND
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 16-13-311 AND 24-32-124 (8) AND ANY OTHER
MONEY THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY APPROPRIATE OR TRANSFER TO
THE FUND. THE ADMINISTRATOR MAY SEEK, ACCEPT, AND EXPEND GIFTS,
GRANTS, OR DONATIONS FROM PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SOURCES FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION. THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL TRANSMIT ALL
MONEY RECEIVED FROM GIFTS, GRANTS, OR DONATIONS TO THE STATE
TREASURER, WHO SHALL CREDIT THE MONEY TO THE FUND. SUBJECT TO
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THE ADMINISTRATOR
MAY EXPEND ANY STATE MONEY FROM THE FUND TO MAKE PAYMENTS TO
THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR AND FOR DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH ADMINISTERING THIS SECTION. THE ST A TE TREASURER
SHALL CREDIT ALL INTEREST AND INCOME DERIVED FROM THE DEPOSIT AND
INVESTMENT OF MONEY IN THE FUND TO THE FUND.
(II) NOTWITHSTANDING THIS SUBSECTION (3)(b), THE FUND'S
MAXIMUM BALANCE IS FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS. IF THE FUND'S
PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
BALANCE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM, THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL TRANSMIT
THE DIFFERENCE OF THE BALANCE OF THE FUND MINUS FIVE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS TO THE STATE TREASURER, WHO SHALL CREDIT THE
MONEY TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT PROGRAM
FUND, CREATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-32-124 (5).
(III) NOTWITHSTANDING THIS SUBSECTION (3 )(b ), BEGINNING IN THE
2027-28 STATE FISCAL YEAR, THE FUND MUST ONLY BE FUNDED THROUGH
GIFTS, GRANTS, DONATIONS, AND MONEY TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 16-13-311 (3)(a)(VII)(C). THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SHALL NOT
APPROPRIATE MONEY FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE FUND.
(IV) THE SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR MUST BE CONTINGENT ON MONEY BEING IN THE
FUND. IF THE FUND DOES NOT HA VE .MONEY, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS NOT
REQUIRED TO APPROPRIATE OR TRANSFER MONEY TO THE FUND. THE
PRIVATE CONTRACTOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LEGAL DEFENSE FOR
INDIGENT CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE DEFENDANTS IF THERE IS NO BALANCE
REMAINING FROM THE MONEY THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR RECEIVES FROM
THE FUND.
( C) (I) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2026, THE ADMINISTRATOR
SHALL ENTER INTO A SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH A PRIVATE CONTRACTOR
WHO REGULARLY PROVIDES LEGAL SERVICES FOR INDIGENT CLIENTS OR
LITIGANTS TO PROVIDE A LEGAL DEFENSE TO A CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE
PROCEEDING OR TO CONTRACT WITH AN ATTORNEY TO PROVIDE A LEGAL
DEFENSE TO A CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PROCEEDING.
(II) UPON ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A PRIVATE
CONTRACTOR, AND ON JULY 1 OF EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, THE
ADMINISTRATOR SHALL DISTRIBUTE THE UNENCUMBERED MONEY IN THE
FUND TO THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR.
(III) THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A LIST OF
QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS THAT THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE OR
CONTRACT WITH TO REPRESENT INDIGENT FORFEITURE DEFENDANTS. THE
PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL UPDATE AND PROVIDE THE LIST FOR THE
ADMINISTRATOR OF CONTRACTED ATTORNEYS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.
(d) UPON REQUEST OF A FORFEITURE DEFENDANT, THE PRIVATE
PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
CONTRACTOR SHALL APPOINT A FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR THE
FORFEITURE DEFENDANT. THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROTATE THE
ATTORNEYS, AS MUCH AS IS PRACTICABLE, TO DISTRIBUTE FORFEITURE
DEFENSE COUNSEL CASES EVENLY AMONG QUALIFYING A TIORNEYS
SELECTED BY THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR.
( e) THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR MAY RETAIN UNSPENT MONEY AT THE
END OF A BUDGET YEAR FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING A LEGAL DEFENSE
TO A CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
(f) IF THERE IS ANY UNSPENT MONEY AT THE END OF THE SERVICE
AGREEMENT, THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN THE UNSPENT
MONEY TO THE ADMINISTRATOR. THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL TRANSMIT ALL
MONEY RECEIVED FROM THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR TO THE STATE
TREASURER, WHO SHALL CREDIT THE MONEY TO THE FUND.
(4) THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT QUARTERLY TO THE
ADMINISTRATOR THE FOLLOWING:
(a) THE NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO THIS
SECTION;
(b) THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH CASE;
( c) ANY CHALLENGES OR DIFFICULTIES IN RETAINING A TIORNEYS TO
SERVE AS APPOINTED FORFEITURE DEFENSE COUNSEL; AND
( d) THE AMOUNT OF UNSPENT MONEY THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR
RETAINS AT THE END OF THE BUDGET YEAR.
SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-13-505, amend
(1.5), ( 1.6), (1. 7) introductory portion, ( 1. 7)(a)(II), ( 1. 7)(b ), ( 1. 7)( c ),
( 1. 7)( d), ( 1. 7)( e ), ( 1. 7)( f), and (3) introductory portion; and add (3 )(g) as
follows:
16-13-505. Forfeiture proceedings.
(1.5) No A COURT SHALL NOT ENTER judgment of forfeiture of
property in any forfeiture proceeding shall be entered unless and until an
owner of the prope11y is convicted of an offense involving the conduct
PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
listed in section 16-13-503, or a lesser included offense of an eligible
offense if the conviction is the result of a negotiated guilty plea. Nothing in
this section shall be constmcd to requite REQUIRES the conviction to be
obtained in the same jurisdiction as the jurisdiction in which the forfeiture
action is brought. In the C\1cnt ONE OR MORE criminal charges MUST BE
FILED arising from the same activity giving rise to the forfeiture,
prncccdings arc filed against an:y in:div idual el aiming an inter est in the
property subject to the forfcitUic proceeding, the trial and discovery phases
of the forfcitUic prncccding shall be stayed by the court AND THE COURT
SHALL ST A y THE FORFEITURE PROCEEDING until the disposition of the
criminal charges. A stay shall not be maintained during an appeal or
post-conviction proceeding challenging a criminal conviction. Nothing in
this section shall be constmcd to prnhibit or prevent PROHIBITS OR
PREVENTS the parties from contemporaneously resolving criminal charges
and a forfeiture proceeding arising from the same activity.
(1.6) Upon acquittal or dismissal of a criminal action against a
person named in a forfeiture action related to the criminal action; unless the
forfcitUic action was brnught pttisuant to one or more of paragraphs (a) to
(f) of subsection ( 1. 7) EXCEPT THAT, IF A PROVISION OF SUBSECTION ( l. 7) of
this section APPLIES, the forfeiture claim shall be dismissed and the seized
property shall be returned as respects the subject matter property or interest
therein of that person, if the case has been adjudicated as to all other claims,
interests, and owners, unless possession of the property is illegal. If the
forfeiture action is dismissed or judgment is entered in favor of the
claimant, the claimant shall not be IS NOT subject to any monetary charges
by the state for storage of the property or expenses incurred in the
preservation of the property, unless at the time of dismissal the plaintiff
shows that those expenses would have been incurred to prevent waste of the
property even if it had not been seized.
(1.7) Notwithstanding the prnvisions of subsection (1.5) of this
section:
(a) (11) If a person lacks standing pursuant to this paragraph (a)
SUBSECTION (l.7)(a), the forfeiture action may proceed AGAINST THE
PERSON'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY and a judgment of forfeiture may be
entered without a THE PERSON'S criminal conviction, of an owner, upon
motion and notice as provided in the rules of civil procedure.
PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
(b) If, following THE DISPOSITION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE AND notice
to all persons known to have an interest or who have asserted an interest in
the property subject to forfeiture, an NO owner fails to file FILES an answer
or other appropriate response with the court claiming an interest in the
subject matter property, or no person establishes standing to contest the
forfeiture action pursuant to section 16-13-504 (2), a forfeiture action may
proceed and a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without a criminal
conviction of an owner.
(c) If the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that the
property was instrumental in the commission of an offense listed in section
16-13-503 (1) or that the property is traceable proceeds of the offense or
related criminal activity by a nonowner and the plaintiff proves by clear and
convincing evidence that an owner is not an innocent owner pursuant to
section 16-13-504 (2.2), a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without
ONL y AFTER a criminal conviction of an owner THE NONOWNER IN THE
UNDERLYING CRJMINAL OFFENSE RELATED TO THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO
THE FORFEITUR E PROCEEDING.
( d) If an owner of the property who was involved in the public
nuisance act or conduct giving rise to the claim of forfeiture subsequently
dies, THE FORFEITURE ACTION MA y PROCEED AGAINST THE OWNER'S
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, and IF THE PLAINTIFF PROVES THAT THE
DECEASED OWNER was not an innocent owner pursuant to section 16-13-504
(2.2), a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without a THE OWNER'S
criminal conviction. of an owner.
( e) If an owner received a deferred judgment, deferred sentence, or
participated in a diversion program, or in the case of a juvenile a deferred
adjudication or deferred sentence or participated in a diversion program for
the offense, THE FORFEITURE ACTION MA y PROCEED AGAINST THE OWNER'S
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY' AND a judgment of forfeiture may be entered
without a criminal conviction.
(f) A defendant or claimant shall be IS permitted to waive the
requirement of a criminal conviction in order to settle a forfeiture action AS
TO THE DEFENDANT'S OR CLAIMANT'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY.
(3) The citation specified in paragraph (b) of subsection (2)
SUBSECTION (2)(b) of this section shalt MUST:
PAGE IO-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
(g) ADVISE THE DEFENDANT OF THE ABILITY TO ACCESS FORFEITURE
DEFENSE COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-13-318.
SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-32-124, amend
(5)(b); and add (8) as follows:
24-32-124. Law enforcement community services grant program
- committee - policies and procedures - fund - rules - report -
definitions.
(5) (b) The law enforcement community services grant program
fund is created in the state treasury. The fund consists of money transferred
to the fund pursuant to section 16-13-311, SECTION 16-13-318 (3 )(b) AND
any other money that the general assembly may appropriate or transfer to
the fund and any gifts, grants, or donations received by the division. Subject
to annual appropriation by the general assembly, the division may only
expend money from the fund for the grants awarded pursuant to this section
and for up to five percent of the money in the fund for the direct and
indirect costs incurred in administering the program. Any unexpended and
unencumbered money from an appropriation made for the purposes of this
section remains available for expenditure by the division in the next fiscal
year without further appropriation.
(8) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SECTION TO
THE CONTRARY, ON JULY 1, 2026, THE STATE TREASURER SHALL TRANSFER
THE UNEXPENDED AND UNENCUMBERED MONEY IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT PROGRAM FUND TO THE FORFEITURE DEFENSE
COUNSEL FUND CREATED IN SECTION 16-13-318.
SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-3-101, add (18) as
follows:
13-3-101. State court administrator-duties -report-definitions
-repeal.
(18) PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-13-318, THE STATE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR SHALL CONTRACT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL THAT PROVIDES A
LEGAL DEFENSE TO A CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PROCEEDING OR TO CONTRACT
WITH AN ATTORNEY TO PROVIDE A LEGAL DEFENSE TO A CIVIL ASSET
FORFEITURE PROCEEDING.
PAGE 11-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
SECTION 7. Appropriation. (1) For the 2026-27 state fiscal year,
$556,750 is appropriated to the judicial department for use by state courts
administration. This appropriation is from the forfeiture defense counsel
fund created in section 16-13-318 (3)(a), C.R.S. To implement this act, the
administration may use this appropriation for civil assets forfeiture defense
contract.
(2) For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, $55,000 is appropriated to the
department oflocal affairs for use by the division oflocal government. This
appropriation is from the proceeds of property forfeited pursuant to section
16-13-311 (3), C.R.S., that is allocated pursuant to section 16-13-311
(3)(a)(VI.5), C.R.S. To implement this act, the division may use this
appropriation for civil asset forfeiture portal administration.
SECTION 8. Effective date -applicability. This act takes effect
July 1, 2026, and applies to forfeiture actions commenced on or after said
date.
SECTION 9. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,
determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for
PAGE 12-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state
institutions.
J~
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
v~~
Vanessa Reilly
CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
PRESIDENT OF
THE SENATE
Esther van Mourik
SECRETARY OF
THE SENATE
APPROVED c:::»V\ 'Th~Jtt~ j'\.N\L j;t'-' 2.o:2-(p ,._+ 12.: "h,Yl\
(Date and Time) - T
Jared S.
GOVE
PAGE 13-HOUSE BILL 26-1250
LORADO