Back to Colorado

HB26-1254 • 2026

Audit Enforcement

The bill defines "noncompliant state agency" with respect to the implementation date for an audit recommendation and requires the legislative audit committee (committee) to determine, by majority vote

Budget
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Rep. M. Brooks, Rep. L. Suckla, Sen. L. Frizell, Rep. J. Bacon
Last action
2026-03-12
Official status
House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The exact implementation date for the bill is not specified in the provided official source material.

Audit Enforcement

The bill defines a 'noncompliant state agency' and sets rules for how the legislative audit committee can respond to agencies that do not follow audit recommendations on time.

What This Bill Does

  • Defines what it means for a state agency to be noncompliant with an audit recommendation.
  • Requires the legislative audit committee to decide if a noncompliant state agency has tried its best to follow an audit recommendation by the set date.
  • If the committee finds that the agency did try its best, they can allow more time for compliance.
  • If the committee finds that the agency did not try its best, they can tell the state auditor to inform the state controller about this issue.
  • Requires the state controller to restrict funding by 3% of a noncompliant agency's budget if the audit recommendation is not followed.

Who It Names or Affects

  • State agencies that do not follow audit recommendations on time.
  • The legislative audit committee, which reviews and acts upon these issues.
  • The state auditor and controller who enforce funding restrictions.

Terms To Know

Noncompliant State Agency
A state agency that has agreed to follow an audit recommendation but did not complete it by the set date.
Legislative Audit Committee
The committee responsible for reviewing and deciding on noncompliance issues with audit recommendations.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Details about the exact implementation date are not provided in the summary.
  • The bill's effectiveness depends on whether a referendum petition is filed against it.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L.001

HOU State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes how the Legislative Audit Committee can restrict funding for noncompliant state agencies by requiring a majority vote and setting limits on the amount of funds that can be restricted.

  • Adds a requirement for the Legislative Audit Committee to determine restrictions on noncompliant state agency funding through a majority vote.
  • Limits the restriction to no more than three percent of the total General Fund appropriations for the next fiscal year.
  • Requires the State Auditor to include any recommended funding restrictions in notifications sent out.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how the committee will determine the specific amount within the three percent limit.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-12 House

    House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely

  2. 2026-02-18 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

Official Summary Text

The bill defines "noncompliant state agency" with respect to the implementation date for an audit recommendation and requires the legislative audit committee (committee) to determine, by majority vote, whether or not a noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort to comply with an audit recommendation by the implementation date. If the committee determines that the noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort, the committee may accept an extended implementation date provided by the noncompliant state agency. If the committee determines there has not been a good faith effort, the committee may direct the state auditor to notify the state controller of the noncompliant state agency. The bill also requires the state controller to, upon receipt of notice from the state auditor, restrict, in an amount equal to 3% of the total amount of the noncompliant state agency's general fund appropriations, the noncompliant state agency's appropriations for the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the state controller receives the notice from the state auditor. This restriction may only be released if the general assembly enacts a bill to do so, or if the committee directs the state auditor to notify the state controller to rescind the restriction.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Second Regular Session
Seventy-fifth General Assembly
STATE OF COLORADO
INTRODUCED

LLS NO. 26-0781.03 Stephanie Schrab x4330 HOUSE BILL 26-1254
House Committees Senate Committees
State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
A BILL FOR AN ACT
CONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY101
THE STATE AUDITOR.102
Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
http://leg.colorado.gov.)
The bill defines "noncompliant state agency" with respect to the
implementation date for an audit recommendation and requires the
legislative audit committee (committee) to determine, by majority vote,
whether or not a noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort
to comply with an audit recommendation by the implementation date. If
the committee determines that the noncompliant state agency has made
HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
Brooks and Suckla, Bacon
SENATE SPONSORSHIP
Frizell,
Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.
Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
a good faith effort, the committee may accept an extended
implementation date provided by the noncompliant state agency. If the
committee determines there has not been a good faith effort, the
committee may direct the state auditor to notify the state controller of the
noncompliant state agency. The bill also requires the state controller to,
upon receipt of notice from the state auditor, restrict, in an amount equal
to 3% of the total amount of the noncompliant state agency's general fund
appropriations, the noncompliant state agency's appropriations for the
fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the state controller receives
the notice from the state auditor. This restriction may only be released if
the general assembly enacts a bill to do so, or if the committee directs the
state auditor to notify the state controller to rescind the restriction.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 2-3-103, add (9.6)2
as follows:3
2-3-103. Duties of state auditor - definitions.4
(9.6) (a) A S USED IN THIS SECTION , UNLESS THE CONTEXT5
OTHERWISE REQUIRES:6
(I) "S TATE AGENCY " MEANS A PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF THE7
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT OR ANY DIVISION OR8
PROGRAM WITHIN A PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT.9
(II) "NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY " MEANS A STATE AGENCY10
THAT:11
(A) WAS SUBJECT TO AN AUDIT THAT IDENTIFIED A SIGNIFICANT12
PROBLEM OR A MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN THE STATE AGENCY;13
(B) HAS, AT A HEARING OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE,14
AGREED OR PARTIALLY AGREED TO THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION AND15
SELECTED A DATE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATION;16
AND 17
(C) HAS NOT COMPLETED THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THAT18
IMPLEMENTATION DATE.19
HB26-1254-2-
(b) I F A STATE AGENCY BECOMES A NONCOMPLIANT STATE1
AGENCY, THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE SHALL , AT ITS NEXT2
REGULAR MEETING AND WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NONCOMPLIANT3
STATE AGENCY PRESENT , DETERMINE WHETHER THE NONCOMPLIANT4
STATE AGENCY HAS MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLETE THE5
RECOMMENDATION OF THE AUDIT BY THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE.6
(c) (I) IF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE DETERMINES BY A7
MAJORITY VOTE THAT THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS MADE A8
GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE9
IMPLEMENTATION DATE , THE COMMITTEE MAY ACCEPT AN EXTENDED10
IMPLEMENTATION DATE PROVIDED BY THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE11
AGENCY.12
(II) I F THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMIT TEE DETERMINES BY A13
MAJORITY VOTE THAT THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS NOT MADE14
A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMME NDATION BY THE15
IMPLEMENTATION DATE , THE COMMITTEE MAY DIRECT THE STATE16
AUDITOR TO TAKE THE ACTIONS SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(e) OF THIS17
SECTION.18
(d) I F THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE EXTENDS THE19
IMPLEMENTATION DATE AS SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(c)(I) OF THIS20
SECTION AND THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY DOES NOT COMPLETE21
THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THE EXTENDED IMPLEMENTATION DATE,22
THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE MAY AGAIN DETERMINE WHETHER23
THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO24
IMPLEMENT THE AUDIT RECOMME NDATION PURS UANT TO SUBSECTION25
(9.6)(b) OF THIS SECTION AND MAY THEN TAKE EITHER ACTION SPECIFIED26
IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(c) OF THIS SECTION.27
HB26-1254-3-
(e) THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE, BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF1
THE COMMITTEE, MAY DIRECT THE STATE AUDITOR TO NOTIFY THE STATE2
CONTROLLER WHEN A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS NOT MADE A3
GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLETE AN AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THE4
IMPLEMENTATION DATE.5
(f) T HE STATE AUDITOR SHALL MAKE ONLY ONE NOTIFICATION6
PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (9.6)(e) OF THIS SECTION FOR A NONCOMPLIANT7
STATE AGENCY FOR A SINGLE AUDIT , REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF8
AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS THAT CAUSED THE STATE AGENCY TO BECOME9
A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY.10
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 24-30-211 as11
follows:12
24-30-211. Restriction of general fund appropriation - state13
agency noncompliance with audit requirements - state auditor notice.14
IF THE STATE CONTROLLER RECEIVES NOTICE FROM THE STATE15
AUDITOR OF A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY PURSUANT TO SECTION16
2-3-103 (9.6), THE STATE CONTROLLER SHALL RESTRICT, IN AN AMOUNT17
EQUAL TO THREE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE NONCOMPLIANT18
STATE AGENCY'S GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS, THE NONCOMPLIANT19
STATE AGENCY'S APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR FOLLOWING THE20
FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE STATE CONTROLLER RECEIVES THE NOTICE21
FROM THE STATE AUDITOR. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY ENACT A BILL22
TO RELEASE THE RESTRICTION , OR THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE23
MAY, BY MAJORITY VOTE , DIRECT THE STATE AUDITOR TO NOTIFY THE24
STATE CONTROLLER TO RESCIND THE RESTRICTION IF THE STATE AUDITOR25
DETERMINES THAT THE STATE AGENCY HAS BECOME COMPLIANT BEFORE26
THE RESTRICTION TAKES EFFECT.27
HB26-1254-4-
SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act1
takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the2
ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August3
12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026); except that, if a4
referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the5
state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act6
within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect7
unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in8
November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the9
official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.10
HB26-1254-5-