Back to Colorado

HB26-1288 • 2026

Jury Selection Requirements

The act creates a jury selection working group (working group) in the judicial department to identify best practices and make recommendations for statutory or rule changes to improve jury selection. T

Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Rep. M. Carter, Rep. J. Joseph, Sen. D. Roberts, Sen. K. Wallace, Rep. J. Bacon, Rep. C. Clifford, Sen. J. Coleman, Sen. L. Cutter, Sen. J. Gonzales, Sen. I. Jodeh, Sen. R. Rodriguez, Sen. M. Weissman
Last action
2026-05-28
Official status
Governor Signed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The exact date for submitting the final report is determined by the working group's co-chairs, not a fixed calendar date like the progress report.

Jury Selection Working Group

This law creates a new group in the Judicial Department to study jury selection and suggest ways to improve it.

What This Bill Does

  • Creates a Jury Selection Working Group inside the Judicial Department.
  • Requires the group to identify best practices for juror questionnaires, time limits for questioning jurors (voir dire), rules on rehabilitating jurors, judge training scripts, and other related topics.
  • Asks the group to get input from communities and stakeholders before making suggestions.
  • Mandates that the group submit a progress report by December 1, 2026, which must be posted online for public access.
  • Requires the Colorado Supreme Court to respond to any rule change recommendations by June 15, 2027.

Who It Names or Affects

  • The Judicial Department
  • Judges and justices in Colorado courts
  • Lawyers representing clients in civil or criminal cases
  • Jury commissioners

Terms To Know

Working Group
A temporary team created to study jury selection issues and make recommendations.
Voir Dire
The process where lawyers ask questions to potential jurors before they are selected for a trial.
Rehabilitating Jurors
Rules regarding the process and effectiveness of explaining why a juror might be biased so they can still serve if appropriate.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The law does not say exactly what changes will happen until the working group finishes its study.
  • This section of the law ends on July 1, 2027.
  • Working group members do not receive a salary for their service.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L.002

HOU Judiciary

Passed [*]

Plain English: This amendment creates a new Jury Selection Working Group in Colorado to study how jurors are chosen, find the best ways to improve the process, and suggest changes to laws or court rules.

  • It establishes a working group made up of judges, lawyers from different types of cases, public defenders, prosecutors, jury commissioners, and an expert researcher.
  • The group must look at specific topics like how much time attorneys get for questioning jurors, using questionnaires to pick jurors, removing bias, and training for judges and lawyers.
  • Members will gather input from the community and submit a progress report by December 1, 2026, followed by a final report with recommendations later in 2027.
  • The Colorado Supreme Court must respond to any suggestions about changing court rules by June 15, 2027.
  • This amendment only creates the group and sets deadlines for reports; it does not immediately change how jury selection works in courts today.
  • The specific names of the people who will join the working group are not listed yet, as they must be appointed by June 15, 2026.
L.004

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: This amendment removes a specific sentence from the Judiciary Committee Report about creating a jury selection working group.

  • It deletes line 2 on page 3 of the April 1, 2026 report.
  • The official text does not say what words were in line 2 or exactly how removing them changes the bill.
  • Because the original sentence is missing from this document, it is impossible to explain the full effect of deleting it.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-28 Governor

    Governor Signed

  2. 2026-05-22 Governor

    Sent to the Governor

  3. 2026-05-22 Senate

    Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. 2026-05-22 House

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. 2026-04-27 Senate

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. 2026-04-24 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. 2026-04-22 Senate

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. 2026-04-20 Senate

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

  9. 2026-04-16 House

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. 2026-04-15 House

    House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  11. 2026-04-14 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  12. 2026-04-07 House

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  13. 2026-04-01 House

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  14. 2026-02-23 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

Official Summary Text

The act creates a jury selection working group (working group) in the judicial department to identify best practices and make recommendations for statutory or rule changes to improve jury selection.
The act details the working group's membership and duties, and requires the working group to submit a final report of the working group's recommendations to the judiciary committees of the house of representatives and the senate and to each supreme court justice. If recommendations for rule changes are made, the Colorado supreme court shall respond to the recommendations and post the response on its website for public access.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HOUSE BILL 26-1288
BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Joseph and Carter, Bacon, Clifford;
also SENATOR(S) Roberts and Wallace, Cutter, Gonzales J., Jodeh,
Rodriguez, Weissman, Coleman.
CONCERNING MEASUR E S RELATED TO JURY SELECTION.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 13-3-121 as
follows:
13-3-121. Jury selection working group -creation -members -
duties -report - definition -repeal.
(1) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE
REQUIRES, "WORKING GROUP" MEANS THE JURY SELECTION WORKING GROUP
CREATED IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION.
(2) THERE IS CREATED IN THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE JURY
SELECTION WORKING GROUP TO MAKE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING JURY SELECTION.
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
the act.
(3) (a) THE WORKING GROUP CONSISTS OF:
(I) THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, OR THEIR DESIGNEE;
(II) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR THEIR DESIGNEE;
(Ill) THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS, WHO ARE APPOINTED BY THE
ASSOCIATION THAT THEY REPRESENT, WHICH ASSOCIATION IS CHOSEN BY
THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT:
(A) ONE MEMBER WHO REPRESENTS A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS;
(B) ONE MEMBER WHO REPRESENTS A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF
MUNICIPAL JUDGES;
(C) ONE MEMBER WHO REPRESENTS A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF
CIVIL TRIAL LA WYERS;
(D) ONE MEMBER WHO REPRESENTS A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF
CIVIL DEFENSE LA WYERS;
(E) ONE MEMBER WHO REPRESENTS A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LA WYERS;
(F) ONE MEMBER WHO IS A MEMBER OF A STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION
OF LA WYERS AND WHO HAS EXPERIENCE WITH REPRESENTING CLIENTS IN
COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION INVOLVING PRIVATE PARTIES; AND
(G) ONE MEMBER WHO IS AN INSTRUCTOR AT AN INSTITUTION OF
HIGHER EDUCATION AND HAS EXPERT KNOWLEDGE OF, AND RESEARCH
EXPERIENCE WITH, JURY SELECTION; AND
(IV) THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS, APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE
OF THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT:
(A) A JUSTICE OR JUDGE;
(B) THE CHAIR OF THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE COMMITTEE;
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1288
(C) THE CHAIR OF THE CIVIL RULES COMMITTEE;
(D) FOUR JUDGES, WHO IN FULL REPRESENT DISTRICT COURT,
COUNTY COURT, RURAL JURISDICTION, AND URBAN JURISDICTION;
(E) ONE JURY COMMISSIONER WHO REPRESENTS AN URBAN JUDICIAL
DISTRICT; AND
(F) ONE JURY COMMISSIONER WHO REPRESENTS A RURAL JUDICIAL
DISTRICT.
(b) TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, THE APPOINTING AUTHORITIES
SHALL ATTEMPT TO APPOINT WORKING GROUP MEMBERS WHO REFLECT THE
DIVERSITY OF THE STATE WITH REGARD TO GEOGRAPHY, RACE, ETHNICITY,
GENDER, AND AREAS OF PRACTICE.
( c) THE APPOINTING AUTHORITIES SHALL MAKE APPOINTMENTS TO
THE WORKING GROUP NO LATER THAN JUNE 15, 2026.
( d) (I) THE JUSTICE OR JUDGE APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
(3)(a)(IV)(A) OF THIS SECTION SERVES AS A CO-CHAIR OF THE WORKING
GROUP.
(II) THE WORKING GROUP SHALL SELECT A MEMBER DESCRIBED IN
SUBSECTION (3)(a)(I), (3)(a)(II), OR (3)(a)(III) OF THIS SECTION TO SERVE AS
A CO-CHAIR OF THE WORKING GROUP.
(e) MEMBERS SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION BUT MAY BE
REIMBURSED FOR EXPENSES DIRECTLY RELATING TO THEIR SERVICE TO THE
WORKING GROUP.
( 4) THE WORKING GROUP SHALL:
(a) SOLICIT INPUT FROM RELEVANT COMMUNITIES AND
STAKEHOLDERS TO ASSIST THE WORKING GROUP WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF
ITS DUTIES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)(b) OF THIS SECTION;
(b) IDENTIFY BEST PRACTICES CONCERNING:
(I) THE AMOUNT OF TIME PROVIDED TO ATTORNEYS TO PERFORM
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1288
VOIRDIRE;
(II) THE USE OF CASE-SPECIFIC OR MODEL QUESTIONNAIRES FOR
POTENTIAL JURORS;
(Ill) THE USE OF RULES FOR THE PROCESS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF
REHABILITATING JURORS;
(IV) THE USE OF MODEL BENCH BOOK SCRIPTS FOR JURY SELECTION;
(V) TRAINING FOR JUDGES AND LA WYERS REGARDING JURY
SELECTION; AND
(VI) ANY OTHER MATfER RELATED TO JURY SELECTION DEEMED
APPROPRIATE BY THE WORKING GROUP; AND
(c) CONSIDERMAKINGRECOMMENDATIONSFORSTATUTORYORRULE
CHANGES TO IMPROVE JURY SELECTION.
(5) (a) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2026, THE WORKING GROUP
SHALL SUBMIT A PROGRESS REPORT OF ITS IDENTIFIED BEST PRACTICES
PURSUANTTO SUBSECTION ( 4 )(b) OF THIS SECTION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FORSTATUTORYORRULECHANGES PURSUANTTOSUBSECTION ( 4)(c) OF THIS
SECTION, IF ANY, TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENA TE, OR ANY SUCCESSOR COMMITTEES, AND
EACH COLORADO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
(b) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2026, THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
SHALL POST THE REPORT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (5)(a) OF THIS SECTION
ON ITS WEBSITE FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.
(6) (a) ON OR BEFORE A DATE DETERMINED BY THE WORKING
GROUP'S CO-CHAIRS THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE COLORADO SUPREME
COURT TO RESPOND PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (7) OF THIS SECTION, THE
WORKING GROUP SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT OF ITS IDENTIFIED BEST
PRACTICES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION ( 4 )(b) OF THIS SECTION, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STATUTORY OR RULE CHANGES PURSUANT TO
SUBSECTION ( 4 )( c) OF THIS SECTION, IF ANY, TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES
OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE, OR ANY SUCCESSOR
COMMITTEES, AND EACH COLORADO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1288
(b) WITHIN ONE WEEK OF RECEIVING THE FINAL REPORT DESCRIBED
IN SUBSECTION (6)(a) OF THIS SECTION, THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT SHALL
POST THE REPORT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (6)(a) OF THIS SECTION ON ITS
WEBSITE FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.
(7) (a) IF ANY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RULE CHANGES ARE MADE,
THENONORBEFOREJUNE 15,2027, THECOLORADOSUPREMECOURTSHALL
RESPOND TO THE WORKING GROUP'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RULE CHANGES
TO IMPROVE JURY SELECTION.
(b) ONORBEFOREJUNE 15,2027, THEJUDICIALDEPARTMENTSHALL
POST THE RESPONSE DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (7)(a) OF THIS SECTION ON
ITS WEBSITE FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.
(8) THIS SECTION IS REPEALED, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2027.
SECTION 2. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,
determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for
PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1288
the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state
institutions.
Ju~
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
v~~
Vanessa Reilly
CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
::1--e~
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
PRESIDENT OF
THE SENATE
Esther van Mourik
SECRETARY OF
THE SENATE
APPROVED OV\ ""d~ rn~'-1 2e<\\,.. i.ov.a ~~ 12 ~ oorrY'\
(b ate an~ Time)
ATE OF cbLORADO
PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 26-1288