Back to Colorado

SB26-004 • 2026

Expand List of Petitioners for Protection Order

The act adds a co-responder who is part of a co-responder community response to the list of community members who may petition the court for an extreme risk protection order. Health-care facilities, b

Children Education Firearms
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Sen. J. Gonzales, Sen. T. Sullivan, Rep. M. Froelich, Rep. J. Willford, Sen. J. Amabile, Sen. M. Ball, Sen. J. Coleman, Sen. L. Cutter, Sen. J. Danielson, Sen. T. Exum, Sen. I. Jodeh, Sen. C. Kipp, Sen. C. Kolker, Sen. W. Lindstedt, Sen. D. Michaelson Jenet, Sen. R. Rodriguez, Sen. K. Wallace, Sen. M. Weissman, Rep. J. Bacon, Rep. A. Boesenecker, Rep. K. Brown, Rep. S. Camacho, Rep. M. Duran, Rep. C. Espenoza, Rep. L. García, Rep. L. Gilchrist, Rep. E. Hamrick, Rep. J. Jackson, Rep. J. Joseph, Rep. M. Lindsay, Rep. J. McCluskie, Rep. K. McCormick, Rep. K. Nguyen, Rep. A. Paschal, Rep. M. Rutinel, Rep. G. Rydin, Rep. E. Sirota, Rep. L. Smith, Rep. R. Stewart, Rep. T. Story, Rep. B. Titone, Rep. S. Woodrow, Rep. Y. Zokaie
Last action
2026-04-06
Official status
Governor Signed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide details on the consequences of sharing protected health information beyond court proceedings.

Expanding Who Can Ask for Protection Orders

This law allows co-responders and certain institutions to petition courts for extreme risk protection orders.

What This Bill Does

  • Adds co-responders from community response teams as eligible petitioners for extreme risk protection orders.
  • Establishes health-care facilities, behavioral health treatment centers, school districts, charter schools, private schools, and higher education institutions as institutional petitioners who may file petitions for extreme risk protection orders.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who can file extreme risk protection orders now include co-responders from community response teams.
  • Institutions such as health-care facilities, behavioral health treatment centers, school districts, charter schools, private schools, and higher education institutions are now eligible to petition for extreme risk protection orders.

Terms To Know

Community member
A person who interacts with a respondent or their child through professional relationships, such as educators and co-responders from community response teams.
Institutional petitioner
An entity that employs or contracts with community members to file petitions for extreme risk protection orders, including schools, health-care facilities, and higher education institutions.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify the exact process for appointing attorneys for respondents.
  • It is unclear how the new provisions will be implemented in practice by courts and institutions.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L.007

SEN State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment changes the list of people who can ask for an extreme risk protection order by including minors under 18 years old and community members.

  • Adds persons under eighteen years old to those eligible to petition for an extreme risk protection order.
  • Includes community members in the list of individuals allowed to file a petition for an extreme risk protection order.
  • The amendment text does not specify all details about how these changes will be implemented or what specific rights and responsibilities come with being a new petitioner type.
L.008

SEN State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

Passed [*]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new type of community member who can ask for an extreme risk protection order from the court.

  • Adds individuals who are part of law enforcement or emergency response teams and provide on-site crisis services to the list of people allowed to petition the court for an extreme risk protection order.
  • The exact definition and scope of 'community member' as used in this amendment is not fully explained, which may cause some uncertainty about who qualifies under this new provision.
L.001

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires that if a petition for an extreme risk protection order is filed by an institutional petitioner, the name of the individual community member who initiated the petition must be made available to the public.

  • Adds a requirement for institutional petitioners to disclose the name of the initiating community member when filing a petition for an extreme risk protection order.
  • The amendment text does not specify how or where this information must be made available to the public, which could leave some uncertainty about implementation details.
L.003

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment requires institutional petitioners to file a sworn affidavit with signatures from at least three individuals of the entity when requesting an extreme risk protection order.

  • Institutional petitioners must now submit a signed affidavit along with their request for an extreme risk protection order, attesting to the need for it.
  • If an institution employs or contracts fewer than three people, at least one individual from that entity must sign the affidavit.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens if an institutional petitioner fails to comply with these new requirements.
L.004

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a requirement that petitions for extreme risk protection orders must be filed within ten days of the petitioner's last interaction with the respondent, and courts cannot grant such petitions if more than ten days have passed since their last contact.

  • Adds a time limit of ten days from the last interaction between the petitioner and the respondent to file for an extreme risk protection order.
  • Specifies that courts will not issue an extreme risk protection order if it has been eleven or more days since the last interaction between the petitioner and the respondent.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if a petition is filed after ten days but before eleven days have passed.
  • It's unclear how this new requirement will affect existing cases or petitions already in process.
L.005

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the section of the bill that lists who can ask for an extreme risk protection order by removing references to specific parts of the law and reorganizing them.

  • Removes lines from page 3, lines 12 through 20 of the printed bill.
  • Changes '(f)' to '(a)' on page 3, line 21.
  • Changes '(g)' to '(b)' on page 3, line 24.
  • The exact content removed by striking lines 12 through 20 is not provided in the amendment text.
  • It's unclear how these changes will affect the overall meaning of the bill without seeing the full context and original text.
L.006

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds rules that prevent a court from issuing an extreme risk protection order if the person asking for it was previously found to have been violent against the person they are now trying to protect.

  • Adds a rule stating that courts cannot issue temporary extreme risk protection orders if the petitioner (the person requesting the order) has a history of being violent towards the respondent in previous criminal cases.
  • Also adds this same rule for non-temporary extreme risk protection orders.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens when there is no clear record or evidence of past violence between the petitioner and respondent.
L.010

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds rules that prevent a court from issuing an extreme risk protection order if the person asking for it was previously found to have assaulted, harassed, or stalked the person they are now trying to get the order against.

  • Adds a rule stating that courts cannot grant temporary extreme risk protection orders if the petitioner has been identified as the assaultive party in previous criminal cases involving sexual assault, harassment, or stalking of the respondent.
  • Includes similar rules for permanent extreme risk protection orders.
  • The amendment text does not specify how courts should handle situations where there is no clear evidence of a previously filed criminal case.
L.012

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes certain references to 'CO-RESPONDER' and makes a minor textual change in the bill that expands who can petition for an extreme risk protection order.

  • Removes the word 'CO-RESPONDER' from the committee report's title.
  • Deletes line 19 of the first page, which starts with the letter 'A'.
  • Makes a minor change to the text by substituting 'CO-RESPONDER,' for another instance.
  • The amendment does not provide enough context about what is deleted in line 19 or its impact.
  • It's unclear how this deletion and substitution affect the overall meaning of the bill.
L.014

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes specific lines from the bill that list certain community members who can petition for an extreme risk protection order.

  • Removes lines 12 through 18 on page 2 of the printed bill, which contain a list of community members eligible to petition for an extreme risk protection order.
  • The exact content removed by this amendment is not provided in the official text, making it unclear what specific community members were listed and are now being struck from the bill.
L.015

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the list of people who can ask a court for an extreme risk protection order by adding 'OR' after 'SCHOOL;' and removing lines that mention 'COLLEGE;' and other community members.

  • Adds 'OR' after 'SCHOOL;' in the list of petitioners.
  • Removes 'COLLEGE;' from the list of petitioners.
  • Strikes out lines mentioning additional community members who can petition for an extreme risk protection order.
  • The exact impact on other community members mentioned in the struck-out lines is unclear without seeing those specific lines.
L.019

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds protections for institutional petitioners and other community members who act in good faith when seeking extreme risk protection orders.

  • Adds a new section that protects institutional petitioners, community members, and entities from criminal, administrative, or civil liability if they act in good faith while obtaining an extreme risk protection order.
  • Specifies that this protection applies to actions such as reporting, investigating, filing petitions, and enforcing orders related to these protection measures.
  • The exact definition of 'institutional petitioner' is not provided in the amendment text, which may cause some uncertainty about who exactly is protected under this new section.
L.026

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section that allows people who file false or malicious petitions for extreme risk protection orders to face criminal charges and civil liability, including paying damages and legal fees.

  • Adds a clause allowing individuals who submit false or malicious petitions for extreme risk protection orders to be subject to criminal prosecution or civil penalties.
  • Specifies that in civil cases arising from such false petitions, the person who wins can receive actual damages and their attorney's fees.
  • The exact details of how these new provisions will be enforced are not specified in the amendment text.
L.027

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the language in a bill to clarify who can petition for an extreme risk protection order by changing 'including but not limited to' to 'meaning', and combining two conditions with 'and' instead of 'or'.

  • Changes 'INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:' to 'MEANING:' on page 3, line 8.
  • Replaces the word 'OR' with 'AND' on page 3, line 20.
  • The amendment text does not provide details about how these changes will affect the list of petitioners or the overall meaning of the bill's provisions.
L.034

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment removes references to institutional petitioners in the bill that allows certain community members to ask for an extreme risk protection order.

  • Removes specific mentions of 'institutional petitioners' throughout the bill text.
  • Strikes out sections detailing how institutional petitioners can file petitions.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens to the rights or roles of institutional petitioners after their removal from the bill.
L.036

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a provision that stops an institutional petitioner from filing certain protection orders if they are found guilty of submitting malicious or knowingly false petitions.

  • Adds a new rule prohibiting institutional petitioners who have been convicted of filing malicious or knowingly false extreme risk protection order petitions from filing future temporary or permanent extreme risk protection orders.
  • The amendment text does not specify the consequences for violating this prohibition, such as penalties or enforcement mechanisms.
  • It is unclear how 'institutional petitioners' are defined in the context of this bill.
L.041

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section to the bill that penalizes community members who file malicious or knowingly false petitions for protection orders by automatically losing any state or board accreditation or licensure they hold at the time of filing.

  • Adds a new clause (6) after existing clauses in the bill, which states that community members who file malicious or knowingly false petitions will lose their state or board accreditation and licenses.
  • The amendment text does not specify what types of accreditations or licenses are affected by this penalty.
  • It is unclear how the determination of a petition being 'malicious' or 'knowingly false' would be made.
L.047

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment changes the list of people who can ask a court for an extreme risk protection order and adds new rules about how law enforcement must review these requests before the court considers them.

  • Adds co-responders from a community response team to the list of petitioners allowed to file for an extreme risk protection order.
  • Requires petitions filed by family members, community members, or institutional petitioners to be reviewed by law enforcement before being considered by the court.
  • Law enforcement must conduct a preliminary investigation and determine if there is probable cause that the respondent poses an imminent risk of unlawful firearm use.
  • The amendment text does not specify all details about how the review process will work, such as timelines or specific procedures for law enforcement agencies.
L.048

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new requirement for the court to collect and report data related to extreme risk protection orders, including information about petitioners and respondents.

  • Adds a new section in Colorado Revised Statutes that requires courts to gather detailed demographic and background information from both petitioners and respondents when issuing or renewing an extreme risk protection order.
  • Specifies the types of data to be collected such as age, sex, race, relationship status, alcohol/drug use history, prior arrests, firearm details, and more.
  • Requires annual reporting by the Judicial Department starting in January 2027 on this collected data during their 'Smart Act' hearing.
  • The exact format or method of how the data will be reported is not specified in the amendment text.
L.049

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section to the law that says police cannot take away someone's property or guns until after a judge has given an order saying it’s okay.

  • Adds a new part (8) to Colorado Revised Statutes 13-14.5-108, which states that law enforcement agencies or officers must wait for a court order before seizing the respondent's property or firearms.
  • The amendment text does not specify what happens if there is an immediate danger and waiting for a court order could be risky.
  • It’s unclear how this change will affect current practices of law enforcement in emergency situations.
L.051

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a rule that stops certain people from asking the court for an extreme risk protection order if they have a history of domestic violence or stalking against someone who is now trying to get this kind of order.

  • Adds a new rule that prevents individuals with a past conviction related to domestic violence or stalking, where the victim was later protected by a criminal protection order, from filing for an extreme risk protection order if the current respondent in their case was previously the victim.
  • The amendment text is specific and clear but may be complex for some readers due to legal terminology. It does not provide details on how this rule will be enforced or what happens when someone tries to file despite these restrictions.
L.052

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a rule that stops certain institutions from filing extreme risk protection orders against former members of the U.S. Armed Forces who are getting treatment at those same institutions.

  • Adds a new rule preventing institutional petitioners, as defined in specific sections, from filing temporary extreme risk protection orders if the respondent is a former member of the U.S. Armed Forces seeking treatment at that institution.
  • The amendment text references specific legal sections (13-14.5-102 (6.5)(f) and (g)) which are not explained here, making it hard to fully understand the exact institutions involved without additional context.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-06 Governor

    Governor Signed

  2. 2026-03-27 Governor

    Sent to the Governor

  3. 2026-03-26 House

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. 2026-03-26 Senate

    Signed by the President of the Senate

  5. 2026-03-20 House

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. 2026-03-19 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. 2026-03-05 House

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  8. 2026-03-02 House

    House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. 2026-02-04 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

  10. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  11. 2026-02-02 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  12. 2026-01-30 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/02/2026 - No Amendments

  13. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  14. 2026-01-14 Senate

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

Official Summary Text

The act adds a co-responder who is part of a co-responder community response to the list of community members who may petition the court for an extreme risk protection order. Health-care facilities, behavioral health treatment facilities, school districts, the state charter school institute, K-12 charter schools, private schools, and institutions of higher education are established as institutional petitioners that may petition a court for an extreme risk protection order.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SENATE BILL 26-004
BY SENATOR(S) Sullivan and Gonzales J., Amabile, Ball, Cutter,
Danielson, Exum, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Lindstedt, Michaelson Jenet,
Rodriguez, Wallace, Weissman, Coleman;
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Froelich and Willford, Bacon, Boesenecker,
Brown, Camacho, Duran, Espenoza, Garcia, Gilchrist, Hamrick, Jackson,
Joseph, Lindsay, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Rydin, Sirota,
Smith, Stewart R., Story, Titone, Woodrow, Zokaie, McCluskie.
CONCERNING WHO MAY PETITION A COURT FOR AN EXTREME RISK
PROTECTION ORDER.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-102, amend
(1), (2), and (11); and add (6.5) as follows:
13-14.5-102. Definitions.
As used in this article 14.5, unless the context otherwise clearly
reqmres:
(1) "Community member" means:
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
the act.
( a) A licensed health-care professional or mental health professional
who, through a direct professional relationship, provided care to the
respondent or the respondent's child within six months before requesting the
protection order; or
(b) An educator who, through a direct professional relationship,
interacted with the respondent or the respondent's child within six months
before requesting the protection order; OR
( c) A CO-RESPONDER WHO IS PART OF A CO-RESPONDER COMMUNITY
RESPONSE, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-32-3501 (8)(d), WHO, IN THEIR
CAPACITY AS A CO-RESPONDER, OR A COMMUNITY MEMBER, AS DEFINED IN
THIS SECTION, WHO, AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM, PROVIDES ON-SITE CRISIS ASSESSMENT,
DE-ESCALATION, OR INTERVENTION SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS IN CRISIS,
WHO INTERACTED WITH THE RESPONDENT OR THE RESPONDENT'S CHILD
WITHIN SIX MONTHS BEFORE REQUESTING THE PROTECTION ORDER BUT WHO
IS NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO RESPONDED TO A BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH-RELATED CALL INVOLVING THE RESPONDENT.
(2) "Educator" means a teacher employed to instruct students or a
school administrator in a school district, private school, charter school
institute, or an individual charter school; or a faculty member at an
institution of higher education, INCLUDING A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, A
LOCAL DISTRICT COLLEGE, OR AN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE.
( 6.5) "INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER" MEANS AN ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS
OR CONTRACTS WITH A COMMUNITY MEMBER AS DEFINED IN THIS SECTION,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
(a) A SCHOOL DISTRICT;
(b) A PRIVATE SCHOOL;
( c) THE ST ATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE CREATED IN SECTION
22-30.5-503;
( d) AN INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CHARTER SCHOOL OR INSTITUTE
CHARTER SCHOOL;
PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-004
( e) AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION, INCLUDING A
COMMUNITY COLLEGE, A LOCAL DISTRICT COLLEGE, OR AN AREA TECHNICAL
COLLEGE;
(f) A HOSPITAL OR HEALTH-CARE FACILITY LICENSED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 1 OF ARTICLE 3 OF TITLE 25;
OR
(g) A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER
TREATMENT FACILITY, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ENTITIES, OR OTHER FACILITY
WHERE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CRISIS SERVICES ARE OFFERED.
(11) "Respondent" means the person, INCLUDING A PERSON UNDER
EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD who is identified as the respondent in a petition filed
pursuant to this article 14.5.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-103, amend
(l)(a) and (l)(b) as follows:
13-14.5-103. Temporary extreme risk protection orders.
(1) (a) A family or household member of the respondent, a
community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement
officer or agency may request a temporary extreme risk protection order
without notice to the respondent by including in the petition for the extreme
risk protection order an affidavit, signed under oath and penalty of perjury,
supporting the issuance of a temporary extreme risk protection order that
sets forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the petition or the
reason for believing they exist and, if the petitioner is a family or household
member or community member, attesting that the petitioner is a family or
household member or community member. The petition must comply with
the requirements of section 13-14.5-104 (3 ). If the petitioner is a law
enforcement officer or law enforcement agency, AND IF THE LA w
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY HAS PROBABLE
CAUSE TO BELIEVE THE RESPONDENT HAS FIREARMS WITHIN THEIR CUSTODY,
CONTROL, OR POSSESSION, the law enforcement officer or law enforcement
agency shall concurrently file a sworn affidavit for a COURT TO ISSUE A
search warrant pursuant to section 16-3-301.5 to search for any firearms in
the possession, CUSTODY, or control of the respondent at a location or
locations to be named in the warrant. If a petition filed pursuant to section
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-004
27-65-106 is also filed against the respondent, a court of competent
jurisdiction may hear that petition at the same time as the hearing for a
temporary extreme risk protection order or the hearing for a continuing
extreme risk protection order.
(b) N otwithstanding any provision oflaw to the contrary, a licensed
health-eat e pt ofessional ot mental health pt ofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER
OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER authorized to file a petition for a temporary
extreme risk protection order, upon filing the petition for a temporary
extreme risk protection order, is authorized to disclose protected health
information of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and
disposition of the request for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
When disclosing protected health information, the licensed health-care
professional ot mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR
INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER shall make reasonable efforts to limit protected
health information to the minimum necessary to accomplish the filing of the
petition. Upon receipt of a petition by a licensed health-care professional ot
mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL
PETITIONER, and for good cause shown, the court may issue orders to obtain
any records or documents relating to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and
clinical records, of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and
disposition of the petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
When protected health information is disclosed or when the court receives
any records or documents related to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment or
clinical records, the court shall order that the parties are prohibited from
using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other
than the proceedings for a petition for a temporary extreme risk protection
order and shall order the return to the covered entity or destroy the protected
health information, including all copies made, at the end of the litigation or
proceeding. The court shall seal all records and other health information
received that contain protected health information. The decision of a
licensed health-cat e pt ofessional 01 mental health pt ofessional COMMUNITY
MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose
records or documents relating to the diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and
clinical records of a respondent, when made reasonably and in good faith,
shall not be the basis for any civil, administrative, or criminal liability with
respect to the licensed health-eat e professional ot licensed mental health
professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER.
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-104, amend
PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-004
(l)(a) and (l)(b) as follows:
13-14.5-104. Petition for extreme risk protection order.
(1) (a) A petition for an extreme risk protection order may be filed
by a family or household member of the respondent, a community member ,
AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement officer or agency. If
the petition is filed by a law enforcement officer or agency, a county or city
attorney shall represent the officer or agency in any judicial proceeding
upon request. If the petition is filed by a family or household member or
community member, the petitioner, to the best of the petitioner's ability,
shall notify the law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction where the
respondent resides of the petition and the hearing date with enough advance
notice to allow for participation or attendance. Upon the filing of a petition,
the court shall appoint an attorney to represent the respondent, and the court
shall include the appointment in the notice of hearing provided to the
respondent pursuant to section 13-14.5-105 (l)(a). The respondent may
replace the attorney with an attorney of the respondent's own selection at
any time at the respondent's own expense. The court shall pay the attorney
fees for an attorney appointed for the respondent.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision oflaw to the contrary, a licensed
health-care professional or mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER
OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONEK -autlrorized to fil~nrpetitfon for an-extreme
risk protection order, upon filing the petition for an extreme risk protection
order, is authorized to disclose protected health information of the
respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the
petition for an extreme risk protection order. When disclosing protected
health information, the licensed health-care professional or mental health
professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER shall
make reasonable efforts to limit protected health information to the
minimum necessary to accomplish the filing of the request. Upon receipt of
a petition by a licensed health-care professional or mental health
professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, and for
good cause shown, the court may issue orders to obtain any records or
documents relating to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and clinical
records of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and
disposition of the petition for an extreme risk protection order. When
protected health information is disclosed or when the court receives any
records or documents related to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment or
PAGE 5-SENA TE BILL 26-004
clinical records, the court shall order that the parties are prohibited from
using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other
than the proceedings for a petition for an extreme risk protection order and
shall order the return to the covered entity or destroy the protected health
information, including all copies made, at the end of the litigation or
proceeding. The court shall seal all records and other health information
received that contain protected health information. The decision of a
licensed health-eat e pt ofessional ot mental health pt ofessional COMMUNITY
MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose
records or documents relating to the diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and
clinical records of a respondent, when made reasonably and in good faith,
must not be the basis for any civil, administrative, or criminal liability with
respect to the licensed health-eat e pt ofessional ot mental health pt ofessional
COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER.
SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-107, amend
(2)(b) as follows:
13-14.5-107. Termination or renewal of protection orders.
(2) Renewal.
(b) A petitioner, a family or household member of a respondent, a
community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement
officer or agency may, by motion, request a renewal of an extreme risk
protection order at any time within sixty-three calendar days before the
expiration of the order.
SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-113, amend
(1) and (4) as follows:
13-14.5-113. Liability.
(1) Except as provided in section 13-14.5-111, this article 14.5 does
not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person,
including a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or entity
for acts or omissions made in good faith related to obtaining an extreme risk
protection order or a temporary extreme risk protection order, including but
not limited to reporting, declining to report, investigating, declining to
investigate, filing, or declining to file a petition pursuant to this article 14.5.
PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-004
This article 14.5 does not impose criminal or civil liability on a peace
officer lawfully enforcing an order pursuant to this article 14.5.
( 4) This article 14.5 does not require a family or household member
of the respondent, a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or
a law enforcement officer or agency to file a petition for a temporary
emergency extreme risk protection order or petition for an extreme risk
protection order.
SECTION 6. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,
determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for
PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-004
the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state
institutions.
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
PRESIDENT OF
THE SENATE
sther van Mourik
SECRETARY OF
THE SENATE
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
~Reilly
CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES
APPROVED uh YY\(H'\0°'-1 Arv;\ ~ t'-2-cr2Jo "-\ I\: OOAl'r)
(Date and Time)
Jare
G THE S ATE O OLORADO
PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-004