Back to Colorado

SB26-013 • 2026

Exclude Cohabitation from Elements of Bigamy

The act excludes cohabitation as a possible element of bigamy. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Children Taxes
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Sen. N. Hinrichsen, Sen. J. Marchman, Rep. Y. Zokaie, Sen. J. Coleman, Sen. J. Gonzales, Sen. I. Jodeh, Sen. C. Kipp, Sen. M. Snyder, Sen. K. Wallace, Sen. M. Weissman, Rep. J. Bacon, Rep. S. Lieder, Rep. M. Lindsay, Rep. J. Mabrey, Rep. K. Nguyen, Rep. M. Rutinel, Rep. S. Woodrow
Last action
2026-03-26
Official status
Governor Signed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide additional details on the bill's text, digest, or effective date.

Exclude Living Together from Bigamy Law

This law says that living with someone without being married is not part of what makes bigamy.

What This Bill Does

  • Changes the definition of bigamy to remove cohabitation as an element.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who are in relationships but aren't married
  • Courts dealing with bigamy cases

Terms To Know

Bigamy
When someone is legally married to one person and then gets married again without ending the first marriage.
Cohabitation
Living with another person as if you are a couple, but not being officially married.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not change other laws about marriage or living together.
  • It only affects how bigamy is defined and understood in legal terms.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L.001

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds new rules to prevent married individuals from falsely representing multiple spousal relationships for benefits and clarifies that cohabitation alone does not count as bigamy.

  • Adds a rule stating that legally married people cannot maintain multiple households pretending to be spouses or marriage-like relationships just to get public assistance, tax benefits, or government programs.
  • Includes another rule saying if someone who is already married claims more than one person as their spouse for any kind of benefit or legal status, it can be seen as bigamy.
  • The amendment text does not fully explain how cohabitation will be excluded from the elements of bigamy.
  • It's unclear what specific changes are being made to line 1 and after line 12 on page 2, since the exact wording is not provided.
L.002

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds new provisions to the bill, allowing only one taxpayer or household to claim a child as a dependent for state tax benefits in a given year and requiring the Department of Revenue to designate which taxpayer can claim the child if multiple adults are involved.

  • Adds a new section (3) that allows only one taxpayer or household to claim a child as a dependent for state tax purposes in any given tax year.
  • Inserts a new section (4) requiring the Department of Revenue to designate which taxpayer can claim a child if multiple adults reside in the same household and maintain marriage-like relationships with the child.
  • Includes a new section (5) that permits the Department of Revenue to create rules ensuring no child is claimed by more than one taxpayer for state tax benefits in the same year.
  • The amendment text does not specify how the Department of Revenue will determine which taxpayer can claim the child, leaving this detail undefined.
L.004

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds new requirements for establishing paternity and child support, defines evidence of a marriage-like relationship involving children, and clarifies that cohabitation alone does not create legal parental status beyond two individuals.

  • Adds provisions requiring cooperation with the establishment of paternity and child support when state-funded public assistance is involved.
  • Defines the existence of a child born to or legally adopted by two individuals as evidence of a marriage-like relationship between them.
  • Clarifies that cohabitation does not create legal parental status for more than two individuals.
  • The amendment text references sections and articles from other titles, which are not provided here and may require additional context to fully understand the implications.
L.006

Second Reading

Passed [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section to the bill that gives a title to another part of the bill.

  • Adds a new section (1.1) right after line 2 on page 1, which states 'THE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS "THE MITTERRAND ACT."'.
  • The amendment does not explain what the Mitterrand Act is or how it relates to excluding cohabitation from bigamy elements.
L.008

Second Reading

Lost [**]

Plain English: The amendment adds new requirements for establishing paternity and child support, defines evidence of a marriage-like relationship, and clarifies that cohabitation alone does not create legal parental status.

  • Adds provisions requiring cooperation with the establishment of paternity and child support when state-funded public assistance is involved.
  • Defines a child born to or legally adopted by two individuals as evidence of a marriage-like relationship between them.
  • Requires applicants for public assistance to cooperate in establishing paternity and enforcing child support unless there is good cause not to do so.
  • Clarifies that cohabitation does not create legal parental status beyond the biological parents.
  • The amendment text does not specify all details about how these new requirements will be implemented or enforced.
L.009

Third Reading

Passed

Plain English: The amendment removes specific language about a portion of the bill related to bigamy.

  • Removes the phrase 'portion; and add (0.5) as' from page 2, line 1 of the bill.
  • Deletes lines 4 and 5 on page 2.
  • The amendment does not provide details about what was in lines 4 and 5 that were deleted, so it's unclear exactly what information or rules were removed.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-26 Governor

    Governor Signed

  2. 2026-03-18 Governor

    Sent to the Governor

  3. 2026-03-18 House

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. 2026-03-17 Senate

    Signed by the President of the Senate

  5. 2026-03-13 Senate

    Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. 2026-03-12 Senate

    Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Laid Over to 03/13/2026

  7. 2026-03-11 House

    House Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor

  8. 2026-03-10 House

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor

  9. 2026-03-09 House

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  10. 2026-03-04 House

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  11. 2026-02-12 House

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  12. 2026-02-11 Senate

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  13. 2026-02-10 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  14. 2026-02-09 Senate

    Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/10/2026 - No Amendments

  15. 2026-02-04 Senate

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  16. 2026-01-14 Senate

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

Official Summary Text

The act excludes cohabitation as a possible element of bigamy.
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)