Back to Delaware

HB75 • 2025

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.

Children Education Healthcare Labor
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Dukes
Last action
2026-07-01
Official status
Stricken 7/1/26
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official text indicates the bill was stricken in the House on July 1, 2026. While the summary states it passed both chambers earlier, the final action 'Stricken' means the legislation did not become law.

HB75: Removing Time Limits for Civil Lawsuits About Child Sexual Abuse

This bill would allow victims of child sexual abuse in Delaware who were previously barred by time limits to file civil lawsuits against their abusers at any time.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows a victim of child sexual abuse that occurred in the state, who was previously barred from filing suit due to an expired statute of limitations, to file claims in Superior Court at any time.
  • States that this change is intended to apply retroactively to past acts of abuse.
  • Requires proof of gross negligence for lawsuits against institutions or businesses where the abuser worked if they had a duty of care to the victim.
  • Allows defendants accused falsely with malicious intent and no factual basis to recover attorney fees, provided the court makes an independent finding of improper motive.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Victims of child sexual abuse in Delaware who were previously unable to sue because legal deadlines had passed.
  • Individuals accused of committing sexual abuse against a minor.
  • Institutions, businesses, charitable organizations, schools, hospitals, and government entities that may be held liable for the actions of their employees.

Terms To Know

Statute of limitations
A law that sets a maximum time limit for filing legal lawsuits after an event occurs.
Retroactively
Applying new rules to events or actions that happened before the rule was created.
Gross negligence
A severe failure to take reasonable care, showing a reckless disregard for safety or duty.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill was stricken in the House on July 1, 2026, meaning it did not become law.
  • Because the legislation was removed from consideration, no effective date is listed and the changes described would not take effect.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

SA 1

1 • Sokola

Stricken 7/1/26

Plain English: This amendment changes rules about suing for childhood sexual abuse, allowing victims to sue organizations if they were negligent and setting specific limits on how much money can be awarded.

  • It allows a victim who missed the deadline to sue an individual abuser to still file a lawsuit against them at any time in Superior Court.
  • It lets victims sue companies or groups that employed the abuser if those organizations were negligent, with stricter rules for abuse happening before July 9, 2007.
  • It removes legal protections (sovereign immunity) so that government agencies and school districts can be sued just like private businesses.
  • It sets a maximum limit of $500,000 in damages from the abuser or an organization, but this cap does not apply to medical bills.
  • The official text provided ends abruptly while explaining rules for suing someone who is dead or unable to defend themselves.
  • Some parts of the amendment use complex legal terms that are difficult to explain simply without guessing at their full meaning.
SA 2

2 • Sokola

Stricken 7/1/26

Plain English: This amendment changes rules for lawsuits about child sexual abuse by allowing victims to sue organizations even if time limits have passed, while setting specific money caps and removing protections that usually shield the government from being sued.

  • Victims can file a lawsuit against an organization at any time, even if the usual deadline has already passed for suing the individual abuser.
  • Organizations like schools or charities must pay damages only if they were negligent (careless) in hiring or supervising the person who committed the abuse.
  • The government and its agencies lose their special legal protection called 'sovereign immunity,' meaning they can be sued just like private companies for these crimes.
  • There is a limit of $500,000 on how much money an abuser or an organization must pay in total damages, but this cap does not apply to medical bills and counseling costs.
  • The official text provided ends abruptly with the word 'act', so it is unclear what specific rules follow regarding cases where the alleged abuser has died or cannot participate in court.
  • Some parts of the amendment use complex legal terms like 'joint tortfeasors' and 'gross negligence' that are difficult to explain simply without guessing at their exact meaning.
SA 3

3 • Sokola

Passed 7/1/26

Plain English: This amendment clarifies that victims can sue both individual abusers and organizations for past child sexual abuse, while setting specific rules on how much money they might receive.

  • It allows lawsuits against groups like schools or charities if they were negligent in hiring or supervising the person who committed the abuse.
  • It removes special legal protections that usually stop people from suing the state government or school districts for these crimes.
  • It sets a limit of $500,000 on money awarded for pain and suffering, but does not limit payments for medical bills or counseling costs.
  • The official text provided ends abruptly in the middle of a sentence about suing if an abuser is alive, so rules regarding dead defendants are unclear.
  • Some parts of the amendment contain confusing formatting errors that make it hard to read exactly how certain legal terms were changed.

Bill History

  1. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 1 to HB 75 - Stricken in Senate

  2. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 2 to HB 75 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  3. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 3 to HB 75 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  4. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 2 to HB 75 - Stricken in Senate

  5. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 3 to HB 75 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 14 YES 6 NO 1 ABSENT

  6. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  7. 2026-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Stricken in House

  8. 2026-06-29 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment SA 1 to HB 75 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  9. 2026-03-25 Delaware General Assembly

    Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 2 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits

  10. 2025-07-01 Delaware General Assembly

    Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

  11. 2025-06-30 Delaware General Assembly

    Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 VACANT

  12. 2025-04-09 Delaware General Assembly

    Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 9 Favorable, 1 On Its Merits

  13. 2025-03-11 Delaware General Assembly

    Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Official Summary Text

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.
A victim of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who has been barred from filing suit against the victim’s abuser by virtue of the expiration of a former civil statute of limitations are permitted to file these claims in the Superior Court of this state at any time. This is intended to apply retroactively.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Legislation Document

SPONSOR:

Rep. Dukes & Rep. Griffith & Rep. Minor-Brown & Sen. Poore

Reps. Gorman, Hilovsky, K. Johnson, Phillips, Romer, Ross Levin, Snyder-Hall, Shupe, Lambert, Postles; Sens. Hansen, Hocker, Hoffner, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Wilson, Sokola, Pinkney

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY

HOUSE BILL NO. 75

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CIVIL CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR.

WHEREAS, in June of 2007, the 144

th

General Assembly unanimously passed Senate Bill 29, which gave victims of childhood sexual abuse a two year “window,” allowing them to bring a civil action against their abusers in cases previously barred by the law. The bill, known as the Child Victim’s Act of 2007, was signed into law on July 10, 2007; and

WHEREAS, in enacting the bipartisan Child Victim’s Act, Delaware was one of two states at the forefront of a revolution for children; and

WHEREAS, following the enactment of SB 29, opponents of the bill challenged it in the Delaware Supreme Court in

Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales,

15 A.3d 1247 (Del. 2011) (en banc), claiming that retroactivity and changes to the statute of limitation were unconstitutional; and

WHEREAS, the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the Child Victim’s Act of 2007; and

WHEREAS, 22 states have now followed the pioneering examples of Delaware and California in enacting Child Victim’s Act legislation for survivors of childhood sexual abuse, most recently in the State of Maryland where SB 686 (“The Child Victim’s Act of 2023”) was signed by its Governor on April 11, 2023, to retroactively remove the statute of limitations for all claims of sexual abuse of a minor in that State; and

WHEREAS, while all victims of childhood sexual abuse were covered by the Child Victim’s Act of 2007, many were too young to avail themselves of the opportunity to sue their abusers during the two year “window” provided by the Act; and

WHEREAS, for example, an 8-year-old child sexually abused in 1999 was only 16 when Delaware had its two year window for legal claims; and

WHEREAS, victims of child sexual abuse face significant barriers to disclosure such that the average length of time before disclosure is around 20 years and significantly longer for those who experience institutional abuse; and

WHEREAS, most victims do not acknowledge or understand their abuse and its consequences until well into adulthood, long after the statute of limitations has expired on their claims; and

WHEREAS, it is the intent of this legislature and the purpose of this legislation to give full access to justice for victims of childhood sexual abuse regardless of when it occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:

Section 1. Amend § 8145, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:

§ 8145. Civil suits for damages based upon sexual abuse of a minor by an adult.

(a) A cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult may be filed in the Superior Court of this State at any time following the commission of the act or acts that constituted the sexual abuse. A civil cause of action for sexual abuse of a minor shall be based upon sexual acts that would constitute a criminal offense under the Delaware Code.

(b)

For a period of 2 years following July 9, 2007, victims of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who have been barred from filing suit against their abusers by virtue of the expiration of the former civil statute of limitations, shall be permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court of this State. If the person committing the act of sexual abuse against a minor was employed by an institution, agency, firm, business, corporation, or other public or private legal entity that owned a duty of care to the victim, or the accused and the minor were engaged in some activity over which the legal entity had some degree of responsibility or control, damages against the legal entity shall be awarded under this subsection only if there is a finding of gross negligence on the part of the legal entity.

Victims of child sexual abuse who have been barred from filing a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitation, notice of claim, presentation deadline, or any other time limit that had expired, or for which a final judgment was rendered based on the expiration of any time limitation or other procedural bases, are permitted to file those claims in the Superior Court at any time.

(c) No action relating to the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult that is filed or pending after [the effective date of this act] may be dismissed by virtue of the expiration of a civil statute of limitations.

(d) This section applies to any actions for damages against any person, institution, public or private entity, including any charitable organization, educational institution, hospital, and the government. The State waives sovereign immunity in a cause of action based upon the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult.

(c)

(e)

A person against whom a suit is filed may recover attorneys’ fees where the Court determines that a false accusation was made with no basis in fact and with malicious intent. A verdict in favor of the accused shall not be the sole basis for a determination that an accusation was false. The Court must make an independent finding of an improper motive to award attorneys’ fees under this section.

SYNOPSIS

A victim of child sexual abuse that occurred in this State who has been barred from filing suit against the victim’s abuser by virtue of the expiration of a former civil statute of limitations are permitted to file these claims in the Superior Court of this state at any time. This is intended to apply retroactively.