Back to Delaware

HS1FORHB145 • 2025

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.

Crime Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Wilson-Anton
Last action
2026-05-19
Official status
Senate Judiciary 5/19/26
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary and text do not provide details on the handling of evidence obtained before the law is enacted.

Law to Restrict Reverse Keyword Searches

This act restricts government entities in Delaware from using reverse keyword searches unless investigating a Class A violent felony with limited results.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibits law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and requests.
  • Allows for the use of reverse-keyword court orders only to investigate suspected Class A violent felonies if the search query returns five or fewer hits.
  • Requires suppression of evidence obtained through unlawful reverse keyword searches.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Law enforcement and courts in Delaware
  • Citizens whose personal data might be searched without probable cause

Terms To Know

Reverse-keyword court order
A legal document that allows the government to obtain technology search data about people who have searched for specific words or phrases online, even if they are not suspected of a crime.
Class A violent felony
The most serious type of crimes in Delaware, such as murder and robbery involving death.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not specify what happens to evidence obtained before the law is passed.
  • Does not address how courts will handle cases where reverse keyword searches were used but are now banned.
  • The effective date of this act has not been determined yet.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

HA 1

1 • Wilson-Anton

Passed 5/19/26

Plain English: This amendment adds definitions for 'data' and 'database', expands the list of crimes eligible for reverse keyword searches, changes references from class A violent felonies to reverse-keyword designated felonies, and requires that evidence unrelated to a case be destroyed unless it is potentially exculpatory.

  • Adds new definitions for 'data' and 'database'.
  • Expands the list of crimes eligible for reverse keyword searches to include specific violent and sexual offenses.
  • Changes references from class A violent felonies to reverse-keyword designated felonies.
  • Requires that evidence unrelated to a case be destroyed unless it is potentially exculpatory.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how the definitions of 'data' and 'database' will be used in practice.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-19 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  2. 2026-05-19 Delaware General Assembly

    Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  3. 2026-05-19 Delaware General Assembly

    Passed By House. Votes: 24 YES 12 NO 5 ABSENT

  4. 2026-05-19 Delaware General Assembly

    Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

  5. 2026-05-06 Delaware General Assembly

    Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits

  6. 2026-04-14 Delaware General Assembly

    Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 145, and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Official Summary Text

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.
Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search.
This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Legislation Document

SPONSOR:

Rep. Wilson-Anton & Sen. Pinkney

Reps. Burns, Morrison, Gorman, Harris

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY

HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO. 1

FOR

HOUSE BILL NO. 145

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.

WHEREAS,

since our Nation’s founding, general warrants, which permit government officials to conduct broad searches without identifying a specific crime or specific suspect that is being investigated, have been deemed a significant threat to personal freedom, privacy, and liberty; and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the use of general warrants; and

WHEREAS, reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to precisely identify an unspecified and unlimited number of persons who have sought information about a specific word or phrase, without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime; and

WHEREAS, the mass surveillance that is effectuated by reverse-keyword court orders severely undermines the right to privacy and can adversely impact and chill the exercise of the freedom of speech, association, religion, assembly, movement, and the press; and

WHEREAS, the government’s ability to obtain the same mass surveillance information that can be obtained using reverse-keyword court orders through voluntary compliance-based reverse-keyword requests can produce the same adverse impacts and chilling effects upon personal freedom, privacy, and liberty as their court-ordered counterparts.

NOW, THEREFORE:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:

Section 1. Amend Chapter 23, Title 11 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:

§ 2312. Reverse-keyword searches prohibited.

(a) For

purposes of this section:

(1) “Class A violent felony” means those felonies designated as class A that appear in § 4201(c) of this title.

(2) “Government entity” means any department or agency of

the State or any political subdivision thereof

, or any individual acting for or on behalf of the State or a political subdivision thereof.

(3) “Reverse-keyword court order” means any court order, including a search warrant or subpoena, compelling the disclosure of records or information identifying any unnamed persons

, by name or other unique identifier,

who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the order is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.

(4) “Reverse-keyword request” means any request, in the absence of a court order, by any government entity for the voluntary provision of records or information identifying any unnamed persons, by name or other unique identifier, who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the request is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.

A “reverse-keyword request” includes an offer to purchase such records or information.

(5) “Search hit” means a search result that identifies an individual device location or keyword entry that, upon querying of a database that is the subject of a reverse-keyword court order, precisely matches the criteria of the court order’s search query.

(b) Reverse-keyword court orders prohibited.

(1)

A government entity may not seek, from any court, a

reverse-keyword court order

.

(2) A government entity may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword court order.

(3) No court of this State may issue a reverse-keyword court order.

(4) No court or government entity of

the State or a political subdivision thereof, may support, assist, or enforce a reverse-keyword court order issued by the State of Delaware or a political subdivision thereof, or any other state or a political subdivision thereof, including the domestication of any such court order.

(c)

Reverse-keyword requests

prohibited.

(1) A government entity may not make a reverse-keyword request.

(2) A government entity may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword request.

(d) Notwithstanding the prohibition in subsection (b) of this section, a government entity may seek, and a court may grant, a reverse-keyword court order in the investigation of a class A violent felony, subject to all of the following conditions:

(1) If a database query undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in 5 or fewer search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by fully producing the information sought by the order.

(2) If a database query that was undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in more than 5 search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by only providing the number of search hits produced by the query without any further information. The government entity may not seek, view, or accept any additional information generated by the search. A government entity may seek a new reverse-keyword court order with narrower search terms that meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.

(3) A reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection must prominently state the required limited response mandated under paragraph (d)(2) of this section in the event the search query returns more than 5 search hits.

(e) A government entity may not seek the assistance of any agency of the federal government or any agency of the government of another state or subdivision thereof in obtaining information or data from a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request if the government entity would be barred from directly seeking such information under this section.

(f) Suppression of evidence.

(1) Except as proof of a violation of this section, no record or information obtained, accessed, or otherwise secured in violation of this section, nor any evidence derived therefrom, is admissible in any criminal, civil, administrative, or other proceeding.

(2) For purposes of this subsection, a record, information, or evidence is “derived from” a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request where the government entity would not have originally possessed the information or evidence but for the violative court order or request, and regardless of any claim that the record, information, or evidence is attenuated from the unlawful order or request, would inevitably have been discovered, or was subsequently reobtained through other means.

§ 2313. Notice and enforcement.

(a) A person whose name or other identifying information was obtained by a government entity in violation of

§ 2312 of this title

must be notified of the violation, in writing, by the government entity who committed the violation and of the legal recourse available to that person under this section.

(b) A violation of § 2312 of this title constitutes an injury and a person injured by a violation may institute proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for any of the following

:

(1) Injunctive relief.

(2) Declaratory relief.

(3) A writ of mandamus.

(4)

Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

(c) Any data or other information acquired in violation of § 2312 of this title must be immediately deleted and destroyed.

(d) Any officer, employee, or agent of the State or a political subdivision thereof who violates § 2312 of this title is subject to appropriate disciplinary action.

SYNOPSIS

Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search.

This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.