Back to District of Columbia

B26-0570 • 2025

Office of Human Rights Rulemaking Authority Amendment Act of 2026

Office of Human Rights Rulemaking Authority Amendment Act of 2026

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Nadeau
Last action
2026-05-12
Official status
Under Council Review
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Checked against official source text during the last sync.

Amending Language Access Act to Include Enforcement

This bill amends the Language Access Act of 2004 by adding enforcement measures, allowing complainants to prove violations without needing to show intent or discrimination, and permitting the Mayor to create rules for its implementation.

What This Bill Does

  • Adds new sections to the Language Access Act that make covered entities responsible if they do not follow language access requirements.
  • Allows complainants to prove a violation without needing to show intent, discrimination, or animus.
  • Requires remedies such as corrective action and statutory damages for those who violate the act.
  • Gives the Mayor authority to create rules to enforce the Language Access Act.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Covered entities that must provide language access services under the Language Access Act of 2004.
  • Complainants seeking remedies for violations of the Language Access Act.

Terms To Know

covered entity
An organization or business required by law to provide language access services.
statutory damages
Money awarded as a penalty for breaking the law, even if no actual harm was done.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify when it will take effect.
  • It is unclear how much funding or staffing will be needed to enforce these new rules.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-12 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Public Hearing on B26-0570

  2. 2026-04-17 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register

  3. 2026-04-13 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary by Public Works and Operations

  4. 2026-03-12 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Public Hearing Canceled

  5. 2026-03-09 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Cancellation Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary

  6. 2026-02-20 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register

  7. 2026-02-17 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary by Public Works and Operations

  8. 2026-02-06 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Notice of Intent to Act on B26-0570 Published in the District of Columbia Register

  9. 2026-02-03 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Referred to Committee on Public Works and Operations

  10. 2026-01-26 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    B26-0570 Introduced by Councilmember Nadeau at Office of the Secretary

Official Summary Text

Office of Human Rights Rulemaking Authority Amendment Act of 2026

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
1
_____________________________
Councilmember Brianne K. Nadeau

A BILL

_________________________

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________

To amend the Language Access Act of 2004 to include enforcement and relief provisions for 1
violations of the act; to authorize the Office of Human Rights to adopt rules and 2
regulations to implement the provisions of this act. 3
4
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 5
act may be cited as the “Office of Human Rights Rulemaking Authority Amendment Act of 6
2026”. 7
Sec. 2. The Language Access Act of 2004, effective June 19, 2004 (D.C. Law 15-167; 8
D.C. Official Code § 2-1931 et seq.) is amended as follows: 9
(a) Section 6 (D.C. Official Code § 2-1935) is amended by adding new subsections (d) 10
through (i), to read as follows: 11
“(d) A covered entity shall be strictly liable for failure to comply with the requirements of 12
this act. 13
“(e) To establish a violation, the complainant need only demonstrate that: 14
"(1) They were entitled to language access services under this act; and 15
"(2) Such services were not provided in the manner or timeframe required by this 16

2
act. 17
"(f) Proof of intent, discrimination, or animus shall not be required to establish non- 18
compliance. 19
“(g) Lack of funding, staffing limitations, or administrative burden shall not constitute a 20
defense to liability.”. 21
“(h) Upon a finding of non-compliance, the Director of Language Access shall order 22
remedies sufficient to place the complainant in the position they would have been in but for the 23
denial of required language access. Such remedies shall include: 24
"(1) Corrective action; and 25
"(2) Statutory damages awarded to the complainant. 26
“(i) Statutory damages awarded under this section shall be paid directly to the 27
complainant and shall not be contingent upon proof of actual damages.". 28
(b) A new section 9a is added to read as follows: 29
“Sec. 9a. Rulemaking. 30
The Mayor, pursuant to Title I of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, 31
approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C. Official Code § 2-501 et seq.), shall issue rules 32
to implement the provisions of this act.”. 33
Sec. 3. Applicability. 34
(a) Section 2(a) shall apply upon the date of inclusion of its fiscal effect in an approved 35
budget and financial plan. 36
(b) Section 2(b) shall apply as of June 19, 2004. 37
Sec. 4. Fiscal impact statement. 38
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 39

3
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 40
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a). 41
Sec. 5. Effective date. 42
This act shall take effect after approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 43
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as 44
provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 45
24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 46
Columbia Register. 47