Back to District of Columbia

B26-0712 • 2025

Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Technical Emergency Amendment Act of 2026

Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Technical Emergency Amendment Act of 2026

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Allen
Last action
2026-07-07
Official status
Under Mayoral Review
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The exact date when Section 3 expires depends on a future 'applicability date' of another bill, which is not specified in this text.

Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Technical Emergency Amendment Act of 2026

This emergency bill temporarily changes rules for police complaints in Washington, D.C., by expanding the review board to nine members with no law enforcement ties and allowing officials to start their own investigations into officer misconduct.

What This Bill Does

  • Increases the number of members on the Police Complaints Board from five to nine people.
  • Requires that all new board members have no current connection to any law enforcement agency after the term of the currently serving police member ends.
  • Allows the Executive Director of the Office of Police Complaints to file a complaint if they find evidence of abuse not mentioned in an original report.
  • Defines specific situations where officers must intervene or report when another officer uses excessive force, engages in misconduct, or breaks rules.
  • Clarifies that certain legal protections regarding victims only apply to people under 18 years old.

Who It Names or Affects

  • The Police Complaints Board in the District of Columbia
  • Officers with the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
  • Victims who are younger than 18 years old
  • The Office of Police Complaints and its Executive Director

Terms To Know

Police Complaints Board
A group that reviews complaints made against police officers.
Executive Director
The top leader of the Office of Police Complaints who can now start their own investigations if they find new evidence of abuse.
Emergency Act
A law that takes effect quickly but only stays in force for a short time, up to 90 days.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The changes to the Police Complaints Board will expire when another policing reform act from 2023 becomes fully effective.
  • The rules about victims under age 18 will expire when a different education and reentry bill passed in June 2026 takes effect.
  • This law only stays active for no longer than 90 days after the Mayor approves it.

Bill History

  1. 2026-07-07 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Jul 21, 2026

  2. 2026-06-30 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Retained by the Council

  3. 2026-06-30 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    Legislative Meeting

  4. 2026-06-29 Council of the District of Columbia LIMS

    B26-0712 Introduced by Councilmember Allen at Office of the Secretary

Official Summary Text

Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Technical Emergency Amendment Act of 2026

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
ENROLLED ORIGINAL

1

AN ACT

___________

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________

To amend, on an emergency basis, the Office of Citizen Complaint Review Establishment Act of
1998 to expand the membership of the Police Complaints Board and to allow the Office
of Police Complaints’ Executive Director to initiate their own complaint if they discover
evidence of abuse or misuse of police powers that was not alleged in the original
complaint, including the failure to intervene or report to a supervisor when another
officer used excessive force, engaged in other forms of misconduct, or violated a rule or
regulation; and to amend Chapter 3 of Title 14 of the District of Columbia Official Code
to clarify that certain provisions only apply to a victim who is under the age of 18.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
act may be cited as the “Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Technical Emergency
Amendment Act of 2026”.

Sec. 2. The Office of Citizen Complaint Review Establishment Act of 1998, effective
March 26, 1999 (D.C. Law 12-208; D.C. Official Code § 5-1101 et seq.), is amended as
follows:
(a) Section 4 (D.C. Official Code § 5-1103) is amended by adding a new paragraph (3B)
to read as follows:
“(3B) “MPD” means the Metropolitan Police Department.”.
(b) Section 5(a) (D.C. Official Code § 5-1104(a)) is amended by striking the phrase
“There is established a Police Complaints Board (“Board”). The Board shall be composed of 5
members, one of whom shall be a member of the MPD, and 4 of whom shall have no current
affiliation with any law enforcement agency.” and inserting the phrase “There is established a
Police Complaints Board. The Board shall be composed of 9 members, which shall include one
member from each Ward and one at-large member, none of whom, after the expiration of the
term of the currently serving member of the MPD, shall be affiliated with any law enforcement
agency.” in its place.
(c) Section 8 (D.C. Official Code § 5-1107) is amended as follows:
(1) A new subsection (g-1) is added to read as follows:
ENROLLED ORIGINAL

2

“(g-1)(1) If the Executive Director discovers evidence of abuse or misuse of police
powers that was not alleged by the complainant in the complaint, the Executive Director may:
“(A) Initiate the Executive Director’s own complaint against the subject
police officer; and
“(B) Take any of the actions described in subsection (g)(2) through (6) of
this section.
“(2) The authority granted pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall
include circumstances in which the subject police officer failed to:
“(A) Intervene in or subsequently report any use of force incident in which
the subject police officer observed another law enforcement officer, including an MPD officer,
utilizing excessive force or engaging in any type of misconduct, pursuant to MPD General Order
901.07, its successor directive, or a similar local or federal directive; or
“(B) Immediately report to their supervisor any violations of the rules and
regulations of the MPD committed by any other MPD officer, and each instance of their use of
force or a use of force committed by another MPD officer, pursuant to MPD General Order
201.26, or any successor directive.”.
(2) Subsection (h) is amended by striking the phrase “subsection (g)” and
inserting the phrase “subsection (g) or (g-1)” in its place.

Sec. 3. Chapter 3 of Title 14 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended as
follows:
(a) Section 14-310(b)(4) is amended as follows:
(1) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “whom the victim has”
and inserting the phrase “whom a victim under 18 years of age has” in its place.
(2) Subparagraph (C) is amended by striking the phrase “the victim” and inserting
the phrase “a victim who is under 18 years of age” in its place.
(b) Section 14-311(b)(4) is amended as follows:
(1) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “with whom the victim
has” and inserting the phrase “with whom a victim under 18 years of age has” in its place.
(2) Subparagraph (C) is amended by striking the phrase “the victim” and inserting
the phrase “a victim who is under 18 years of age” in its place.
(c) Section 14-312(b)(5) is amended as follows:
(1) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “with whom the sexual
assault victim has” and inserting the phrase “with whom a sexual assault victim under 18 years
of age has” in its place.
(2) Subparagraph (C) is amended by striking the phrase “the sexual assault
victim” and inserting the phrase “a sexual assault victim who is under 18 years of age” in its
place.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

3

Sec. 4. Applicability.
(a) Section 2 shall expire on the applicability date of section 105 of the Comprehensive
Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, effective April 21, 2023 (D.C. Law 24-
345; 70 DCR 6316).
(b) Section 3 shall expire on the applicability date of section 4 of the Leading Education
Access for Reentry and Necessary Success (“LEARNS”) Amendment Act of 2026, passed on
2nd reading on June 2, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-526).

Sec. 5. Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement of the Budget Director as the fiscal impact
statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved
October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a).

Sec. 6. Effective date.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto) and shall remain in effect for no longer than
90 days, as provided for emergency acts of the Council of the District of Columbia in section
412(a) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 788;
D.C. Official Code § 1-204.12(a)).

___________________________________
Chairman
Council of the District of Columbia

_________________________________
Mayor
District of Columbia