Back to Hawaii

HB127 • 2026

RELATING TO PRETRIAL RELEASE.

RELATING TO PRETRIAL RELEASE.

Crime
Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
TARNAS, BELATTI, GRANDINETTI, IWAMOTO, MARTEN, PERRUSO, POEPOE, SOUZA, TAKAYAMA
Last action
2026-04-02
Official status
Received notice of the discharge of all House Conferees (Hse. Com. No. 457).
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill's effectiveness may depend on the availability of resources to support changes in pretrial release procedures.

Rules for Setting Bail

This bill requires courts to set bail amounts that defendants can afford based on certain factors.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires the court to write down why it thinks certain conditions are necessary for a defendant's release.
  • Sets bail at an amount that the defendant can afford, considering their financial situation and other relevant information.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who are charged with crimes and need to post bail before their trial.
  • Courts that set bail amounts for defendants.

Terms To Know

Pretrial Release
The process of allowing a person accused of a crime to be free before their trial, often with conditions such as posting bail.
Bail
Money or other security given by someone who has been charged with a crime to ensure they will return for their court date.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
  • It is unclear how courts will implement these new requirements in practice.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

HD1

1

Hawaii published version HD1

Plain English: This amendment requires bail to be set based on what the defendant can afford, considering factors like income level and public benefits.

  • Bail amounts must now be set in an amount that the defendant is able to pay, taking into account their financial situation as described in their affidavit or testimony at the release hearing.
  • The court will exclude certain types of income, such as public benefits and income below the federal poverty level, when setting bail.
  • If a defendant has no income other than public benefits or if their household income is below 150% of the federal poverty level, the court will presume they cannot afford any bail amount.
  • The amendment specifies an effective date of July 1, 3000, which seems to be a placeholder and not intended for actual implementation.
  • Some parts of the amendment text are bracketed or stricken out, indicating they might have been removed but do not provide clear information on what was removed.
SD1

3

Hawaii published version SD1

Plain English: This amendment requires bail to be set based on what the defendant can afford, considering factors like income and public benefits.

  • Bail amounts must now be set in a way that the defendant can actually pay, taking into account their financial situation and excluding certain types of income such as public benefits.
  • If a defendant has no income other than public benefits or is below 150% of the federal poverty level, they are presumed unable to afford bail.
  • The amendment text does not specify all details about how bail amounts will be calculated for defendants above 150% of the federal poverty level.
  • It is unclear what happens if a defendant cannot provide sufficient financial information at their hearing.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-02 S

    Received notice of the discharge of all House Conferees (Hse. Com. No. 457).

  2. 2026-04-01 H

    House Conferee(s) discharged.

  3. 2026-03-20 H

    Received notice of all Senate conferees being discharged (Sen. Com. No. 409).

  4. 2026-03-20 S

    Senate Conferee(s) discharged.

  5. 2025-12-08 D

    Carried over to 2026 Regular Session.

  6. 2025-04-24 S

    Conference committee meeting to reconvene on 04-24-25 5:15 PM; Conference Room 325.

  7. 2025-04-23 H

    Bill scheduled for Conference Committee Meeting on Thursday, 04-24-25 2:00PM in conference room 325.

  8. 2025-04-23 S

    Received notice of appointment of House conferees (Hse. Com. No. 805).

  9. 2025-04-22 H

    Received notice of Senate conferees (Sen. Com. No. 862).

  10. 2025-04-22 H

    House Conferees Appointed: Tarnas Chair; Poepoe, Garcia.

  11. 2025-04-22 S

    Senate Conferees Appointed: Rhoads Chair; Chang, San Buenaventura.

  12. 2025-03-31 S

    Received notice of disagreement (Hse. Com. No. 422).

  13. 2025-03-28 H

    House disagrees with Senate amendment (s).

  14. 2025-03-27 H

    Returned from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 404) in amended form (SD 1).

  15. 2025-03-27 S

    Passed Third Reading, as amended (SD 1). Ayes, 19; Aye(s) with reservations: Senator(s) Elefante, McKelvey, Moriwaki . Noes, 3 (Senator(s) Awa, DeCorte, Fevella). Excused, 3 (Senator(s) DeCoite, Lee, C., Richards). Transmitted to House.

  16. 2025-03-25 S

    48 Hrs. Notice 03-27-25.

  17. 2025-03-25 S

    Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1).

  18. 2025-03-25 S

    Reported from JDC (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1365) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and placement on the calendar for Third Reading.

  19. 2025-03-13 S

    The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in JDC were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Rhoads, Gabbard, Chang, San Buenaventura; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 1 No(es): Senator(s) Awa; and 0 Excused: none.

  20. 2025-03-10 S

    Re-Referred to JDC.

  21. 2025-03-07 S

    The committee(s) on JDC has scheduled a public hearing on 03-13-25 9:45AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.

  22. 2025-03-06 S

    Referred to JDC, WAM.

  23. 2025-03-06 S

    Passed First Reading.

  24. 2025-03-06 S

    Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 190).

  25. 2025-03-04 H

    Passed Third Reading with Representative(s) Reyes Oda voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Alcos, Garcia, Kila, Kong, Matsumoto, Muraoka, Shimizu voting no (7) and Representative(s) Kapela, Pierick, Ward excused (3). Transmitted to Senate.

  26. 2025-02-27 H

    Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1; placed on the calendar for Third Reading with Representative(s) Alcos, Matsumoto, Reyes Oda voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Garcia, Muraoka, Shimizu voting no (3) and Representative(s) Cochran, Pierick, Templo, Ward excused (4).

  27. 2025-02-27 H

    Reported from JHA (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 819) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and placement on the calendar for Third Reading.

  28. 2025-02-07 H

    The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Hashem, Kahaloa, Perruso, Takayama, Todd; Ayes with reservations: none; 2 Noes: Representative(s) Garcia, Shimizu; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Belatti, Cochran.

  29. 2025-02-04 H

    Bill scheduled to be heard by JHA on Friday, 02-07-25 2:05PM in House conference room 325 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE.

  30. 2025-01-21 H

    Referred to JHA, referral sheet 1

  31. 2025-01-16 H

    Introduced and Pass First Reading.

  32. 2025-01-14 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

RELATING TO PRETRIAL RELEASE.
Pretrial Release; Bail
Requires bail to be set in an amount that the defendant can afford based on certain factors. Effective 7/1/3000. (SD1)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB127

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

H.B. NO.

127

THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025

STATE OF HAWAII

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING
TO PRETRIAL RELEASE
.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

����
SECTION 1.
�
The legislature finds that the right to
physical liberty is one of the foundational principles of the United States
Constitution.
�
In
United States v.
Salerno
, 481 U.S. 739 (1987), the United States Supreme Court unequivocally
stated that "[i]n our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to
trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception".

����
As outlined in the 2018 final report
of the criminal pretrial task force, convened by the Hawaii state judiciary
pursuant to House Concurrent Resolution No. 134, H.D. 1, Regular Session of
2017, the right to liberty is also supported by the most basic constitutional
principles of presumption of innocence, due process, equal protection, the
right to counsel, and the right to confrontation.

����
The legislature finds that the
current use of cash bail is widely understood to disadvantage poor people who
are unable to secure their liberty while awaiting trial.

����
The legislature also recognizes
that, in Hawaii, the consequences of pretrial detention fall disproportionately
on Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and other people of color, who are more
likely to be arrested, detained, and unable to afford bail.
�
The right to liberty should not be threatened
because of an individual's ethnicity or socioeconomic status.

����
The legislature further finds that
reducing pretrial incarceration would help address severe overcrowding in
Hawaii's jails.
�
In October 2022, the
Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission reported that seventy-eight per
cent of all people in jails are awaiting trial.
�
Reducing pretrial incarceration rates would
also reduce the State's expenses.
�
It
costs the State approximately $250 per day, or $91,250 per year, to incarcerate
each adult.

����
The purpose of this Act is to
improve the State's system of pretrial justice by considering the need to
evaluate risks to public safety, individual constitutional rights, and the
fiscal and human harms that arise from overcrowded prisons.
�
Specifically, this Act
requires:

����
(1)
�
The court to enter on the record its written
findings regarding the necessity of the conditions imposed on a defendant's
release; and

����
(2)
�
Bail to be set in an amount that the
defendant can afford based on certain factors.

����
SECTION
2
.
�
Section 804-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is
amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

����
"(a)
�
If the charge is for an offense for which
bail is allowable under section 804-3, the defendant may be admitted to bail
before conviction as a matter of right and under the least restrictive
conditions required to ensure the defendant's appearance and to protect the
public.
�
The court shall enter on the
record its written findings regarding why the conditions imposed on the
defendant are necessary to ensure defendant's appearance, or to protect the
public, or both.

����
Except
for section 712-1207(7), bail shall be allowed for any person charged under
section 712-1207 only subject to the mandatory condition that the person
observe geographic restrictions that prohibit the defendant from entering or
remaining on public property, in Waikiki and other areas in the State
designated by county ordinance during the hours from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.; [
and
]
provided [
further
] that nothing contained in this subsection shall be
construed as prohibiting the imposition of stricter geographic restrictions
under section 804-7.1.
�
The right to bail
shall continue after conviction of a misdemeanor, petty misdemeanor, or
violation, and release on bail may continue, in the discretion of the court,
after conviction of a felony until the final determination of any motion for a
new trial, appeal, habeas corpus, or other proceedings that are made, taken,
issued, or allowed for the purpose of securing a review of the rulings,
verdict, judgment, sentence, or other proceedings of any court or jury in or by
which the defendant has been arraigned, tried, convicted, or sentenced;
provided that[
:
]
no bail shall be allowed:

����
(1)
�
[
No bail shall be allowed after
]

After
conviction and [
prior to
]
before
sentencing in cases
where bail was not available under section 804-3, or where bail was denied or
revoked before conviction;

����
(2)
�
[
No bail shall be allowed pending
]

Pending
appeal of a felony conviction where a sentence of imprisonment
has been imposed; and

����
(3)
�
[
No bail shall be allowed pendin
g]

Pending
appeal of a conviction for a violation of section 712-1207,
unless the court finds, based on the defendant's record, that the defendant may
be admitted to bail subject to the mandatory condition that the person observe
geographic restrictions that prohibit the defendant from entering or walking
along the public streets or sidewalks of Waikiki or other areas in the State
designated by county ordinance pursuant to section 712-1207 during the hours
from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.

Notwithstanding
any other provision of law to the contrary, any person who violates these bail
restrictions shall have the person's bail revoked after hearing and shall be
imprisoned forthwith."

����
SECTION

3
.
�
Section 804-9,
Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

����
"
�804-9
�

Amount.
�
The amount of bail
rests in the discretion of the justice or judge or the officers named in
section 804-5 and shall be set in a reasonable amount based upon all available
information, including the offense alleged, the possible punishment upon
conviction, and the defendant's financial ability to afford bail.

����
Any
bail amount set, whether secured or unsecured, shall be in an amount that the
person is able to afford based on the person's affidavit or testimony at the
release hearing, subject to any rebuttal evidence from the prosecution.
�
In the setting of bail, the following
shall apply:

����
(1)
�
The court shall exclude from
consideration any income derived from public benefits; including supplemental
security income, social security disability insurance, and temporary assistance
for needy families; and any income below the federal poverty level;

����
(2)
�
If the person has no income other
than public benefits or is a member of a household having a household income
below one hundred fifty per cent of the federal poverty level, the court shall
presume that the person is unable to pay any bail amount; and

����
(3)
�
If the person's household income,
exclusive of any income derived from public benefits, is above one hundred
fifty per cent of the federal poverty level, the court shall consider what the
individual could reasonably pay within forty hours of arrest, subject to the
exclusions in paragraph (1).

����
The bail amount should be so determined as
not to suffer the wealthy to escape by the payment of a pecuniary penalty, nor
to render the privilege useless to the poor."

����
SECTION 4.
�
This Act does not affect rights and duties
that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun
before its effective date.

����
SECTION 5.
�
Statutory material to be repealed is
bracketed and stricken.
�
New statutory
material is underscored.

����
SECTION 6.
�
This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.

INTRODUCED BY:

_____________________________

Report Title:

Pretrial
Release; Bail

Description:

Requires
the court to enter on the record its written findings regarding the necessity
of the conditions imposed on a defendant's release.
�
Requires bail to be set in an amount that the
defendant can afford based on certain factors.

The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.