Back to Hawaii

SB2893 • 2026

RELATING TO GAMBLING.

RELATING TO GAMBLING.

Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
LAMOSAO
Last action
2026-01-30
Official status
Referred to PSM, JDC.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

RELATING TO GAMBLING.

RELATING TO GAMBLING.

What This Bill Does

  • RELATING TO GAMBLING.
  • Gambling; Social Gambling; Affirmative Defense; Noise Complaints Provides that a defendant may not assert social gambling as an affirmative defense if the gambling activity occurred at the defendant's residence and gambling activities have resulted in multiple recent documented noise complaints.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-30 S

    Referred to PSM, JDC.

  2. 2026-01-26 S

    Passed First Reading.

  3. 2026-01-23 S

    Introduced.

Official Summary Text

RELATING TO GAMBLING.
Gambling; Social Gambling; Affirmative Defense; Noise Complaints
Provides that a defendant may not assert social gambling as an affirmative defense if the gambling activity occurred at the defendant's residence and gambling activities have resulted in multiple recent documented noise complaints.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB2893

THE SENATE

S.B. NO.

2893

THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026

STATE OF HAWAII

A BILL FOR AN ACT

relating
to gambling
.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

����
SECTION 1.
�
The legislature finds that social gambling
may be harmful to residential neighborhoods in which it takes place.
�
For example, gambling activities in private
homes may lead neighbors to complain about excess noise.
�
The legislature believes that the affirmative
defense of social gambling should not be available to a defendant if the
defendant's gambling activities cause repeated noise complaints that disturb
neighbors and monopolize police resources.

����
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act
is to provide that a defendant may not assert social gambling as an affirmative
defense if the gambling activity occurred at the defendant's residence and
gambling activities have resulted in multiple recent documented noise
complaints.

����
SECTION
2
.
�
Section
712-1231, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

����
"
�712-1231
�
Social gambling;
definition and specific conditions, affirmative defense.
�
(a)
�

Definition.
�
"Social
gambling" means gambling in which all of the following conditions are [
present:
]

met:

����
(1)
�
Players compete on
equal terms with each other; [
and
]

����
(2)
�
No player
receives, or becomes entitled to receive, anything of value or any profit,
directly or indirectly, other than the player's personal gambling winnings; [
and
]

����
(3)
�
No other person,
corporation, unincorporated association, or entity receives or becomes entitled
to receive, anything of value or any profit, directly or indirectly, from any
source, including [
but not limited to permitting
]
value or profit for
providing
the use of premises, [
supplying refreshments,
] food[
,
]

or
drinks, [
service,
]
services,
lodging
,
or
entertainment; [
and
]

����
(4)
�
It is not
conducted or played in or at a hotel, motel, bar, nightclub, cocktail lounge,
restaurant, massage parlor, billiard parlor, or any business establishment of
any kind, public parks, public buildings, public beaches, school grounds,
churches or any other public area; [
and
]

����
(5)
�
None of the
players is below the age of majority; and

����
(6)
�
The gambling
activity is not bookmaking.

����
(b)
�

Affirmative defense:

����
(1)
�
In any prosecution
for an offense described in [
[
]section[
]
] 712-1223, 712-1224,
712-1225 or 712-1226, a defendant may assert the affirmative defense that the
gambling activity in question was [
a
] social gambling [
game
] as
defined in [
[section] 712-1231(a).
]
subsection (a); provided that a
defendant may not assert the affirmative defense of social gambling if:

���������
(A)
�
The
gambling activities occurred at the defendant's residence; and

���������
(
B)
�
Gambling activities at
the defendant's residence have resulted in or
more prior noise complaints to police, as documented by police reports, within
the preceding
months.

����
(2)
�
If the defendant
asserts [
the
]
social gambling as an
affirmative defense, the
defendant shall have the burden of [
going forward with
]
providing

evidence to prove the facts constituting [
such
]
the
defense [
unless
such facts are supplied by the testimony of the prosecuting witness or
circumstance in such testimony, and of proving such facts by a preponderance of
evidence.
]
by a preponderance of the evidence.

����
(c)
�

[
In any
]
No
prosecution for an offense described in this
part [
the fact
]
shall be required to prove in its prima facie case

that the gambling activity involved was other than [
a
] social gambling [
game
shall not be an element of the offense to be proved by the prosecution in
making out its prima facie case
]."

����
SECTION 3.
�
This Act does not affect rights and duties
that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun
before its effective date.

����
SECTION 4.
�
Statutory material to be repealed is
bracketed and stricken.
�
New statutory
material is underscored.

����
SECTION 5.
�
This Act shall take effect upon its approval.

INTRODUCED BY:

_____________________________

Report Title:

Gambling;
Social Gambling; Affirmative Defense; Noise Complaints

Description:

Provides
that
a defendant may not assert social gambling as an affirmative defense if the
gambling activity occurred at the defendant's residence and gambling activities
have resulted in multiple recent documented noise complaints.

The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.