Read the full stored bill text
SB575
THE SENATE
S.B. NO.
575
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
STATE OF HAWAII
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating
to historic preservation reviews
.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
����
SECTION 1.
�
The legislature finds that
historic preservation review requirements play an essential
role in the protection and management of the State's historic places, burial
sites, and aviation artifacts by requiring state agencies and offices to submit
all projects that may affect historic properties to the state historic
preservation division of the department of land and natural resources for
review before approval.
����
The legislature further finds that
regulatory costs are a major contributor to the high cost of housing in Hawaii
despite the State facing an unprecedented housing crisis.
�
According to a report released by the
university of Hawaii economic research organization in 2024, the median sale
price of a new two-bedroom condo in Hawaii was about $670,000, more than double
the price in the average state, and regulatory costs comprise $387,000.
�
Permit applicants face significant delays in
obtaining county permits that require historic preservation review because of
the overwhelming volume of submittals for review.
�
Consequently, much needed housing, economic
development, and critical infrastructure projects often face significant delays
in permit approvals and project implementation.
����
The legislature believes that it
must take immediate action to mitigate the overwhelming volume of submittals
and the impacts on permit applicants.
����
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act
is to promote more timely reviews of projects by requiring the department of
land and natural resources, through the state historic preservation division
and subject to approval from the appropriate island burial council, to contract
its review of proposed state projects, projects on privately owned historic
property, and projects affecting historic properties to third-party consultants
if the department will not be able to complete its review within sixty days.
����
SECTION
2
.
�
Section 6E-8,
Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
����
"
�6E-8
�
Review
of effect of proposed state projects.
�
(a)
�
Before
any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any
project [
which
]
that
may affect historic property, aviation
artifact, or a burial site, the agency or officer shall advise the department
and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the
proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites,
consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register
of historic places.
�
The proposed project
shall not be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued, until the
department has given its written concurrence.
�
If:
����
(1)
�
The proposed
project consists of corridors or large land areas;
����
(2)
�
Access to
properties is restricted; or
����
(3)
�
Circumstances
dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department may give its written concurrence
based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a
programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that
identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
����
The
department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety
days after the filing of a request with the department.
�
The agency or officer seeking to proceed with
the project, or any person, may appeal the department's concurrence or
non-concurrence to the Hawaii historic places review board.
�
An agency, officer, or other person who is
dissatisfied with the decision of the review board may apply to the governor,
who may take action as the governor deems best in overruling or sustaining the
department.
����
(b)
�
The department of Hawaiian home lands, prior to any proposed project
relating to lands under its jurisdiction, shall consult with the department
regarding the effect of the project upon historic property or a burial site.
����
(c)
�
The State, its political subdivisions, agencies, and officers shall
report to the department the finding of any historic property during any
project and shall cooperate with the department in the investigation, recording,
preservation, and salvage of the property.
����
(d)
�
The department shall retain a third-party consultant to conduct the
review described under subsection (a) if, after an initial evaluation, the
department determines that:
����
(1)
�
It will not be
able to provide its written concurrence or non-concurrence within sixty days of
the filing of the request with the department;
����
(2)
�
The third-party
consultant has the qualifications and experience to conduct the review pursuant
to subsection (e); and
����
(3)
�
The third-party
consultant will contract to provide a recommendation to the department within
thirty days of the filing of the request with the department.
����
(e)
�
Whenever the department retains any third party, including an architect,
engineer, archaeologist, planner, or other, to review an application for a
permit, license, or approval under subsection (d), the third party shall meet
the educational and experience standards as well as the qualifications for
preservation professionals as determined by rules adopted by the state historic
preservation division.
����
[
(d)
]
(f)
�
The department shall adopt rules in
accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section.
"
����
SECTION
3
.
�
Section 6E-10,
Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
����
"
�6E-10
�
Privately owned historic property.
�
(a)
�
Before any construction,
alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by
a private landowner may be commenced [
which
]
that
will affect an
historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner
shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or
improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of
the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or
improvement of any nature on the historic property.
�
The proposed construction, alteration,
disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the
event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its
concurrence or ninety days have elapsed.
�
Within ninety days after notification, the department shall:
����
(1)
�
Commence
condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the
department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of
action;
����
(2)
�
Permit the owner
to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or
����
(3)
�
In coordination
with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation,
and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian
history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.
����
(b)
�
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary
maintenance or repair of any feature in or on an historic property that does
not involve a change in design, material, or outer appearance or change in
those characteristics which qualified the historic property for entry onto the
Hawaii register of historic places.
����
(c)
�
Any person, natural or corporate, who violates the provisions of this
section shall be fined not more than $1,000, and each day of continued
violation shall constitute a distinct and separate offense under this section
for which the offender may be punished.
����
(d)
�
If funds for the acquisition of needed property are not available, the
governor may, upon the recommendation of the department allocate from the
contingency fund an amount sufficient to acquire an option on the property or
for the immediate acquisition, preservation, restoration, or operation of the
property.
����
(e)
�
The department shall retain a third-party
consultant to conduct the review described under subsection (a) if, after an
initial evaluation, the department determines that:
����
(1)
�
It will not be
able to provide its written concurrence or non-concurrence within sixty days of
the landowner's notification;
����
(2)
�
The
third-party consultant has the qualifications and experience to conduct the
review pursuant to subsection (f); and
����
(3)
�
The
third-party consultant will contract to provide a recommendation to the
department within thirty days of the landowner's notification.
����
(f)
�
Whenever the department retains any third
party, including an architect, engineer, archaeologist, planner, or other, to
review an application for a permit, license, or approval under subsection (e),
the third party shall meet the educational and experience standards as well as
the qualifications for preservation professionals as determined by rules
adopted by the state historic preservation division.
����
[
(e)
]
(g)
�
The department
or the department's third-party
consultant, as applicable,
may enter, solely in performance of its official
duties and only at reasonable times, upon private lands for examination or
survey thereof.
�
Whenever any member of
the department
or the department's third-party consultant, as applicable,
duly authorized to conduct investigations and surveys of an historic or
cultural nature determines that entry onto private lands for examination or
survey of historic or cultural finding is required, the department
or the
department's third-party consultant, as applicable,
shall give written
notice of the finding to the owner or occupant of such property at least five
days prior to entry.
�
If entry is
refused, the member
or the department's third-party consultant, as
applicable,
may make a complaint to the district environmental court in the
circuit in which such land is located.
�
The district environmental court may thereupon issue a warrant, directed
to any police officer of the circuit, commanding the officer to take sufficient
aid, and, being accompanied by a member of the department[
,
]
or the
department's third-party consultant, as applicable,
between the hours of
sunrise and sunset, allow the member of the department
or the department's third-party
consultant, as applicable,
to examine or survey the historic or cultural
property."
����
SECTION
4
.
�
Section 6E-42,
Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
����
"
�6E-42
�
Review of proposed projects.
�
(
a)
�
Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before
any
agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any
project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision,
or other entitlement for use[
, which
]
that
may affect historic
property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall
advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an
opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on
historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with
section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic
places.
�
If:
����
(1)
�
The proposed
project consists of corridors or large land areas;
����
(2)
�
Access to
properties is restricted; or
����
(3)
�
Circumstances
dictate that construction be done in stages,
the department's review and comment may be based on
a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic
agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each
phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.
����
(b)
�
The department shall inform the public of any project proposals
submitted to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the
requirement of a public hearing or other public notification.
����
(c)
�
The department shall retain a third-party
consultant to conduct the review and comment described under subsection (a) if,
after an initial evaluation, the department determines that:
����
(1)
�
It
will not be able to provide its review and comment within sixty days of being
advised pursuant to subsection (a);
����
(2)
�
The third-party
consultant has the qualifications and experience to conduct the review required
by subsection (d); and
����
(3)
�
The third-party
consultant will contract to provide a recommendation to the department within
thirty days of being advised pursuant to subsection (a).
����
(d)
�
Whenever the department retains any third
party, including any architect, engineer, archaeologist, planner, or other, to
review an application for a permit, license, or approval under subsection (c),
the third party shall meet the educational and experience standards as well as
the qualifications for preservation professionals as determined by rules
adopted by the state historic preservation division.
����
[
(c)
]
(e)
�
The department shall adopt rules in
accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section.
"
����
SECTION
5.
�
This Act does not affect rights and
duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were
begun before its effective date.
����
SECTION
6.
�
Statutory material to be repealed is
bracketed and stricken.
�
New statutory
material is underscored.
����
SECTION 7.
�
This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY:
_____________________________
Report Title:
Historic
Preservation Reviews; Third-party Consultants
Description:
Requires
the Department of Land and Natural Resources to contract its review of proposed
state projects, projects on privately owned historic property, and projects
affecting historic properties to third-party consultants if the Department is
unable to complete its review within sixty days.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.