AI-MEANINGFUL HUMAN REVIEW

Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of HB3567

Select Language

×

The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.

Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.

The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.

NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.

Choose Language

English

Afrikaans

Albanian

Arabic

Armenian

Azerbaijani

Basque

Bengali

Bosnian

Catalan

Croatian

Czech

Danish

Dutch

Esperanto

Estonian

Filipino

Finnish

French

Galician

Georgian

German

Greek

Gujarati

Haitian Creole

Hausa

Hawaiian

Hebrew

Hindi

Hungarian

Icelandic

Indonesian

Interlingua

Interlingue

Inuktitut

Irish

Italian

Japanese

Javanese

Kannada

Khmer

Korean

Latin

Latvian

Lithuanian

Luxembourgish

Macedonian

Malagasy

Malayalam

Maltese

Maori

Marathi

Myanmar

Nepali

Norwegian

Odia

Pashto

Punjabi

Romanian

Russian

Samoan

Sango

Sanskrit

Sardinian

Sindhi

Sinhala

Slovak

Slovenian

Somali

Southern Sotho

Spanish

Sundanese

Swahili

Swedish

Tamil

Telugu

Thai

Tigrinya

Tonga

Turkish

Ukrainian

Urdu

Vietnamese

Welsh

Xhosa

Yiddish

Yoruba

Zulu

Powered by
Translate

Close

Illinois General Assembly

Top Navigation Bar

Translate

Learn

Select General Assembly

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.

ILGA.GOV

LEGISLATION & LAWS

Bills & Resolutions

Public Acts

Illinois Compiled Statutes

Illinois Constitution

Search Legislation

Glossary

Guide

Reports & Inquiry

Legislative Reports

Special Reports

FTP Site

Legislator Lookup

Capitol Complex Phone Numbers

Rules & Regulations

Illinois Register

Administrative Rules

Senate

Members

Schedules

Committees

Request for Remote Testimony

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

Senate Employment Opportunities

Media Guidelines

House

Members

Schedules

Committees

Submit testimony for House Committees

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

House Employment Opportunities

Log In

Mobile Top Bar

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.

Full Text of HB3567

Home

Legislation

Full Text

HB3567 - 104th General Assembly

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Select Menu

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Open PDF

104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
HB3567

Introduced 2/18/2025, by Rep. Amy Briel

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:

New Act

Creates the Meaningful Human Review of Artificial Intelligence Act.
Sets forth provisions prohibiting a State agency, or any entity acting on
behalf of an agency, from utilizing or applying any automated
decision-making system, directly or indirectly, without continuous
meaningful human review when performing any of the agency's specified
functions. Requires impact assessments to be performed by State agencies
seeking to utilize or apply an automated decision-making system with
continuous meaningful human review. Provides that the impact assessment
shall include a description of the objectives of the automated
decision-making system; an evaluation of the ability of the automated
decision-making system to achieve its stated objectives; a specified
description and evaluation of the objectives and development of the
automated decision-making; testing of the automated decision-making
system; and the notification mechanism or procedure, if any, by which
individuals impacted by the utilization of the automated decision-making
system may be notified of the use of such automated decision-making system
and of the individual's personal data, and informed of their rights and
options relating to such use. Requires submission of impact assessments to
the Governor and General Assembly.
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b

A BILL FOR

HB3567
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

AN ACT concerning State government.

2

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3
represented in the General Assembly:

4

Section 1.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
5
Meaningful Human Review of Artificial Intelligence Act.

6

Section 5.
Definitions.
As used in this Act:
7

"Automated decision-making system" means any software that
8
uses algorithms, computational models, or artificial
9
intelligence techniques, or a combination thereof, to
10
automate, support, or replace human decision-making.
11
"Automated decision-making system" includes, without
12
limitation, systems that process data and apply predefined
13
rules or machine learning algorithms to analyze such data and
14
generate conclusions, recommendations, outcomes, assumptions,
15
projections, or predictions without meaningful human
16
discretion. "Automated decision-making system" does not
17
include any software used primarily for basic computerized
18
processes, such as calculators, spellcheck tools, autocorrect
19
functions, spreadsheets, electronic communications, or any
20
tool that relates only to internal management affairs, such as
21
ordering office supplies or processing payments and that do
22
not materially affect the rights, liberties, benefits, safety,
23
or welfare of any individual within the State.

HB3567
- 2 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

"Meaningful human review" means review, oversight, and
2
control of the automated decision-making process by one or
3
more individuals who understand the risks, limitations, and
4
functionality of, and are trained to use, the automated
5
decision-making system and who have the authority to intervene
6
or alter the decision under review, including, but not limited
7
to, the ability to approve, deny, or modify any decision
8
recommended or made by the automated system.
9

"State agency" means any Department, public authority,
10
board, bureau, commission, division, office, council,
11
committee, or officer of the State.
12

"Public assistance benefit" means any service or program
13
within the control of the State or benefit provided by the
14
State to individuals or households, including, but not limited
15
to, public assistance, cash assistance, grants, child care
16
assistance, housing assistance, unemployment benefits,
17
transportation benefits, education assistance, domestic
18
violence services, and any other assistance or benefit within
19
the authority of the State to grant to individuals within the
20
State. "Public assistance benefit" does not include any
21
federal program that is administered by the federal government
22
or the State.

23

Section 10.
Use of automated decision-making systems by
24
agencies.
25

(a) A State agency, or any entity acting on behalf of an

HB3567
- 3 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1
agency, shall not utilize or apply any automated
2
decision-making system, directly or indirectly, without
3
continuous meaningful human review when performing any
4
function that:
5

(1) is related to the delivery of any public
6

assistance benefit;
7

(2) will have a material impact on the rights, civil
8

liberties, safety, or welfare of any individual within the
9

State; or
10

(3) affects any statutorily or constitutionally
11

provided right of an individual who shall use the
12

automated decision-making system unless the system is
13

subject to continuous meaningful human review.
14

(b) A State agency shall not authorize any procurement,
15
purchase, or acquisition of any service or system utilizing,
16
or relying on, automated decision-making systems in performing
17
any function that is:
18

(1) related to the delivery of any public assistance
19

benefit;
20

(2) will have a material impact on the rights, civil
21

liberties, safety, or welfare of any individual within the
22

State; or
23

(3) affects any statutorily or constitutionally
24

provided right of an individual unless such automated
25

decision-making system is subject to continuous meaningful
26

human review.

HB3567
- 4 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

(c) The use of an automated decision-making system shall
2
not affect:
3

(1) the existing rights of employees pursuant to an
4

existing collective bargaining agreement; or
5

(2) the existing representational relationships among
6

employee organizations or the bargaining relationships
7

between the employer and an employee organization. The use
8

of an automated decision-making system shall not result in
9

the:
10

(A) discharge, displacement, or loss of position,
11

including partial displacement, such as a reduction in
12

the hours of non-overtime work, wages, or employment
13

benefits, or result in the impairment of existing
14

collective bargaining agreements;
15

(B) transfer of existing duties and functions
16

currently performed by employees of the State or any
17

agency or public authority to an automated
18

decision-making system; or
19

(C) transfer of future duties and functions
20

ordinarily performed by employees of the State or any
21

agency or public authority. The use of an automated
22

decision-making system shall not alter the rights,
23

benefits, and privileges, including, but not limited
24

to, terms and conditions of employment, civil service
25

status, and collective bargaining unit membership
26

status of all existing employees of the State or any

HB3567
- 5 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

agency or public authority shall be preserved and
2

protected.

3

Section 15.
Impact assessments.
4

(a) State agencies seeking to utilize or apply an
5
automated decision-making system permitted under Section 10 of
6
this Act with continuous meaningful human review shall conduct
7
an impact assessment bearing the signature of one or more
8
individuals responsible for meaningful human review for the
9
lawful application and use of the automated decision-making
10
system. Following the first impact assessment, an impact
11
assessment shall be conducted in accordance with this Section
12
at least once every 2 years. An impact assessment shall be
13
conducted prior to any material change to the automated
14
decision-making system that may change the outcome or effect
15
of such system. Such impact assessments shall include:
16

(1) a description of the objectives of the automated
17

decision-making system;
18

(2) an evaluation of the ability of the automated
19

decision-making system to achieve its stated objectives;
20

(3) a description and evaluation of the objectives and
21

development of the automated decision-making including:
22

(A) a summary of the underlying algorithms,
23

computational modes, and artificial intelligence tools
24

that are used within the automated decision-making
25

system; and

HB3567
- 6 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

(B) the design and training data used to develop
2

the automated decision-making system process;
3

(4) testing for:
4

(A) accuracy, fairness, bias, and discrimination
5

and an assessment of whether the use of the automated
6

decision-making system produces discriminatory results
7

on the basis of a consumer's or a class of consumers'
8

actual or perceived race, color, ethnicity, religion,
9

national origin, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual
10

orientation, familial status, biometric information,
11

lawful source of income, or disability and outlines
12

mitigations for any identified performance differences
13

in outcomes across relevant groups impacted by such
14

use;
15

(B) any cybersecurity vulnerabilities and privacy
16

risks resulting from the deployment and use of the
17

automated decision-making system and the development
18

or existence of safeguards to mitigate the risks;
19

(C) any public health or safety risks resulting
20

from the deployment and use of the automated
21

decision-making system;
22

(D) any reasonably foreseeable misuse of the
23

automated decision-making system and the development
24

or existence of safeguards against such misuse;
25

(E) the extent to which the deployment and use of
26

the automated decision-making system requires input of

HB3567
- 7 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

sensitive and personal data, how that data is used and
2

stored, and any control users may have over their
3

data; and
4

(5) the notification mechanism or procedure, if any,
5

by which individuals impacted by the utilization of the
6

automated decision-making system may be notified of the
7

use of such automated decision-making system and of the
8

individual's personal data, and informed of their rights
9

and options relating to such use.
10

(b) Notwithstanding applicable law, if an impact
11
assessment finds that the automated decision-making system
12
produces discriminatory or biased outcomes, the State agency
13
shall cease any utilization, application, or function of such
14
automated decision-making system and of any information
15
produced using the system.

16

Section 20.
Submission to the Governor and General
17
Assembly.
18

(a) Each impact assessment conducted pursuant to this Act
19
shall be submitted to the Governor, the President of the
20
Senate, and the Speaker of the House at least 30 days prior to
21
the implementation of the automated decision-making system
22
that is the subject of such assessment.
23

(b)(1) The impact assessment of an automated
24
decision-making system shall be published on the Internet
25
website of the relevant State agency.

HB3567
- 8 -
LRB104 09826 BDA 19894 b
1

(2) If the State agency makes a determination that the
2
disclosure of any information required in the impact
3
assessment would result in a substantial negative impact on
4
health or safety of the public, infringe upon the privacy
5
rights of individuals, or significantly impair the State
6
agency's ability to protect its information technology or
7
operational assets, such State agency may redact such
8
information, provided that an explanatory statement on the
9
process by which the State agency made such determination is
10
published along with the redacted impact assessment.
11

(3) If the impact assessment covers any automated
12
decision-making system that includes technology that is used
13
to prevent, detect, protect against, or respond to security
14
incidents, identity theft, fraud, harassment, malicious or
15
deceptive activities, or other illegal activity; preserve the
16
integrity or security of systems; or to investigate, report,
17
or prosecute those responsible for any such malicious or
18
deceptive action, a State agency may redact the information,
19
so long as an explanatory statement on the process by which the
20
State agency made such determination is published along with
21
the redacted impact assessment.

Footer

Disclaimer

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.

Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn