EQUITABLE UNIVERSITY FUNDING

Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of SB0013

Select Language

×

The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.

Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.

The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.

NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.

Choose Language

English

Afrikaans

Albanian

Arabic

Armenian

Azerbaijani

Basque

Bengali

Bosnian

Catalan

Croatian

Czech

Danish

Dutch

Esperanto

Estonian

Filipino

Finnish

French

Galician

Georgian

German

Greek

Gujarati

Haitian Creole

Hausa

Hawaiian

Hebrew

Hindi

Hungarian

Icelandic

Indonesian

Interlingua

Interlingue

Inuktitut

Irish

Italian

Japanese

Javanese

Kannada

Khmer

Korean

Latin

Latvian

Lithuanian

Luxembourgish

Macedonian

Malagasy

Malayalam

Maltese

Maori

Marathi

Myanmar

Nepali

Norwegian

Odia

Pashto

Punjabi

Romanian

Russian

Samoan

Sango

Sanskrit

Sardinian

Sindhi

Sinhala

Slovak

Slovenian

Somali

Southern Sotho

Spanish

Sundanese

Swahili

Swedish

Tamil

Telugu

Thai

Tigrinya

Tonga

Turkish

Ukrainian

Urdu

Vietnamese

Welsh

Xhosa

Yiddish

Yoruba

Zulu

Powered by
Translate

Close

Illinois General Assembly

Top Navigation Bar

Translate

Learn

Select General Assembly

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.

ILGA.GOV

LEGISLATION & LAWS

Bills & Resolutions

Public Acts

Illinois Compiled Statutes

Illinois Constitution

Search Legislation

Glossary

Guide

Reports & Inquiry

Legislative Reports

Special Reports

FTP Site

Legislator Lookup

Capitol Complex Phone Numbers

Rules & Regulations

Illinois Register

Administrative Rules

Senate

Members

Schedules

Committees

Request for Remote Testimony

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

Senate Employment Opportunities

Media Guidelines

House

Members

Schedules

Committees

Submit testimony for House Committees

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

House Employment Opportunities

Log In

Mobile Top Bar

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.

Full Text of SB0013

Home

Legislation

Full Text

SB0013 - 104th General Assembly

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Select Menu

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Senate Amendment 001

Senate Amendment 002

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Senate Amendment 001

Senate Amendment 002

Open PDF

104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
SB0013

Introduced 1/13/2025, by Sen. Kimberly A. Lightford

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:

New Act
110 ILCS 205/8

from Ch. 144, par. 188

Creates the Adequate and Equitable Public University Funding Act.
Provides that, after the effective date of the Act, all general operating
expenses for public universities shall be distributed by the Board of
Higher Education through a funding formula for eligible public
institutions and shall be administered by the Board. Defines "eligible
public institution". Sets forth provisions concerning the adequacy targets
and resource profiles of eligible public institutions. Provides for the
distribution of State appropriations and the calculation of the base
funding minimum for each eligible public institution. Provides that the
Board shall oversee an accountability and transparency framework for
assessing the distribution and use of all funds appropriated by the
funding formula and evaluating the funds' effects on institutional
outcomes pertaining to student affordability, enrollment, persistence, and
outcome metrics. Provides for reporting and the establishment of an
Accountability and Transparency Committee. Provides that the Board shall
establish a Funding Formula Review Panel tasked with studying and
reviewing topics pertaining to the implementation and impact of the
funding formula. Contains provisions concerning the Board's annual budget
request and the collection of data. Amends the Board of Higher Education
Act. Removes certain provisions concerning budget proposals. Effective
immediately.
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b

A BILL FOR

SB0013
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

AN ACT concerning education.

2

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3
represented in the General Assembly:

4

Section 1.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
5
Adequate and Equitable Public University Funding Act.

6

Section 5.
Findings.
The General Assembly makes all of the
7
following findings:
8

(1) A thriving postsecondary education system enriches
9

the State and its residents.
10

(2) Illinois requires an adequate, equitable, and
11

stable approach to funding public universities.
12

(3) Historic inequities in university funding underlie
13

current gaps in access, retention, and attainment among
14

different groups of students in this State.
15

(4) The State must seek to reduce on behalf of
16

underserved students the significant disparities in public
17

university access, affordability, and measures of
18

retention, progress, and degree completion, by, among
19

other things, addressing the influence of disparities in
20

resources by race, income, age of entry, and location.
21

(5) High-quality, evidence-based student support has
22

been shown to improve enrollment and outcomes for
23

students.

SB0013
- 2 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(6) Illinois' public universities have a variety of
2

missions and characteristics.
3

(7) Through "A Thriving Illinois: Higher Education
4

Paths to Equity, Sustainability, and Growth", the State
5

has set systemwide goals for equity, sustainability, and
6

growth, and the General Assembly must strategically fund
7

public universities to achieve these goals.
8

(8) As State funding has decreased, Illinois' public
9

universities have become increasingly reliant on tuition
10

and fees, increasing the debt students take on to fund
11

their education.
12

(9) Public universities should be funded to
13

sufficiently achieve student, institutional, and State
14

goals.
15

(10) Public higher education should be affordable for
16

all students.
17

(11) Increasing public funding for public universities
18

should be paired with increased transparency and
19

accountability.

20

Section 10.
Purpose.
It is the purpose of this Act to
21
establish an adequate and equitable funding formula for public
22
universities that shall do all of the following:
23

(1) ensure that the State provides adequate,
24

equitable, and stable funding for public universities that
25

is particularly directed to serving students from groups

SB0013
- 3 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

for whom there is evidence of meaningful gaps in
2

enrollment, retention, and completion compared to their
3

peers;
4

(2) determine, for each eligible public institution, a
5

funding level based on the unique needs and of the
6

eligible public institution's student body and the
7

eligible public institution's mission and mix of programs;
8

(3) encourage greater access and success for students
9

who are, based on evidence, less likely to enroll,
10

persist, progress, and complete their selected programs of
11

study; and
12

(4) provide a funding increase to each eligible public
13

institution when new funds are invested;
14

(5) support the diverse missions of each eligible
15

public institution;
16

(6) foster economic activity and innovation;
17

(7) ensure that each eligible public institution has
18

the flexibility to invest in ways that best serve the
19

eligible public institution's students;
20

(8) allow for ongoing monitoring and continuous
21

improvement of the adequate and equitable funding formula
22

for eligible public institutions;
23

(9) incentivize each eligible public institution to
24

reduce reliance on student tuition and fees with increased
25

State investment;
26

(10) distribute new funding through an equitable

SB0013
- 4 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

allocation that drives resources to eligible public
2

institution that are furthest from adequate funding; and
3

(11) ensure that each eligible public institution is
4

held harmless in the transition to a new funding model.

5

Section 15.
Definitions.
In this Act:
6

"Academic and nonacademic support" means a per-student
7
funding amount required to cover costs related to providing
8
high-impact support for student retention and completion.
9
"Academic and nonacademic support" includes, among other
10
things, academic support for curriculum design, academic
11
advising, career services, and tutoring, as well as
12
nonacademic support for single stop centers, emergency aid,
13
student mental health support, and services related to
14
housing, transportation, and child care.
15

"Access adjustment" means an adjustment to access support
16
for the increased costs of closing enrollment gaps for
17
underserved students.
18

"Access support" means a per-student funding amount
19
required to cover costs related to outreach, recruitment, and
20
enrollment of students, including admissions and financial aid
21
offices.
22

"Adequacy components" means the components of an adequate
23
education, including the components necessary to provide
24
instruction and student services, to advance the eligible
25
public institution's research and public service mission, and

SB0013
- 5 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
to cover its operations and maintenance needs.
2

"Adequacy gap" means the funding gap between the adequacy
3
target of an eligible public institution and the resource
4
profile of that eligible public institution.
5

"Adequacy gap formula" means a formula for distributing
6
funds among eligible public institutions based on an eligible
7
public institution's adequacy gap, as calculated on a
8
percentage basis.
9

"Adequacy target" means the amount of funding a particular
10
eligible public institution needs to cover the expenses of
11
instruction and student services, the eligible public
12
institution's research and public service mission, and
13
operations and maintenance associated with the student
14
population the eligible public institution serves and the
15
eligible public institution's institutional characteristics,
16
as well as to support closing gaps in enrollment, retention,
17
or completion for underserved students.
18

"Adult student" means a student who is 25 years old or
19
older.
20

"Affordability" means the total expense of attendance that
21
a student can reasonably be expected to pay given the
22
student's means.
23

"Annual formula funding" means the sum of the following
24
State appropriations for the fiscal year: the base funding
25
minimum appropriated for each eligible public institution for
26
the fiscal year, plus all new State formula funding

SB0013
- 6 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
appropriated for the fiscal year.
2

"Base funding minimum" means the minimum funding amount
3
each year per eligible public institution to which new State
4
formula funding is added, as calculated in subsection (b) of
5
Section 35.
6

"Board" means the Board of Higher Education.
7

"Carnegie Classification system" means the 2021 version of
8
the basic classification system developed and maintained by
9
the American Council on Education, which classifies higher
10
education institutions based on their level of degrees awarded
11
and level of research activity.
12

"Concentration factor adjustment" means an adjustment to
13
academic and nonacademic support based on the percentage of
14
all undergraduate students who meet the requirements for a
15
high and intensive holistic support equity adjustment.
16

"Core funding" means a per-student funding amount
17
determined to be necessary to provide the following types of
18
support before any adjustments are made:
19

(1) access support;
20

(2) academic and nonacademic support;
21

(3) core instructional program support;
22

(4) research support;
23

(5) public service and artistry support;
24

(6) institutional support; and
25

(7) physical plant support.
26

"Core instructional program adjustment" means an

SB0013
- 7 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
adjustment to core instructional program support to cover the
2
increased costs of high-cost programs, health professional
3
programs, and medical programs.
4

"Core instructional program support" means a per-student
5
funding amount required to cover costs related to delivering
6
instructional programs.
7

"Cumulative statewide adequacy gap percentage" means the
8
sum of all eligible public institution adequacy gap
9
percentages.
10

"Distribution formula" means the formula for calculating
11
funding amounts to be allocated across eligible public
12
institutions, as set forth in Section 35.
13

"Diversity programs adjustment" means an adjustment to
14
core instructional program support for underrepresented
15
students enrolled in high-cost programs, health professional
16
programs, and medical programs, including undergraduate,
17
graduate, or professional studies.
18

"Dollar gap formula" means a formula for distributing
19
funds among eligible public institutions based on an eligible
20
public institution's adequacy gap in absolute dollars.
21

"Eligible public institution" means each of the following
22
public institutions of higher education: Chicago State
23
University, Eastern Illinois University, Governors State
24
University, Illinois State University, Northeastern Illinois
25
University, Northern Illinois University, Southern Illinois
26
University at Carbondale, Southern Illinois School of

SB0013
- 8 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
Medicine; Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, the
2
University of Illinois at Chicago, the University of Illinois
3
at Chicago School of Medicine, the University of Illinois at
4
Springfield, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
5
the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of
6
Medicine, Western Illinois University, or any other public
7
college or university now or hereafter established or
8
authorized by the General Assembly and deemed to be eligible
9
for funding through the Adequate and Equitable Funding Formula
10
by the Board of Higher Education, except a community college.
11

"Eligible public institution adequacy gap percentage"
12
means the ratio of an eligible public institution's adequacy
13
gap and its adequacy target.
14

"Equitable student share" means the amount an eligible
15
public institution should be expected to contribute toward its
16
adequacy target that can be reasonably generated by student
17
tuition and fees, based on the characteristics of its student
18
body, as determined under Section 30. The equitable student
19
share of an eligible public institution is a hypothetical
20
calculation made for the express purpose of differentiating
21
which portion of a particular eligible public institution's
22
adequacy target costs should be covered by State
23
appropriations rather than student tuition and fee payments.
24
The use of the equitable student share calculation after the
25
effective date of this Act shall shift responsibility to cover
26
more of the cost of funding the adequacy target of a particular

SB0013
- 9 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
eligible public institution to be borne by State
2
appropriations, rather than student tuition and fee payments,
3
making higher education attendance more affordable for all
4
students who attend the eligible public institution.
5

"Funding formula" means the adequate and equitable funding
6
formula for public universities created under this Act.
7

"Funding Formula Review Panel" means the panel established
8
under Section 45.
9

"Head count" means the rolling 3-year average of the
10
unduplicated number of degree-seeking students enrolled in an
11
eligible public institution.
12

"Health professional program adjustment" means an
13
adjustment to core instructional program support calculated by
14
the Board, based on cost modeling research, to cover the
15
increased costs of offering master's and doctoral degree
16
programs in the following disciplines: veterinary medicine,
17
dentistry, pharmacy, physical therapy, and audiology and
18
speech pathology.
19

"High-cost program adjustment" means an adjustment to core
20
instructional program support calculated by the Board, based
21
on cost modeling research, to cover the higher costs of
22
offering certain programs, including, but not limited to,
23
engineering, fine arts, and registered nursing. These programs
24
shall be identified based on consistently higher than average
25
costs relative to other programs at the same level across
26
multiple institutions, time periods, and states.

SB0013
- 10 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

"Holistic support equity adjustment" means an adjustment
2
to academic and nonacademic support for the increased costs of
3
closing retention gaps for underserved students.
4

"Institutional support" means a per-student funding amount
5
required to cover costs related to the basic administration of
6
an eligible public institution, such as central
7
administration, business office, and human resource costs.
8

"Laboratory space adjustment" means an adjustment to
9
physical plant support based on the cost of maintaining
10
laboratory space.
11

"Medical program adjustment" means an adjustment to core
12
instructional program support calculated by the Board, based
13
on cost modeling research, to cover the increased costs of
14
offering medical degree programs.
15

"New State formula funding" means, for a given fiscal
16
year, all State funds appropriated for the adequate and
17
equitable funding formula for public universities in excess of
18
the amount provided in the previous fiscal year.
19

"Other resources" means a percentage of an eligible public
20
institution's endowment that it may be expected to spend
21
without depleting its endowment. "Other resources" does not
22
include grants and contracts.
23

"Percentage gap" means the size of an eligible public
24
institution's adequacy gap measured by dividing its resource
25
profile by its adequacy target.
26

"Physical plant support" means a per-student funding

SB0013
- 11 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
amount required to cover costs related to the operation and
2
maintenance of a physical campus of an eligible public
3
institution, including, but not limited to, custodial
4
services, snow removal, painting, and repairs.
5

"Public service and artistry support" means a per-student
6
funding amount required to cover costs related to public
7
service and artistry.
8

"Public university" means the University of Illinois,
9
Southern Illinois University, Chicago State University,
10
Eastern Illinois University, Governors State University,
11
Illinois State University, Northeastern Illinois University,
12
Northern Illinois University, Western Illinois University, or
13
any other public college or university now or hereafter
14
established or authorized by the General Assembly, except a
15
community college.
16

"Research support" means a per-student funding amount
17
required to cover costs related to research.
18

"Resource profile" means the resources available to a
19
public university to cover the costs of the adequacy target.
20

"Scaled institutional ratio cut" means the calculation
21
used to apply the reduction ratio to the amount of the funding
22
reduction in a given fiscal year. To calculate the scaled
23
institutional ratio cut, each eligible public institution's
24
percentage reduction ratio shall be proportionally scaled up
25
or down based on the total amount of reduced appropriations.
26

"School size adjustment" means an adjustment to

SB0013
- 12 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
institutional support for an eligible public institution with
2
a head count of less than 20,000 students.
3

"Statewide adequacy gap" means the difference between (i)
4
the cumulative total of each eligible public institution's
5
adequacy targets and (ii) the cumulative total of each
6
eligible public institution's resource profile.
7

"Statewide gap" means the statewide funding gap determined
8
by dividing the adequacy target of all eligible public
9
institutions by the resource profile of all eligible public
10
institutions, measured as a percentage.
11

"Underserved students" means students or student groups
12
that have gaps in enrollment, retention, or completion between
13
their population and a relevant comparison group based on data
14
available to the State. The Board shall determine which
15
students or student groups meet this term through a
16
data-informed determination of "underserved students" that
17
shall be updated every 3 years. The Board shall consider data
18
about postsecondary enrollment patterns, student demographics,
19
student and family income levels, student outcomes, and
20
geographic distribution when developing its determination.

21

Section 20.
Adequate and equitable funding formula for
22
public universities.
23

(a) After the effective date of this Act, all general
24
operating expenses for public universities shall be
25
distributed by the Board through the funding formula created

SB0013
- 13 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
under this Act for public universities and shall be
2
administered by the Board.
3

(b) The adequate and equitable funding formula for public
4
universities shall include all of the following:
5

(1) an adequacy target for each eligible public
6

institution, as calculated in Section 25;
7

(2) a resource profile for each eligible public
8

institution, as calculated in Section 30; and
9

(3) an adequacy gap for each eligible public
10

institution, which is the difference between the adequacy
11

target and the resource profile.
12

(c) The funding formula shall operate as follows:
13

(1) The General Assembly shall appropriate new funding
14

to reduce the statewide adequacy gap.
15

(A) The Board shall use the formula in Section 25
16

to calculate the adequacy target for each eligible
17

public institution.
18

(B) The Board shall use the formula in Section 30
19

to calculate the resource profile for each eligible
20

public institution.
21

(C) After calculating the adequacy target and
22

resource profile for each eligible public institution,
23

the Board shall subtract the resource profile from the
24

adequacy target to determine the adequacy gap for each
25

eligible public institution.
26

(2) The Board shall use the distribution formula set

SB0013
- 14 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

forth in Section 35 to calculate the amount of the new
2

funding to allocate for each eligible public institution.
3

(A) Unless the Board determines an eligible public
4

institution to be ineligible for new funding after
5

considering recommendations of the Accountability and
6

Transparency Committee, each eligible public
7

institution is eligible for new funding.
8

(B) The Board shall outline what conditions, if
9

any, come with the new funding.
10

(3) The Board shall distribute new funding to each
11

public university through the distribution formula set
12

forth in Section 35.

13

Section 25.
Adequacy target.
14

(a) As used in this Section, "underrepresented students"
15
means student groups whose share of the head count of the
16
relevant core instructional program across all eligible public
17
institutions is less than the share of that same student group
18
across every eligible public institution's undergraduate head
19
count.
20

(b) The adequacy target for each eligible public
21
institution is the sum of the eligible public institution's
22
cost of providing an equitable and adequate education based on
23
the specific characteristics of the eligible public
24
institution and the eligible public institution's student body
25
as calculated in accordance with this Section each fiscal

SB0013
- 15 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
year. Each eligible public institution's adequacy target shall
2
be made up of the following adequacy components:
3

(1) an instruction and student services component,
4

which shall cover the expenses of providing access
5

support, academic and nonacademic support, and core
6

instructional program support;
7

(2) a research and public service mission component,
8

which shall cover the expenses of providing mission
9

support and public service and artistry support; and
10

(3) an operations and maintenance component, which
11

shall cover the expenses of institutional support and
12

physical plant support.
13

(c) The adequacy components shall be predicated on a base,
14
per-student, core funding amount and, if necessary,
15
accompanying adjustments, each of which has been identified as
16
evidence-based or as needed to enhance, based on the available
17
data, the enrollment and graduation of underserved students,
18
and shall be evaluated and adjusted under subsection (g) of
19
Section 45. In Fiscal Year 2026 and in each fiscal year
20
thereafter, the dollar value of each of the core funding
21
elements and any adjustment represented by a dollar value
22
identified in this Section shall be increased annually, on a
23
cumulative basis, predicated on the Employment Cost Index
24
(Midwest Economy) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
25
of the United States Department of Labor for the 4-quarter
26
period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding

SB0013
- 16 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
fiscal year. The adequacy target of an eligible public
2
institution in a fiscal year shall be the sum of its adequacy
3
components for the fiscal year, adjusted for inflation as
4
provided in this subsection (c).
5

(d) The instruction and student services adequacy
6
component shall be determined as follows:
7

(1) The Board shall include in each eligible public
8

institution's adequacy target the costs required to
9

provide students with access support as follows:
10

(A) The Board shall include access support in the
11

amount of $1,136 per student in each eligible public
12

institution's adequacy target.
13

(B) The access adjustments to the access support
14

shall be determined as follows:
15

(i) the Board shall include in each eligible
16

public institution's adequacy target an additional
17

$500 for each undergraduate student included in
18

the eligible public institution's head count who
19

meets the requirements for a low-access adjustment
20

as defined in subsection (g); and
21

(ii) the Board shall include in each eligible
22

public institution's adequacy target an additional
23

$1,000 for each undergraduate student included in
24

the eligible public institution's head count who
25

meets the requirements for a medium-access
26

adjustment as defined in subsection (g).

SB0013
- 17 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(2) The Board shall include in each eligible public
2

institution's adequacy target the funding required to
3

provide students with academic and nonacademic support as
4

follows:
5

(A) The Board shall include academic and
6

nonacademic support in the amount of $2,196 per
7

student in each eligible public institution's adequacy
8

target.
9

(B) The holistic support equity adjustment to the
10

academic and nonacademic support shall be determined
11

as follows:
12

(i) The Board shall include in each eligible
13

public institution's adequacy target an additional
14

$2,000 for each student included in the eligible
15

public institution's head count who meets the
16

requirements for a low holistic support equity
17

adjustment as defined in subsection (h).
18

(ii) The Board shall include in each eligible
19

public institution's adequacy target an additional
20

$4,000 for each student included in the eligible
21

public institution's head count who meets the
22

requirements for a medium holistic support equity
23

adjustment as defined in subsection (h).
24

(iii) The Board shall include in each eligible
25

public institution's adequacy target an additional
26

$6,000 for each student included in the eligible

SB0013
- 18 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

public institution's head count who meets the
2

requirements for a high holistic support equity
3

adjustment as defined in subsection (h).
4

(iv) The Board shall include in each eligible
5

public institution's adequacy target an additional
6

$8,000 for each student included in the eligible
7

public institution's head count who meets the
8

requirements for an intensive holistic support
9

equity adjustment as defined in subsection (h).
10

(C) The concentration factor adjustment to
11

academic and nonacademic support shall be determined
12

as follows:
13

(i) If 75% or more of the undergraduate
14

students included in an eligible public
15

institution's head count meet the requirements for
16

a high holistic support equity adjustment or an
17

intensive holistic support equity adjustment, then
18

each of the holistic support equity adjustment
19

amounts described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph
20

(2) of this subsection (d) shall be increased by a
21

concentration factor of 50%.
22

(ii) If 60% or more but less than 75% of the
23

undergraduate students included in an eligible
24

public institution's head count meet the
25

requirements for a high holistic support equity
26

adjustment or an intensive holistic support equity

SB0013
- 19 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

adjustment, then each of the holistic support
2

equity adjustment amounts described in
3

subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of this
4

subsection (d) shall be increased by a
5

concentration factor of 30%.
6

(iii) If 50% or more but less than 60% of the
7

undergraduate students included in an eligible
8

public institution's head count meet the
9

requirements for a high holistic support equity
10

adjustment or an intensive holistic support equity
11

adjustment, then each of the holistic support
12

equity adjustment amounts described in
13

subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of this
14

subsection (d) shall be increased by a
15

concentration factor of 10%.
16

(iv) If less than 50% of the undergraduate
17

students included in an eligible public
18

institution's head count meet the requirements for
19

a high holistic support equity adjustment or an
20

intensive holistic support equity adjustment, then
21

no concentration factor may be applied to the
22

eligible public institution's holistic support
23

equity adjustments.
24

(3) The Board shall include in each eligible public
25

institution's adequacy target the funding required to
26

provide students with core instructional program support

SB0013
- 20 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

as follows:
2

(A) The Board shall include core instructional
3

program support in the amount of $9,797 per student in
4

each eligible public institution's adequacy target.
5

(B) For Fiscal Year 2026 and Fiscal Year 2027, the
6

high-cost and high-priority programs to be included in
7

the adjustment are as follows:
8

(i) Engineering (all Classification of
9

Instructional Programs (CIP) codes 14.XXXX).
10

(ii) Fine arts (all CIP codes 50.XXXX).
11

(iii) Registered nursing (CIP code 51.38XX).
12

(iv) Other health professional programs (CIP
13

codes 01.8001, 51.0201, 51.0202, 51.0204, 51.0401,
14

51.2001, 51.2308, and 51.3818).
15

(C) The core instructional program adjustment to
16

core instructional program support shall be determined
17

as follows:
18

(i) For students participating in a high-cost
19

program at the eligible public institution, the
20

dollar amount of the core instructional program
21

support shall be increased by 20%.
22

(ii) For students participating in a health
23

professional program at the eligible public
24

institution, the dollar amount of core
25

instructional program support shall be increased
26

by 100%.

SB0013
- 21 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(iii) For students participating in a medical
2

program at the eligible public institution, the
3

dollar amount of core instructional program
4

support shall be increased by 1,100%.
5

(D) The diversity programs adjustment shall be
6

calculated using each eligible public institution's
7

head count of underrepresented students in core
8

instructional programs. The diversity programs
9

adjustments shall be determined as follows:
10

(i) For each underrepresented student enrolled
11

in a high-cost program at the eligible public
12

institution, the high-cost program adjustment
13

shall be increased by 45%.
14

(ii) For each underrepresented student
15

enrolled in a health professional program at the
16

eligible public institution, the health
17

professional program adjustment shall be increased
18

by 69%.
19

(iii) For each underrepresented student
20

enrolled in a medical program at the eligible
21

public institution the medical program adjustment
22

shall be increased by 18%.
23

(e) The research and public service mission adequacy
24
component shall be determined as follows:
25

(1) The Board shall include in each eligible public
26

institution's adequacy target the funding required to

SB0013
- 22 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

conduct research as follows:
2

(A) The Board shall include research support in
3

the amount of $600 per student in each eligible public
4

institution's adequacy target.
5

(B) For the head count of an eligible public
6

institution, a research support adjustment shall be
7

applied to the research support provided for each
8

student. The research support adjustment shall be
9

determined as follows:
10

(i) the Board shall include in an eligible
11

public institution's adequacy target an additional
12

$500 for each enrolled student if the eligible
13

public institution is under the category of D/PU:
14

Doctoral/Professional Universities under the
15

Carnegie Classification system;
16

(ii) the Board shall include in an eligible
17

public institution's adequacy target an additional
18

$700 for each enrolled student if the eligible
19

public institution is under the category of R2:
20

Doctoral Universities - High research activity
21

under the Carnegie Classification system; or
22

(iii) the Board shall include in an eligible
23

public institution's adequacy target an additional
24

$1,200 for each enrolled student if the eligible
25

public institution is under the category of R1:
26

Doctoral Universities - Very high research

SB0013
- 23 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

activity under the Carnegie Classification system.
2

(2) The Board shall include in each eligible public
3

institution's adequacy target the funding required to
4

promote public service and artistry. For the head count of
5

an eligible public institution, the eligible public
6

institution shall include public service and artistry
7

support in the amount of $200 per student in its adequacy
8

target.
9

(f) The operations and maintenance adequacy component
10
shall be determined as follows:
11

(1) The Board shall include in each eligible public
12

institution's adequacy target the funding required to
13

provide institutional support as follows:
14

(A) The Board shall include institutional support
15

in the amount of $1,941 per student in each eligible
16

public institution's adequacy target.
17

(B) The school size adjustment shall be applied to
18

any eligible public institution with a head count of
19

less than 20,000 students. The school size adjustment
20

shall be calculated by subtracting the eligible public
21

institution's head count from 20,000, dividing the
22

result by 20,000, then multiplying that quotient by
23

45%. The resulting percentage shall be multiplied by
24

the institutional support for each eligible public
25

institution to get the per-student subsidy amount.
26

That amount shall then be multiplied by the head count

SB0013
- 24 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

and the resulting amount shall be included in the
2

eligible public institution's adequacy target.
3

(2) The Board shall include in each eligible public
4

institution's adequacy target the funding required to
5

maintain the eligible public institution's physical plant
6

as follows:
7

(A) Each eligible public institution shall include
8

physical plant support in the amount of $7.78 per
9

square foot in its adequacy target.
10

(B) Each eligible public institution shall include
11

in its adequacy target a laboratory space adjustment
12

cost of $1.54 per square foot of laboratory space in
13

the eligible public institution's physical plant.
14

(g) As used in this subsection (g):
15

"Low-access adjustment" means an adjustment for an
16
eligible public institution having a disparity that is greater
17
than or equal to 1% but less than 10% in statewide public
18
university enrollment rates for any subgroup of students
19
compared to the statewide average of all other students.
20

"Medium-access adjustment" means an adjustment for an
21
eligible public institution having a 10% or greater disparity
22
in statewide public university enrollment rates for any
23
subgroup of students compared to the statewide average of all
24
other students.
25

Eligibility for the access adjustments shall be determined
26
using the gaps in the percentage of statewide public

SB0013
- 25 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
university enrollment of recent high school graduates for any
2
subgroup of students compared to the statewide average of all
3
other students, as determined by the Board. The access
4
adjustments shall be allocated based on the head count of
5
undergraduate students at each eligible public institution and
6
shall be categorized as either low-access adjustments or
7
medium-access adjustments, with student populations with
8
larger enrollment gaps having higher adjustment amounts.
9
Students with multiple characteristics shall be placed in the
10
category associated with their highest characteristic.
11

(h) As used in this subsection (h):
12

"High holistic support adjustment" means an adjustment for
13
an eligible public institution having greater than or equal to
14
11% disparity in retention rates for any subgroup of students
15
compared to the statewide average of all other students.
16

"Intensive holistic support adjustment" means an
17
adjustment for an eligible public institution having students
18
belonging to 2 other categories of holistic support, one of
19
which is high holistic support.
20

"Low holistic support adjustment" means an adjustment for
21
an eligible public institution having a disparity in retention
22
rates greater than or equal to 1% but less than 6% for any
23
subgroup of students compared to the statewide average of all
24
other students.
25

"Medium holistic support adjustment" means an adjustment
26
for an eligible public institution having a disparity in

SB0013
- 26 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
retention rates greater than or equal to 6% but less than 11%
2
for any subgroup of students compared to the statewide average
3
of all other students.
4

The academic and nonacademic support adjustments shall be
5
determined using the statewide gaps in the percentage of
6
year-over-year retention for any subgroup of students compared
7
to the statewide average of all other students, as determined
8
by the Board. The holistic support equity adjustments shall be
9
categorized, in descending order, as intensive, high, medium,
10
or low, with students with multiple characteristics being
11
placed one category above the category associated with their
12
highest characteristic. Undergraduate students are eligible
13
for all holistic support equity adjustments. Graduate students
14
are eligible for the high and medium holistic support equity
15
adjustments.
16

(i) The adequacy target does not include, among other
17
expenditures, any of the following:
18

(1) expenditures for hospitals, athletics,
19

auxiliaries, housing, health insurance, or deferred
20

maintenance; or
21

(2) institutional financial aid.
22

(j) The Board, in consultation with the Funding Formula
23
Review Panel, may, by rule, define additional academic and
24
nonacademic support and additional high-cost programs. The
25
Board, in consultation with the Funding Formula Review Panel,
26
may also define by rule the maximum adjustment and number of

SB0013
- 27 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
students who are eligible for the school size adjustment.

2

Section 30.
Resource profile.
3

(a) As used in this Section:
4

"Deemed State appropriation percentage" means that portion
5
of an eligible public institution's core funding that State
6
appropriations are deemed responsible to cover, predicated on
7
a weighted average of the following apportionments of the core
8
funding, using the head count at the eligible public
9
institution of the following students, provided that the
10
apportionments set forth within each paragraph are cumulative
11
so that if a student is associated with more than one
12
apportionment criterion, the multiple apportionments shall be
13
added together:
14

(1) 30% of the core funding associated with each
15

in-state undergraduate student included in the eligible
16

public institution's head count; plus
17

(2) 50% of the core funding associated with each
18

in-state undergraduate who is also an underrepresented
19

student included in the eligible public institution's head
20

count; plus
21

(3) 50% of the core funding associated with each
22

in-state undergraduate student attending the eligible
23

public institution who is qualified by income for a grant
24

under the Monetary Award Program or the Federal Pell Grant
25

Program; plus

SB0013
- 28 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(4) 10% of the core funding associated with each
2

in-state undergraduate student included in the eligible
3

public institution's head count who also attended a public
4

high school located in a school district placed into Tier
5

1 under Section 18-8.15 of the School Code; plus
6

(5) 10% of the core funding associated with each
7

in-state undergraduate student included in the eligible
8

public institution's head count who also attended a public
9

high school located in a school district placed into Tier
10

2 under Section 18-8.15 of the School Code and who is also
11

low income; plus
12

(6) 25% of the core funding associated with each
13

in-state undergraduate student included in the eligible
14

public institution's head count who is an adult student,
15

provided that in no event shall more than 100% of the
16

responsibility for covering the core funding associated
17

with any in-state undergraduate student included in an
18

eligible public institution's head count be apportioned to
19

State appropriations under this Section, irrespective of
20

how many apportionment adjustments may be applicable to
21

the student; plus
22

(7) 25% of the core funding associated with each
23

in-state graduate student included in the eligible public
24

institution's head count, plus an additional 50% of the
25

core funding associated with each in-state graduate
26

student who is also an underrepresented student included

SB0013
- 29 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

in the eligible public institution's head count; plus
2

(8) 10% of the core funding associated with each
3

out-of-state undergraduate student included in the
4

eligible public institution's head count; plus
5

(9) 25% of the core funding associated with each
6

out-of-state undergraduate student who is also an
7

underrepresented student included in the eligible public
8

institution's head count; plus
9

(10) 25% of the core funding associated with each
10

in-state undergraduate student included in the eligible
11

public institution's head count who is low income,
12

provided that in no event shall more than 35% of the
13

responsibility for covering the core funding associated
14

with any out-of-state undergraduate student be apportioned
15

to State appropriations under this Section, irrespective
16

of how many apportionment adjustments may be applicable to
17

the student; plus
18

(11) 5% of the core funding associated with each
19

out-of-state graduate student included in the eligible
20

public institution's head count; plus
21

(12) 25% of the core funding associated with each
22

out-of-state graduate student who is also an
23

underrepresented student included in the eligible public
24

institution's head count.
25

"ESS index" means, for an eligible public institution, a
26
percentage that is equal to 100% minus the deemed State

SB0013
- 30 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
appropriation percentage applicable to the eligible public
2
institution in the fiscal year, as determined in this Section.
3

(b) The resource profile shall be the sum of each eligible
4
public institution's other resources, equitable student share,
5
base funding minimum, and special operational funding as
6
determined under this Act.
7

(1) The other resources of an eligible public
8

institution shall be an amount that is equal to 4.2% of the
9

most recent 4-year average of the eligible public
10

institution's end-of-fiscal-year endowment value.
11

(2) The equitable student share apportionments shall
12

be predicated on data that shows disparities among various
13

student subgroups in enrollment and retention at each
14

eligible public institution. In each academic year, the
15

equitable student share of an eligible public institution
16

shall be a dollar amount that is equal to the eligible
17

public institution's core funding multiplied by its ESS
18

index.
19

(3) The base funding minimum shall be calculated under
20

subsection (b) of Section 35.
21

(4) Special operational funding is funding for
22

scholarships and specific appropriations aimed at a
23

specific initiative, project, or center that is aligned
24

with one or more of the adequacy components.
25

(A) For Fiscal Year 2026 and Fiscal Year 2027, the
26

following line-item State appropriations shall be

SB0013
- 31 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

included in the resource profile :
2

(i) at Chicago State University, the Chicago
3

State University Education Improvement Fund and
4

the College of Pharmacy.
5

(ii) at Eastern Illinois University, the
6

equity-based student achievement program, Grow
7

Your Own Teachers at Eastern Illinois University
8

scholarships, and scholarship appropriations.
9

(iii) at Illinois State University,
10

scholarship appropriations.
11

(iv) at Northern Illinois University,
12

scholarship appropriations.
13

(iv) at Southern Illinois University, the
14

Daily Egyptian, the School of Pharmacy, and
15

scholarship appropriations.
16

(vi) at the University of Illinois, labor and
17

employment relations, the Hispanic Center of
18

Excellence, the Dixon Springs Agricultural Center,
19

the Institute of Government and Public Affairs,
20

the College of Dentistry, the College of Pharmacy
21

in Rockford, and scholarship appropriations.
22

(B) For Fiscal Year 2028 and each fiscal year
23

thereafter, the Board shall determine, based on the
24

recommendations of the Funding Formula Review Panel,
25

the special operational funding to be included in the
26

resource profile.

SB0013
- 32 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(c) The resource profile may not include any of the
2
following:
3

(1) tuition and fee revenue;
4

(2) revenue from State or federal financial aid; or
5

(3) special operational funding as follows:
6

(A) for Fiscal Year 2026 and Fiscal Year 2027, the
7

following line-item State appropriations may not be
8

included in the resource profile:
9

(i) at Southern Illinois University, the
10

National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Center,
11

programming at Belleville, the Office of Community
12

Engagement, the Center for Rural Health and Social
13

Service Development, and the Simmons Cancer
14

Institute; and
15

(ii) at the University of Illinois, the
16

Prairie Research Institute, the University of
17

Illinois Hospital, Illinois Heart Rescue, the
18

Illinois Innocence Project, the Climate Jobs
19

Institute, the Illinois Fire Service Institute,
20

emergency mosquito abatement, pet population
21

control, carbon dioxide capture technology, carbon
22

capture utilization and storage, and water reports
23

under the federal Advanced Research Projects
24

Agency.
25

(B) for Fiscal Year 2028 and each fiscal year
26

thereafter, the Board shall determine, based on the

SB0013
- 33 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

recommendations of the Funding Formula Review Panel,
2

the special operational funding to be included in the
3

resource profile.

4

Section 35.
Distribution of State appropriations for
5
eligible public institutions.
6

(a) As used in this Section:
7

"Guardrail percentage" means the percentage obtained by
8
multiplying 50% by the lesser of either:
9

(1) the annual inflation rate measured by the
10

Employment Cost Index (Midwest Economy) published by the
11

Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department
12

of Labor for the 4-quarter period ending on December 31 of
13

the immediately preceding fiscal year, but not less than
14

0%; or
15

(2) the percentage equal to (i) the total amount of
16

new State formula funding for the fiscal year, divided by
17

(ii) the total amount of annual formula funding for the
18

immediately preceding fiscal year.
19
The dollar amount of new State formula funding in a fiscal year
20
that remains after accounting for all guardrail distributions
21
to be made in the fiscal year shall be referred to as the new
22
State formula funding.
23

"New State formula funding" means, in a fiscal year, the
24
dollar amount of State appropriations that exceeds the dollar
25
amount of the annual formula funding appropriated for public

SB0013
- 34 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
universities in the immediately preceding fiscal year.
2

"Pro rata share" means an amount that is equal to the sum
3
of (i) the amount of the guardrail distribution allocated to
4
the eligible public institution for the fiscal year, as
5
determined in subsection (e), plus (ii) the eligible public
6
institution's adequacy gap formula distribution and dollar gap
7
formula distribution for the fiscal year, as determined in
8
paragraph (1) of subsection (f).
9

(b) The base funding minimum for each eligible public
10
institution shall be determined as follows:
11

(1) For Fiscal Year 2026, the base funding minimum of
12

an eligible public institution shall be the sum of all
13

State appropriations made from the Education Assistance
14

Fund or the General Revenue Fund to the eligible public
15

institution to use as operating funds in the previous
16

fiscal year.
17

(2) For Fiscal Year 2027 and each fiscal year
18

thereafter, the base funding minimum of an eligible public
19

institution shall be the dollar value of its base funding
20

minimum from the immediately preceding fiscal year,
21

increased by any new State formula funding the eligible
22

public institution received in the immediately preceding
23

fiscal year, provided that there was new State formula
24

funding appropriated in the immediately preceding fiscal
25

year. If there was no increase or decrease made to annual
26

formula funding in the immediately preceding fiscal year,

SB0013
- 35 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

then the dollar value of the base funding minimum for the
2

eligible public institution that pertained to the
3

immediately preceding fiscal year shall carry forward into
4

the next fiscal year. If there was a year-to-year
5

reduction in annual formula funding in the immediately
6

preceding fiscal year, then the base funding minimum for
7

the eligible public institution in the next succeeding
8

fiscal year shall be the State appropriations made to the
9

eligible public institution to meet its operational
10

expenses for the fiscal year.
11

(c) To enhance the stability of long-term funding for
12
public universities, to create predictability in funding, to
13
enhance the capacity of public universities to prepare
14
budgets, and to create a feasible pathway to fully fund the
15
adequacy target of each public university within a reasonable
16
period of time, in Fiscal Year 2026 and in each fiscal year
17
thereafter, the State shall endeavor to increase the aggregate
18
amount of annual formula funding by an amount that is at least
19
$135,000,000 more than the aggregate annual formula funding
20
appropriation made in the immediately preceding fiscal year,
21
and that amount shall be designated as the minimum target
22
increase. The minimum target increase shall be in addition to
23
and not a replacement for any other appropriations the State
24
makes to support either public universities or the students
25
who attend public universities.
26

The first fiscal year occurring after the adequacy target

SB0013
- 36 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
of every eligible public institution is fully funded, after
2
accounting for inflation and enrollment changes, shall be the
3
full funding date, and the minimum target increase shall be an
4
amount equal to the annual formula funding amount for the
5
fiscal year of the full funding date, increased on a
6
cumulative basis by a percentage equal to the percentage
7
increase, if any, in the Employment Cost Index (Midwest
8
Economy) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the
9
United States Department of Labor for the 4-quarter period
10
ending on December 31 of the fiscal year in which the full
11
funding date occurs. Thereafter, the minimum target increase
12
in a fiscal year shall be the annual formula funding amount for
13
the immediately preceding fiscal year, increased by a
14
percentage equal to the percentage increase, if any, in the
15
Employment Cost Index (Midwest Economy) published by the
16
Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of
17
Labor for the 4-quarter period ending on December 31 of the
18
immediately preceding fiscal year.
19

(d) In Fiscal Year 2026 and in each fiscal year thereafter
20
in which the State appropriates new State formula funding,
21
each public university shall receive an appropriation from the
22
Board equal to the sum of its base funding minimum for the
23
fiscal year, plus its pro rata share of new State formula
24
funding for the fiscal year. A public university shall receive
25
all funding on behalf of each eligible public institution that
26
is part of that public university and then distribute that

SB0013
- 37 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
funding to each eligible public institution.
2

(e) In each fiscal year in which the State appropriates
3
new State formula funding, a portion of the new State formula
4
funding shall be set aside and used as the aggregate guardrail
5
distribution that shall be made to all public universities in
6
the fiscal year. The amount of the guardrail distribution a
7
public university shall receive in an applicable fiscal year
8
shall be equal to the dollar value of its base funding minimum
9
for the fiscal year, multiplied by the guardrail percentage.
10

(f) In each fiscal year in which there is new State formula
11
funding, 50% of the new State formula funding shall be
12
calculated using the dollar gap formula for each eligible
13
public institution, and the remaining 50% shall be calculated
14
using the adequacy gap formula for each eligible public
15
institution through the following calculations:
16

(1) The portion of the new State formula funding to be
17

distributed under the dollar gap formula shall be
18

calculated for each eligible public institution as
19

follows:
20

(A) First, add the total dollar value of the
21

adequacy gap of all eligible public institutions for
22

the fiscal year, which shall be the total adequacy
23

gap.
24

(B) Second, divide the dollar value of the
25

adequacy gap of the eligible public institution by the
26

dollar value of the total adequacy gap, which shall be

SB0013
- 38 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

the gap percentage A.
2

(C) Third, multiply the eligible public
3

institution's gap percentage A times the amount
4

available for the dollar gap formula for the fiscal
5

year.
6

(D) The dollar value of the product obtained after
7

calculating subparagraph (C) of this paragraph (1)
8

shall be the dollar gap formula distribution for the
9

eligible public institution.
10

(2) The portion of the new State formula funding to be
11

distributed under the adequacy gap formula shall be
12

calculated for each eligible public institution as
13

follows:
14

(A) First, add the percentage gaps of all eligible
15

public institutions for the fiscal year, which shall
16

be the total percentage gap.
17

(B) Second, divide the percentage gap of the
18

eligible public institution by the total percentage
19

gap, which shall be the gap percentage B.
20

(C) Third, multiply the eligible public
21

institution's gap percentage B times the amount
22

available for the adequacy gap formula for the fiscal
23

year.
24

(D) The dollar value of the product obtained after
25

calculating subparagraph (C) of this paragraph (2)
26

shall be the adequacy gap formula distribution for the

SB0013
- 39 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

eligible public institution.
2

(g) The reduction formula shall be used in a fiscal year in
3
which the State reduces its overall appropriations to public
4
universities relative to the previous fiscal year such that
5
funds are insufficient to provide each public university with
6
its base funding minimum. In each fiscal year in which there is
7
a reduction in funds relative to the previous fiscal year, the
8
funding reductions shall be borne by public universities using
9
the reduction guardrail factor, which equals 25%, and the
10
remaining 75% shall be borne by public universities using the
11
scaled institutional ratio cut. The reduction formula shall be
12
determined as follows:
13

(1) A reduction shall be determined by multiplying the
14

amount of the reduction of funds relative to the previous
15

fiscal year by the reduction guardrail factor. This amount
16

is to be subtracted from the eligible public institutions'
17

base funding minimum, with each eligible public
18

institution absorbing the percentage of the amount that
19

corresponds to each eligible public institution's
20

percentage of the base funding minimum.
21

(2) The balance of the remaining reduction in funds
22

shall be distributed to universities using the reduction
23

ratio formula determined as follows:
24

(A) The reduction ratio formula shall be
25

calculated by dividing the cumulative statewide
26

adequacy gap percentage by each eligible public

SB0013
- 40 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

institution's adequacy gap percentage and multiplying
2

the result by the percentage decrease in the current
3

fiscal year's appropriation compared to the prior
4

fiscal year's appropriation.
5

(B) To complete the reduction calculation, each
6

eligible public institution's percentage of the cut
7

shall be proportionally scaled up or down to fit the
8

total amount of the reduced appropriations. The scaled
9

institutional ratio cut shall be scaled by:
10

(i) calculating the difference between the
11

statewide sum of institutional ratio cuts and the
12

statewide sum of the guardrail reduction;
13

(ii) calculating the ratio of each
14

institutional ratio cut and the statewide sum of
15

institutional ratio cuts; and
16

(iii) calculating the product of subdivisions
17

(i) and (ii) of this subparagraph (B) and
18

subtracting that amount from each institutional
19

ratio cut.
20

(C) Once the reduction calculation is complete,
21

each eligible public institution that is part of a
22

public university shall have its cuts aggregated into
23

a total cut for the public university.

24

Section 40.
Accountability and transparency framework;
25
reporting; committee.

SB0013
- 41 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(a) The Board shall oversee an accountability and
2
transparency framework for assessing the distribution and use
3
of funds appropriated by the funding formula under Section 30
4
and evaluating the funds' effects on institutional outcomes
5
pertaining to student affordability, enrollment, persistence,
6
and outcome metrics.
7

(b) The Board shall report annually to the General
8
Assembly on the implementation of the funding formula as
9
follows:
10

(1) The report shall be posted publicly on the Board's
11

website by March 1 of each year and shall, at a minimum,
12

include all of the following:
13

(A) an updated adequacy target for each eligible
14

public institution for the upcoming fiscal year,
15

calculated from the following:
16

(i) the updated resource profile for each
17

eligible public institution; and
18

(ii) the updated adequacy gap for each
19

eligible public institution; and
20

(B) a description of the use of all resources
21

received by eligible public institutions through the
22

appropriations of the funding formula; and
23

(C) a description of the status and year-over-year
24

progress of each eligible public institution on a
25

series of institutional spending, institutional
26

performance, and student support metrics described in

SB0013
- 42 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

this Section.
2

(2) The Board, with advice of each public university,
3

shall specify a set of metrics and associated information
4

designated for evaluating institutional performance and
5

annually report on those metrics. These metrics shall
6

include both point-in-time and longitudinal measures of
7

institutional spending of any resources received from the
8

funding formula and institutional performance regarding
9

student affordability, student enrollment, student
10

retention, and student graduation. Each eligible public
11

institution shall provide the needed data to calculate the
12

set of metrics and related information annually to the
13

Board by December 31. The metrics and related information
14

and materials shall include all of the following
15

information:
16

(A) Prospective spending proposals through which
17

eligible public institutions delineate their projected
18

use of appropriations allocated through the funding
19

formula for the forthcoming fiscal year. These
20

expenditure plans shall be categorized according to
21

accounting spending classifications established by the
22

Board.
23

(B) Retrospective spending summaries through which
24

eligible public institutions disclose the expenditure
25

of all new appropriations received in the preceding
26

fiscal year. These expenditure reports shall be

SB0013
- 43 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

structured based on accounting spending categories
2

designated by the Board.
3

(C) Metrics measuring the institutional status and
4

year-over-year changes in students' tuition and fees,
5

net price, and expected share of expenses. Student
6

affordability data and data trends shall be
7

disaggregated by undergraduate and graduate students
8

with further disaggregation by the student equity
9

categories aligned with the equitable student share,
10

set forth in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of
11

Section 30.
12

(D) Metrics measuring the institutional status and
13

year-over-year changes in student enrollment.
14

Enrollment data and data trends shall be disaggregated
15

by undergraduate and graduate students with further
16

disaggregation by the student groups who carry with
17

them equity adjustments, as set forth in subsections
18

(c) through (e) of Section 25.
19

(E) Metrics measuring the institutional status and
20

year-over-year changes in student retention increased
21

rates from one year of enrollment to the next, minus
22

those that transfer from one eligible public
23

institution to another, and minus those that receive a
24

credential and no longer enroll thereafter. Student
25

retention data and data trends shall be disaggregated
26

by the student groups who carry with them equity

SB0013
- 44 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

adjustments, as set forth in subsections (c) through
2

(e) of Section 25.
3

(F) Metrics measuring student graduation rates
4

within 4 years, 5 years, and 6 years and
5

year-over-year changes in graduation rates. Graduation
6

data and data trends shall be disaggregated by the
7

student groups who carry with them equity adjustments,
8

as described in subsections (c) through (e) of Section
9

25.
10

(3) The Board shall identify at what point an adequacy
11

gap is sufficiently small, thereby signifying an eligible
12

public institution's capability to consistently advance
13

toward achieving State objectives, including, but not
14

limited to, institutional student affordability,
15

enrollment, persistence, completion, and outcomes. If an
16

eligible public institution's adequacy gap exceeds the
17

level determined by the Board, the eligible public
18

institution is exempt from the actions described in
19

paragraph (4) of subsection (e).
20

(c) For each of its metrics, the Board, with advice from
21
eligible public institutions, shall determine goals for each
22
eligible public institution in alignment with the funding
23
formula. These goals shall include overall progress and status
24
goals for the eligible public institution, as well as goals
25
that close equity gaps between students who carry with them
26
subsidies and the institutional average. The Board shall track

SB0013
- 45 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
and report publicly on its website and in its annual written
2
reports the progress of each eligible public institution
3
toward those goals.
4

(d) The Board may review data submitted by an eligible
5
public institution to ensure that it is responsive to the
6
requirements of this Act. If the Board determines that the
7
data submitted is not responsive to the requirements of this
8
Act or the Board's rules, the Board may require an eligible
9
public institution to submit corrected data.
10

(1) If an eligible public institution does not comply
11

with data requests promptly, the Board may withhold any
12

funds appropriated to that eligible public institution
13

from the funding formula beyond the eligible public
14

institution's base funding minimum until the proper data
15

is submitted.
16

(2) If the Board determines that an eligible public
17

institution has reported revenue or expenditures in the
18

wrong category as set by the Board, the Board may
19

reclassify those revenues or expenditures.
20

(e) To aid the Board in upholding the accountability and
21
transparency framework and in reporting its findings in Fiscal
22
Year 2026, the Executive Director of the Board shall establish
23
an Accountability and Transparency Committee tasked with
24
conducting pertinent technical evaluations of each eligible
25
public institution's resource allocation and advancement in
26
student affordability, enrollment, persistence, and outcome

SB0013
- 46 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
metrics. The Accountability and Transparency Committee shall
2
offer relevant and necessary technical expertise in
3
facilitating the implementation of the accountability and
4
transparency measures set forth in this Act, including, but
5
not limited to, those in paragraph (4) of this subsection (e).
6

(1) The Accountability and Transparency Committee
7

shall be composed of no more than 15 individuals and shall
8

consist of Board members, policymakers, and State and
9

national technical experts on higher education
10

accountability systems.
11

Members of the Accountability and Transparency
12

Committee shall be appointed by the Executive Director of
13

the Board. The Accountability and Transparency Committee
14

shall include:
15

(A) 4 members of the Board or their designees;
16

(B) one member with expertise in closing
17

educational disparities and identifying and
18

implementing solutions that address historic
19

inequities in higher education;
20

(C) one member with expertise in providing
21

research-based academic and student support that
22

prepares all students to achieve success in college
23

and a career;
24

(D) 2 members with expertise in public university
25

budget and finance; and
26

(E) one member with expertise in university

SB0013
- 47 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

management and performance.
2

The Executive Director of the Board shall ensure that
3

the membership of the Accountability and Transparency
4

Committee includes representatives reflecting the
5

geographic, socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic diversity of
6

this State. Members shall be appointed to 4-year terms,
7

except that for the initial appointments, half of the
8

members shall be appointed to initial 2-year terms.
9

Members may be reappointed to the Accountability and
10

Transparency Committee, and all reappointments shall be
11

for 4-year terms.
12

(2) Recommendations of the Accountability and
13

Transparency Committee shall be made based on a simple
14

majority vote of those Committee members present and
15

voting. A minority opinion may also accompany any
16

recommendation of the Accountability and Transparency
17

Committee.
18

(3) The Accountability and Transparency Committee
19

shall holistically assess progress on each of the Board's
20

metrics. The Accountability and Transparency Committee may
21

request an additional explanation or data from an eligible
22

public institution, which the Committee may consider in
23

determining if an eligible public institution has made
24

progress toward a goal. All considerations shall be
25

thoroughly documented and reported to the Board and the
26

public.

SB0013
- 48 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(4) The Accountability and Transparency Committee may
2

request additional data from an eligible public
3

institution regarding spending and reporting if deemed
4

necessary. If the Accountability and Transparency
5

Committee determines that an eligible public institution
6

is failing to meet progress metrics despite being
7

adequately funded, the Accountability and Transparency
8

Committee shall advise the Board to implement the
9

following actions, including, but not limited to,
10

requiring that an eligible public institution:
11

(A) develop a plan for ensuring adequate progress
12

based on the resources provided;
13

(B) provide additional reporting on institutional
14

spending in alignment with the components of the
15

adequacy target;
16

(C) provide additional reporting on the
17

institutional metrics set forth in this Section; and
18

(D) permit closer oversight for spending by the
19

Board.
20

If other actions under this paragraph (4) prove to be
21

unsuccessful, the Board may recommend restricting or
22

pausing access to additional funds until progress has been
23

made.
24

(5) The Board shall review its existing reporting
25

requirements to ensure that the required reporting from
26

each eligible public institution is not duplicative.

SB0013
- 49 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

Section 45.
Funding Formula Review Panel.
2

(a) The Board shall establish a Funding Formula Review
3
Panel tasked with studying and reviewing topics pertaining to
4
the implementation and impact of the funding formula. The
5
Panel shall provide recommendations and service to the
6
Governor, the General Assembly, and the Board.
7

(b) The Executive Director of the Board or the Executive
8
Director's designee shall serve as a voting member and
9
chairperson of the Funding Formula Review Panel.
10

(c) Members of the Funding Formula Review Panel shall be
11
appointed by the Executive Director of the Board, except as
12
otherwise provided in this Section. The Funding Formula Review
13
Panel shall include representatives of public universities,
14
faculty, students, families, advocacy organizations, and State
15
government agencies, along with technical experts, and shall
16
include:
17

(1) the Executive Director of the Board;
18

(2) one member of the House of Representatives,
19

appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;
20

(3) one member of the Senate, appointed by the
21

President of the Senate;
22

(4) one member of the House of Representatives,
23

appointed by the Minority Leader of the House of
24

Representatives;
25

(5) one member of the Senate, appointed by the

SB0013
- 50 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

Minority Leader of the Senate;
2

(6) one member appointed by the Governor;
3

(7) 6 members from public universities, each appointed
4

to reflect the diversity of public universities;
5

(8) the Executive Director of the Illinois Student
6

Assistance Commission or the Executive Director's
7

designee;
8

(9) 2 members representing an organization that
9

advocates on behalf of public university faculty members
10

who are each employed by a different public university;
11

(10) one member representing a statewide organization
12

that has specific expertise in research-based education
13

policy to support a healthy public education system that
14

prepares all students to achieve success in college, a
15

career, and civic life;
16

(11) one member representing a higher education
17

advocacy organization focused on eliminating disparities
18

in college completion in this State for low-income and
19

first-generation college students and students of color;
20

(12) one member representing a statewide advocacy
21

organization focused on improving educational and
22

employment opportunities for women and adults;
23

(13) one member representing a statewide organization
24

that has specific expertise in equity, justice, and
25

economic prosperity for the Latino community;
26

(14) one member representing a statewide organization

SB0013
- 51 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

that has specific expertise in equity, justice, and
2

economic prosperity for the Black community;
3

(15) 2 members with specific expertise in education
4

finance; and
5

(16) 2 members representing an organization that has
6

specific expertise in amplifying young adult voices.
7

The Executive Director shall ensure that the membership of
8
the Funding Formula Review Panel includes representatives
9
reflecting the geographic, socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic
10
diversity of this State.
11

The Executive Director shall appoint a vice chairperson
12
from the membership of the Funding Formula Review Panel.
13

(d) Members shall be appointed for 4-year terms, except
14
that for the initial appointments, half of the members shall
15
be appointed to 2-year terms. Members may be reappointed to
16
the Funding Formula Review Panel, and all reappointments shall
17
be for 4-year terms.
18

(e) Recommendations of the Funding Formula Review Panel
19
shall be made based on a simple majority vote of those Panel
20
members present and voting. A minority opinion may also
21
accompany any recommendation of the Funding Formula Review
22
Panel.
23

The Funding Formula Review Panel shall study topics at the
24
direction of the General Assembly, the Board of Higher
25
Education, or the chairperson and shall recommend any funding
26
formula recalibrations or changes to the Board, including, but

SB0013
- 52 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
not limited to, all of the following:
2

(1) special operational funding for inclusion in the
3

resource profile;
4

(2) equitable student share;
5

(3) the high-cost and high-priority program
6

adjustments;
7

(4) the inclusion of graduate students throughout the
8

funding formula;
9

(5) medical expenses; and
10

(6) additional underserved students to be included in
11

the equity adjustments and equitable student share,
12

including, but not limited to, student parents,
13

undocumented students, English learners, and
14

first-generation students.
15

(f) On an annual basis, the Funding Formula Review Panel
16
shall validate the following per-student elements of the
17
adequacy target on a cumulative basis by inflation computed
18
using the Employment Cost Index (Midwest Economy) published by
19
the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department
20
of Labor for the 4-quarter period ending on December 31 of the
21
fiscal year in which the full funding date occurs:
22

(1) access support;
23

(2) academic and nonacademic support;
24

(3) core instructional program support;
25

(4) research support;
26

(5) public service and artistry support;

SB0013
- 53 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(6) institutional support; and
2

(7) physical plant support.
3

(g) Once every 3 years, the Funding Formula Review Panel
4
shall consider and make recommendations to the Board and
5
General Assembly for recalibrating each of the following
6
adjustments of the adequacy target, except for inflation
7
adjustments under subsection (b) of Section 20, based on
8
evidence-based practices, research, a study of average
9
expenses, and the U.S. National Science Foundation's Higher
10
Education Research and Development database and as reported in
11
the Board's most recent revenue and expenditure reports:
12

(1) the access adjustment;
13

(2) the holistic support equity adjustment;
14

(3) the concentration factor adjustment;
15

(4) the core instructional program adjustment;
16

(5) the diversity programs adjustment;
17

(6) the research support adjustment;
18

(7) the school size adjustment; and
19

(8) the laboratory space adjustment.
20

(h) Within 5 years after the implementation of this
21
Section and every 5 years thereafter, the Funding Formula
22
Review Panel shall conduct a comprehensive review on the
23
functioning of the funding formula that is aligned as much as
24
possible to the Board's strategic plan development timeline.
25
The Funding Formula Review Panel shall report to the Board of
26
Higher Education, the General Assembly, and the Governor on

SB0013
- 54 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
the findings of the review.

2

Section 50.
Board of Higher Education capacity.
The
3
Board's annual budget request shall describe any additional
4
resources needed to support the implementation of the funding
5
formula, the Funding Formula Review Panel, and the
6
Accountability and Transparency Committee. The budget request
7
shall include any relevant descriptions regarding how the
8
Board is supporting the initial implementation of the funding
9
formula, including establishing the necessary definitions,
10
reviewing submitted eligible public institution data for
11
accuracy and completeness, working with each eligible public
12
institution to ensure the accuracy of reported data,
13
determining whether each eligible public institution is
14
complying with the requirements of this Act, and supporting
15
each eligible public institution to improve the eligible
16
public institution's performance.

17

Section 55.
Data infrastructure.
18

(a) The Board's annual budget request shall describe the
19
resources needed to support the collection of data needed to
20
implement and recommend recalibrations of the funding formula.
21
If the Accountability and Transparency Committee or Funding
22
Formula Review Panel recommends additional data capacity, the
23
Board shall consider those recommendations in developing its
24
annual budget request.

SB0013
- 55 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

(b) The Board shall develop guidelines for each eligible
2
public institution receiving funds under the funding formula
3
to submit data annually for inclusion in the funding formula.

4

Section 900.
The Board of Higher Education Act is amended
5
by changing Section 8 as follows:

6

(110 ILCS 205/8)

(from Ch. 144, par. 188)
7

Sec. 8.
The Board of Trustees of the University of
8
Illinois, the Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois
9
University, the Board of Trustees of Chicago State University,
10
the Board of Trustees of Eastern Illinois University, the
11
Board of Trustees of Governors State University, the Board of
12
Trustees of Illinois State University, the Board of Trustees
13
of Northeastern Illinois University, the Board of Trustees of
14
Northern Illinois University, and the Board of Trustees of
15
Western Illinois University shall submit to the Board not
16
later than the 15th day of November of each year
their

its

17
budget proposals for the
operation and
capital needs of the
18
institutions under
their

its
governance or supervision for the
19
ensuing fiscal year. The Illinois Community College Board
20
shall submit to the Board by December 15 of each year its
21
budget proposal for the operation and capital needs of the
22
institutions under its governance or supervision for the
23
ensuing fiscal year. Each budget proposal shall conform to the
24
procedures developed by the Board in the design of an

SB0013
- 56 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
information system for State universities and colleges.
2

In order to maintain a cohesive system of higher
3
education, the Board and its staff shall communicate on a
4
regular basis with all public university presidents. They
5
shall meet at least semiannually to achieve economies of scale
6
where possible and provide the most innovative and efficient
7
programs and services.
8

The Board, in the analysis of formulating the annual
9
budget request, shall consider rates of tuition and fees and
10
undergraduate tuition and fee waiver programs at
public
11
community

the State universities and
colleges. The Board shall
12
also consider the current and projected utilization of the
13
total physical plant of each campus of a
public
university or
14
community
college in approving the capital budget for any new
15
building or facility.
16

The Board of Higher Education shall submit to the
17
Governor, to the General Assembly, and to the appropriate
18
budget agencies of the Governor and General Assembly its
19
analysis and recommendations on such budget proposals.
20

The Board is directed to form a broad-based group of
21
individuals representing the Office of the Governor, the
22
General Assembly, public
community colleges

institutions of
23
higher education
, State agencies, business and industry,
24
statewide organizations representing faculty and staff, and
25
others as the Board shall deem appropriate to devise a system
26
for allocating State resources to public
community colleges

SB0013
- 57 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
institutions of higher education
based upon performance in
2
achieving State goals related to student success and
3
certificate and degree completion.
4

In each fiscal year

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2013
, the
5
Board of Higher Education budget recommendations to the
6
Governor and the General Assembly shall include allocations to
7
public
community colleges

institutions of higher education

8
based upon performance metrics designed to promote and measure
9
student success in degree and certificate completion. Public
10
university metrics must be adopted by the Board by rule, and
11
public
community college metrics must be adopted by the
12
Illinois Community College Board by rule. These metrics must
13
be developed and promulgated in accordance with the following
14
principles:
15

(1) The metrics must be developed in consultation with
16

public
community colleges

institutions of higher
17

education
, as well as other State educational agencies and
18

other higher education organizations, associations,
19

interests, and stakeholders as deemed appropriate by the
20

Board.
21

(2) The metrics shall include provisions for
22

recognizing the demands on and rewarding the performance
23

of
community colleges

institutions
in advancing the
24

success of students who are academically or financially at
25

risk, including first-generation students, low-income
26

students, and students traditionally underrepresented in

SB0013
- 58 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1

higher education, as specified in Section 9.16 of this
2

Act.
3

(3) The metrics shall recognize and account for the
4

differentiated missions of
community colleges

institutions

5

and sectors of higher education.
6

(4) The metrics shall focus on the fundamental goal of
7

increasing completion of college courses, certificates,
8

and degrees. Performance metrics shall recognize the
9

unique and broad mission of public community colleges
10

through consideration of additional factors
,
including,
11

but not limited to, enrollment, progress through key
12

academic milestones, transfer to a baccalaureate
13

institution, and degree completion.
14

(5) The metrics must be designed to maintain the
15

quality of degrees, certificates, courses, and programs.
16
In devising performance metrics, the Board may be guided by
17
the report of the Higher Education Finance Study Commission.
18

Each State university must submit its plan for capital
19
improvements of non-instructional facilities to the Board for
20
approval before final commitments are made if the total cost
21
of the project as approved by the institution's board of
22
control is in excess of $2 million. Non-instructional uses
23
shall include
,
but not be limited to
,
dormitories, union
24
buildings, field houses, stadium, other recreational
25
facilities
,
and parking lots. The Board shall determine
26
whether or not any project submitted for approval is

SB0013
- 59 -
LRB104 07750 LNS 17795 b
1
consistent with the strategic plan for higher education and
2
with instructional buildings that are provided for therein. If
3
the project is found by a majority of the Board not to be
4
consistent, such capital improvement shall not be constructed.
5
(Source: P.A. 102-1046, eff. 6-7-22; 103-940, eff. 8-9-24;
6
revised 8-23-24.)

7

Section 999.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon
8
becoming law.

Footer

Disclaimer

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.

Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn