Read the full stored bill text
Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of SB3502
Select Language
×
The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.
Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.
The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.
NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.
Choose Language
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Interlingua
Interlingue
Inuktitut
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Khmer
Korean
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Myanmar
Nepali
Norwegian
Odia
Pashto
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Sango
Sanskrit
Sardinian
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Southern Sotho
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Powered by
Translate
Close
Illinois General Assembly
Top Navigation Bar
Translate
Learn
Select General Assembly
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.
ILGA.GOV
LEGISLATION & LAWS
Bills & Resolutions
Public Acts
Illinois Compiled Statutes
Illinois Constitution
Search Legislation
Glossary
Guide
Reports & Inquiry
Legislative Reports
Special Reports
FTP Site
Legislator Lookup
Capitol Complex Phone Numbers
Rules & Regulations
Illinois Register
Administrative Rules
Senate
Members
Schedules
Committees
Request for Remote Testimony
Journals
Transcripts
Rules
Audio/Video
FOIA Information
Senate Employment Opportunities
Media Guidelines
House
Members
Schedules
Committees
Submit testimony for House Committees
Journals
Transcripts
Rules
Audio/Video
FOIA Information
House Employment Opportunities
Log In
Mobile Top Bar
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.
Full Text of SB3502
Home
Legislation
Full Text
SB3502 - 104th General Assembly
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Select Menu
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Open PDF
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
SB3502
Introduced 2/5/2026, by Sen. Rachel Ventura
SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act
Creates the Artificial Intelligence Design Requirements Act. Sets
forth provisions concerning product liability actions brought against a
developer of an artificial intelligence system for defective design,
failure to contain adequate instructions or warnings, and failure to
conform to an express warranty. Provides that a deployer of an artificial
intelligence system shall be deemed to be liable as a developer for harm
caused by a product if: (1) the deployer makes material and substantial
change to the product or (2) the deployer intentionally misuses the
product contrary to the express warranty and that use was the proximate
cause of harm to the plaintiff. Sets forth provisions concerning
applicability and enforcement.
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
A BILL FOR
SB3502
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
AN ACT concerning civil law.
2
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3
represented in the General Assembly:
4
Section 1.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
5
Artificial Intelligence Design Requirements Act.
6
Section 5.
Intent.
The General Assembly finds that
7
artificial intelligence shifts decision-making power and
8
responsibility away from persons to software-based systems,
9
often without direct human oversight. While this technology
10
offers significant benefits, its deployment has already caused
11
measurable harm to individuals and businesses.
12
The General Assembly also finds that developers of
13
artificial intelligence have an obligation to make the systems
14
safe when used in reasonably foreseeable ways. Deployers of
15
these products also have an obligation to ensure that these
16
products are used in a way that does not materially affect an
17
individual's rights.
18
Section 10.
Definitions.
As used in this Act:
19
"Artificial intelligence" has the meaning set forth in
20
Section 2-101 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
21
"Consequential decision" means a decision that either has
22
a legal or similarly significant effect on an individual's
SB3502
- 2 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
access to the criminal justice system, housing, employment,
2
credit, education, health care, or insurance.
3
"Deployer" means a person, including a developer, who uses
4
or operates an artificial intelligence system for use by a
5
deployer or for use by third parties. "Deployer" does not
6
include an individual or business with fewer than 20 employees
7
or less than 10,000 users of its product.
8
"Design" means the intended or known physical and material
9
characteristics of a product and shall include any intended or
10
known formulation or content of the product and the usual
11
result of the intended development or other process used to
12
produce the product, which includes, but is not limited to,
13
unexpected skills or behaviors that appear in a product.
14
"Developer" means a person who designs, codes, produces,
15
owns, or substantially modifies an artificial intelligence
16
system for use by a developer or for use by a third party.
17
"Developer" does not include a person who uses an open source
18
artificial intelligence system but does not substantially
19
modify the system.
20
"Express warranty" means any material, positive statement,
21
affirmation of fact, promise, or description relating to a
22
product, including any sample or model of a product.
23
"Harm" means:
24
(1) damage to property other than the product itself;
25
(2) personal physical, financial or reputational
26
injury, illness, or death;
SB3502
- 3 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
(3) mental or psychological anguish, emotional harm,
2
or distortion of a person's behavior that would be highly
3
offensive to a reasonable person; or
4
(4) any loss of consortium or services or other loss
5
deriving from any type of harm described in this Act.
6
"High-impact artificial intelligence system" means any
7
artificial intelligence system, regardless of the number of
8
parameters and supervision structure, that is:
9
(1) used, reasonably foreseeable as being used, or is
10
a controlling factor in making a consequential decision;
11
(2) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, to
12
categorize groups of persons by protected characteristics,
13
such as race, ethnic origin, or religious belief;
14
(3) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, in
15
the direct management or operation of critical
16
infrastructure;
17
(4) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, in
18
a vehicle, a medical device, or in the safety system of a
19
vehicle or medical device;
20
(5) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, to
21
engage in a synthetic relationship; and
22
(6) exhibits, or could be easily modified to exhibit,
23
high levels of performance at tasks that pose a serious
24
risk to economic security, public health or safety, or any
25
combination of those matters.
26
"Material fact" means any specific characteristic or
SB3502
- 4 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
quality of the product. "Material fact" does not include a
2
general opinion about, or praise of, the product or its
3
quality.
4
"Method of development" includes, but is not limited to,
5
the selection of training data for the product, and training,
6
testing, auditing, and fine-tuning the product.
7
"Person" means any individual, corporation, company,
8
association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company,
9
or any other entity, including any government entity or
10
unincorporated association of persons.
11
"Product" means a high-impact artificial intelligence
12
system or a generative artificial intelligence system.
13
"Product release" means the specific way in which a
14
product is integrated and made accessible within a production
15
environment, including how it interacts with data sources,
16
delivers predictions or results, and is accessed by users.
17
"Synthetic relationship" means a series of interactions
18
between an individual and an artificial intelligence system
19
that mimics human interaction and emotional responses.
20
Section 15.
Developer accountability for harm to consumers
21
or businesses.
22
(a) In any products liability action, a developer shall be
23
liable to a plaintiff only if the plaintiff establishes:
24
(1) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
25
care with respect to the design of the product and the
SB3502
- 5 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
failure to exercise reasonable care was a proximate cause
2
of harm to the plaintiff;
3
(2) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
4
care with respect to providing adequate instructions or
5
warnings applicable to the product that allegedly caused
6
the harm that is the subject of the complaint and the
7
failure to provide adequate instructions or warnings was a
8
proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff; and
9
(3) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
10
care with respect to providing an express warranty
11
applicable to the product that allegedly caused the harm
12
that is the subject of the complaint; the product failed
13
to conform to the warranty; and the failure of the product
14
to conform to the warranty caused harm to the plaintiff.
15
(b) In any action alleging that a product is unreasonably
16
dangerous because of a defective design, the plaintiff shall
17
prove by a preponderance of the evidence that, at the time the
18
product left the developer's control:
19
(1) the developer knew or, in light of then-existing
20
scientific and technical knowledge, reasonably should have
21
known of the danger that caused the plaintiff's harm;
22
(2) the developer accounted for both intended uses and
23
reasonably foreseeable unintended uses of their systems;
24
and
25
(3) there existed a technologically feasible and
26
practical alternative design, including, but not limited
SB3502
- 6 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
to, product release and the method of development, that
2
would have reduced or avoided a foreseeable risk of harm
3
without significantly impairing the usefulness of the
4
product to the group of persons who are the intended and
5
legitimate users of the product.
6
(c) In any action alleging that a product is defective
7
because it failed to contain adequate instructions or
8
warnings:
9
(1) An adequate warning or instruction is one that a
10
reasonably prudent person in the same or similar
11
circumstances would have provided with respect to the
12
danger and communicates sufficient information on the
13
dangers and safe use of the product, taking into account
14
the characteristics of, and the ordinary knowledge common
15
to an ordinary consumer who uses the product.
16
(2) The plaintiff shall prove by a preponderance of
17
the evidence that, at the time the product left the
18
developer's control, the developer knew or, in light of
19
then-existing scientific and technical knowledge,
20
reasonably should have known of the danger that caused the
21
plaintiff's harm.
22
(3) A developer shall not be liable for failure to
23
instruct or warn about a danger that is known or open and
24
obvious to the user or consumer of the product, or should
25
have been known or open and obvious to the user or consumer
26
of the product, taking into account the characteristics
SB3502
- 7 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
of, and the ordinary knowledge common to, the persons who
2
ordinarily use or consume the product.
3
A danger is presumed to not be open and obvious to a user
4
or consumer of the product under 17 years old.
5
(d) A product may be unreasonably dangerous because it did
6
not conform to an express warranty only if the plaintiff
7
proves by a preponderance of the evidence that:
8
(1) the plaintiff reasonably relied on an express
9
warranty made by the developer about a material fact
10
concerning the safety of the product;
11
(2) this express warranty proved to be untrue; and
12
(3) the plaintiff would not have been harmed if the
13
representation had been true.
14
Section 20.
Deployer accountability for harm to consumer
15
or business.
16
(a) A deployer shall be deemed to be liable as a developer
17
under Section 15 for harm caused by a product if:
18
(1) the deployer makes material and substantial change
19
to the product; or
20
(2) the deployer intentionally misuses the product
21
contrary to the express warranty and that use was the
22
proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff.
23
(b) For the purposes of this Section, a use of a product
24
that is intended by the developer of the product does not
25
constitute a misuse or material or substantial change of the
SB3502
- 8 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
product. If a developer does not specify an intended use for
2
the product, intended use shall be inferred by the targeted
3
market and manner of distribution.
4
(c) Any deployer licensing a product shall not be liable
5
to a plaintiff for violations subsection (a) of Section 15 by
6
another solely by reason of ownership or use of the product.
7
Section 25.
Applicability and enforcement.
8
(a) This Act shall supplement any common law tort
9
liability and any product liability laws of this State. This
10
Act does not prohibit any product liability cause of action
11
involving a generative artificial intelligence system or a
12
high-impact artificial intelligence system brought under a
13
different claim pursuant to product liability common law or
14
statute. This Section does not supersede any product liability
15
cause of action under State law except to the extent that the
16
law would directly conflict with the provisions of this Act.
17
(b) Products used strictly for peer-reviewed scientific
18
research are exempt from this Act.
19
(c) In a liability action brought under this Act, the
20
court shall apply a comparative negligence standard, whereby a
21
plaintiff's recovery shall be diminished in proportion to the
22
percentage of fault attributable to the plaintiff, but the
23
recovery shall not be barred regardless of the plaintiff's
24
degree of fault, and developers and deployers may be held
25
jointly and severally liable for the portion of harm that
SB3502
- 9 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
contributed to the plaintiff's injury.
2
In a liability action brought under this Act, the damages
3
for which a deployer is otherwise liable shall be reduced by
4
the percentage of responsibility for the plaintiff's harm
5
attributable to violations of Section 15 by any person if the
6
defendant establishes that the percentage of the plaintiff's
7
harm was proximately caused by a violation under Section 15.
8
(d) In any products liability action brought under this
9
Act, a court shall recognize a rebuttable presumption that a
10
product is not defective if and only if that deployer:
11
(1) has conducted a documented testing, evaluation,
12
verification, validation, and auditing of that system
13
consistent with industry best practices, such as the
14
latest version of the National Institute of Standards and
15
Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
16
Framework;
17
(2) has mitigated foreseeable risks to the extent
18
possible and has considered alternatives;
19
(3) has disclosed foreseeable risks and mitigation
20
tactics directly to deployers and consumers using the
21
product;
22
(4) has maintained and made available upon request by
23
the Attorney General an artificial intelligence data sheet
24
that includes, at a minimum, the following information:
25
(A) information on the intended contexts and uses
26
of the artificial intelligence model in accordance
SB3502
- 10 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
with the map guidelines articulated in the National
2
Institute of Standards and Technology's latest
3
Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework;
4
(B) information regarding the datasets upon which
5
the artificial intelligence was trained, including
6
sources, volume, whether the dataset is proprietary,
7
and how the datasets further the intended purpose of
8
the product;
9
(C) information accounting for foreseeable risks
10
identified in the management guidelines of the
11
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
12
latest Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
13
Framework and information about steps taken to manage
14
those risks; and
15
(D) information concerning the results of
16
red-teaming testing and steps taken to mitigate
17
identified risks, based on guidance developed by the
18
National Institute of Standards and Technology;
19
(5) has, if the product is designed for or is
20
reasonably likely to be used by individuals under 17 years
21
old, documented assessments of use of the product's impact
22
on cognitive and emotional development, implemented
23
age-gating or content restrictions for a product that
24
poses foreseeable risks, and provided to deployers and
25
direct consumers and their guardians clear, accessible
26
disclosures about potential risks; and
SB3502
- 11 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
(6) has prominently included in the terms and
2
conditions of a product the information included in an
3
artificial intelligence data sheet, that deployers of the
4
product may rely upon when making fit-for-use and
5
deployment decisions.
6
(e) In any products liability action brought under this
7
Act, a court shall recognize a rebuttable presumption that a
8
product is not defective if and only if that deployer has
9
designed and implemented a risk management policy that:
10
(1) specifies the principles, processes, and personnel
11
that the deployer shall use in maintaining the risk
12
management policy to identify, mitigate, and document any
13
risk, especially those impacting individuals under 17
14
years old, that is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of
15
deploying or using the system;
16
(2) is consistent with industry best practices, such
17
as the latest version of the National Institute of
18
Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk
19
Management Framework;
20
(3) is reasonable considering:
21
(A) the size and complexity of the deployer;
22
(B) the nature and scope of the system, including
23
the intended uses and unintended uses and the
24
modifications made to the system by the deployer; and
25
(C) the data that the system, once deployed,
26
processes as inputs; and
SB3502
- 12 -
LRB104 20017 SPS 33468 b
1
(4) is electronically available to its employees and
2
to the Attorney General upon request.
3
(f) This Act applies with respect to any action commenced
4
on or after the effective date of this Act without regard to
5
whether the harm that is the subject of the action or the
6
conduct that caused the harm occurred before that date.
7
Section 97.
Severability.
The provisions of this Act are
8
severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.
Footer
Disclaimer
This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
Contact ILGA Webmaster
ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies
ILGA.GOV
2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA
|
Disclaimers
|
Learn
This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
Contact ILGA Webmaster
ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies
ILGA.GOV
2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA
|
Disclaimers
|
Learn