Back to Illinois

SB3590 • 2026

AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Mary Edly-Allen
Last action
2026-05-22
Official status
Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

What This Bill Does

  • AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-22 Illinois General Assembly

    Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments

  2. 2026-05-15 Illinois General Assembly

    Rule 2-10 Committee/3rd Reading Deadline Established As May 22, 2026

  3. 2026-04-24 Illinois General Assembly

    Rule 2-10 Committee/3rd Reading Deadline Established As May 15, 2026

  4. 2026-03-27 Illinois General Assembly

    Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As April 24, 2026

  5. 2026-03-13 Illinois General Assembly

    Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As March 27, 2026

  6. 2026-02-18 Illinois General Assembly

    To AI and Social Media

  7. 2026-02-17 Illinois General Assembly

    Assigned to Executive

  8. 2026-02-05 Illinois General Assembly

    Filed with Secretary by Sen. Mary Edly-Allen

  9. 2026-02-05 Illinois General Assembly

    First Reading

  10. 2026-02-05 Illinois General Assembly

    Referred to Assignments

Official Summary Text

AI PRODUCT LIABILITY ACT

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of SB3590

Select Language

×

The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.

Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.

The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.

NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.

Choose Language

English

Afrikaans

Albanian

Arabic

Armenian

Azerbaijani

Basque

Bengali

Bosnian

Catalan

Croatian

Czech

Danish

Dutch

Esperanto

Estonian

Filipino

Finnish

French

Galician

Georgian

German

Greek

Gujarati

Haitian Creole

Hausa

Hawaiian

Hebrew

Hindi

Hungarian

Icelandic

Indonesian

Interlingua

Interlingue

Inuktitut

Irish

Italian

Japanese

Javanese

Kannada

Khmer

Korean

Latin

Latvian

Lithuanian

Luxembourgish

Macedonian

Malagasy

Malayalam

Maltese

Maori

Marathi

Myanmar

Nepali

Norwegian

Odia

Pashto

Punjabi

Romanian

Russian

Samoan

Sango

Sanskrit

Sardinian

Sindhi

Sinhala

Slovak

Slovenian

Somali

Southern Sotho

Spanish

Sundanese

Swahili

Swedish

Tamil

Telugu

Thai

Tigrinya

Tonga

Turkish

Ukrainian

Urdu

Vietnamese

Welsh

Xhosa

Yiddish

Yoruba

Zulu

Powered by
Translate

Close

Illinois General Assembly

Top Navigation Bar

Translate

Learn

Select General Assembly

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.

ILGA.GOV

LEGISLATION & LAWS

Bills & Resolutions

Public Acts

Illinois Compiled Statutes

Illinois Constitution

Search Legislation

Glossary

Guide

Reports & Inquiry

Legislative Reports

Special Reports

FTP Site

Legislator Lookup

Capitol Complex Phone Numbers

Rules & Regulations

Illinois Register

Administrative Rules

Senate

Members

Schedules

Committees

Request for Remote Testimony

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

Senate Employment Opportunities

Media Guidelines

House

Members

Schedules

Committees

Submit testimony for House Committees

Journals

Transcripts

Rules

Audio/Video

FOIA Information

House Employment Opportunities

Log In

Mobile Top Bar

Search the 104th General Assembly

Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.

Full Text of SB3590

Home

Legislation

Full Text

SB3590 - 104th General Assembly

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Select Menu

Bill Status

Full Text

Votes

Witness Slips

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Printer Friendly Version

Introduced

Open PDF

104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
SB3590

Introduced 2/5/2026, by Sen. Mary Edly-Allen

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:

New Act

Creates the Artificial Intelligence Product Liability Act. Sets forth
provisions concerning product liability actions brought against a
developer of an artificial intelligence system for defective design,
failure to contain adequate instructions or warnings, and failure to
conform to an express warranty. Provides that a deployer of an artificial
intelligence system shall be deemed to be liable as a developer for harm
caused by a product if: (1) the deployer makes material and substantial
change to the product or (2) the deployer intentionally misuses the
product contrary to the express warranty and that use was the proximate
cause of harm to the plaintiff. Sets forth provisions concerning
applicability and enforcement.
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b

A BILL FOR

SB3590
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

AN ACT concerning civil law.

2

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3
represented in the General Assembly:

4

Section 1.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
5
Artificial Intelligence Product Liability Act.

6

Section 5.
Intent.
The General Assembly finds that
7
artificial intelligence shifts decision-making power and
8
responsibility away from persons to software-based systems,
9
often without direct human oversight. While this technology
10
offers significant benefits, its deployment has already caused
11
measurable harm to individuals and businesses.
12

The General Assembly also finds that developers of
13
artificial intelligence have an obligation to make the systems
14
safe when used in reasonably foreseeable ways. Deployers of
15
these products also have an obligation to ensure that these
16
products are used in a way that does not materially affect an
17
individual's rights.

18

Section 10.
Definitions.
As used in this Act:
19

"Artificial intelligence" has the meaning set forth in
20
Section 2-101 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
21

"Consequential decision" means a decision that either has
22
a legal or similarly significant effect on an individual's

SB3590
- 2 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1
access to the criminal justice system, housing, employment,
2
credit, education, health care, or insurance.
3

"Deployer" means a person, including a developer, who uses
4
or operates an artificial intelligence system for use by a
5
deployer or for use by third parties. "Deployer" does not
6
include an individual or business with fewer than 20 employees
7
or less than 10,000 users of its product.
8

"Design" means the intended or known physical and material
9
characteristics of a product and shall include any intended or
10
known formulation or content of the product and the usual
11
result of the intended development or other process used to
12
produce the product, which includes, but is not limited to,
13
unexpected skills or behaviors that appear in a product.
14

"Developer" means a person who designs, codes, produces,
15
owns, or substantially modifies an artificial intelligence
16
system for use by a developer or for use by a third party.
17
"Developer" does not include a person who uses an open source
18
artificial intelligence system but does not substantially
19
modify the system.
20

"Express warranty" means any material, positive statement,
21
affirmation of fact, promise, or description relating to a
22
product, including any sample or model of a product.
23

"Harm" means:
24

(1) damage to property other than the product itself;
25

(2) personal physical, financial or reputational
26

injury, illness, or death;

SB3590
- 3 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

(3) mental or psychological anguish, emotional harm,
2

or distortion of a person's behavior that would be highly
3

offensive to a reasonable person; or
4

(4) any loss of consortium or services or other loss
5

deriving from any type of harm described in this Act.
6

"High-impact artificial intelligence system" means any
7
artificial intelligence system, regardless of the number of
8
parameters and supervision structure, that is:
9

(1) used, reasonably foreseeable as being used, or is
10

a controlling factor in making a consequential decision;
11

(2) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, to
12

categorize groups of persons by protected characteristics,
13

such as race, ethnic origin, or religious belief;
14

(3) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, in
15

the direct management or operation of critical
16

infrastructure;
17

(4) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, in
18

a vehicle, a medical device, or in the safety system of a
19

vehicle or medical device;
20

(5) used, or reasonably foreseeable as being used, to
21

engage in a synthetic relationship; and
22

(6) exhibits, or could be easily modified to exhibit,
23

high levels of performance at tasks that pose a serious
24

risk to economic security, public health or safety, or any
25

combination of those matters.
26

"Material fact" means any specific characteristic or

SB3590
- 4 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1
quality of the product. "Material fact" does not include a
2
general opinion about, or praise of, the product or its
3
quality.
4

"Method of development" includes, but is not limited to,
5
the selection of training data for the product, and training,
6
testing, auditing, and fine-tuning the product.
7

"Person" means any individual, corporation, company,
8
association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company,
9
or any other entity, including any government entity or
10
unincorporated association of persons.
11

"Product" means a high-impact artificial intelligence
12
system or a generative artificial intelligence system.
13

"Product release" means the specific way in which a
14
product is integrated and made accessible within a production
15
environment, including how it interacts with data sources,
16
delivers predictions or results, and is accessed by users.
17

"Synthetic relationship" means a series of interactions
18
between an individual and an artificial intelligence system
19
that mimics human interaction and emotional responses.

20

Section 15.
Developer accountability for harm to consumers
21
or businesses.
22

(a) In any products liability action, a developer shall be
23
liable to a plaintiff only if the plaintiff establishes:
24

(1) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
25

care with respect to the design of the product and the

SB3590
- 5 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

failure to exercise reasonable care was a proximate cause
2

of harm to the plaintiff;
3

(2) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
4

care with respect to providing adequate instructions or
5

warnings applicable to the product that allegedly caused
6

the harm that is the subject of the complaint and the
7

failure to provide adequate instructions or warnings was a
8

proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff; and
9

(3) that the developer failed to exercise reasonable
10

care with respect to providing an express warranty
11

applicable to the product that allegedly caused the harm
12

that is the subject of the complaint; the product failed
13

to conform to the warranty; and the failure of the product
14

to conform to the warranty caused harm to the plaintiff.
15

(b) In any action alleging that a product is unreasonably
16
dangerous because of a defective design, the plaintiff shall
17
prove by a preponderance of the evidence that, at the time the
18
product left the developer's control:
19

(1) the developer knew or, in light of then-existing
20

scientific and technical knowledge, reasonably should have
21

known of the danger that caused the plaintiff's harm;
22

(2) the developer accounted for both intended uses and
23

reasonably foreseeable unintended uses of their systems;
24

and
25

(3) there existed a technologically feasible and
26

practical alternative design, including, but not limited

SB3590
- 6 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

to, product release and the method of development, that
2

would have reduced or avoided a foreseeable risk of harm
3

without significantly impairing the usefulness of the
4

product to the group of persons who are the intended and
5

legitimate users of the product.
6

(c) In any action alleging that a product is defective
7
because it failed to contain adequate instructions or
8
warnings:
9

(1) An adequate warning or instruction is one that a
10

reasonably prudent person in the same or similar
11

circumstances would have provided with respect to the
12

danger and communicates sufficient information on the
13

dangers and safe use of the product, taking into account
14

the characteristics of, and the ordinary knowledge common
15

to an ordinary consumer who uses the product.
16

(2) The plaintiff shall prove by a preponderance of
17

the evidence that, at the time the product left the
18

developer's control, the developer knew or, in light of
19

then-existing scientific and technical knowledge,
20

reasonably should have known of the danger that caused the
21

plaintiff's harm.
22

(3) A developer shall not be liable for failure to
23

instruct or warn about a danger that is known or open and
24

obvious to the user or consumer of the product, or should
25

have been known or open and obvious to the user or consumer
26

of the product, taking into account the characteristics

SB3590
- 7 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

of, and the ordinary knowledge common to, the persons who
2

ordinarily use or consume the product.
3

A danger is presumed to not be open and obvious to a user
4
or consumer of the product under 17 years old.
5

(d) A product may be unreasonably dangerous because it did
6
not conform to an express warranty only if the plaintiff
7
proves by a preponderance of the evidence that:
8

(1) the plaintiff reasonably relied on an express
9

warranty made by the developer about a material fact
10

concerning the safety of the product;
11

(2) this express warranty proved to be untrue; and
12

(3) the plaintiff would not have been harmed if the
13

representation had been true.

14

Section 20.
Deployer accountability for harm to consumer
15
or business.
16

(a) A deployer shall be deemed to be liable as a developer
17
under Section 15 for harm caused by a product if:
18

(1) the deployer makes material and substantial change
19

to the product; or
20

(2) the deployer intentionally misuses the product
21

contrary to the express warranty and that use was the
22

proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff.
23

(b) For the purposes of this Section, a use of a product
24
that is intended by the developer of the product does not
25
constitute a misuse or material or substantial change of the

SB3590
- 8 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1
product. If a developer does not specify an intended use for
2
the product, intended use shall be inferred by the targeted
3
market and manner of distribution.
4

(c) Any deployer licensing a product shall not be liable
5
to a plaintiff for violations subsection (a) of Section 15 by
6
another solely by reason of ownership or use of the product.

7

Section 25.
Applicability and enforcement.
8

(a) This Act shall supplement any common law tort
9
liability and any product liability laws of this State. This
10
Act does not prohibit any product liability cause of action
11
involving a generative artificial intelligence system or a
12
high-impact artificial intelligence system brought under a
13
different claim pursuant to product liability common law or
14
statute. This Section does not supersede any product liability
15
cause of action under State law except to the extent that the
16
law would directly conflict with the provisions of this Act.
17

(b) Products used strictly for peer-reviewed scientific
18
research are exempt from this Act.
19

(c) In a liability action brought under this Act, the
20
court shall apply a comparative negligence standard, whereby a
21
plaintiff's recovery shall be diminished in proportion to the
22
percentage of fault attributable to the plaintiff, but the
23
recovery shall not be barred regardless of the plaintiff's
24
degree of fault, and developers and deployers may be held
25
jointly and severally liable for the portion of harm that

SB3590
- 9 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1
contributed to the plaintiff's injury.
2

In a liability action brought under this Act, the damages
3
for which a deployer is otherwise liable shall be reduced by
4
the percentage of responsibility for the plaintiff's harm
5
attributable to violations of Section 15 by any person if the
6
defendant establishes that the percentage of the plaintiff's
7
harm was proximately caused by a violation under Section 15.
8

(d) In any products liability action brought under this
9
Act, a court shall recognize a rebuttable presumption that a
10
product is not defective if and only if that deployer:
11

(1) has conducted a documented testing, evaluation,
12

verification, validation, and auditing of that system
13

consistent with industry best practices, such as the
14

latest version of the National Institute of Standards and
15

Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
16

Framework;
17

(2) has mitigated foreseeable risks to the extent
18

possible and has considered alternatives;
19

(3) has disclosed foreseeable risks and mitigation
20

tactics directly to deployers and consumers using the
21

product;
22

(4) has maintained and made available upon request by
23

the Attorney General an artificial intelligence data sheet
24

that includes, at a minimum, the following information:
25

(A) information on the intended contexts and uses
26

of the artificial intelligence model in accordance

SB3590
- 10 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

with the map guidelines articulated in the National
2

Institute of Standards and Technology's latest
3

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework;
4

(B) information regarding the datasets upon which
5

the artificial intelligence was trained, including
6

sources, volume, whether the dataset is proprietary,
7

and how the datasets further the intended purpose of
8

the product;
9

(C) information accounting for foreseeable risks
10

identified in the management guidelines of the
11

National Institute of Standards and Technology's
12

latest Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
13

Framework and information about steps taken to manage
14

those risks; and
15

(D) information concerning the results of
16

red-teaming testing and steps taken to mitigate
17

identified risks, based on guidance developed by the
18

National Institute of Standards and Technology;
19

(5) has, if the product is designed for or is
20

reasonably likely to be used by individuals under 17 years
21

old, documented assessments of use of the product's impact
22

on cognitive and emotional development, implemented
23

age-gating or content restrictions for a product that
24

poses foreseeable risks, and provided to deployers and
25

direct consumers and their guardians clear, accessible
26

disclosures about potential risks; and

SB3590
- 11 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

(6) has prominently included in the terms and
2

conditions of a product the information included in an
3

artificial intelligence data sheet, that deployers of the
4

product may rely upon when making fit-for-use and
5

deployment decisions.
6

(e) In any products liability action brought under this
7
Act, a court shall recognize a rebuttable presumption that a
8
product is not defective if and only if that deployer has
9
designed and implemented a risk management policy that:
10

(1) specifies the principles, processes, and personnel
11

that the deployer shall use in maintaining the risk
12

management policy to identify, mitigate, and document any
13

risk, especially those impacting individuals under 17
14

years old, that is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of
15

deploying or using the system;
16

(2) is consistent with industry best practices, such
17

as the latest version of the National Institute of
18

Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk
19

Management Framework;
20

(3) is reasonable considering:
21

(A) the size and complexity of the deployer;
22

(B) the nature and scope of the system, including
23

the intended uses and unintended uses and the
24

modifications made to the system by the deployer; and
25

(C) the data that the system, once deployed,
26

processes as inputs; and

SB3590
- 12 -
LRB104 20015 SPS 33466 b
1

(4) is electronically available to its employees and
2

to the Attorney General upon request.
3

(f) This Act applies with respect to any action commenced
4
on or after the effective date of this Act without regard to
5
whether the harm that is the subject of the action or the
6
conduct that caused the harm occurred before that date.

7

Section 97.
Severability.
The provisions of this Act are
8
severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.

Footer

Disclaimer

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.

Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn

This site is maintained for the Illinois General Assembly by the
Legislative Information System, 705 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
Contact ILGA Webmaster

ILGA.gov uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse ILGA.gov you consent to our use of cookies.
Read About Cookies

ILGA.GOV

2026 ILGA.gov | All Rights Reserved |
ADA

|
Disclaimers
|
Learn