Back to Kansas

HB2247 • 2026

Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

Healthcare
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Last action
2026-04-10
Official status
Died in Committee
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-10 House

    Died in Committee

  2. 2026-02-02 House

    Hearing: Monday, February 2, 2026, 3:30 PM — Room 218-N — CANCELED event

  3. 2025-02-04 House

    Referred to House Committee on Insurance

  4. 2025-02-04 House

    Introduced

Official Summary Text

Prohibiting certain terms in a contract between a health insurer and a dentist and requiring that reviews, audits or investigations of healthcare providers be completed within six months.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Session of 2025
HOUSE BILL No. 2247
By Committee on Health and Human Services
Requested by Representative Reavis on behalf of the Kansas Dental Association
2-4
AN ACT concerning insurance; relating to contracts between an insurer
and a dental healthcare provider; requiring reviews, audits or
investigations be completed within six months; prohibiting denial for
claims submitted by dentists for procedures included in a prior
authorization; amending K.S.A. 40-2,185 and repealing the existing
section.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
New Section 1. (a) Except as otherwise provided, any review, audit or
investigation by a nonprofit dental service corporation concerning
healthcare provider claims that result in the recoupment or setoff of funds
previously paid to the healthcare provider shall be completed not more
than six months after the completed claims were initially paid.
(b) This section shall not restrict any review, audit or investigation
concerning the following:
(1) Fraudulently submitted claims;
(2) claims that the healthcare provider knew, or should have known,
to be a pattern of inappropriate billing according to the standards of the
respective dental or medical specialty;
(3) claims that are related to the coordination of benefits; or
(4) claims that are subjected to any federal law or regulation that
permits claims review beyond the specified period in subsection (a).
New Sec. 2. (a) As used in this section:
(1) "Prior authorization" means any written communication by a
dental benefit plan or utilization review entity indicating that a specific
procedure is covered under the patient's dental plan and is reimbursable at
a specific amount, subject to the applicable coinsurance and deductibles,
and is issued in response to a request submitted by a dentist using a format
prescribed by the health insurer.
(2) "Utilization review entity" means an individual or entity that
performs prior authorization for:
(A) An employer with employees in Kansas who are covered under a
health benefit plan or health insurance policy;
(B) an insurer that writes health insurance policies;
(C) a preferred provider organization or health maintenance
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
HB 2247 2
organization; or
(D) any other individual or entity that provides, offers to provide or
administers hospital, outpatient, medical, prescription drug or other health
benefits to a person treated by a healthcare professional in Kansas under a
policy, plan or contract.
(b) A dental benefit plan or utilization review entity shall not deny a
claim submitted by a dentist for procedures specifically included in a prior
authorization, unless for each procedure denied:
(1) Benefit limitations, including annual maximums and frequency
limitations, that were not applicable at the time of the prior authorization
are reached due to utilization subsequent to the issuance of the prior
authorization;
(2) the documentation for the claim provided by the person
submitting the claim clearly fails to support the claim as originally
authorized;
(3) new procedures are provided to the patient subsequent to the
issuance of the prior authorization or the patient's condition changes such
that the prior authorized procedure would no longer be considered
medically necessary based on the prevailing standard of care; or
(4) new procedures are provided to the patient subsequent to the
issuance of the prior authorization or the patient's condition changes such
that the prior authorized procedure would presently require disapproval.
Sec. 3. K.S.A. 40-2,185 is hereby amended to read as follows: 40-
2,185. No contract issued or renewed after July 1, 2010, between a health
insurer and a dentist who is a participating provider with respect to such
health insurer's health benefit plan shall contain any provision which that
requires the dentist who provides to provide any service to an insured
under such health benefit plan at a fee set or prescribed by the health
insurer unless such service is a covered service.
(b) A contract between an insurer and a dentist shall not:
(1) Limit the fee that the dentist may charge for a service that is not a
covered service; or
(2) include a provision that both:
(A) Allows the insurer to disallow a service, resulting in denial of
payment to the dentist for a service that ordinarily would have been
covered; and
(B) prohibits the dentist from billing for and collecting the amount
owed from the patient for such service if there is a dental necessity for
such service.
(c) As used in this section, "dental necessity" means whether a
prudent dentist, acting in accordance with generally accepted practices of
the professional dental community and within the American dental
association's parameters of care for dentistry and the quality assurance
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2247 3
criteria of the American academy of pediatric dentistry, as applicable,
would provide the service or product to a patient to diagnose, prevent or
treat orofacial pain, infection, disease, dysfunction or disfiguration.
Sec. 4. K.S.A. 40-2,185 is hereby repealed.
Sec. 5. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its
publication in the statute book.
1
2
3
4
5
6