Back to Kentucky

HB842 • 2026

AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

Children
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
J. Watkins
Last action
2026-03-10
Official status
03/10/26: to Judiciary (H)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

What This Bill Does

  • AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-10 Kentucky Legislative Research Commission

    to Judiciary (H)

  2. 2026-03-03 Kentucky Legislative Research Commission

    introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)

Official Summary Text

AN ACT relating to interrogation of children.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 856
Page 1 of 2
XXXX 9/15/2025 3:24 PM Jacketed
AN ACT relating to interrogation of children. 1
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: 2
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 610 IS CREATED TO 3
READ AS FOLLOWS: 4
(1) As used in this section: 5
(a) "Deception" includes but is not limited to the knowing communication of 6
false statements about evidence, the misrepresentation of the accu racy of 7
the facts, or the making of false statements regarding leniency; and 8
(b) "Psychologically manipulative interrogation tactics" include but are not 9
limited to: 10
1. Practices that rely on deceit or a presumption of guilt; 11
2. Techniques to scare or intimidate the child by repetitively asserting the 12
child is guilty despite his or her denials, or exaggerating the 13
magnitude of the charges or the strength of the evidence, including 14
suggesting the existence of evidence that does not exist; 15
3. Practices that minimize the moral seriousness of the offense by falsely 16
communicating that the conduct is justified, excusable, or accidental; 17
4. Direct or indirect promises of leniency; or 18
5. Employment of the false or forced choice strategy, where the child is 19
encouraged to select one (1) of two (2) options, both incriminatory, but 20
one (1) is characterized as morally or legally justified or excusable. 21
(2) During a custodial interrogation of a child relating to the commission of a public 22
offense, a law enforcement officer shall not employ threats, physical harm, 23
deception, or psychologically manipulative interrogation tactics. 24
(3) Subsection (2) of this section does not apply to interrogations of a child if: 25
(a) The law enforcement officer who questioned the child reasonably believed 26
the information the officer sought was necessary to protect life or property 27
UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 856
Page 2 of 2
XXXX 9/15/2025 3:24 PM Jacketed
from an imminent threat; and 1
(b) The questions by law enforcement officers were limited to those questions 2
that were reasonably necessary to obtain information related to the 3
imminent threat. 4
SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF THE KENTUCKY RULES OF 5
EVIDENCE IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 6
(a) Except as prov ided in subdivision (b) of this rule, a statement made by a child in 7
the course of a custodial interrogation that did not comply with applicable 8
statutes is not admissible against the child in any civil, criminal, or juvenile 9
proceeding. 10
(b) Evidence exclu ded in subdivision (a) of this rule is admissible if otherwise 11
admissible under these rules, and offered by the plaintiff in an action for 12
damages arising from the interrogation. 13