Back to Louisiana

HB126 • 2026

COURTS: Provides relative to the use of a facility dog by a witness during certain circumstances

COURTS: Provides relative to the use of a facility dog by a witness during certain circumstances

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Mandie Landry
Last action
2026-05-29
Official status
Adopted in House concurrence
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide details on how the law will be enforced in different court settings or what happens if no facility dog is available.

Facility Dogs for Witnesses in Court

This bill allows certain witnesses, including those under 18 years old or with developmental disabilities and victims of sex offenses, to be accompanied by a facility dog during court testimony.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows witnesses who are under 18 years old, have a developmental disability, or are testifying in cases involving sex offenses to be accompanied by a facility dog if available while testifying in court.
  • Requires the presence of the facility dog to be obscured from the jury's view at all times.
  • Ensures that the entry and exit of the facility dog occur when the jury is not present.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Witnesses under 18 years old or with developmental disabilities who testify in court.
  • Victims of sex offenses during their testimony.
  • Courts and judges overseeing these cases.

Terms To Know

Facility dog
A trained dog that provides emotional support to witnesses testifying in court without causing distractions.
Developmental disability
A condition affecting a person's physical, intellectual, or emotional development starting before adulthood.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if no facility dog is available.
  • It is unclear how the law will be enforced in different court settings.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: The amendment requires courts to take steps to hide the presence of a facility dog from the jury in sex offense trials.

  • Courts must ensure that the jury does not see or know about the facility dog when it is present during testimony in sex offense cases.
  • The amendment text does not specify how exactly the presence of the dog should be obscured, leaving some details unclear.

Plain English: The amendment changes how a judge can order the presence of a facility dog during certain court cases, ensuring that the jury does not see the dog and instructing them about its role.

  • Adds new rules for judges to hide the facility dog from the jury's view.
  • Requires judges to explain the role of the facility dog to the jury.
  • Allows judges or either party in a case to request these instructions.
  • The amendment does not specify what happens if the judge decides not to hide the dog from the jury.

Plain English: The amendment changes a part of the bill to specify that a witness who needs a facility dog during certain court proceedings is referred to as 'who is' instead of 'any'.

  • Changes the phrase from 'any' to 'who is' in reference to a witness needing a facility dog.
  • The amendment text does not provide additional context about why this change is necessary or what specific circumstances it applies to, making it hard to understand its full impact.

Plain English: The amendment adds new rules for using a facility dog during certain types of trials and names the section after Duvall's Duvall and Karissa's Law.

  • Adds references to R.S. 15:284(D) and (F) in addition to (A).
  • Allows any witness, not just victims of sex offenses, to use a facility dog during trials for sex offenses.
  • Requires the court to hide the presence of the facility dog from the jury and instruct them on its role.
  • Names the section as 'Duvall's Duvall and Karissa's Law'.
  • The amendment text does not explain what R.S. 15:284(D) and (F) are, so their specific roles are unclear.

Plain English: The amendment adds a new section (F) to R.S. 15:284 and changes references to include this new section, also providing a name for the law.

  • Adds a new part F to R.S. 15:284 that allows the use of facility dogs by witnesses in certain situations.
  • Updates existing references from 'R.S. 15:284(A)' to include both parts A and F, making it 'R.S. 15:284(A) and (F)'.
  • Names this section as 'Duvall's Duvall and Karissa's Law' for easy reference.
  • The exact details of how facility dogs will be used are not provided in the amendment text.
  • It is unclear what specific circumstances allow witnesses to use a facility dog.

Plain English: The amendment to HB126 allows for the use of a facility dog by a witness during certain court proceedings.

  • Adds provisions allowing witnesses to have a facility dog present when testifying in specific circumstances.
  • The official text does not specify which 'certain circumstances' are referred to, making it unclear exactly when the use of a facility dog would be permitted.
  • Details about how the presence of a facility dog will be managed or regulated during court proceedings are not provided.

Plain English: The amendment adds language requiring that steps be taken to hide a facility dog from the jury when it is being used by a witness.

  • Adds new text after 'jury' on page 2, line 2, stating that precautions should obscure the presence of the facility dog from the jury.
  • The amendment does not specify what these precautions are or how they will be implemented.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-29 H

    Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.

  2. 2026-05-27 H

    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/29/2026.

  3. 2026-05-26 H

    Received from the Senate with amendments.

  4. 2026-05-26 S

    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.

  5. 2026-05-26 S

    Rules suspended. Called from the Calendar.

  6. 2026-05-05 S

    Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.

  7. 2026-04-27 S

    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.

  8. 2026-04-22 S

    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.

  9. 2026-04-21 S

    Reported favorably.

  10. 2026-03-31 S

    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary B.

  11. 2026-03-30 S

    Received in the Senate. Rules suspended. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.

  12. 2026-03-26 H

    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 91, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.

  13. 2026-03-26 H

    Called from the calendar.

  14. 2026-03-26 H

    Read by title, returned to the calendar.

  15. 2026-03-25 H

    Scheduled for floor debate on 03/26/2026.

  16. 2026-03-24 H

    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.

  17. 2026-03-23 H

    Reported with amendments (14-0).

  18. 2026-03-09 H

    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  19. 2026-02-13 H

    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/13/2026.

  20. 2026-02-13 H

    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  21. 2026-02-13 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

COURTS: Provides relative to the use of a facility dog by a witness during certain circumstances

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HLS 26RS-784 REENGROSSED
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 126
BY REPRESENTATIVES MANDIE LANDRY, ADAMS, AMEDEE, BAYHAM,
BOUDREAUX, BOYD, CHASSION, CHENEVERT, CREWS, DOMANGUE,
EGAN, FREIBERG, GALLE, GREEN, DANA HENRY, HILFERTY, JORDAN,
KERNER, KNOX, LACOMBE, LAFLEUR, TERRY LANDRY, LARVADAIN,
MARTINEZ, MCMAHEN, MCMAKIN, MOORE, MURRAY, OWEN, PHELPS,
SAWYER, STAGNI, TAYLOR, THOMPSON, VENTRELLA, AND WYBLE
COURTS: Provides relative to the use of a facility dog by a witness during certain
circumstances
1 AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact R.S. 15:284(A), (D), and (F), relative to the use of facility dogs; to
3 provide for the use of facility dogs by victims of sex offenses; and to provide for
4 related matters.
5 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
6 Section 1. R.S. 15:284(A), (D), and (F) are hereby amended and reenacted to read
7 as follows:
8 §284. Facility dogs; use in court; procedure
9 A. The court shall allow a any witness who is either under eighteen years of
10 age, or who has a developmental disability as defined in R.S. 28:451.2, or who is in
11 a trial for a sex offense as defined in R.S. 15:541 to have be accompanied by a
12 facility dog, if available, accompany them while testifying in court.
13 * * *
14 D. To ensure that the presence of a facility dog does not influence the jury
15 or is not a reflection on the truthfulness of any testimony that is offered by the victim
16 or witness, the court shall may order that the presence of the dog be obscured from
17 the jury at all times and may instruct the jury on the role of the facility dog and, on
18 the court's own motion or upon request of either party. The court shall ensure that the
Page 1 of 3
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-784 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 126
1 facility dog is a trained animal. The facility dog's entry into and exit from the
2 courtroom shall be done outside the presence of the jury.
3 * * *
4 F. This Section may be referred to and may be cited as "Duvall's Duvall and
5 Karissa's Law".
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 126 Reengrossed 2026 Regular Session Mandie Landry
Abstract: Authorizes the use of facility dogs by certain witnesses who participate in trials
relative to sex offenses.
Present law requires the court to allow a witness who is either under 18 years of age or who
has a developmental disability to be accompanied by a facility dog, if available, while
testifying in court.
Present law authorizes the court to allow the use of facility dogs in cases involving all other
witnesses.
Present law requires notice to the court and provides for jury instructions regarding the role
of the facility dog.
Present law defines "facility dog" as a dog that is certified and a graduate of an assistance
dog organization that is accredited and is specially trained to provide emotional support to
witnesses testifying in judicial proceedings without causing a distraction during the
proceedings.
Proposed law retains present law and requires the court to allow a witness in any trial of a
sex offense to be accompanied by a facility dog, if available, while testifying in court.
Proposed law permits the court to order that the presence of the dog be obstructed from the
view of the jury. On motion of the court or either party, permits the court to instruct the jury
on the role of the dog. Further requires that the dog's entry and exit from the courtroom be
conducted out of the presence of the jury.
Proposed law provides that the law be referred to and cited as "Duvall and Karissa's Law".
(Amends R.S. 15:284(A), (D), and (F))
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Judiciary to the
engrossed bill:
1. Make technical changes.
2. Provide that a witness in a trial of a sex offense may be accompanied by a facility
dog.
Page 2 of 3
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-784 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 126
3. Require that the presence of the dog be obstructed from the jury's view.
4. Require the entry and exit of the dog from the courtroom to be outside of the
presence of the jury.
The House Floor Amendments to the engrossed bill:
1. Make technical corrections.
2. Permit the court or the parties to order that the facility dog's presence be
obscured from the presence of the jury.
3. Permit the court or the parties to make a motion to instruct the jury on the role
of the facility dog.
Page 3 of 3
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.