Back to Louisiana

HB159 • 2026

CRIMINAL/SENTENCING: Creates a pretrial incarceration alternative pilot program in Caddo Parish (REF SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

CRIMINAL/SENTENCING: Creates a pretrial incarceration alternative pilot program in Caddo Parish (REF SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

Crime Labor Taxes Technology
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Steven Jackson
Last action
2026-05-29
Official status
Pending in Conference Committee (House)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The exact details on funding mechanisms through fees and grants were not fully detailed in the official source material.

Pretrial Incarceration Alternative Program for Caddo Parish

This bill creates a pilot program in Caddo Parish that allows eligible defendants to use home incarceration and electronic monitoring instead of traditional imprisonment before their trial.

What This Bill Does

  • Creates a pretrial incarceration alternative program using home incarceration and electronic monitoring for eligible defendants in Caddo Parish.
  • Sets criteria for eligibility, including no violent or sex crime charges and a positive risk assessment by the sheriff's office.
  • Requires the development of rules and regulations for supervision, conditions, employment requirements, and behavioral health checks.
  • Establishes funding mechanisms through fees and grants to support the program.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Defendants in Caddo Parish who are eligible for pretrial home incarceration under specific criteria.
  • The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office, which will manage and implement the program.

Terms To Know

Pretrial Incarceration
Detention before a trial to ensure defendants appear in court.
Electronic Monitoring
Using technology like ankle bracelets to track the location of individuals.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if the program is terminated early.
  • It's unclear how many defendants will be eligible for this alternative program.
  • The effectiveness and costs of the program are yet to be determined through evaluation.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: The amendment changes who receives reports about the pilot program, requires monthly behavioral health checks for defendants identified as needing them, and modifies liability rules related to harm caused by participants.

  • Changes the recipient of the report from the Senate Committee on Judiciary B to the Senate Committee on Judiciary C.
  • Requires monthly behavioral health checks for defendants if their risk assessment identifies behavioral health factors relevant to supervision or compliance risks.
  • Modifies liability rules, providing an exception where clear and convincing evidence shows certain circumstances related to program administration or participant actions.
  • The amendment text does not provide full details on all technical changes mentioned.

Plain English: The amendment rejects all Senate amendments to HB159.

  • Rejects all changes made by the Senate to HB159.
  • The specific details of the Senate amendments are not provided, so it is unclear what those changes were.

Plain English: The amendment changes a sentence to include collaboration between the court, the sheriff, and the district attorney instead of just mentioning the court.

  • Replaces 'court' with 'collaboration and coordination between the court, the sheriff, and the district attorney for'.
  • The amendment text does not provide further details on how this collaboration will be implemented or what specific actions it entails.

Plain English: The amendment adds a requirement for electronic monitoring providers to follow specific state laws when enforcing the new pretrial incarceration alternative program.

  • Adds a new section that requires any electronic monitoring provider chosen or contracted with to enforce the provisions of this Section to comply with R.S. 15:571.36 and 571.37.
  • The amendment does not provide details about what exactly R.S. 15:571.36 and 571.37 entail, so it's unclear what specific requirements electronic monitoring providers must follow.

Plain English: The amendment adds protections from civil lawsuits for certain officials and entities involved with the pretrial incarceration alternative pilot program in Caddo Parish.

  • Adds immunity provisions for the sheriff, deputies, employees, parish governing authority, and parties engaged in cooperative agreements with the program against civil actions unless specific conditions are met.
  • The amendment text does not specify all details about how these immunities will be applied or enforced.
  • It is unclear what constitutes a 'material condition' for participation or continued participation in the program.

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill by making specific corrections and additions related to pretrial incarceration alternatives in Caddo Parish.

  • Changes 'may' to 'shall' after 'sheriff' on page 3, line 1.
  • Replaces 'periodic' with 'monthly' on page 3, line 2.
  • Adds '(1)' after 'H.' on page 4, line 18.
  • Inserts a new paragraph between lines 21 and 22 of page 4 to clarify the limitation of liability.
  • The amendment text does not provide additional context about how these changes will affect the overall program or its implementation.

Plain English: The amendment changes specific numbers and letters in the bill text to improve clarity.

  • Changes '(a)' to '(1)', '(b)' to '(2)', '(c)' to '(3)', '(d)' to '(4)', and '(e)' to '(5)' on page 4 of the bill.
  • Replaces '30' with 'thirty' on page 5 of the bill.
  • The exact impact of these changes is not explained in the amendment text, but they likely improve readability and consistency within the bill.

Plain English: The amendment changes a single letter from 'B' to 'C' in the bill text.

  • Changes the letter on page 5, line 2 from 'B' to 'C'.
  • It is unclear what specific change this letter alteration makes or its impact on the overall meaning of the bill.

Plain English: The amendment changes a single letter from 'B' to 'C' in the bill text.

  • Changes the letter 'B' to 'C' on page 5, line 2 of the bill.
  • The exact impact and context of changing this letter are unclear without additional information.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-29 H

    Notice of Senate conferees appointed.

  2. 2026-05-29 S

    Notice House Conference Committee members appointed.

  3. 2026-05-29 S

    Senate conference committee members appointed: Jenkins, Morris, and Boudreaux.

  4. 2026-05-29 H

    House conferees appointed: Jackson, Villio, and Amedee.

  5. 2026-05-29 S

    Notice House rejected the Senate amendments.

  6. 2026-05-29 H

    Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments rejected, conference committee appointment pending.

  7. 2026-05-27 H

    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/29/2026.

  8. 2026-05-26 H

    Received from the Senate with amendments.

  9. 2026-05-26 S

    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.

  10. 2026-05-26 S

    Rules suspended. Called from the Calendar.

  11. 2026-05-13 S

    Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.

  12. 2026-05-13 S

    Rules suspended.

  13. 2026-05-07 S

    Reported with Legislative Bureau amendments which were read and adopted. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.

  14. 2026-05-06 S

    Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.

  15. 2026-05-05 S

    Rules suspended. Reported with amendments.

  16. 2026-04-28 S

    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary C.

  17. 2026-04-27 S

    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.

  18. 2026-04-22 H

    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 90, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.

  19. 2026-04-21 H

    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/22/2026.

  20. 2026-04-16 H

    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.

  21. 2026-04-15 H

    Reported with amendments (11-0).

  22. 2026-03-09 H

    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.

  23. 2026-02-13 H

    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/13/2026.

  24. 2026-02-13 H

    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.

  25. 2026-02-13 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

CRIMINAL/SENTENCING: Creates a pretrial incarceration alternative pilot program in Caddo Parish (REF SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 159
BY REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON
CRIMINAL/SENTENCING: Creates a pretrial incarceration alternative pilot program in
Caddo Parish
1 AN ACT
2 To enact R.S. 15:571.35.2, relative to incarceration; to authorize the Caddo Parish Sheriff's
3 Office to establish a pilot program utilizing home incarceration and electronic
4 monitoring; to provide criteria for eligibility for participation in such program; to
5 require the development of rules and regulations for the development,
6 implementation, and administration of such program; to provide for applicability; to
7 require the inclusion of certain conditions within the rules and regulations; to provide
8 for a limitation of liability; to require an evaluation of the program and a report
9 regarding the program to be provided to certain legislative committees; to provide
10 for termination of the program; and to provide for related matters.
11 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
12 Section 1. R.S. 15:571.35.2 is hereby enacted to read as follows:
13 §571.35.2. Pilot program; Caddo Parish Pretrial Home Incarceration Program;
14 electronic monitoring
15 A. The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office may implement a pilot program using
16 active electronic monitoring of defendants who are eligible pursuant to the
17 provisions of this Section as an alternative mode of incarceration to traditional
18 imprisonment. This program shall be referred to as the Caddo Parish Pretrial Home
19 Incarceration Program.
Page 1 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
1 B. A defendant may be eligible for participation in the program if he meets
2 all of the following conditions:
3 (1) The defendant has not been charged with a crime of violence as defined
4 in R.S. 14:2(B) or a sex offense as defined in R.S. 15:541.
5 (2) The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office has determined that the particular
6 defendant is likely to respond in an affirmative manner to participation in the
7 program.
8 (3) The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office, in coordination with the district
9 attorney and district court, has interviewed the defendant and has made a risk
10 assessment determination that the defendant is eligible for participation in the
11 program. The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office shall forward the risk assessment to the
12 court for use as the court may deem proper.
13 C.(1) The Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office shall develop, adopt, and implement
14 rules and regulations for the development, implementation, and administration of the
15 program. Such rules and regulations shall include but not be limited to all of the
16 following:
17 (a) Supervision of the defendant and conditions required for participation in
18 the program. The conditions may include any condition reasonably related to the
19 program, including curfew, home visitations by persons designated by the sheriff,
20 and limitations of the activities of the defendant outside of the home.
21 (b) The use of electronic monitoring devices.
22 (c) Requirements that a defendant obtain employment and pay a reasonable
23 supervision fee to the supervising agency to defray the cost of his supervision and
24 the cost of the required electronic monitoring.
25 (d) Participation eligibility of indigent defendants and the sharing of costs
26 for monitoring indigent defendants, in collaboration with the Caddo Parish
27 Commission. Such rules may provide for a sliding scale of payment so that a
28 defendant who is able to pay a portion, but not all, of such costs may be required to
29 pay such portion.
Page 2 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
1 (2) The sheriff may require the defendant, as a condition of participation in
2 the program, to participate in periodic behavioral health checks with a licensed
3 mental health provider if the risk assessment conducted pursuant to Subsection B of
4 this Section identifies behavioral health factors that are reasonably related to
5 supervision or compliance risk. For purposes of this Subsection, "compliance" shall
6 consist of verification of attendance. Failure of the defendant to comply with the
7 provisions of this Paragraph may result in termination of participation in the program
8 if the failure is determined to be willful and not the result of lack of service
9 availability.
10 (3) The defendant shall be given notice in writing of the conditions imposed
11 and shall agree in writing to the conditions.
12 (4) Participation in the program does not negate or nullify the bail
13 obligations as set by the court.
14 (5) Any electronic monitoring provider who is chosen or contracted with to
15 enforce the provisions of this Section shall comply with the provisions of R.S.
16 15:571.36 and 571.37.
17 D.(1) No defendant shall be admitted to the program prior to collaboration
18 and coordination between the court, the sheriff, and the district attorney for approval
19 of the defendant's participation in the program.
20 (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the court, at
21 any time on its own motion, may prohibit or terminate the initial or continued
22 participation of a defendant in the program.
23 E.(1) Upon negotiation and agreement with the parish governing authority,
24 the sheriff may collect a sum of not less than the per diem fee authorized by R.S.
25 13:5535(1) to apply to the funding of the program. In lieu of the per diem, the
26 sheriff may establish a fee which is agreed upon by the parish governing authority
27 and the sheriff. Funds obtained pursuant to this Subsection shall not be considered
28 surplus funds.
Page 3 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
1 (2) The sheriff may apply for funding and grants from any source he deems
2 appropriate to develop, design, implement, administer, and evaluate the program.
3 (3) The sheriff may engage in cooperative endeavor agreements with other
4 government agencies or departments and with any nonprofit organization whose
5 mission is compatible with the goals and objectives of the program.
6 F. The sheriff may terminate the participation of any defendant in the
7 program who fails to comply with the conditions of the program and require the
8 physical return of the defendant to the parish jail or any other facility as the sheriff
9 deems appropriate for the purpose of continuing the pretrial detention of the
10 defendant.
11 G. The sheriff or the parish governing authority shall not be responsible for
12 any of the following as it relates to a defendant in the program:
13 (a) Medical costs or the provision of medical care.
14 (b) Transportation costs or the provision of transportation.
15 (c) Housing costs or the provision of housing.
16 (d) Food costs or the provision of food.
17 (e) Clothing costs or the provision of clothing.
18 H. The sheriff and his deputies and employees, the parish governing
19 authority or its elected or appointed officials, deputies, or employees, or any party
20 engaged in a cooperative endeavor agreement with the program shall not be liable
21 for any act of a defendant who is admitted to and participating in the program.
22 I.(1) The pilot program established pursuant to the provisions of this Section
23 shall be evaluated with regard to security, beneficial and detrimental effects on the
24 prisoner, projected probable effects on deterrence, costs, labor intensiveness, and
25 other relevant measures of effectiveness. Such evaluation shall provide the required
26 information on a project basis as well as in comparison with traditional
27 imprisonment.
28 (2) A report of the evaluation of the program shall be presented to all of the
29 following:
Page 4 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
1 (a) The House Committee on the Administration of Criminal Justice.
2 (b) The Senate Committee on Judiciary B.
3 (c) Members of the North Louisiana Legislative Delegation who represent
4 Caddo Parish.
5 (d) The Caddo Parish Commission.
6 (3) Unless otherwise terminated by appropriate legislative action, the pilot
7 program shall begin a termination process not later than sixty days after the date in
8 which either of the following occur in Caddo Parish:
9 (a) A larger parish jail is constructed, opened, and occupied.
10 (b) A new structure is built or an existing structure is renovated that
11 materially expands capacity of the parish jail.
12 (4) If either of the conditions of Paragraph (3) of this Subsection have been
13 satisfied, no new participants shall be admitted to the program. Except as otherwise
14 provided in this Section, any participants in the program prior to the completion date
15 of the new construction or renovation shall be allowed to continue participation and
16 the program shall be phased out and fully terminated when the number of
17 participants declines to zero.
18 Section 2. The pilot program authorized in R.S. 15:571.35.2, as enacted by Section
19 1 of this Act, may be implemented on or before January 1, 2027.
20 Section 3. The evaluation report of the pilot program, required in R.S.
21 15:571.35.2(I)(2), as enacted by Section 1 of this Act, shall be presented in accordance with
22 this Act no later than 30 days prior to the first day of the 2028 Regular Session of the
23 Legislature of Louisiana and no later than December thirty-first in each year thereafter.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 159 Reengrossed 2026 Regular Session Jackson
Abstract: Creates the Caddo Parish Pretrial Home Incarceration Program.
Page 5 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
Proposed law authorizes the Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office, not later than Jan. 1, 2027, to
implement a pilot program using active electronic monitoring of eligible defendants as an
alternative mode of incarceration to traditional imprisonment.
Proposed law provides for eligibility conditions that include the criminal offense that the
defendant is charged with along with determinations and risk assessments made by the
Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office.
Proposed law requires the Caddo Parish Sheriff's Office to develop, adopt, and implement
rules and regulations for the program and provides for criteria to be included in these rules
and regulations.
Proposed law permits the sheriff to require the defendant, as a condition of participation in
the program, to participate in periodic behavioral health checks with a licensed mental health
provider if the risk assessment conducted pursuant to proposed law identifies behavioral
health factors that are reasonably related to supervision or compliance risk.
Proposed law describes what constitutes "compliance" and provides for termination of
participation in the program if the defendant fails to comply.
Proposed law requires that notice be provided to the defendant in writing of the conditions
imposed for participation in the program and requires that the defendant agree in writing to
the conditions. Further provides that participation in the program does not in any way negate
or nullify the bail obligations as set by the court.
Proposed law requires any electronic monitoring provider who is chosen or contracted with
to enforce the provisions of proposed law to comply with the provisions of present law (R.S.
15:571.36 and 571.37).
Proposed law prohibits a defendant from being admitted to the program prior to
collaboration and coordination between the court, the sheriff, and the district attorney for
approval of the defendant's participation in the program and permits the court, at any time
on its own motion, to prohibit or terminate the initial or continued participation of a
defendant in the program.
Proposed law entitles the sheriff to the collection of a sum of not less than the per diem fee
authorized by present law (R.S. 13:5535(1)) to be applied to the funding of the program
upon negotiation and agreement with the parish governing authority.
Proposed law further permits the sheriff to establish a fee which is agreed upon by the parish
governing authority and the sheriff and provides that funds obtained pursuant to proposed
law are not considered surplus funds.
Proposed law permits the sheriff to apply for funding and grants from any source he deems
appropriate for administration of the program and to engage in cooperative endeavor
agreements with other government agencies or departments or nonprofit organizations whose
missions are compatible with the goals and objectives of the program.
Proposed law permits the sheriff to terminate the participation of any defendant in the
program for failure to comply with the conditions of the program and requires the physical
return of the defendant to the parish jail or any other facility as the sheriff deems appropriate
for the purpose of continuing the pretrial detention of the defendant.
Proposed law provides for a list of expenses, relative to the defendant's participation in the
program, that are not the responsibility of the sheriff or the parish governing authority.
Proposed law provides for a limitation of liability as it pertains to any act of a defendant who
is admitted to and participating in the program.
Page 6 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-622 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 159
Proposed law provides for an evaluation of the program, reporting requirements pertaining
to the program, recipients of the report, and a termination date for the program that is
contingent on the construction or renovation of certain facilities or structures in Caddo
Parish.
Proposed law further provides for a phasing out of participants upon termination of the
program.
(Adds R.S. 15:571.35.2)
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Administration of
Criminal Justice to the original bill:
1. Require any electronic monitoring provider who is chosen or contracted with to
enforce the provisions of proposed law to comply with the provisions of present
law (R.S. 15:571.36 and 571.37).
The House Floor Amendments to the engrossed bill:
1. Provide that the defendant's admittance to the program is based on collaboration
and coordination between the court, the sheriff, and the district attorney rather
than only court approval.
Page 7 of 7
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.