Back to Louisiana

HB342 • 2026

EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement (RE1 SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement (RE1 SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

Education Parental Rights
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Alonzo Knox
Last action
2026-05-29
Official status
Adopted in House concurrence
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide information about the bill's name being inspired by specific students or details regarding financial impacts.

Special Education Hearing Rules

This bill changes the rules for special education hearings so that local education agencies must prove their decisions about a student's program or placement are correct.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires local education agencies to have the burden of proof in special education due process hearings regarding the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Local education agencies in Louisiana.
  • Students with special education needs and their families.

Terms To Know

burden of proof
The responsibility to provide evidence or argument to support a claim.
preponderance of the evidence
A standard in legal cases where one side must show that its claims are more likely true than not.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if a local education agency cannot meet this burden.
  • It is unclear how this change will affect the overall process of special education hearings.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: The amendment changes the law so that local education agencies must prove in special education hearings that a student's current or proposed program or placement is appropriate.

  • Local education agencies will now have to show proof that a student’s existing or suggested educational plan and setting are suitable during special education hearings.
  • The amendment text does not provide specific details on how the burden of proof will be implemented in practice, such as what evidence is needed.
  • It's unclear if there are any exceptions to this new rule or under what circumstances it might not apply.

Plain English: The amendment changes the name and numbering of a section in the bill related to special education due process hearings.

  • Adds a new section at the beginning of the bill, naming it after several individuals: Erin Carpenter, Corinth Corley, Landry Cravins, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron Hogan, Vinaya Martin, and Henry Lee Wray.
  • Changes 'Section 1.' to 'Section 2.' on line 8 of the original bill.
  • The amendment does not provide details about how this change affects the content or implementation of the special education due process hearings described in the bill.

Plain English: The amendment to HB342 changes the responsibility for proving that a student's special education program or placement is appropriate during a due process hearing from the parent or guardian to the local education agency.

  • Shifts the burden of proof in special education due process hearings from parents or guardians to the local education agency.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how this change will be implemented or what specific criteria the local education agency must meet.
  • It is unclear if there are any exceptions or limitations to this new requirement for the local education agency.

Plain English: The amendment changes the name of the bill to honor several individuals by naming it after them.

  • Changes the title of the bill to 'Vinaya Alexander, Landry Bell, Noah Cannino, Erin Carpenter, Corinth Corley, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron Hogan, Eden Emily Robinson, Sammy Rollins, and Henry Lee Wray Act'.
  • The amendment does not provide information on why these individuals are being honored or what impact this change will have beyond renaming the bill.

Plain English: The amendment changes the name of the bill to honor several individuals by naming it after them.

  • Changes the title of the bill to 'Vinaya Alexander, Landry Bell, Noah Cannino, Erin Carpenter, Corinth Corley, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron Hogan, Eden Emily Robinson, Sammy Rollins, and Henry Lee Wray Act'.
  • The amendment does not provide information on why these individuals are being honored or what impact this change will have beyond renaming the bill.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-29 H

    Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.

  2. 2026-05-29 H

    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/29/2026.

  3. 2026-05-28 H

    Received from the Senate with amendments.

  4. 2026-05-27 S

    The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.

  5. 2026-05-26 S

    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.

  6. 2026-05-25 S

    Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.

  7. 2026-05-21 S

    Reported with amendments.

  8. 2026-04-20 S

    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Education.

  9. 2026-04-15 S

    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.

  10. 2026-04-14 H

    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 99, nays 2. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.

  11. 2026-04-13 H

    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/14/2026.

  12. 2026-04-09 H

    Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.

  13. 2026-04-08 H

    Reported favorably (11-0).

  14. 2026-03-09 H

    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Education.

  15. 2026-02-27 H

    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.

  16. 2026-02-24 H

    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Education.

  17. 2026-02-24 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement (RE1 SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HLS 26RS-1062 REENGROSSED
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 342
BY REPRESENTATIVES KNOX, ADAMS, AMEDEE, BAYHAM, BERAULT, BOYD,
BROUSSARD, CARPENTER, WILFORD CARTER, CARVER, CHASSION,
CHENEVERT, EDMONSTON, EGAN, FISHER, FREIBERG, GREEN,
JACKSON, TRAVIS JOHNSON, JORDAN, LACOMBE, TERRY LANDRY,
LARVADAIN, LYONS, MARCELLE, MARTINEZ, MENA, MOORE, NEWELL,
OWEN, PHELPS, SCHAMERHORN, SPELL, STAGNI, TAYLOR, VENTRELLA,
WALTERS, WILEY, WYBLE, YOUNG, AND ZERINGUE
EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of
proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of
a student's current or proposed program or placement
1 AN ACT
2 To enact R.S. 17:1946(B)(3), relative to special education; to provide for special education
3 due process hearings; to provide that local education agencies shall have the burden
4 of proof in such hearings relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or
5 proposed placement or program; to provide for how the burden of proof shall be met;
6 and to provide for related matters.
7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8 Section 1. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Erin Carpenter, Corinth
9 Corley, Landry Cravins, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron Hogan, Vinaya Martin,
10 and Henry Lee Wray Act".
11 Section 2. R.S. 17:1946(B)(3) is hereby enacted to read as follows:
12 §1946. Procedural safeguards
13 * * *
14 B.
15 * * *
Page 1 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1062 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 342
1 (3) In any special education due process hearing, the local education agency
2 shall have the burden of proof, including the burden of persuasion and production,
3 relative to the appropriateness of a student's program or placement or the
4 appropriateness of the program or placement proposed by the agency. This burden
5 shall be met by a preponderance of the evidence.
6 * * *
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 342 Reengrossed 2026 Regular Session Knox
Abstract: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any
special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's
current or proposed program or placement and that the burden of proof shall be met
by a preponderance of the evidence.
Present law requires the state Dept. of Education, the Special School District, and the local
education agencies to establish and maintain regulations and procedures in accordance with
present law and the federal law (IDEA) to ensure that students with exceptionalities and their
parents are provided procedural safeguards for the provision of free appropriate public
education by such agencies, including provisions for special education due process hearings.
Proposed law retains present law and adds that in all such hearings, the local education
agency shall have the burden of proof, including the burden of persuasion and production,
relative to the appropriateness of a student's program or placement or the appropriateness of
the program or placement proposed by the agency. Provides that this burden shall be met
by a preponderance of the evidence.
Proposed law provides that proposed law shall be known and may be cited as the "Erin
Carpenter, Corinth Corley, Landry Cravins, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron
Hogan, Vinaya Martin, and Henry Lee Wray Act".
(Adds R.S. 17:1946(B)(3))
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The House Floor Amendments to the engrossed bill:
1. Add that proposed law shall be known and may be cited as the "Erin Carpenter,
Corinth Corley, Landry Cravins, Zachry Edmonston, Carter Hart, Cameron
Hogan, Vinaya Martin, and Henry Lee Wray Act".
Page 2 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.