Back to Louisiana

HB410 • 2026

CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Requires notification of all parties to record in-person communication

CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Requires notification of all parties to record in-person communication

Labor Privacy
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Laurie Schlegel
Last action
2026-05-29
Official status
Pending House concurrence - Sched. for 5/31/26
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill text does specify penalties for violations but does not provide detailed specifics on how these will be enforced.

Requires Notice Before Recording In-Person Conversations

This law requires people to tell others if they are recording an in-person conversation, unless the conversation is happening under certain exceptions like public meetings or emergencies.

What This Bill Does

  • Creates rules that require all parties involved in a direct in-person conversation to be notified if someone is recording the conversation.
  • Defines what counts as a 'direct conversation' and sets out exceptions where notification isn't needed, such as during law enforcement activities, public meetings, emergencies, or first responder activities.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who record conversations with portable devices
  • Individuals involved in direct conversations

Terms To Know

Direct conversation
An in-person oral communication directed to a specific individual or individuals under circumstances where recording is not expected.
First responder activity
Recordings or transcriptions made by first responders during the performance of their official duties.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The law does not apply to public meetings, law enforcement activities, emergencies, and certain other situations.
  • It is unclear how this will be enforced in practice.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: The amendment modifies the bill to include videoing direct conversations, specify wearable eyeglass devices for recordings, and expand exceptions for recording public officials and participants in certain locations.

  • Includes videoing of direct conversations along with audio recordings or transcriptions.
  • Specifies that a portable device used for recording must be a wearable eyeglass device.
  • Expands the exception to allow videos, recordings, or transcriptions made by public officials for preserving evidence related to public corruption or malfeasance in office.
  • Adds exceptions for participants who record conversations in their own place of business, employment, vehicle, or employer's vehicle.
  • The amendment text does not provide clear details on how the changes will be enforced or what constitutes 'incidental capture'.

Plain English: The amendment adds a new requirement that recordings or transcriptions of conversations must be notified to all parties involved if the person making the recording is not part of the conversation.

  • Adds a new section (9) requiring notification to all parties in a conversation when someone who is not participating records or transcribes it.
  • The amendment text does not specify how this notification should be carried out, leaving details such as the method and timing of notification unclear.

Plain English: The amendment adds the word 'portable' to specify that a portable device must be used for recording in-person communications.

  • Adds the word 'portable' before 'device' on page 3, line 2 of the bill.
  • The amendment does not provide further details about what constitutes a 'portable device'.

Plain English: The amendment adds specific types of recordings that do not require notification to all parties involved, including undercover operations and body camera footage.

  • Adds a list of exceptions where recording does not need prior notice to all parties: undercover operations involving officers or informants, one-party consent recordings for investigations, and law enforcement body cameras.
  • The amendment text does not specify the exact conditions under which these exceptions apply beyond listing them as types of recordings that do not require notification.

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to require that all participants be notified if someone is recording or transcribing a direct conversation, and it adds exceptions for certain types of recordings.

  • Adds a requirement that individuals must notify all parties involved in a direct conversation before recording or transcribing it.
  • Includes specific definitions and exemptions for 'first responder activity' and various other scenarios where recordings can be made without prior notification.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how the requirement to notify all parties will be enforced or what penalties might apply if this rule is violated.
  • Some parts of the amendment are technical and may require further explanation for full understanding.

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to require that all participants be notified if someone is recording or transcribing a direct conversation, and it adds exceptions for certain types of recordings.

  • Adds a requirement that all parties in a direct conversation must be informed if the conversation is being recorded or transcribed.
  • Removes references to 'technological format' and replaces them with language about reasonable expectations of privacy during conversations.
  • Includes new definitions for 'first responder activity' and adds exceptions for recordings made by first responders, evidence preservation, and personal residence recordings.
  • The amendment text does not provide specific penalties or enforcement mechanisms for violations of the notification requirement.

Plain English: The amendment changes the bill to include videos along with recordings in all relevant sections.

  • Adds 'videos' before or after mentions of 'recordings' throughout the bill text.
  • Inserts new provisions allowing certain types of video recording without notification.
  • The exact impact on existing legal definitions and procedures is unclear due to technical language.

Plain English: The amendment adds exceptions to when recordings of public officials can be made without violating privacy laws and clarifies that incidental background recordings are allowed.

  • Adds new rules allowing the recording of public officials in public places where there is no expectation of privacy, for preserving evidence related to public corruption or malfeasance in office.
  • Includes a provision stating that this law does not apply to unintentional or background recordings made in public places.
  • The amendment text does not provide details on how the new rules will be enforced or what penalties might apply for violations.

Plain English: The amendment adds exceptions for recording public officials under certain conditions.

  • Adds an exception allowing recordings or transcriptions of a public official performing duties in a public place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
  • Includes an exception for recordings made to preserve evidence related to public corruption crimes as defined by R.S. 11:293.
  • Allows recordings made to preserve evidence related to malfeasance in office as provided in R.S. 14:134.
  • The amendment text does not specify how these exceptions will be enforced or what constitutes a 'public place' with no reasonable expectation of privacy.

Bill History

  1. 2026-05-29 H

    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/31/2026.

  2. 2026-05-29 H

    Received from the Senate with amendments.

  3. 2026-05-29 S

    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 30 yeas and 6 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.

  4. 2026-05-29 S

    Called from the Calendar.

  5. 2026-05-26 S

    Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.

  6. 2026-05-26 S

    Rules suspended.

  7. 2026-05-21 S

    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.

  8. 2026-05-20 S

    Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.

  9. 2026-05-19 S

    Reported with amendments.

  10. 2026-04-14 S

    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.

  11. 2026-04-13 S

    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.

  12. 2026-04-09 H

    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 54, nays 34. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.

  13. 2026-04-09 H

    Called from the calendar.

  14. 2026-04-08 H

    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/09/2026.

  15. 2026-04-08 H

    Notice given.

  16. 2026-04-07 H

    Read by title, amended, returned to the calendar.

  17. 2026-04-01 H

    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/07/2026.

  18. 2026-03-31 H

    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.

  19. 2026-03-30 H

    Reported with amendments (6-0-1).

  20. 2026-03-09 H

    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.

  21. 2026-02-27 H

    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.

  22. 2026-02-25 H

    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.

  23. 2026-02-25 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Requires notification of all parties to record in-person communication

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 410
BY REPRESENTATIVES SCHLEGEL AND EDMONSTON
CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Requires notification of all parties to record in-person
communication
1 AN ACT
2 To enact Chapter 7 of Code Title IV of Book III of Title 9 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes
3 of 1950, to be comprised of R.S. 9:2790.1 through 2790.4, relative to in-person
4 communication; to provide for legislative intent; to provide for definitions; to require
5 individuals to be informed they are being recorded; to provide for penalties; and to
6 provide for related matters.
7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8 Section 1. Chapter 7 of Code Title IV of Book III of Title 9 of the Louisiana Revised
9 Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 9:2790.1 through 2790.4, is hereby enacted to read as
10 follows:
11 CHAPTER 7. UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFER ACT
12 ALL PARTY NOTIFICATION FOR IN-PERSON CONVERSATION
13 §2790.1. Legislative findings; declaration of purpose
14 A. The legislature finds that advances in consumer recording technology,
15 artificial intelligence, wearable devices, and automated transcription tools enable
16 interpersonal communications to be permanently preserved in digital form.
17 B. The legislature recognizes that modern technologies enable the creation
18 of permanent digital memory far beyond ordinary human recollection and the
19 legislature declares that individuals retain a reasonable expectation of privacy against
20 the undisclosed technological preservation of direct conversations.
Page 1 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 410
1 C. The legislature further finds that an individual who engages in a direct
2 conversation has a reasonable expectation that the conversation is not recorded or
3 transcribed unless notice is given, and that the undisclosed preservation and
4 dissemination of direct conversations undermines trust, autonomy, dignity, privacy,
5 and fairness in human interactions.
6 D. Recent incidents have highlighted the misuse of wearable recording
7 devices such as smart glasses for covertly filming individuals without their
8 knowledge. These recordings are often disseminated on social media platforms,
9 leading to harassment and violations of personal privacy.
10 E. The purpose of this Chapter is to protect individuals from the
11 technological preservation and harmful dissemination of direct conversations while
12 preserving the lawful recording of public events, legitimate law enforcement activity,
13 public officials, and recordings made to document criminal, tortious, or threatening
14 conduct.
15 F. This Chapter shall not be interpreted to restrict lawful recording protected
16 by the Constitution of the United States of America or the Constitution of Louisiana.
17 §2790.2. Definitions
18 For purposes of this Chapter, the following definitions apply:
19 (1) "Direct conversation" means any in-person oral communication directed
20 to a specific individual or individuals under circumstances in which a reasonable
21 person would not expect the communication to be recorded or transcribed.
22 (2) "First responder activity" means recordings or transcriptions made by a
23 first responder, as defined by R.S. 40:978.1, in the performance of official duties.
24 (3) "Law enforcement activity" means recordings or transcriptions made by
25 a peace officer or other person acting under color of law in the lawful performance
26 of official duties including but not limited to the following:
27 (a) Undercover operations that produce recordings made by undercover
28 officers, confidential informants, and cooperating individuals.
Page 2 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 410
1 (b) One-party consent recordings conducted as part of an investigation or
2 intelligence-gathering function.
3 (c) Body camera recordings or any recording conducted by or at the
4 discretion of law enforcement.
5 (4) "Public or semi-public meetings" mean governmental hearings, press
6 conferences, public speeches, rallies, or other similar circumstances.
7 §2790.3. Notification of recording direct conversation
8 A. No participant in a direct conversation shall intentionally use a portable
9 device to record or transcribe a direct conversation with any other participant unless
10 all participants are specifically notified that the conversation is being recorded or
11 transcribed.
12 B. The provisions of this Section do not apply to any of the following:
13 (1) Public or semi-public meetings.
14 (2) Law enforcement activity.
15 (3) Emergencies or first responder activities.
16 (4) Public officials performing official duties in public places where there
17 is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
18 (5)(a) A person who records a law enforcement officer in the performance
19 of his official duties while the officer is in a public place or a place where the private
20 person has a legal right to be.
21 (b) The exception provided in this Paragraph does not extend to an
22 individual who physically interferes or materially obstructs lawful law enforcement
23 activity.
24 (6) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made for the
25 purpose of preserving evidence related to an actual or anticipated civil or
26 administrative proceeding.
27 (7) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made for the
28 purpose of preserving evidence related to a criminal act or proceeding.
Page 3 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 410
1 (8) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made by a
2 participant in his own residence.
3 (9) Recordings or transcriptions of a conversation if the person recording or
4 transcribing the conversation is not a participant.
5 C. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit, modify, expand, or
6 supersede the provisions of the Electronic Surveillance Act, R.S. 15:1301 et seq.
7 §2790.4. Penalties
8 Any person who is found to have violated the provisions of this Chapter shall
9 be liable to an individual for any damages including court costs and reasonable
10 attorney fees as ordered by the court.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 410 Reengrossed 2026 Regular Session Schlegel
Abstract: Requires disclosure to all parties that a direct, in-person conversation is being
recorded under circumstances in which a person has a reasonable expectation of
privacy.
Proposed law outlines legislative intent and defines "direct conversation", "first responder
activity", "law enforcement activity", and "public or semi-public meetings".
Proposed law prohibits a person from intentionally using a portable device to record or
transcribe a direct conversation with another party unless all participants of the conversation
are specifically notified that the conversation is being recorded or transcribed.
Proposed law does not apply to the following:
(1) Public or semi-public meetings.
(2) Law enforcement activity.
(3) Emergencies or first responder activity.
(4) Public officials performing official duties in public places where there is no
reasonable expectation of privacy.
(5) A person who records a law enforcement officer in the performance of his official
duties while the officer is in a public place or a place where the private person has
a legal right to be. This exception does not extend to an individual who physically
interferes or materially obstructs lawful law enforcement activity.
Page 4 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 410
(6) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made for the purpose of
preserving evidence related to an actual or anticipated civil or administrative
proceeding.
(7) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made for the purpose of
preserving evidence related to a criminal act or proceeding.
(8) Recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made by a participant in his
own residence.
(9) Recordings or transcriptions of a conversation if the person recording or transcribing
the conversation is not a participant.
Proposed law does not limit, modify, expand, or supersede the provisions of the Electronic
Surveillance Act as provided for in present law (R.S. 15:1301-1318).
Proposed law requires the payment of court costs and reasonable attorney fees of a person
who violates proposed law.
(Adds R.S. 9:2790.1-2790.4)
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Civil Law and
Procedure to the original bill:
1. Make technical changes.
2. Remove language relative to consent to provide that a person only needs to be
notified that a direct conversation is being recorded or transcribed.
3. Remove language regarding a reasonable person distinguishing between being
overheard and being recorded.
4. Provide that a person who engages in a direct conversation has a reasonable
expectation that the conversation is not being recorded or transcribed unless
specific notification is given.
5. Define "first responder activity".
6. Remove "sporting events" from the definition of "public or semi-public
meetings".
7. Specify that all participants in a direct conversation are to be specifically notified
if the conversation is being recorded.
8. Provide that first responder activity is an exception to the notification
requirement of proposed law.
9. Add exceptions for recordings or transcriptions of a direct conversation made for
the purpose of preserving evidence related to an actual or anticipated civil or
administrative proceeding, a criminal act or proceeding, or recordings or
transcriptions of a direct conversation made by a participant in his own
residence.
Page 5 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-912 REENGROSSED
HB NO. 410
The House Floor Amendments to the engrossed bill:
1. Make technical changes.
2. Expand the definition of "law enforcement activity".
3. Specify the recording or transcription device as a portable device.
4. Provide an exception if the recording or transcription of a conversation is made
by an individual who is not a participant.
Page 6 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.