Back to Louisiana

HB814 • 2026

COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Edmond Jordan
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
Pending House Commerce - Considered 3/17/26
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

What This Bill Does

  • COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 H

    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  2. 2026-02-27 H

    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.

  3. 2026-02-27 H

    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  4. 2026-02-27 H

    Prefiled.

Official Summary Text

COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act (OR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 814
BY REPRESENTATIVE JORDAN
COMMERCE: Provides for the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act
1 AN ACT
2 To enact Chapter 25 of Title 6 of the Louisiana Revised Statues of 1950, to be comprised of
3 R.S. 6:1431 through 1436, relative to the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness
4 Act; to provide for findings and purpose; to provide for definitions; to provide for
5 community investment examinations; to provide for public disclosure or ratings; to
6 provide for rating consequences; and to provide for related matters.
7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8 Section 1 . Chapter 25 of Title 6 of the Louisiana Revised Statues of 1950, comprised
9 of R.S. 6:1431 through 1436 is hereby enacted to read as follows:
10 CHAPTER 25: THE LOUISIANA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FAIRNESS ACT
11 §1431. Short title
12 This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Louisiana Community
13 Investment Fairness Act" or "LA-CIFA".
14 §1432. Findings and purpose
15 A. The legislature finds that:
16 (1) State-chartered financial institutions receive substantial public benefits
17 including state deposit insurance backstops, access to the state's payment systems,
18 and tax advantages.
19 (2) Despite these public benefits, evidence demonstrates that state-chartered
20 institutions make significantly fewer loans per capita in predominantly minority and
Page 1 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 814
1 low-to-moderate income, or LMI, communities than in predominantly white and
2 higher-income communities, a practice historically characterized as redlining.
3 (3) The federal Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 applies to federally
4 chartered institutions; however, state-chartered institutions not subject to federal
5 examination have demonstrated systematically lower community investment
6 performance.
7 (4) Louisiana has a compelling public interest in ensuring that institutions
8 receiving state privileges serve the communities in which they are chartered.
9 B. It is the purpose of this Chapter to encourage state-chartered financial
10 institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they are
11 chartered, consistent with safe and sound operation.
12 §1433. Definitions
13 For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms have the following
14 meanings:
15 (1) "Assessment area" means the geographic area in which a regulated
16 institution is obligated to demonstrate community investment performance, defined
17 as the parishes in which the institution maintains branches or offices.
18 (2) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the office of financial
19 institutions.
20 (3) "Community development activity" means:
21 (a) Loans, investments, or services that support affordable housing for LMI
22 individuals or families.
23 (b) Loans to small businesses and small farms in LMI census tracts or
24 majority-minority census tracts.
25 (c) Investments in or grants to community development financial institutions,
26 or CDFIs.
27 (d) Financial education and counseling services provided to LMI or minority
28 communities.
29 (e) Mortgage lending in majority-minority census tracts.
Page 2 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 814
1 (4) "LMI" means low-to-moderate income, defined as a census tract in which
2 the median household income is less than eighty percent of the area median income.
3 (5) "Majority-minority census tract" means a census tract in which more than
4 fifty percent of the population identifies as non-white.
5 (6) "Regulated institution" means any bank, savings institution, or credit
6 union chartered by this state with assets of one hundred million dollars or more.
7 §1434. Community investment examinations
8 A. The commissioner shall conduct a community investment examination
9 of each regulated institution no less than once every three years. Examinations shall
10 assess all of the following:
11 (1) The institution's record of lending to LMI borrowers and in LMI and
12 majority-minority census tracts within its assessment area, compared to:
13 (a) The institution's lending in non-LMI, non-minority census tracts.
14 (b) Demographic data on the composition of the institution's assessment
15 area.
16 (c) Aggregate lending by all institutions in the same assessment area.
17 (2) The institution's investments in community development activities as
18 defined in R.S. 6:1433.
19 (3) The provision of financial services and products accessible to LMI and
20 minority customers.
21 (4) Any formal complaints alleging discriminatory lending practices filed
22 during the examination period.
23 B. Following each examination, the commissioner shall assign the institution
24 one of the following ratings:
25 (1) Outstanding: The institution's community investment performance is
26 exceptional and substantially exceeds peer benchmarks.
27 (2) Satisfactory: The institution's performance meets community needs and
28 satisfies the requirements of this Chapter.
Page 3 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 814
1 (3) Needs to Improve: The institution's performance falls below peer
2 benchmarks and requires corrective action.
3 (4) Substantial Noncompliance: The institution has failed to meet its
4 community investment obligations and demonstrates a pattern of discriminatory or
5 exclusionary lending.
6 §1435. Public disclosure of ratings
7 A. The commissioner shall make all community investment examination
8 reports and ratings publicly available within sixty days of the completion of each
9 examination, including publication on the office of financial institutions' website.
10 B. Each regulated institution shall post its current community investment
11 rating in a conspicuous location in each branch, on its website, and in its annual
12 report to depositors.
13 C. The commissioner shall publish an annual statewide community
14 investment report summarizing the performance of all regulated institutions.
15 §1436. Consequences of ratings
16 A. A regulated institution rated "Needs to Improve" shall do all of the
17 following:
18 (1) Submit a corrective action plan to the commissioner within ninety days,
19 describing specific steps to improve community investment performance.
20 (2) Meet with the commissioner or his designee within sixty days to discuss
21 deficiencies.
22 (3) Undergo an accelerated examination within eighteen months.
23 B. The commissioner shall consider a regulated institution's community
24 investment rating in reviewing and acting upon applications by the institution for:
25 (1) New branch openings or closures in this state.
26 (2) Merger or acquisition approvals.
27 (3) Conversion of charter type.
28 (4) Other actions requiring commissioner approval.
Page 4 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 814
1 C. A regulated institution rated "Substantial Noncompliance" for two
2 consecutive examination cycles may be subject to all of the following:
3 (1) Denial or conditioning of any pending application for which
4 commissioner approval is required.
5 (2) Required divestiture of state-funded deposits held by state agencies, if
6 the commissioner determines such action is appropriate to protect the public interest.
7 (3) Referral to the attorney general for investigation of potential fair lending
8 violations.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 814 Original 2026 Regular Session Jordan
Abstract: Provides relative to the Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act.
Proposed law creates the "Louisiana Community Investment Fairness Act" or "LA-CIFA."
Proposed law provides for findings and purpose.
Proposed law defines "assessment area", "commissioner", "community development
activity", "LMI", "majority-minority census tract", and "regulated institution".
Proposed law provides that the commissioner shall conduct a community investment
examination of each regulated institution no less than once every three years. Examinations
shall assess all of the following:
(1) The institution's record of lending to LMI borrowers and in LMI and
majority-minority census tracts within its assessment area, compared to the
institution's lending in non-LMI, non-minority census tracts, demographic data on
the composition of the institution's assessment area and aggregate lending by all
institutions in the same assessment area.
(2) The institution's investments in community development activities as defined in
proposed law.
(3) The provision of financial services and products accessible to LMI and minority
customers.
(4) Any formal complaints alleging discriminatory lending practices filed during the
examination period.
Proposed law provides that following each examination, the commissioner shall assign the
institution one of the following ratings:
(1) Outstanding: The institution's community investment performance is exceptional and
substantially exceeds peer benchmarks.
Page 5 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-1291 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 814
(2) Satisfactory: The institution's performance meets community needs and satisfies the
requirements of proposed law.
(3) Needs to Improve: The institution's performance falls below peer benchmarks and
requires corrective action.
(4) Substantial Noncompliance: The institution has failed to meet its community
investment obligations and demonstrates a pattern of discriminatory or exclusionary
lending.
Proposed law provides that the commissioner shall make all community investment
examination reports and ratings publicly available within 60 days of the completion of each
examination, including publication on the office of financial institutions' website.
Proposed law provides that each regulated institution shall post its current community
investment rating in a conspicuous location in each branch, on its website, and in its annual
report to depositors.
Proposed law provides that commissioner shall publish an annual statewide community
investment report summarizing the performance of all regulated institutions.
Proposed law provides the requirements for a regulated institution rated "Needs to Improve".
Proposed law provides that the commissioner shall consider a regulated institution's
community investment rating in reviewing and acting upon applications by the institution
for:
(1) New branch openings or closures in this state.
(2) Merger or acquisition approvals.
(3) Conversion of charter type.
(4) Other actions requiring commissioner approval.
Proposed law provides what a regulated institution rated "Substantial Noncompliance" for
two consecutive examination cycles may be subject to.
(Adds R.S. 6:1431-1436)
Page 6 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.