Back to Maine

LD1544 • 2025

An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases

An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases

Children
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Senator Donna Bailey
Last action
2026-04-26
Official status
Became Law without Governor's Signature
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases

An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases Sponsor: Senator Donna Bailey Reference committee: Judiciary Governor action: Became Law without Governor's Signature

What This Bill Does

  • An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases Sponsor: Senator Donna Bailey Reference committee: Judiciary Governor action: Became Law without Governor's Signature

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Adopted by House & Senate

Plain English: Page 1 - 132LR0671(02) COMMITTEE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.

  • Page 1 - 132LR0671(02) COMMITTEE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.
  • 1544 2 Date: (Filing No.
  • S- ) 3JUDICIARY 4 Reproduced and distributed under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate.
  • 5STATE OF MAINE 6SENATE 7132ND LEGISLATURE 8FIRST SPECIAL SESSION 9 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT “ ” to S.P.
Sponsored By Senator Rotundo of Androscoggin , Adopted by House & Senate

Plain English: Page 1 - 132LR0671(04) SENATE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.

  • Page 1 - 132LR0671(04) SENATE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.
  • 1544 2 Date: (Filing No.
  • S- ) 3 Reproduced and distributed under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate.
  • 4STATE OF MAINE 5SENATE 6132ND LEGISLATURE 7SECOND REGULAR SESSION 8 SENATE AMENDMENT “ ” to COMMITTEE AMENDMENT “A” to S.P.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-26 Governor

    Became Law without Governor's Signature

  2. 2026-04-13 House

    PASSED TO BE ENACTED . Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.

  3. 2026-04-13 Senate

    PASSED TO BE ENACTED , in concurrence.

  4. 2025-06-09 Committee

    Reported Out; OTP-AM/ONTP

  5. 2025-04-30 Committee

    Work Session Held

  6. 2025-04-30 Committee

    Voted; Divided Report

  7. 2025-04-23 Committee

    Work Session Held; TABLED

  8. 2025-04-10 Committee

    Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

Official Summary Text

An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child Protection Cases
Sponsor:
Senator Donna Bailey
Reference committee:
Judiciary
Governor action:
Became Law without Governor's Signature

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Page 1 - 132LR0671(05)
STATE OF MAINE
_____
IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD
TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-SIX
_____
S.P. 628 - L.D. 1544
An Act to Support Families by Improving the Court Process for Child
Protection Cases
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:
Sec. 1. 22 MRSA §4002, sub-§1-B, ¶C, as enacted by PL 1997, c. 715, Pt. B, §1,
is repealed.
Sec. 2. 22 MRSA §4034, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2015, c. 501, §9, is repealed
and the following enacted in its place:
1. Request. A petitioner may add to a child protection petition a request for a
preliminary protection order or may request a preliminary protection order separately from
the child protection petition. A request for a preliminary protection order must be sworn
and must include at least the following:
A. A summary of facts to support the request;
B. A detailed summary of how the department weighed the trauma to the child of
removal from the child's home against the alleged immediate risk of serious harm to
the child and the specific factors the department considered; and
C. The specific services offered and provided under section 4036‑B, subsection 3 to
prevent the removal of the child from the child's home.
Sec. 3. 22 MRSA §4034, sub-§2, as amended by PL 2001, c. 696, §25, is further
amended to read:
2. Order. If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence presented in the sworn
summary or otherwise that there is an immediate risk of serious harm to the child, it may
order any disposition under section 4036. In considering whether to grant a preliminary
protection order, the court shall consider the trauma to the child of removal from the child's
home and whether the department has exhausted the options to mitigate the immediate risk
of serious harm to the child and avoid the removal of the child from the child's home. A
preliminary protection order automatically expires at the time of the issuing of a final
protection order under section 4035 or a judicial review order under section 4038.
LAW WITHOUT
GOVERNOR'S
SIGNATURE

APRIL 26, 2026
CHAPTER
774
PUBLIC LAW
Page 2 - 132LR0671(05)
Sec. 4. 22 MRSA §4034, sub-§4, as amended by PL 2015, c. 501, §10, is further
amended to read:
4. Summary preliminary hearing. The court shall schedule a summary preliminary
hearing on a preliminary protection order within 14 days but not less than 7 days after
issuance of the preliminary protection order, except that counsel for a parent may request
that the hearing take place sooner. Upon request of counsel, the court may conduct the
summary preliminary hearing as expeditiously as the court determines the interests of
justice require. If a parent, custodian or legal guardian appears for the summary
preliminary hearing and does not consent to the preliminary protection order, the court shall
conduct a hearing at which the petitioner bears the burden of proof. At a summary
preliminary hearing, the court shall consider the trauma to the child of removal from the
child's home in determining whether to continue the preliminary protection order and
whether the department has exhausted the options to mitigate the immediate risk of serious
harm to the child and avoid the removal of the child from the child's home. The court may
limit testimony to the testimony of the caseworker, parent, custodian, legal guardian,
guardian ad litem, foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care and may
admit evidence, including reports and records, that would otherwise be inadmissable
inadmissible as hearsay evidence. If after the hearing the court finds by a preponderance
of the evidence that returning the child to the child's custodian would place the child in
immediate risk of serious harm, it shall make findings explaining why the risk of harm to
the child is outweighed by the trauma of the child's removal from the child's home and that
the department has exhausted the options to mitigate the immediate risk of serious harm
and avoid the removal of the child from the child's home and continue the order or make
another disposition under section 4036. If the court's preliminary protection order includes
a finding of an aggravating factor, the court may order the department not to commence
reunification or to cease reunification, in which case the court shall conduct a hearing on
jeopardy and conduct a permanency planning hearing. The hearings must commence
within 30 days of entry of the preliminary protection order.
If the petitioner has not been able to serve a parent, custodian or legal guardian before the
scheduled summary preliminary hearing, the parent, custodian or legal guardian may
request a subsequent summary preliminary hearing within 10 days after receipt of the
petition.