Back to Maine

LD1894 • 2025

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness

Housing
Active

The official status still shows this bill as active or still awaiting another formal step.

Sponsor
Representative Daniel Sayre
Last action
2026-04-29
Official status
Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES . (DEAD)
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness Sponsor: Representative Daniel Sayre Reference committee: Housing and Economic Development Latest committee action: Reported Out; OTP-AM/ONTP

What This Bill Does

  • Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness Sponsor: Representative Daniel Sayre Reference committee: Housing and Economic Development Latest committee action: Reported Out; OTP-AM/ONTP

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Adopted by House & Senate

Plain English: Page 1 - 132LR2187(02) COMMITTEE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.

  • Page 1 - 132LR2187(02) COMMITTEE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.
  • 1894 2 Date: (Filing No.
  • H- ) 3HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4 Reproduced and distributed under the direction of the Clerk of the House.
  • 5STATE OF MAINE 6HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 7132ND LEGISLATURE 8FIRST SPECIAL SESSION 9 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT “ ” to H.P.
Sponsored By Senator Curry of Waldo

Plain English: Page 1 - 132LR2187(04) SENATE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.

  • Page 1 - 132LR2187(04) SENATE AMENDMENT 1 L.D.
  • 1894 2 Date: (Filing No.
  • S- ) 3 Reproduced and distributed under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate.
  • 4STATE OF MAINE 5SENATE 6132ND LEGISLATURE 7FIRST SPECIAL SESSION 8 SENATE AMENDMENT “ ” to COMMITTEE AMENDMENT “A” to H.P.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-29 Senate

    Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES . (DEAD)

  2. 2025-06-09 House

    This being an emergency measure, a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to the House was necessary. FAILED FINAL PASSAGE . ROLL CALL NO. 361 (Yeas 76 - Nays 69 - Absent 4 - Excused 2) Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.

  3. 2025-06-03 Committee

    Reported Out; OTP-AM/ONTP

  4. 2025-05-20 Committee

    Work Session Held

  5. 2025-05-20 Committee

    Voted; Divided Report

  6. 2025-05-15 Committee

    Work Session Held; TABLED

  7. 2025-05-01 Committee

    Referred to Committee on Housing and Economic Development.

Official Summary Text

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness
Sponsor:
Representative Daniel Sayre
Reference committee:
Housing and Economic Development
Latest committee action:
Reported Out; OTP-AM/ONTP

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Printed on recycled paper
132nd MAINE LEGISLATURE
FIRST SPECIAL SESSION-2025
Legislative Document No. 1894
H.P. 1265 House of Representatives, May 5, 2025
An Act to Address Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness
Received by the Clerk of the House on May 1, 2025. Referred to the Committee on
Housing and Economic Development pursuant to Joint Rule 308.2 and ordered printed
pursuant to Joint Rule 401.
ROBERT B. HUNT
Clerk
Presented by Representative SAYRE of Kennebunk.
Cosponsored by Senator TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland and
Representatives: CLOUTIER of Lewiston, CROCKETT of Portland, Speaker FECTEAU of
Biddeford, MATLACK of St. George, MOONEN of Portland, Senators: BENNETT of Oxford,
GROHOSKI of Hancock, NANGLE of Cumberland.

Page 1 - 132LR2187(01)
1Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:
2Sec. 1. 10 MRSA c. 239 is enacted to read:
3CHAPTER 239
4CONSUMER GROCERY PRICING FAIRNESS
5§1500-W. Consumer Grocery Pricing Fairness
61. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise indicates, the
7 following terms have the following meanings.
8 A. "Channels of trade" means the pathways through which covered goods are
9 marketed, distributed and sold to consumers, including, but not limited to,
10 supermarkets, hypermarkets, discount stores, convenience stores, online or electronic
11 commerce retailers, specialty food stores, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs and
12 any other retail establishments, platforms or entities that compete for consumer grocery
13 dollars and that engage in the sale of covered goods, either primarily or as a segment
14 of their broader retail offering.
15 B. "Covered good" means a grocery item or packaged good, including, but not limited
16 to:
17 (1) Any food or food product intended for human consumption, except for
18 alcoholic beverages, tobacco and hot foods and hot food products prepared for
19 immediate consumption and any deposit fee required to purchase any food or food
20 product contained in a returnable bottle, can or other container, regardless of
21 whether the fee is included in the shelf price posted for the food or food product;
22 and
23 (2) Seeds and plants to grow food for personal consumption.
24 "Covered good" does not include gasoline or prescription drugs.
25 C. "Covered retailer" means an entity that sells, or an entity that oversees another entity
26 that sells, covered goods at retail to consumers at one or more physical locations in the
27 State.
28 D. "Covered supplier" means an entity that produces and sells, or an entity that oversees
29 another entity that produces and sells, covered goods in the State to covered retailers
30 or covered wholesalers, whether directly or indirectly, through a purchasing agent or
31 3rd-party entity, in an aggregate amount exceeding $6,000,000,000 annually.
32 E. "Covered wholesaler" means an entity that purchases, or an entity that oversees
33 another entity that purchases, covered goods for the purposes of reselling or
34 distributing the covered goods to covered retailers in the State.
35 F. "Dominant covered retailer" means a covered retailer that has one or more store
36 locations or distribution centers in this State and in at least 20 other states, with retail
37 sales of covered goods in an aggregate amount exceeding $18,000,000,000 annually.
Page 2 - 132LR2187(01)
1 G. "Pricing differential" means, with respect to the volume unit basis of a covered good
2 purchased by a covered retailer or covered wholesaler compared to the volume unit
3 basis of the same covered good purchased by a dominant covered retailer:
4 (1) The difference in price of the covered good multiplied by the quantity sold; or
5 (2) The difference in the price equivalent of the terms of sale of the covered good,
6 adjusted by the time value of money to account for any difference in payment
7 terms, multiplied by the quantity sold.
8 H. "Purchasing agent" means a 3rd-party entity contracted by a dominant covered
9 retailer to purchase covered goods on behalf of the dominant covered retailer.
10 I. "Same covered goods" means, with respect to 2 different covered goods, a covered
11 good and any other covered good sold under the same brand that differs only in quantity
12 or packaging.
13 J. "Same terms of sale" means, with respect to 2 different sales agreements or contracts,
14 terms of sale that are identical on a per-unit basis, excluding any variation in shipping
15 and delivery costs.
16 K. "Terms of sale" means all substantive terms and conditions of a sale commonly
17 subject to negotiation and competition, including, but not limited to, price, discounts,
18 rebates, delivery terms, payment terms, package size, promotional allowances,
19 marketing devices, merchandising arrangements, terms of distribution and any other
20 similar terms or conditions.
21 L. "Volume unit basis" means the base unit of measurement, not exceeding a truckload,
22 by which purchase quantities are measured in purchase agreements between a covered
23 supplier and a covered retailer or covered wholesaler.
242. Unfair pricing practices; covered suppliers. A covered supplier engages in unfair
25 pricing practices in violation of this subsection if the covered supplier:
26 A. Fails to extend the same terms of sale of a covered good to all covered retailers and
27 covered wholesalers that purchase the covered good on the same volume unit basis in
28 reasonably contemporaneous sales;
29 B. Fails to provide, within 14 days of a written request from a covered retailer or
30 covered wholesaler that has purchased a covered good or received an offer, including
31 terms of sale, for a covered good from the covered supplier, the anonymized terms of
32 sale from all contracts with dominant covered retailers that purchased the same covered
33 good on the same volume unit basis during the 180-day period prior to which the
34 purchase or offer, including terms of sale, was made;
35 C. Refuses the sale of a covered good to a covered retailer or covered wholesaler on
36 the basis of a distinction in channels of trade, or other similar basis, if the effect is to
37 facilitate a difference in terms of sale in violation of paragraph A; or
38 D. Refuses the sale of a covered good to a covered retailer or a covered wholesaler if:
39 (1) The covered retailer is not a dominant covered retailer;
40 (2) The covered retailer or the covered wholesaler has made and completed
41 payment for purchases from the covered supplier within the previous 12 months;
Page 3 - 132LR2187(01)
1 (3) The covered retailer or the covered wholesaler has made a request for the
2 covered supplier to provide to such covered retailer or covered wholesaler the same
3 terms of sale provided to other covered retailers or covered wholesalers, consistent
4 with the terms of this subsection; and
5 (4) The covered retailer or covered wholesaler has no commercially reasonable
6 justification.
7 For the purposes of this subsection, a covered supplier is liable for any violation of this
8 subsection committed by the covered supplier's purchasing agent or contracted 3rd-party
9 entity.
103. Unfair pricing practices; dominant covered retailers. A dominant covered retailer
11 engages in unfair pricing practices in violation of this subsection if the dominant covered
12 retailer:
13 A. Imposes on or requires of a covered supplier terms of sale with respect to a covered
14 good if the dominant covered retailer knows or reasonably should know that:
15 (1) The dominant covered retailer or its purchasing agent will acquire more of the
16 covered good than another dominant covered retailer; and
17 (2) Purchases by the dominant covered retailer or its purchasing agent under the
18 terms of sale are likely to result in unreasonably diminished availability of the
19 covered good to another covered retailer; or
20 B. Takes any action that the dominant covered retailer, its purchasing agent or a
21 contracted 3rd-party entity intends, knows or has reason to know will coerce or induce
22 a covered supplier to violate this subsection.
23 For the purposes of this subsection, a dominant covered retailer is liable for any violation
24 of this subsection committed by the dominant covered retailer's purchasing agent or other
25 contracted 3rd-party entity.
264. Penalties and remedies. An entity that violates this section commits a civil
27 violation for which a civil penalty, recoverable in a civil action, may be adjudged of not
28 more than the greater of:
29 A. One and 1/2 actual damages incurred by entities as a result of the violation; or
30 B. The pricing differential suffered by a covered retailer or a covered wholesaler.
31 Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that a covered supplier or dominant
32 covered retailer is in violation of or intends to violate this section, the Attorney General
33 may bring a civil action seeking civil penalties in the name of the State against the covered
34 supplier or dominant covered retailer to restrain such violation by temporary or permanent
35 injunction.
365. Affirmative defense. An entity alleged to have committed a violation of this section
37 is not subject to penalties under subsection 4 if the entity establishes by a preponderance
38 of evidence that:
39 A. Any difference in the terms of sale was predominantly attributable to a covered
40 retailer engaging in self-distribution of the covered good at issue or otherwise lowering
41 the overall costs of the covered supplier through genuine efficiencies, such as
42 economies in distribution or manufacturing;
Page 4 - 132LR2187(01)
1 B. A covered retailer voluntarily accepted terms of sale relating to a covered good that
2 were not the same terms of sale as the terms of sale of another covered retailer in
3 exchange for commercially reasonable consideration, as long as the acceptance of the
4 terms of sale was not pretextual, coerced or made under duress; or
5 C. The terms of sale applied only to cases in which there was an actual or imminent
6 deterioration of perishable goods, obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under
7 court process or sales in good faith in discontinuance of the goods concerned.
86. Covered supplier immunity. A covered supplier is immune from liability for a
9 violation of this section if the covered supplier establishes by a preponderance of evidence
10 that:
11 A. The violation was imposed on or required of the covered supplier by a dominant
12 covered retailer;
13 B. The covered supplier would have suffered substantial harm to the covered supplier's
14 business were it to refuse the demand of the dominant covered retailer that led to or
15 constituted the violation; and
16 C. The covered supplier made a good faith effort to disclose the dominant covered
17 retailer's conduct to the Attorney General.
18 This subsection does not apply to conduct by a covered supplier that constitutes collusion
19 in violation of federal or state antitrust law.
207. Construction. Except as otherwise specifically provided, this chapter may not be
21 construed to limit, impair or supersede any antitrust laws or require an entity to do business
22 with any other entity unless refusal to do so would violate a provision of this section.
23SUMMARY
24 This bill establishes laws prohibiting large grocery suppliers and retailers from
25 engaging in price discrimination or imposing discriminatory terms of sale and extracting
26 unfair and anticompetitive concessions from wholesalers and suppliers. The bill provides
27 the Attorney General authority to enforce those provisions.
24
25
26
27