Back to Maryland

SB0269 • 2026

Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills

Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills

Healthcare
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Senator Henson
Last action
2026-01-27
Official status
In the Senate - Hearing 2/03 at 2:00 p.m.
Effective date
2026-10-01

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills

Establishing a rebuttable presumption in an action for personal injury or wrongful death that a medical bill from a health care provider or an agent of the health care provider is authentic, fair, and reasonable if the bill was properly provided in discovery; and establishing that a party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical bill, or any charge in a medical bill, is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable.

What This Bill Does

  • Establishing a rebuttable presumption in an action for personal injury or wrongful death that a medical bill from a health care provider or an agent of the health care provider is authentic, fair, and reasonable if the bill was properly provided in discovery; and establishing that a party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical bill, or any charge in a medical bill, is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Hearing canceled

  2. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Hearing 2/03 at 2:00 p.m.

  3. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Hearing 2/03 at 1:00 p.m.

  4. 2026-01-19 Senate

    First Reading Judicial Proceedings

  5. Maryland General Assembly

    Text - First - Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills

Official Summary Text

Establishing a rebuttable presumption in an action for personal injury or wrongful death that a medical bill from a health care provider or an agent of the health care provider is authentic, fair, and reasonable if the bill was properly provided in discovery; and establishing that a party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical bill, or any charge in a medical bill, is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW.
[Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
*sb0269*

SENATE BILL 269
D3 6lr2143
CF 6lr1846
By: Senator Henson
Introduced and read first time: January 19, 2026
Assigned to: Judicial Proceedings

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT concerning 1

Courts and Judicial Proceedings – Evidence – Rebuttable Presumption of 2
Medical Bills 3

FOR the purpose of establishing a rebuttable presumption in certain civil actions that a 4
certain medical bill from a health care provider o r an agent of the health care 5
provider offered as evidence is authentic, fair, and reasonable; establishing that a 6
party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and 7
reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, tha t the medical bill or 8
any charge in a medical bill is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable; and 9
generally relating to medical bills offered as evidence in a civil action. 10

BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 11
Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 12
Section 10–104(a)(1) and (2) 13
Annotated Code of Maryland 14
(2020 Replacement Volume and 2025 Supplement) 15

BY adding to 16
Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 17
Section 10–104.1 18
Annotated Code of Maryland 19
(2020 Replacement Volume and 2025 Supplement) 20

SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 21
That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 22

Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 23

10–104. 24

(a) (1) In this section the following terms have the meanings indicated. 25
2 SENATE BILL 269

(2) “Health care provider” means: 1

(i) A health care provider, as defined in § 3–2A–01 of this article; 2

(ii) An ambulatory surgical facility; 3

(iii) An inpatient facility that is organized primarily in the 4
rehabilitation of disabled persons, through an integrated program of medical and other 5
service provided under competent professional supervision; 6

(iv) A home health agency, as defined in § 19 –401 of the Health – 7
General Article; 8

(v) Any health institution, service, or program for which a certificate 9
of need is required under Title 19 of the Health – General Article; or 10

(vi) A person who is: 11

1. Substantially similar to a health care provider described 12
in items (i) through (v) of this paragraph; and 13

2. Regulated by another state to provide health care services. 14

10–104.1. 15

(A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 16
INDICATED. 17

(2) “HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 18
10–104 OF THIS SUBTITLE. 19

(3) “MEDICAL BILL” MEANS A STATEMENT OF CHARGES, AN INVOICE, 20
OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT PREPARED BY A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR AN AGENT 21
OF A HEALTH CARE PRO VIDER THAT IDENTIFIE S THE COSTS OF HEALT H CARE 22
SERVICES PROVIDED TO AN INDIVIDUAL. 23

(B) (1) IN AN ACTION FOR PERS ONAL INJURY OR WRONG FUL DEATH , 24
THERE IS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT: 25

(I) A MEDICAL BILL PROPERL Y PROVIDED IN DISCOV ERY IS 26
AUTHENTIC; AND 27

(II) CHARGES SET FORTH IN A MEDICAL BILL PROPE RLY 28
PROVIDED IN DISCOVERY ARE FAIR AND REASONABLE. 29
SENATE BILL 269 3

(2) FOR THE PURPOSES OF A DMISSIBILITY, EXPERT TESTIMONY IS 1
NOT REQUIRED TO PROVE THE AUTHENTICITY, FAIRNESS, OR REASONABLENESS OF 2
A MEDICAL BILL DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION. 3

(3) A PARTY MAY OVERCOME T HE PRESUMPTION BY PR OVING, BY A 4
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE MEDICAL BILL OR ANY CHARGE IN 5
A MEDICAL BILL IS NOT AUTHENTIC, IS UNFAIR, OR IS UNREASONABLE. 6

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 7
October 1, 2026. 8